Citations (32)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (7)
Sule Elmali. (2022) Reflections of hands-on dissection and virtual dissection experiences of pre-service science teachers. Journal of Biological Education 0:0, pages 1-9.
Read now
Read now
Martin Riopel, Lucian Nenciovici, Patrice Potvin, Pierre Chastenay, Patrick Charland, Jérémie Blanchette Sarrasin & Steve Masson. (2019) Impact of serious games on science learning achievement compared with more conventional instruction: an overview and a meta-analysis. Studies in Science Education 55:2, pages 169-214.
Read now
Read now
Rebecca Sammet, Anna-Maria Kutta & Daniel Dreesmann. (2015) Hands-on or Video-based Learning with ANTicipation? A Comparative Approach to Identifying Student Motivation and Learning Enjoyment During a Lesson about Ants. Journal of Biological Education 49:4, pages 420-440.
Read now
Read now
P.avol Prokop, M.atej Prokop, Sue Dale Tunnicliffe & Carla Diran. (2007) Children's ideas of animals' internal structures. Journal of Biological Education 41:2, pages 62-67.
Read now
Read now
RebeccaS. Maloney. (2005) Exploring virtual fetal pig dissection as a learning tool for female high school biology students. Educational Research and Evaluation 11:6, pages 591-603.
Read now
Read now
Tassos A. Mikropoulos, Apostolos Katsikis, Eugenia Nikolou & Panayiotis Tsakalis. (2003) Virtual environments in biology teaching. Journal of Biological Education 37:4, pages 176-181.
Read now
Read now
Sue Franklin, Mary Peat & Alison Lewis. (2002) Traditional versus computer-based dissections inenhancing learning in a tertiary setting: a student perspective. Journal of Biological Education 36:3, pages 124-129.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (25)
Veronika Havlíčková, Andrej Šorgo & Martin Bílek. (2023) PREDICTIVE POWER OF BIOLOGY TEACHER’S SELF-EFFICACY ON ACCEPTABILITY AND APPLICATION OF VIRTUAL AND HANDS-ON DISSECTIONS. Problems of Education in the 21st Century 81:2, pages 188-205.
Crossref
Crossref
Hakeemah Al-nakhle. (2022) The effectiveness of scenario-based virtual laboratory simulations to improve learning outcomes and scientific report writing skills. PLOS ONE 17:11, pages e0277359.
Crossref
Crossref
Miriam A. Zemanova. (2022) Attitudes Toward Animal Dissection and Animal-Free Alternatives Among High School Biology Teachers in Switzerland. Frontiers in Education 7.
Crossref
Crossref
Jacob P. Youngblood, Emily A. Webb, Logan E. Gin, Peter van Leusen, Joanna R. Henry, John M. VandenBrooks & Sara E. Brownell. (2022) Anatomical self-efficacy of undergraduate students improves during a fully online biology course with at-home dissections. Advances in Physiology Education 46:1, pages 125-139.
Crossref
Crossref
Marta Novo, Nuria Sánchez, Mónica Gutiérrez López, Rosario G. Cánovas, Fernando Pardos, Dolores Trigo & Darío Díaz Cosín. (2021) The lab In A box: A take‐out practical experience for an online invertebrate biology course. Invertebrate Biology 140:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Miriam Zemanova & Andrew Knight. (2021) The Educational Efficacy of Humane Teaching Methods: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. Animals 11:1, pages 114.
Crossref
Crossref
Catherine Mallia, Patricia Logan & Rafael Freire. (2018) Exploring the Use of Alternatives to Animals in Undergraduate Education in Australia. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 46:3, pages 145-176.
Crossref
Crossref
Veronika Havlíčková, Andrej Šorgo & Martin Bílek. (2018) Can Virtual Dissection Replace Traditional Hands-on Dissection in School Biology Laboratory Work?. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14:4.
Crossref
Crossref
Adam B. Wilson, Corinne H. Miller, Barbie A. Klein, Melissa A. Taylor, Michael Goodwin, Eve K. Boyle, Kirsten Brown, Chantal Hoppe & Michelle Lazarus. (2017) A meta‐analysis of anatomy laboratory pedagogies. Clinical Anatomy 31:1, pages 122-133.
Crossref
Crossref
Iztok Tomažič. (2017) Lower secondary school students’ interest and emotions regarding dissection in schools - a pilot study. Acta Biologica Slovenica 60:1, pages 89-99.
Crossref
Crossref
Padmavati Manchikanti, B. Ramesh Kumar & Vinay Kumar Singh. (2016) Role of Virtual Biology Laboratories in Online and Remote Learning. Role of Virtual Biology Laboratories in Online and Remote Learning.
Jana Fančovičová & Pavol Prokop. (2014) THE EFFECTS OF 3D PLASTIC MODELS OF ANIMALS AND CADAVERIC DISSECTION ON STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE INTERNAL ORGANS OF ANIMALS. Journal of Baltic Science Education 13:6, pages 767-775.
Crossref
Crossref
Silvia Wen-Yu Lee & Chin-Chung Tsai. (2012) Technology-supported Learning in Secondary and Undergraduate Biological Education: Observations from Literature Review. Journal of Science Education and Technology 22:2, pages 226-233.
Crossref
Crossref
Doo Hun Lim, Seung Won Yoon & Sunyoung Park. (2013) Integrating learning outcome typologies for HRD: Review and current status. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development 25:2, pages 33-48.
Crossref
Crossref
John R. Waters, Peggy Van Meter, William Perrotti, Salvatore Drogo & Richard J. Cyr. (2011) Human clay models versus cat dissection: how the similarity between the classroom and the exam affects student performance. Advances in Physiology Education 35:2, pages 227-236.
Crossref
Crossref
N.A. Lili. (2010) Accuracy of Determination for Virtual Animal Halal Slaughtering: A Case Study. Accuracy of Determination for Virtual Animal Halal Slaughtering: A Case Study.
Nor Azan Mat Z. (2009) A-MathS Multimedia Courseware for Effective Mathematic Learning: Matching Instructions to Student′s Learning Style. Journal of Applied Sciences 9:8, pages 1510-1516.
Crossref
Crossref
Pavol Prokop, Gaye Tuncer & Radoslav Kvasničák. (2007) Short-Term Effects of Field Programme on Students’ Knowledge and Attitude Toward Biology: a Slovak Experience. Journal of Science Education and Technology 16:3, pages 247-255.
Crossref
Crossref
Guangxing Li, Jiechao Yin, Yudong Ren, Binjie Wang & Xiaofeng Ren. (2006) A descriptive analysis of computer‐assisted teaching and learning in molecular biological education. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 34:4, pages 272-274.
Crossref
Crossref
Jennifer J. Vogel, David S. Vogel, Jan Cannon-Bowers, Clint A. Bowers, Kathryn Muse & Michelle Wright. (2016) Computer Gaming and Interactive Simulations for Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research 34:3, pages 229-243.
Crossref
Crossref
Nor Azan Mat Zin. (2006) Using Multimedia for Effective Teaching: Matching Instructions to Student's Learning Styles. Using Multimedia for Effective Teaching: Matching Instructions to Student's Learning Styles.
M.K. Khalil, T.E. Johnson & C.H. Lamar. (2005) Comparison of computer-based and paper-based imagery strategies in learning anatomy. Clinical Anatomy 18:6, pages 457-464.
Crossref
Crossref
K. Bo Foreman, David A. Morton, Gina Maria Musolino & Kurt H. Albertine. (2005) Design and utility of a web‐based computer‐assisted instructional tool for neuroanatomy self‐study and review for physical and occupational therapy graduate students. The Anatomical Record Part B: The New Anatomist 285B:1, pages 26-31.
Crossref
Crossref
John R. Waters, Peggy Van Meter, William Perrotti, Salvatore Drogo & Richard J. Cyr. (2005) Cat dissection vs. sculpting human structures in clay: an analysis of two approaches to undergraduate human anatomy laboratory education. Advances in Physiology Education 29:1, pages 27-34.
Crossref
Crossref
H.L. Johnson, B.L. Trout, C.J. Brekke & L.O. Luedecke. (2006) Hands-on, Demonstration, and Videotape Laboratories for Non-Science Majors in a Food Science Course: Achievement, Attitude, and Efficiency. Journal of Food Science Education 3:1, pages 2-7.
Crossref
Crossref