Advanced search
Publication Cover
Communication Quarterly Volume 33, 1985 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
54
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Miscellany

An integrative verbal and visual analysis of the Carter‐Reagan debate

Robert K. Tiemens Professor and Chair in the Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112
,
Susan A. Hellweg Associate Professor in the Department of Speech Communication, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 92182–0300
,
Philip Kipper Assistant Professor in the Department of English, Mills College, Oakland, CA, 94613
&
Steven L. Phillips Senior Management Development Representative, Douglas Aircraft Company/McDonnell Douglas Corporation, 3855 Lakewood Blvd., Long Beach, CA, 90846
Pages 34-42 | Published online: 21 May 2009

Citations (18)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (9)

Pei Zheng & Saif Shahin. (2020) Live tweeting live debates: How Twitter reflects and refracts the US political climate in a campaign season. Information, Communication & Society 23:3, pages 337-357.
Read now
Elisabeth Gidengil & Joanna Everitt. (2000) Filtering the Female. Women & Politics 21:4, pages 105-131.
Read now
LawrenceJ. Mullen. (1999) Television news and contentiousness: An exploratory study of visual and verbal content in news about the president. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 43:2, pages 159-174.
Read now
Mary-Ann Leon. (1993) Revealing Character and Addressing Voters' Needs in the 1992 Presidential Debates: A Content Analysis. Argumentation and Advocacy 30:2, pages 88-105.
Read now
JohnT. Morello. (1992) The “look” and language of clash: Visual structuring of argument in the 1988 Bush‐Dukakis debates. Southern Communication Journal 57:3, pages 205-218.
Read now
Diana Prentice Carlin, Charles Howard, Susan Stanfield & Larry Reynolds. (1991) The Effects of Presidential Debate Formats on Clash: A Comparative Analysis. Argumentation and Advocacy 27:3, pages 126-136.
Read now
JohnT. Morello. (1988) Argument and visual structuring in the 1984 Mondale‐Reagan debates: The medium's influence on the perception of clash. Western Journal of Speech Communication 52:4, pages 277-290.
Read now
JohnT. Morello. (1988) Visual structuring of the 1976 and 1984 nationally televised presidential debates: Implications. Central States Speech Journal 39:3-4, pages 233-243.
Read now
SusanJ. Drucker & Janice Platt Hunold. (1987) The debating game. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 4:2, pages 202-207.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (9)

Jürgen Maier, Isabella Glogger, Lukas P Otto & Jennifer Bast. (2021) Is there a visual bias in televised debates? Evidence from Germany, 2002–2017. Visual Communication 22:2, pages 221-242.
Crossref
Patrick A. Stewart, Austin D. Eubanks, Nicholas Hersom & Cooper A. Hearn. (2020) Visual Priming and Framing During the 2020 Democratic Presidential Debates: Electoral Status Predicts Favorable Camera Treatment. The International Journal of Press/Politics 26:1, pages 256-276.
Crossref
Dhavan V. Shah, Alex Hanna, Erik P. Bucy, David S. Lassen, Jack Van Thomme, Kristen Bialik, JungHwan Yang & Jon C. W. Pevehouse. (2016) Dual Screening During Presidential Debates. American Behavioral Scientist 60:14, pages 1816-1843.
Crossref
Kimberly A. Neuendorf & Anup Kumar. 2015. The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication. The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication 1 10 .
Dhavan V. Shah, Alex Hanna, Erik P. Bucy, Chris Wells & Vidal Quevedo. (2015) The Power of Television Images in a Social Media Age. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 659:1, pages 225-245.
Crossref
Geoffrey Craig. (2016) Moving through Discourses: An Assessment of the New Zealand 2005 Election Televised Leaders' Debates. Media International Australia 123:1, pages 18-33.
Crossref
DIANA B. CARLIN, ERIC MORRIS & SHAWNA SMITH. (2016) The Influence of Format and Questions on Candidates' Strategic Argument Choices in the 2000 Presidential Debates. American Behavioral Scientist 44:12, pages 2196-2218.
Crossref
Elisabeth Gidengil & Joanna Everitt. (2016) Metaphors and Misrepresentation. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 4:1, pages 48-65.
Crossref
RODERICK P. HART & SHARON E. JARVIS. (2016) Political Debate. American Behavioral Scientist 40:8, pages 1095-1122.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.