3,479
Views
173
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Argumentation for Learning: Well-Trodden Paths and Unexplored Territories

&

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (28)

Michal Ayalon & Samaher Nama. (2024) Secondary school mathematics teacher-perceived factors involved in argumentation: an emerging framework. Research in Mathematics Education 26:1, pages 193-214.
Read now
Firas Almasri, Gertrude I. Hewapathirana, Fatimah Alhashem, Cathy E. Daniel & Nick Lee. (2023) The effect of gender composition and pedagogical approach on major and non-major undergraduates biology students’ achievement. Interactive Learning Environments 31:10, pages 7287-7319.
Read now
Wenjing Wang & Xiaoshan Li. (2023) Reducing college students’ social perception biases through social network intervention. Interactive Learning Environments 31:9, pages 5523-5537.
Read now
Noreen M. Webb, Megan L. Franke, Nicholas C. Johnson, Marsha Ing & Joy Zimmerman. (2023) Learning through explaining and engaging with others’ mathematical ideas. Mathematical Thinking and Learning 25:4, pages 438-464.
Read now
Joshua Premo, Andy Cavagnetto, Larry Collins, William B. Davis & Erika Offerdahl. (2023) Discourse Remixed: Shifting Science Learning Through Talk. The Journal of Experimental Education 91:2, pages 336-357.
Read now
Saetbyul Kim, Tzu-Jung Lin, Michael Glassman, Seung Yon Ha, Ziye Wen, Manisha Nagpal, Trent N. Cash & Elizabeth Kraatz. (2023) Linking knowledge justification with peers to the learning of social perspective taking. Journal of Moral Education 0:0, pages 1-21.
Read now
Anouschka van Leeuwen, Lisette Hornstra & Barbara Flunger. (2023) Need supportive collaborative learning: are teachers necessary or do students support each other’s basic psychological needs?. Educational Studies 49:1, pages 131-146.
Read now
Antonia Larrain, Valeska Grau, María José Barrera, Paulina Freire, Patricia López, Sebastián Verdugo, Marisol Gómez, Francisca Ramírez & Gabriel Sánchez. (2022) Productive failure and learning through argumentation: Building a bridge between two research traditions to understand the process of peer learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences 31:4-5, pages 673-688.
Read now
Xiaoshan Li, Wenjing Wang & Yanyan Li. (2022) Systematically reviewing the potential of scientific argumentation to promote multidimensional conceptual change in science education. International Journal of Science Education 44:7, pages 1165-1185.
Read now
Nina Vaupotič, Dorothe Kienhues & Regina Jucks. (2022) Gaining insight through explaining? How generating explanations affects individuals’ perceptions of their own and of experts’ knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, Part B 12:1, pages 42-59.
Read now
Wei-Lun Chang & Vladlena Benson. (2022) Jigsaw teaching method for collaboration on cloud platforms. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 59:1, pages 24-36.
Read now
Kathleen A. Weiss, Mark A. McDermott & Brian Hand. (2022) Characterising immersive argument-based inquiry learning environments in school-based education: a systematic literature review. Studies in Science Education 58:1, pages 15-47.
Read now
Ehud Tsemach & Anat Zohar. (2021) The intersection of gender and culture in argumentative writing. International Journal of Science Education 43:6, pages 969-990.
Read now
Ying-Chih Chen & Xue Qiao. (2020) Using students’ epistemic uncertainty as a pedagogical resource to develop knowledge in argumentation. International Journal of Science Education 42:13, pages 2145-2180.
Read now
Kalypso Iordanou & Deanna Kuhn. (2020) Contemplating the Opposition: Does a Personal Touch Matter?. Discourse Processes 57:4, pages 343-359.
Read now
Andy R. Cavagnetto, Brian Hand & Joshua Premo. (2020) Supporting student agency in science. Theory Into Practice 59:2, pages 128-138.
Read now
Ylva Backman, Teodor Gardelli, Viktor Gardelli & Caroline Strömberg. (2020) Group Argumentation Development through Philosophical Dialogues for Persons with Acquired Brain Injuries. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 67:1, pages 107-123.
Read now
Antonia Larrain, Paulina Freire, Patricia López & Valeska Grau. (2019) Counter-Arguing During Curriculum-Supported Peer Interaction Facilitates Middle-School Students’ Science Content Knowledge. Cognition and Instruction 37:4, pages 453-482.
Read now
Gideon Dishon & Sigal Ben-Porath. (2018) Don’t @ me: rethinking digital civility online and in school. Learning, Media and Technology 43:4, pages 434-450.
Read now
Antonia Larrain, Christine Howe & Paulina Freire. (2018) ‘More is not necessarily better’: curriculum materials support the impact of classroom argumentative dialogue in science teaching on content knowledge. Research in Science & Technological Education 36:3, pages 282-301.
Read now
M. Cáceres, M. Nussbaum, M. Marroquín, S. Gleisner & J. T. Marquínez. (2018) Building arguments: key to collaborative scaffolding. Interactive Learning Environments 26:3, pages 355-371.
Read now
Laura Hemberger, Deanna Kuhn, Flora Matos & Yuchen Shi. (2017) A Dialogic Path to Evidence-Based Argumentive Writing. Journal of the Learning Sciences 26:4, pages 575-607.
Read now
Ivar Bråten, Krista R. Muis & Alina Reznitskaya. (2017) Teachers' Epistemic Cognition in the Context of Dialogic Practice: A Question of Calibration?. Educational Psychologist 52:4, pages 253-269.
Read now
Cindy Litman, Stacy Marple, Cynthia Greenleaf, Irisa Charney-Sirott, Michael J. Bolz, Lisa K. Richardson, Allison H. Hall, MariAnne George & Susan R. Goldman. (2017) Text-Based Argumentation With Multiple Sources: A Descriptive Study of Opportunity to Learn in Secondary English Language Arts, History, and Science. Journal of the Learning Sciences 26:1, pages 79-130.
Read now
Beyza Ucar-Longford, Anesa Hosein & Marion Heron. Improving pre-service teachers’ argumentation skills: A holistic online scaffolding design approach. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education 0:0, pages 1-21.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (145)

Lei Gao, Xiaoran Li, Yaqian Zheng, Yanyan Li, Deliang Wang & Haogang Bao. (2024) Discourse moves and socio-emotional interactions in collaborative argumentation: Exploring how their co-occurrence impacts argumentation quality. Thinking Skills and Creativity 52, pages 101525.
Crossref
Ayhan Koçoğlu & Sedat Kanadlı. (2024) Effect of argumentation-based instruction on student achievement: a mixed-research synthesis. Asia Pacific Education Review.
Crossref
Xinya Chen, Huichen Zhao, Haoyue Jin & Yan Li. (2024) Exploring college students’ depth and processing patterns of critical thinking skills and their perception in argument map(AM)-supported online group debate activities. Thinking Skills and Creativity 51, pages 101467.
Crossref
Christina Nishiyama & E. Michael Nussbaum. (2024) Using computer-supported critical annotation to improve perspective taking. Journal of Computers in Education.
Crossref
Yugo Hayashi. (2023) Modeling Synchronization for Detecting Collaborative Learning Process Using a Pedagogical Conversational Agent: Investigation Using Recurrent Indicators of Gaze, Language, and Facial Expression. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
Crossref
Min-Young Kim & Eileen Shanahan. (2023) Teaching argumentation with a dialogic stance: A case of an 11th-grade English language arts classroom. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 43, pages 100770.
Crossref
Samaher Nama, Maysa Hayeen-Halloun & Michal Ayalon. (2023) Noticing of argumentation: A comparison between pre-service and in-service secondary-school mathematics teachers. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 72, pages 101098.
Crossref
Lei Gao, Xiaoran Li, Yanyan Li & Wanqing Hu. (2022) Capturing Temporal and Sequential Patterns of Socio-Emotional Interaction in High- and Low-Performing Collaborative Argumentation Groups. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 32:6, pages 817-831.
Crossref
Aleksandar Baucal, Smiljana Jošić, Ivana Stepanović Ilić, Marina Videnović, Jovan Ivanović & Ksenija Krstić. (2023) What makes peer collaborative problem solving productive or unproductive: A qualitative systematic review. Educational Research Review 41, pages 100567.
Crossref
David Perl‐Nussbaum, Baruch B. Schwarz & Edit Yerushalmi. (2023) Interdisciplinary dialogic argumentation among out‐of‐field and in‐field physics teachers. Science Education 107:6, pages 1457-1484.
Crossref
Shai Goldfarb Cohen, Amit Zveik Lavi, Ofri Wagner-Lebel & Gideon Dishon. (2023) Your shoes or mine? Examining perspective taking in social interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 42, pages 100755.
Crossref
Ehud Tsemach. (2023) Comparison of oral and written argumentation by Ultra-OrthodoxJewish students. Journal of Argumentation in Context 12:2, pages 135-158.
Crossref
Walter F. Castro & Jorge A. Toro. (2023) Mathematics teacher argumentation in a didactic perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 19:9, pages em2322.
Crossref
Shelley Rap, Sharon Geller, Dvora Katchevich, Hanan Gbarin & Ron Blonder. (2023) “Chemistry, climate and the skills in between”: mapping cognitive skills in an innovative program designed to empower future citizens to address global challenges. Chemistry Teacher International 5:2, pages 143-154.
Crossref
Xiaoshan Li & Chong Peng. (2023) The Role of Communication Media in Argumentative Discourse. Science & Education.
Crossref
Karina Wilkie & Michal Ayalon. (2023) Learning to argue while arguing to learn: Students’ emotional experiences during argumentation for graphing real-life functions. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 19:8, pages em2312.
Crossref
Samaher Nama & Michal Ayalon. (2023) Exploring change in secondary mathematics teachers' noticing of argumentation through experiencing peer-assessment strategies. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education.
Crossref
Amgad Ali Seif. (2023) Use of logic for improving the higher-order thinking skills of student teachers. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education 4:2, pages e02304.
Crossref
Li Xiaoran. (2023) Exploring the Relationship Between Individual Learners' Physiological Arousal and Learning Outcomes in Collaborative Learning*. Exploring the Relationship Between Individual Learners' Physiological Arousal and Learning Outcomes in Collaborative Learning*.
Raphael Wess, Burkhard Priemer & Ilka Parchmann. (2023) Professional development programs to improve science teachers’ skills in the facilitation of argumentation in science classroom—a systematic review. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research 5:1.
Crossref
Ian A.G. Wilkinson, Alina Reznitskaya & Jerome V. D'Agostino. (2023) Professional development in classroom discussion to improve argumentation: Teacher and student outcomes. Learning and Instruction 85, pages 101732.
Crossref
Edith Bouton & Christa S.C. Asterhan. (2023) In pursuit of a more unified method to measuring classroom dialogue: The dialogue elements to compound constructs approach. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 40, pages 100717.
Crossref
Tsu-Nan Lee. (2022) Justifying triangle shapes through their properties in argumentation. European Journal of Psychology of Education 38:2, pages 733-749.
Crossref
Christine Howe. (2023) Classroom interaction and student learning: Reasoned dialogue versus reasoned opposition. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal 11:3, pages A26-A41.
Crossref
Michael Nussbaum, Ian Dove & LeAnn Putney. (2023) Bridging dialogic pedagogy and argumentation theory through critical questions. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal 11:3, pages A7-A25.
Crossref
Jonathan Kilpelä, Jenna Hiltunen, Markus Hähkiöniemi, Kaisa Jokiranta, Sami Lehesvuori, Pasi Nieminen & Jouni Viiri. (2023) Analyzing science teachers’ support of dialogic argumentation using teacher roles of questioning and communicative approaches. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal 11:3, pages A88-A118.
Crossref
Lida T. Klaver, Patrick H. M. Sins, Juliette H. Walma van der Molen & Laurence J. F. Guérin. (2022) Strengthening science education through attention to student resources: A conceptualization of socioscientific capital. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 60:5, pages 1162-1192.
Crossref
Ylva Backman, Alina Reznitskaya, Viktor Gardelli & Ian A. G. Wilkinson. (2023) Beyond Structure: Using the Rational Force Model to Assess Argumentative Writing. Written Communication 40:2, pages 555-585.
Crossref
Xiaoran Li, Yanyan Li, Wanqing Hu, Keru Li & Lei Gao. (2022) More socio-emotional regulation, more effective? Exploring social regulation of learning in collaborative argumentation among the high and low performing groups. Metacognition and Learning 18:1, pages 261-293.
Crossref
Xiaoming Zhai, Kevin C. Haudek & Wenchao Ma. (2022) Assessing Argumentation Using Machine Learning and Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling. Research in Science Education 53:2, pages 405-424.
Crossref
Miriam Granado-Peinado, Isabel Cuevas, Ricardo Olmos, Elena Martín, Lidia Casado-Ledesma & Mar Mateos. (2022) Collaborative writing of argumentative syntheses by low-performing undergraduate writers: explicit instruction and practice. Reading and Writing 36:4, pages 909-936.
Crossref
Lidia Casado-Ledesma, Isabel Cuevas & Elena Martín. (2021) Learning science through argumentative synthesis writing and deliberative dialogues: a comprehensive and effective methodology in secondary education. Reading and Writing 36:4, pages 965-996.
Crossref
Manuel Bächtold, Gwen Pallarès, Kévin De Checchi & Valérie Munier. (2022) Combining debates and reflective activities to develop students' argumentation on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 60:4, pages 761-806.
Crossref
Michaela Oliver & Steve Higgins. (2023) Exploring task design to promote discipline-specific reasoning in primary English. Thinking Skills and Creativity 47, pages 101230.
Crossref
Friederike Reuter. (2023) Explorative mathematical argumentation: a theoretical framework for identifying and analysing argumentation processes in early mathematics learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics 112:3, pages 415-435.
Crossref
Xiaoshan Li, Yanyan Li & Wenjing Wang. (2021) Long-Lasting Conceptual Change in Science Education. Science & Education 32:1, pages 123-168.
Crossref
Jessica Chan & Sibel Erduran. (2022) The Impact of Collaboration Between Science and Religious Education Teachers on Their Understanding and Views of Argumentation. Research in Science Education 53:1, pages 121-137.
Crossref
Michelene T.H. Chi, Nicole S. Boucher & Jesse Ha. 2023. International Encyclopedia of Education(Fourth Edition). International Encyclopedia of Education(Fourth Edition) 689 700 .
Valentina Guzmán & Antonia Larrain. 2023. International Handbook on Education Development in the Asia-Pacific. International Handbook on Education Development in the Asia-Pacific 1057 1070 .
Valentina Guzmán & Antonia Larrain. 2022. International Handbook on Education Development in Asia-Pacific. International Handbook on Education Development in Asia-Pacific 1 14 .
Xuejiao Du, Cong Chen & Hongxin Lin. (2022) The impact of working memory capacity on collaborative learning in elementary school students. Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Crossref
Yunshan Chen, Xiaoran Li & Yanyan Li. (2022) Exploring the relationship between individual characteristics and argumentative discourse styles: the role of achievement goals and personality traits. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research 4:1.
Crossref
Sog Yee Mok, Christian S. Hämmerle, Christian Rüede & Fritz C. Staub. (2022) How do professional development programs on comparing solution methods and classroom discourse affect students' achievement in mathematics? The mediating role of students’ subject matter justifications. Learning and Instruction 82, pages 101668.
Crossref
Lynne M. Zummo. (2022) Disagreement as context for science-civic learning: an analysis of discursive resources brought to bear by high school science students. Cultural Studies of Science Education 17:4, pages 1115-1139.
Crossref
Pablo Brocos, María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre & Michael J. Baker. (2022) “Be rational!” Epistemic aims and socio-cognitive tension in argumentation about dietary choices. Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Crossref
Chrysi Rapanta & Andri Christodoulou. (2022) Walton's types of argumentation dialogues as classroom discourse sequences. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 36, pages 100352.
Crossref
Mark Felton, Amanda Crowell, Merce Garcia-Mila & Constanza Villarroel. (2022) Capturing deliberative argument: An analytic coding scheme for studying argumentative dialogue and its benefits for learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 36, pages 100350.
Crossref
Dorit Alt & Yoav Kapshuk. (2021) Argumentation-based learning with digital concept mapping and college students’ epistemic beliefs. Learning Environments Research 25:3, pages 687-706.
Crossref
Fatma Yaman & Brian Hand. (2022) Examining pre-service science teachers’ development and utilization of written and oral argument and representation resources in an argument-based inquiry environment. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 23:4, pages 948-968.
Crossref
Rachel A. Sparks, P. Citlally Jimenez, Caitlin K. Kirby & Jenny M. Dauer. (2022) Using Critical Integrative Argumentation to Assess Socioscientific Argumentation across Decision-Making Contexts. Education Sciences 12:10, pages 644.
Crossref
Catherine Lammert, Jee Kyung Suh, Brian Hand & Gavin Fulmer. (2022) Is epistemic orientation the chicken or the egg in professional development for knowledge generation approaches?. Teaching and Teacher Education 116, pages 103747.
Crossref
Kalypso Iordanou. (2022) Supporting strategic and meta-strategic development of argument skill: the role of reflection. Metacognition and Learning 17:2, pages 399-425.
Crossref
Dani Ramdani, Herawati Susilo, Suhadi Suhadi & Sueb Sueb. (2022) The Effectiveness of Collaborative Learning on Critical Thinking, Creative Thinking, and Metacognitive Skill Ability: Meta-Analysis on Biological Learning. European Journal of Educational Research volume-11-2022:volume-11-issue-3-july-2022, pages 1607-1628.
Crossref
Yoav Kapshuk & Dorit Alt. (2022) Using Digital Concept Maps in Conflict Resolution Studies: Implications for Students’ Argumentative Skills, Domain-Specific Knowledge, and Academic Efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology 13.
Crossref
Benzi Slakmon. (2022) Effects of dialogic education on sensemaking: Changes in teachers' narrative structure. Teaching and Teacher Education 115, pages 103748.
Crossref
Chrysi Rapanta & Mark K. Felton. (2021) Learning to Argue Through Dialogue: a Review of Instructional Approaches. Educational Psychology Review 34:2, pages 477-509.
Crossref
Martin Luginbühl & Daniel Müller-Feldmeth. (2022) Oral Argumentation Skills between Process and Product. Languages 7:2, pages 139.
Crossref
Katri Kleemola, Heidi Hyytinen & Auli Toom. (2022) The Challenge of Position-Taking in Novice Higher Education Students’ Argumentative Writing. Frontiers in Education 7.
Crossref
Michal Ayalon, Karina J. Wilkie & Katrin Hajjar Eid. (2021) Relating students’ emotions during argumentative discourse to their learning of real-life functional situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics 110:1, pages 23-48.
Crossref
Marina Martins & Fabrizio Macagno. (2022) An analytical instrument for coding and assessing argumentative dialogues in science teaching contexts. Science Education 106:3, pages 573-609.
Crossref
Ana Cristina Azevedo da Silva, Maria Cecília Costa & Joaquim Bernardino Lopes. (2022) Doing mathematics with music – Creating epistemic environments. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 18:5, pages em2111.
Crossref
Martin Hänze & Susanne Jurkowski. (2022) Das Potenzial kooperativen Lernens ausschöpfen: Die Bedeutung der transaktiven Kommunikation für eine lernwirksame Zusammenarbeit. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 36:3, pages 141-152.
Crossref
Markus Hähkiöniemi, Jenna Hiltunen, Kaisa Jokiranta, Jonathan Kilpelä, Sami Lehesvuori & Pasi Nieminen. (2022) Students' dialogic and justifying moves during dialogic argumentation in mathematics and physics. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 33, pages 100608.
Crossref
Şule ŞAHİN DOĞRUER & Didem AKYÜZ. (2022) Öğrencilerin Silindirin Hacmi Konusunda Geliştirdikleri Matematiksel Fikirler: Sınıf İçi Argümantasyon Modeli. Yuzunci Yil Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi.
Crossref
Jeremy Riel & Kimberly A. Lawless. 2022. Cases on Innovative and Successful Uses of Digital Resources for Online Learning. Cases on Innovative and Successful Uses of Digital Resources for Online Learning 151 177 .
Dorit Alt & Lior Naamati-Schneider. (2021) Online argumentation-based learning aided by digital concept mapping during COVID-19: implications for health management teaching and learning. Health Education 122:1, pages 18-36.
Crossref
Marcel Mierwald, Thomas Lehmann & Nicola Brauch. (2021) Writing about the past: the impact of different authentic instructional material on students’ argument writing in history. European Journal of Psychology of Education 37:1, pages 163-184.
Crossref
Ido Gideon. (2021) Epistemology of the Nakba in Israeli education. British Educational Research Journal 48:1, pages 182-200.
Crossref
Valentina Fernández Guzmán, Ingrid González-Palta & Antonia Sutil Larrain. 2020. The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible 1 8 .
Valentina Guzmán Fernández, Ingrid González-Palta & Antonia Larrain Sutil. 2020. The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible 1 8 .
Valentina Fernández Guzmán, Ingrid González-Palta & Antonia Sutil Larrain. 2022. The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible. The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible 224 231 .
Andreani Baytelman, Kalypso Iordanou & Costas P. Constantinou. 2022. Current Research in Biology Education. Current Research in Biology Education 45 57 .
Komang Ming Kristya, I Gede Astawan & I Ketut Dibia. (2021) Meta-Analisis Pengaruh Pendekatan Saintifik terhadap Hasil Belajar Bahasa Indonesia di Sekolah Dasar. Mimbar Pendidikan Indonesia 2:1, pages 180-187.
Crossref
Baruch B. Schwarz & Zvi Bekerman. (2020) Learning practices and development in yeshivas: historical, social, and cultural perspectives. European Journal of Psychology of Education 36:4, pages 1181-1198.
Crossref
Ali Cikmaz, Gavin Fulmer, Fatma Yaman & Brian Hand. (2021) Examining the interdependence in the growth of students' language and argument competencies in replicative and generative learning environments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 58:10, pages 1457-1488.
Crossref
Jeroen Janssen, Femke Kirschner & Paul A. Kirschner. 2021. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning 304 312 .
. 2021. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning 275 336 .
Michaela Oliver. (2021) What styles of reasoning are important in primary English?. The Curriculum Journal 32:4, pages 704-721.
Crossref
Liwei Wei, Carla M. Firetto, Rebekah F. Duke, Jeffrey A. Greene & P. Karen Murphy. (2021) High School Students’ Epistemic Cognition and Argumentation Practices during Small-Group Quality Talk Discussions in Science. Education Sciences 11:10, pages 616.
Crossref
Alina Reznitskaya & Ian A.G. Wilkinson. (2021) The Argumentation Rating Tool: Assessing and supporting teacher facilitation and student argumentation during text-based discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education 106, pages 103464.
Crossref
Chrysoula Malogianni, Tian Luo, Jill Stefaniak & Angela Eckhoff. (2021) An exploration of the relationship between argumentative prompts and depth to elicit alternative positions in ill-structured problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development 69:5, pages 2353-2375.
Crossref
Anne Solli. (2019) Appeals to Science: Recirculation of Online Claims in Socioscientific Reasoning. Research in Science Education 51:S2, pages 983-1013.
Crossref
Fatma Yaman. (2021) Examining students’ quality and perceptions of argumentative and summary writing within a knowledge generation approach to learning in an analytical chemistry course. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 22:4, pages 985-1002.
Crossref
Yuchen Shi, Xiaomin Shen, Tao Wang, Li Cheng & Anchen Wang. (2021) Dialogic teaching of controversial public issues in a Chinese middle school. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 30, pages 100533.
Crossref
Ehud Tsemach & Anat Zohar. (2020) From Yeshiva to Academia: The Argumentative Writing Characteristics of Ultra-Orthodox Male Students. Argumentation 35:3, pages 457-481.
Crossref
Lidia Casado-Ledesma, Isabel Cuevas, Huub Van den Bergh, Gert Rijlaarsdam, Mar Mateos, Miriam Granado-Peinado & Elena Martín. (2021) Teaching argumentative synthesis writing through deliberative dialogues: instructional practices in secondary education. Instructional Science 49:4, pages 515-559.
Crossref
Antonia Larrain, Gabriel Fortes & María Teresa Rojas. (2021) Deliberative Teaching as an Emergent Field: The Challenge of Articulating Diverse Research Agendas to Promote Educational Experiences for Citizenship. Frontiers in Psychology 12.
Crossref
Noreen M. Webb, Marsha Ing, Eric Burnheimer, Nicholas C. Johnson, Megan L. Franke & Joy Zimmerman. (2021) Is There a Right Way? Productive Patterns of Interaction during Collaborative Problem Solving. Education Sciences 11:5, pages 214.
Crossref
Baruch B. Schwarz, Osama Swidan, Naomi Prusak & Alik Palatnik. (2021) Collaborative learning in mathematics classrooms: Can teachers understand progress of concurrent collaborating groups?. Computers & Education 165, pages 104151.
Crossref
Flora Matos. (2021) Collaborative writing as a bridge from peer discourse to individual argumentative writing. Reading and Writing 34:5, pages 1321-1342.
Crossref
Maria Zimmermann & Elisabeth Mayweg-Paus. (2021) The role of collaborative argumentation in future teachers' selection of online information. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 35:2-3, pages 185-198.
Crossref
Edith Bouton, Smadar Bar Tal & Christa S.C. Asterhan. (2021) Students, social network technology and learning in higher education: Visions of collaborative knowledge construction vs. the reality of knowledge sharing. The Internet and Higher Education 49, pages 100787.
Crossref
Martha P. Mendez & Nofal Nagles Garcia. 2021. Handbook of Research on Teaching With Virtual Environments and AI. Handbook of Research on Teaching With Virtual Environments and AI 61 85 .
Bert Slof, Anouschka van Leeuwen, Jeroen Janssen & Paul A. Kirschner. (2020) Mine, ours, and yours: Whose engagement and prior knowledge affects individual achievement from online collaborative learning?. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 37:1, pages 39-50.
Crossref
E. Michael Nussbaum. (2020) Critical integrative argumentation: Toward complexity in students’ thinking. Educational Psychologist 56:1, pages 1-17.
Crossref
Soheila Garshasbi, Brian Yecies & Jun Shen. (2021) Microlearning and computer-supported collaborative learning: An agenda towards a comprehensive online learning system. STEM Education 1:4, pages 225.
Crossref
Maik PhilippMaik Philipp. 2021. Schreiben lernen, schreibend lernen. Schreiben lernen, schreibend lernen 161 207 .
Elisabeth Mayweg-Paus & Maria Zimmermann. 2021. Dialogue for Intercultural Understanding. Dialogue for Intercultural Understanding 149 163 .
Mauro Ocaña, Rebeca Mejía, Carolina Larrea, Carolina Analuisa & Carla Freire. 2021. Artificial Intelligence, Computer and Software Engineering Advances. Artificial Intelligence, Computer and Software Engineering Advances 400 414 .
Friederike Hendriks, Elisabeth Mayweg-Paus, Mark Felton, Kalypso Iordanou, Regina Jucks & Maria Zimmermann. (2020) Constraints and Affordances of Online Engagement With Scientific Information—A Literature Review. Frontiers in Psychology 11.
Crossref
Yuchen Shi. (2020) Constructed dialogs reveal skill development in argumentive writing. Reading and Writing 33:9, pages 2311-2335.
Crossref
Ilana Dubovi & Iris Tabak. (2020) An empirical analysis of knowledge co-construction in YouTube comments. Computers & Education 156, pages 103939.
Crossref
Nikki G. Lobczowski, Elizabeth M. Allen, Carla M. Firetto, Jeffrey A. Greene & P. Karen Murphy. (2020) An exploration of social regulation of learning during scientific argumentation discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology 63, pages 101925.
Crossref
Kati Trempler & Ulrike Hartmann. (2020) Wie setzen sich angehende Lehrkräfte mit pädagogischen Situationen auseinander? Eine Analyse von Argumentationsstrukturen und genutzten InformationenHow do prospective teachers deal with pedagogical situations? An analysis of argumentation structures and used information. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 23:5, pages 1053-1077.
Crossref
Andreani Baytelman, Kalypso Iordanou & Constantinos P. Constantinou. (2020) Epistemic beliefs and prior knowledge as predictors of the construction of different types of arguments on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 57:8, pages 1199-1227.
Crossref
Chun Lai, Yun Wen, Tian Gao & Chin-Hsi Lin. (2020) Mechanisms of the Learning Impact of Teacher-Organized Online Schoolwork Sharing Among Primary School Students. Journal of Educational Computing Research 58:5, pages 978-1002.
Crossref
Antonia Larrain, Paulina Freire, Katherine Strasser & Valeska Grau. (2020) The development of a coding scheme to analyse argumentative utterances during group-work. Thinking Skills and Creativity 36, pages 100657.
Crossref
Amber N. Warren & Jessica Nina Lester. (2020) How teachers deliberate policy: Taking a stance on third grade reading legislation in online language teacher education. Linguistics and Education 57, pages 100813.
Crossref
Sara Hennessy, Christine Howe, Neil Mercer & Maria Vrikki. (2020) Coding classroom dialogue: Methodological considerations for researchers. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 25, pages 100404.
Crossref
Gaowei Chen, Jiahong Zhang, Carol K. K. Chan, Sarah Michaels, Lauren B. Resnick & Xiaorui Huang. (2020) The link between student‐perceived teacher talk and student enjoyment, anxiety and discursive engagement in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal 46:3, pages 631-652.
Crossref
Jeroen Janssen & Paul A. Kirschner. (2020) Applying collaborative cognitive load theory to computer-supported collaborative learning: towards a research agenda. Educational Technology Research and Development 68:2, pages 783-805.
Crossref
Christa S.C. Asterhan & Maya S. Resnick. (2020) Refutation texts and argumentation for conceptual change: A winning or a redundant combination?. Learning and Instruction 65, pages 101265.
Crossref
Klára Šeďová, Zuzana Šalamounová, Roman Švaříček & Martin SedláčekKlára Šeďová, Zuzana Šalamounová, Roman Švaříček & Martin Sedláček. 2020. Getting Dialogic Teaching into Classrooms. Getting Dialogic Teaching into Classrooms 17 36 .
Naomi Prusak, Osama Swidan & Baruch Schwarz. 2020. STEM Teachers and Teaching in the Digital Era. STEM Teachers and Teaching in the Digital Era 293 311 .
Michal Ayalon. (2019) Exploring changes in mathematics teachers' envisioning of potential argumentation situations in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education 85, pages 190-203.
Crossref
Kalypso Iordanou, Deanna Kuhn, Flora Matos, Yuchen Shi & Laura Hemberger. (2019) Learning by arguing. Learning and Instruction 63, pages 101207.
Crossref
Neil Mercer, Rupert Wegerif & Louis MajorNoreen M. Webb, Megan L. Franke, Marsha Ing, Nicholas C. Johnson & Joy Zimmerman. 2019. The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Dialogic Education. The Routledge International Handbook of Research on Dialogic Education 530 546 .
Jorge Iván Hoyos-Morales. (2019) Enseñanza de habilidades argumentativas básicas a través de un juego serio on line. Revista Iberoamericana de Argumentación:18, pages 38.
Crossref
Anouschka van Leeuwen & Jeroen Janssen. (2019) A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review 27, pages 71-89.
Crossref
Anouschka van Leeuwen & Nikol Rummel. (2019) Kooperative Unterrichtsettings: Technologische Tools zur Unterstützung von Lehrkräften. Unterrichtswissenschaft 47:2, pages 137-141.
Crossref
Osama Swidan, Naomi Prusak, Adva Livny, Alik Palatnik & Baruch Schwarz. (2019) Fostering teachers’ understanding of progression of multiple groups towards the orchestration of conceptual learningFörderung des Verständnisses von Lehrkräften über den Arbeitsfortschritt von parallel kooperierenden Kleingruppen zur Unterstützung konzeptuellen Lernens. Unterrichtswissenschaft 47:2, pages 159-176.
Crossref
Benzi Slakmon & Baruch B. Schwarz. (2019) Deliberative emotional talk. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 14:2, pages 185-217.
Crossref
E. Michael Nussbaum, Ian J. Dove, Nathan Slife, CarolAnne M. Kardash, Refika Turgut & David Vallett. (2018) Using critical questions to evaluate written and oral arguments in an undergraduate general education seminar: a quasi-experimental study. Reading and Writing 32:6, pages 1531-1552.
Crossref
Dorothee Gronostay. (2018) To argue or not to argue? The role of personality traits, argumentativeness, epistemological beliefs and assigned positions for students’ participation in controversial political classroom discussionsWer diskutiert mit? Die Bedeutung von Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen, Argumentierfreude, epistemologischen Überzeugungen und zugewiesenen Diskussionspositionen für die Beteiligung an kontroversen politischen Unterrichtsdiskussionen. Unterrichtswissenschaft 47:1, pages 117-135.
Crossref
Antonia Larrain, Paulina Freire, Valeska Grau, Patricia López, Ignacia Salvat, Maximiliano Silva & Vicente Gastellu. (2018) The Effect of Peer-Group Argumentative Dialogue on Delayed Gains in Scientific Content Knowledge. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development 2018:162, pages 67-87.
Crossref
P. Karen Murphy, Jeffrey A. Greene, Elizabeth Allen, Sara Baszczewski, Amanda Swearingen, Liwei Wei & Ana M. Butler. (2018) Fostering high school students’ conceptual understanding and argumentation performance in science through Quality Talk discussions . Science Education 102:6, pages 1239-1264.
Crossref
Joshua Premo & Andy Cavagnetto. (2018) Priming students for whole-class interaction: using interdependence to support behavioral engagement. Social Psychology of Education 21:4, pages 915-935.
Crossref
Christa S.C. Asterhan. (2018) Exploring enablers and inhibitors of productive peer argumentation: The role of individual achievement goals and of gender. Contemporary Educational Psychology 54, pages 66-78.
Crossref
Baruch B. Schwarz, Naomi Prusak, Osama Swidan, Adva Livny, Kobi Gal & Avi Segal. (2018) Orchestrating the emergence of conceptual learning: a case study in a geometry class. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 13:2, pages 189-211.
Crossref
Christa S. C. Asterhan & Aviv Dotan. (2017) Feedback that corrects and contrasts students’ erroneous solutions with expert ones improves expository instruction for conceptual change. Instructional Science 46:3, pages 337-355.
Crossref
Jaana Isohätälä, Piia Näykki, Sanna Järvelä & Michael J. Baker. (2018) Striking a balance: Socio-emotional processes during argumentation in collaborative learning interaction. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 16, pages 1-19.
Crossref
Michal Ayalon & Rina Hershkowitz. (2018) Mathematics teachers' attention to potential classroom situations of argumentation. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior 49, pages 163-173.
Crossref
Jeffrey Alan Greene, Dana Z. Copeland, Victor M. Deekens & Seung B. Yu. (2018) Beyond knowledge: Examining digital literacy's role in the acquisition of understanding in science. Computers & Education 117, pages 141-159.
Crossref
Kristine Callis-Duehl, Robert Idsardi, Eve A. Humphrey & Rebekka Darner Gougis. (2017) Missed Opportunities for Science Learning: Unacknowledged Unscientific Arguments in Asynchronous Online and Face-to-Face Discussions. Journal of Science Education and Technology 27:1, pages 86-98.
Crossref
Gideon Dishon. (2017) New data, old tensions: Big data, personalized learning, and the challenges of progressive education. Theory and Research in Education 15:3, pages 272-289.
Crossref
Sara Greco, Teuta Mehmeti & Anne-Nelly Perret-Clermont. (2017) Do adult-children dialogical interactions leave space for a full development of argumentation?. Journal of Argumentation in Context 6:2, pages 193-219.
Crossref
Antonia Larraín, Consuelo Moreno, Valeska Grau, Paulina Freire, Ignacia Salvat, Patricia López & Maximiliano Silva. (2017) Curriculum materials support teachers in the promotion of argumentation in science teaching: A case study. Teaching and Teacher Education 67, pages 522-537.
Crossref
Antonia Larraín. (2016) Argumentation and concept development: the role of imagination. European Journal of Psychology of Education 32:4, pages 521-536.
Crossref
Maree Davies, Katharina Kiemer & Kane Meissel. (2017) Quality Talk and dialogic teaching—an examination of a professional development programme on secondary teachers’ facilitation of student talk. British Educational Research Journal 43:5, pages 968-987.
Crossref
Antonia Larraín. (2017) Group-work discussions and content knowledge gains: Argumentative inner speech as the missing link?. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 14, pages 67-78.
Crossref
Lia Papathomas & Deanna Kuhn. (2017) Learning to argue via apprenticeship. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 159, pages 129-139.
Crossref
Christa S.C. Asterhan & Edith Bouton. (2017) Teenage peer-to-peer knowledge sharing through social network sites in secondary schools. Computers & Education 110, pages 16-34.
Crossref
Stergios Tegos, Stavros Demetriadis, Pantelis M. Papadopoulos & Armin Weinberger. (2016) Conversational agents for academically productive talk: a comparison of directed and undirected agent interventions. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 11:4, pages 417-440.
Crossref
Lawrence R. Burns, Paul L. Stephenson & Katy Bellamy. (2016) The Socratic Method: Empirical Assessment of a Psychology Capstone Course. Psychology Learning & Teaching 15:3, pages 370-383.
Crossref
Gale M. Sinatra & Barbara K. Hofer. (2016) Public Understanding of Science. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3:2, pages 245-253.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.