2,507
Views
115
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Understanding the rules of the game: marking peer assessment as a medium for developing students' conceptions of assessment

&
Pages 721-733 | Published online: 14 Sep 2010

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (53)

Hongli Li, Jacquelyn A. Bialo, Yao Xiong, Charles Vincent Hunter & Xiuyan Guo. (2021) The Effect of Peer Assessment on Non-Cognitive Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis. Applied Measurement in Education 34:3, pages 179-203.
Read now
W. Brian Whalley. (2021) Using attainment curves and lead-times to help improve student examination performance. Journal of Further and Higher Education 45:1, pages 1-15.
Read now
Marlies Schillings, H. Roebertsen, H. Savelberg, J. Whittingham & D. Dolmans. (2020) Peer-to-peer dialogue about teachers’ written feedback enhances students’ understanding on how to improve writing skills. Educational Studies 46:6, pages 693-707.
Read now
J. W. Gaynor. (2020) Peer review in the classroom: student perceptions, peer feedback quality and the role of assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45:5, pages 758-775.
Read now
Ye Han & Yueting Xu. (2020) The development of student feedback literacy: the influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45:5, pages 680-696.
Read now
Lanqin Zheng, Xuan Zhang & Panpan Cui. (2020) The role of technology-facilitated peer assessment and supporting strategies: a meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45:3, pages 372-386.
Read now
Hongli Li, Yao Xiong, Charles Vincent Hunter, Xiuyan Guo & Rurik Tywoniw. (2020) Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45:2, pages 193-211.
Read now
Lucy M. Alpine, Francieli Tanji Caldas & Emer M. Barrett. (2019) Evaluation of a 2 to 1 peer placement supervision model by physiotherapy students and their educators. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 35:8, pages 748-755.
Read now
Hannah Dickson, Joel Harvey & Nigel Blackwood. (2019) Feedback, feedforward: evaluating the effectiveness of an oral peer review exercise amongst postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44:5, pages 692-704.
Read now
Susan J. Deeley, Moira Fischbacher-Smith, Dimitar Karadzhov & Elina Koristashevskaya. (2019) Exploring the ‘wicked’ problem of student dissatisfaction with assessment and feedback in higher education. Higher Education Pedagogies 4:1, pages 385-405.
Read now
Maya Usher & Miri Barak. (2018) Peer assessment in a project-based engineering course: comparing between on-campus and online learning environments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43:5, pages 745-759.
Read now
Sang-Bin Lee. (2017) University students’ experience of ‘scale-referenced’ peer assessment for a consecutive interpreting examination. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42:7, pages 1015-1029.
Read now
Susan J. Deeley & Catherine Bovill. (2017) Staff student partnership in assessment: enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42:3, pages 463-477.
Read now
Michael Mogessie Ashenafi. (2017) Peer-assessment in higher education – twenty-first century practices, challenges and the way forward. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42:2, pages 226-251.
Read now
Naomi E. Winstone, Robert A. Nash, Michael Parker & James Rowntree. (2017) Supporting Learners' Agentic Engagement With Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes. Educational Psychologist 52:1, pages 17-37.
Read now
Atta Gebril. (2017) Language teachers’ conceptions of assessment: an Egyptian perspective. Teacher Development 21:1, pages 81-100.
Read now
Sean Kearney, Timothy Perkins & Shannon Kennedy-Clark. (2016) Using self- and peer-assessments for summative purposes: analysing the relative validity of the AASL (Authentic Assessment for Sustainable Learning) model. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41:6, pages 840-853.
Read now
Genevieve Simpson & Julian Clifton. (2016) Assessing postgraduate student perceptions and measures of learning in a peer review feedback process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41:4, pages 501-514.
Read now
Tammy Q. Tasker & Leslie Rupert Herrenkohl. (2016) Using Peer Feedback to Improve Students’ Scientific Inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education 27:1, pages 35-59.
Read now
Hongli Li, Yao Xiong, Xiaojiao Zang, Mindy L. Kornhaber, Youngsun Lyu, Kyung Sun Chung & Hoi K. Suen. (2016) Peer assessment in the digital age: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher ratings. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41:2, pages 245-264.
Read now
W. Brian Whalley. (2016) Evaluating student assessments: the use of optimal foraging theory. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41:2, pages 183-198.
Read now
Emma Medland. (2016) Assessment in higher education: drivers, barriers and directions for change in the UK. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41:1, pages 81-96.
Read now
Matthew Bamber. (2015) The impact on stakeholder confidence of increased transparency in the examination assessment process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 40:4, pages 471-487.
Read now
J. D. Adams & M. S. Mabusela. (2015) Quality Assignments: Exploring the Use of Peer Assessment. Journal of Social Sciences 42:1-2, pages 89-96.
Read now
Robyn Yucel, Fiona L. Bird, Jodie Young & Tania Blanksby. (2014) The road to self-assessment: exemplar marking before peer review develops first-year students’ capacity to judge the quality of a scientific report. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39:8, pages 971-986.
Read now
Jane McDonnell & Will Curtis. (2014) Making space for democracy through assessment and feedback in higher education: thoughts from an action research project in education studies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39:8, pages 932-948.
Read now
Alasdair Blair, Alun Wyburn-Powell, Mark Goodwin & Sam Shields. (2014) Can dialogue help to improve feedback on examinations?. Studies in Higher Education 39:6, pages 1039-1054.
Read now
Mirabelle Walker & Judith Williams. (2014) Critical evaluation as an aid to improved report writing: a case study. European Journal of Engineering Education 39:3, pages 272-281.
Read now
Paula Hodgson, Kitty Chan & Justina Liu. (2014) Outcomes of synergetic peer assessment: first-year experience. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39:2, pages 168-178.
Read now
Amani Bell, Rosina Mladenovic & Margaret Price. (2013) Students’ perceptions of the usefulness of marking guides, grade descriptors and annotated exemplars. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38:7, pages 769-788.
Read now
Wichard Zwaal & Hans Otting. (2013) A traditional versus a constructivist conception of assessment. Research in Hospitality Management 2:1-2, pages 29-38.
Read now
Kerry Wimshurst & Matthew Manning. (2013) Feed-forward assessment, exemplars and peer marking: evidence of efficacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38:4, pages 451-465.
Read now
Fatma Sasmaz Oren. (2012) The effects of gender and previous experience on the approach of self and peer assessment: a case from Turkey. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49:2, pages 123-133.
Read now
Jan Hendrik Hahn, Elsa Mentz & Lukas Meyer. (2012) Information technology students' changing perceptions of assessment strategies during pair programming. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 16:2, pages 225-237.
Read now
DuncanD. Nulty. (2011) Peer and self‐assessment in the first year of university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36:5, pages 493-507.
Read now
Sarah Gielen, Filip Dochy & Patrick Onghena. (2011) An inventory of peer assessment diversity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36:2, pages 137-155.
Read now
GrahamD. Hendry, Nikki Bromberger & Susan Armstrong. (2011) Constructive guidance and feedback for learning: the usefulness of exemplars, marking sheets and different types of feedback in a first year law subject. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36:1, pages 1-11.
Read now
David Nicol. (2010) From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35:5, pages 501-517.
Read now
Sarah Gielen, Lies Tops, Filip Dochy, Patrick Onghena & Stijn Smeets. (2010) A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback and of various peer feedback forms in a secondary school writing curriculum. British Educational Research Journal 36:1, pages 143-162.
Read now
GavinT.L. Brown & GerritH.F. Hirschfeld. (2008) Students’ conceptions of assessment: Links to outcomes. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 15:1, pages 3-17.
Read now
Thu Thuy Vu & Gloria Dall’Alba. (2007) Students’ experience of peer assessment in a professional course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32:5, pages 541-556.
Read now
NancyT. Davis, Evrim Genc Kumtepe & Mehmet Aydeniz. (2007) Fostering Continuous Improvement and Learning Through Peer Assessment: Part of an Integral Model of Assessment. Educational Assessment 12:2, pages 113-135.
Read now
Ngar-Fun Liu & David Carless. (2006) Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education 11:3, pages 279-290.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (62)

Kuan-Cheng Lin, Nien-Tzu Li & Mu-Yen Chen. (2024) Sustainable education on improving the quality of peer assessment: design and implementation of an online deep learning-based peer assessment system. Library Hi Tech.
Crossref
David Baidoo-Anu, Daniel Asamoah & Aaron Adusei. (2023) Teachers’ beliefs and attitudes towards students’ self assessment: A latent profile analysis. International Journal of Educational Research Open 5, pages 100275.
Crossref
Lorena Atarés Huerta & Juan Antonio Llorens Molina. (2023) Peer Assessment Reliability in an Organic Chemistry Activity: Do Students Overrate Their Peers?. Journal of Chemical Education 100:9, pages 3200-3208.
Crossref
Frederick C. Berry, Wanju Huang & Marisa Exter. (2023) Improving Accuracy of Self-and-Peer Assessment in Engineering Technology Capstone. IEEE Transactions on Education 66:2, pages 174-187.
Crossref
Selda Aras. 2023. Pedagogy and Psychology in Digital Education. Pedagogy and Psychology in Digital Education 107 118 .
Mara Valente. 2023. Creative Approaches to Technology-Enhanced Learning for the Workplace and Higher Education. Creative Approaches to Technology-Enhanced Learning for the Workplace and Higher Education 607 619 .
Özen YILDIRIM & Safiye BİLİCAN DEMİR. (2022) Inside the black box: do teachers practice assessment as learning?Kara kutunun içine bakmak: öğretmenler öğrenmeyi destekleyici değerlendirme yapıyor mu?. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education 9:Special Issue, pages 46-71.
Crossref
Melissa Jordan. 2022. Integrating Transparency in Learning and Teaching (TILT). Integrating Transparency in Learning and Teaching (TILT) 25 43 .
Crook Stephanie. (2022) A Social-Constructionist Review of Feedback and Revision Research: How Perceptions of Written Feedback Might Influence Understandings of Revision Processes. College Composition & Communication 73:3, pages 593-614.
Crossref
A. De Brún, L. Rogers, A. Drury & B. Gilmore. (2022) Evaluation of a formative peer assessment in research methods teaching using an online platform: A mixed methods pre-post study. Nurse Education Today 108, pages 105166.
Crossref
Hebat Allah A. Amin, Haidy Khalil, Doaa Khaled, Mamdouh Mahdi, Mohamed Fathelbab & Dalia A. Gaber. (2021) Case item creation and video case presentation as summative assessment tools for distance learning in the pandemic era. Medical Journal Armed Forces India 77, pages S466-S474.
Crossref
Mauricio Aniche, Frank Mulder & Felienne Hermans. (2021) Grading 600+ Students: A Case Study on Peer and Self Grading. Grading 600+ Students: A Case Study on Peer and Self Grading.
Elisabeth C. Rosencrum, Emily E. Hildebrand, Meghan Negron & Claire Adkinson. (2021) Complementary Teaching Strategies Anchored in the Peer-Assisted Learning Model. Athletic Training Education Journal 16:2, pages 142-149.
Crossref
Afiqah M. Azahari, Arniyati Ahmad, Syarifah Bahiyah Rahayu & Mohd Hazali Mohamed Halip. (2020) CheckMyCode: Assignment Submission System with Cloud-Based Java Compiler. CheckMyCode: Assignment Submission System with Cloud-Based Java Compiler.
Jen Ross, Jen Scott Curwood & Amani Bell. (2020) A multimodal assessment framework for higher education. E-Learning and Digital Media 17:4, pages 290-306.
Crossref
Sunny Bains. (2019) Teaching Technical Communication to Engineering Students at Scale. Teaching Technical Communication to Engineering Students at Scale.
Lisa R. Lattuca. 2019. Interdisciplinarity and Problem-Based Learning in Higher Education. Interdisciplinarity and Problem-Based Learning in Higher Education 73 86 .
Jacques van der Meer & Phillip Dawson. 2018. The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback. The Cambridge Handbook of Instructional Feedback 264 288 .
Juhaina Awawdeh Shahbari & Fadia Nasser Abu-Alhija. (2017) Does Training in Alternative Assessment Matter? The Case of Prospective and Practicing Mathematics Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Alternative Assessment and Their Beliefs About the Nature of Mathematics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 16:7, pages 1315-1335.
Crossref
Kieran Balloo, Carol Evans, Annie Hughes, Xiaotong Zhu & Naomi Winstone. (2018) Transparency Isn't Spoon-Feeding: How a Transformative Approach to the Use of Explicit Assessment Criteria Can Support Student Self-Regulation. Frontiers in Education 3.
Crossref
John Denholm & Linda Lee-Davies. 2018. Enhancing Education and Training Initiatives Through Serious Games. Enhancing Education and Training Initiatives Through Serious Games 122 145 .
Lolita Wikander & Stéphane L. Bouchoucha. (2018) Facilitating peer based learning through summative assessment – An adaptation of the Objective Structured Clinical Assessment tool for the blended learning environment. Nurse Education in Practice 28, pages 40-45.
Crossref
Owen M. Harney, Michael J. Hogan & Sarah Quinn. (2017) Investigating the effects of peer to peer prompts on collaborative argumentation, consensus and perceived efficacy in collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 12:3, pages 307-336.
Crossref
M. Bowman. (2016) The transition to self‐regulated learning for first‐year dental students: threshold concepts. European Journal of Dental Education 21:3, pages 142-150.
Crossref
Lanqin ZhengLanqin Zheng. 2017. Knowledge Building and Regulation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Knowledge Building and Regulation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 129 144 .
R.B. Kuriakose. (2016) Freshman engineering student perceptions of academic feedback - a case study from Digital Systems 1. Freshman engineering student perceptions of academic feedback - a case study from Digital Systems 1.
Julie Jones. (2016) Impact of peer assessment on student understanding of the assessment process and criteria. British Journal of Midwifery 24:7, pages 484-490.
Crossref
Eugenia M.W. Ng. (2016) Fostering pre-service teachers' self-regulated learning through self- and peer assessment of wiki projects. Computers & Education 98, pages 180-191.
Crossref
Yougen Lou, Zejuan Li, Ping Gong & Jianjun Liu. (2016) A Study on Guided Peer Feedback in Group Work to Improve Non-English-Majored Graduates’ English Writing in Internet-Based Language Laboratory. Open Journal of Social Sciences 04:10, pages 86-96.
Crossref
Rezaul K. Chowdhury. 2016. Advances in Engineering Education in the Middle East and North Africa. Advances in Engineering Education in the Middle East and North Africa 323 342 .
Serafina Pastore. (2015) Quale auto-valutazione in Università per i professionisti di domani? Percorsi operativi tra riflessioni didattiche e ricerca educativa. EDUCATIONAL REFLECTIVE PRACTICES:1, pages 51-64.
Crossref
Ming-Tak Hue, Chi-Hung Leung & Kerry Johon Kennedy. (2014) Student perception of assessment practices: towards ‘no loser’ classrooms for all students in the ethnic minority schools in Hong Kong. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 27:3, pages 253-273.
Crossref
Samantha Sevenhuysen, Melanie K Farlie, Jennifer L Keating, Terry P Haines & Elizabeth Molloy. (2015) Physiotherapy students and clinical educators perceive several ways in which incorporating peer-assisted learning could improve clinical placements: a qualitative study. Journal of Physiotherapy 61:2, pages 87-92.
Crossref
S. T. Teich, C. A. Demko & L. A. Lang. (2014) Students' perception of peer‐assessment in the context of a treatment planning course. European Journal of Dental Education 19:1, pages 8-15.
Crossref
Carol Evans. (2015) Students’ Perspectives on the Role of Peer Feedback in Supporting Learning. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology 14:1, pages 110-125.
Crossref
Domingos Fernandes. (2015) Práticas de avaliação de dois professores universitários: pesquisa utilizando observações e narrativas de atividades das aulas. Educar em Revista:spe1, pages 109-135.
Crossref
Kavitha Sukumaran & Rozita Dass. (2014) Students’ Perspectives on the Use of Peer Feedback in an English as a Second Language Writing Class. Journal for Interdisciplinary Research in Education (JIRE) 4:1.
Crossref
Tasos Hovardas, Olia E. Tsivitanidou & Zacharias C. Zacharia. (2014) Peer versus expert feedback: An investigation of the quality of peer feedback among secondary school students. Computers & Education 71, pages 133-152.
Crossref
Robert L. Hulsman, Joline F. Peters & Marcel Fabriek. (2013) Peer-assessment of medical communication skills: The impact of students’ personality, academic and social reputation on behavioural assessment. Patient Education and Counseling 92:3, pages 346-354.
Crossref
Alasdair Blair, Steven Curtis, Mark Goodwin & Sam Shields. (2012) The Significance of Assignment Feedback: From Consumption to Construction. European Political Science 12:2, pages 231-244.
Crossref
Olliver McGarr & Amanda Marie Clifford. (2012) ‘Just enough to make you take it seriously’: exploring students’ attitudes towards peer assessment. Higher Education 65:6, pages 677-693.
Crossref
Alasdair Blair, Steven Curtis & Sam Mcginty. (2012) Is Peer Feedback an Effective Approach for Creating Dialogue in Politics?. European Political Science 12:1, pages 102-115.
Crossref
Chi-Cheng Chang, Chaoyun Liang & Yi-Hui Chen. (2013) Is learner self-assessment reliable and valid in a Web-based portfolio environment for high school students?. Computers & Education 60:1, pages 325-334.
Crossref
Bart Rienties, Anthony Willis, Peter Alcott & Emma Medland. 2013. Facilitating Learning in the 21st Century: Leading through Technology, Diversity and Authenticity. Facilitating Learning in the 21st Century: Leading through Technology, Diversity and Authenticity 117 136 .
Padmashree Desai & G.H. Joshi. (2012) Activity based teaching learning in software engineering - An experience. Activity based teaching learning in software engineering - An experience.
Padmashree Desai, G.H. Joshi & M Vijayalaskhmi. (2012) A novel approach to carrying out mini project in Computer Science & Engineering. A novel approach to carrying out mini project in Computer Science & Engineering.
Bipasha Choudhury & Ingrid Gouldsborough. (2012) The use of electronic media to develop transferable skills in science students studying anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education 5:3, pages 125-131.
Crossref
Chi-Cheng Chang, Kuo-Hung Tseng & Shi-Jer Lou. (2012) A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among teacher-assessment, student self-assessment and peer-assessment in a Web-based portfolio assessment environment for high school students. Computers & Education 58:1, pages 303-320.
Crossref
Chi-Cheng Chang, Kuo-Hung Tseng, Pao-Nan Chou & Yi-Hui Chen. (2011) Reliability and validity of Web-based portfolio peer assessment: A case study for a senior high school’s students taking computer course. Computers & Education 57:1, pages 1306-1316.
Crossref
Savanid Vatanasakdakul & Chadi Aoun. (2011) Why don't accounting students like AIS?. International Journal of Educational Management 25:4, pages 328-342.
Crossref
Melissa C. Marty, Jolene M. Henning & John T. Willse. (2010) Accuracy and Reliability of Peer Assessment of Athletic Training Psychomotor Laboratory Skills. Journal of Athletic Training 45:6, pages 609-614.
Crossref
Badri Basnet, Lyn Brodie & John Worden. (2010) Peer assessment of assignment. Peer assessment of assignment.
Sarah Gielen, Elien Peeters, Filip Dochy, Patrick Onghena & Katrien Struyven. (2010) Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction 20:4, pages 304-315.
Crossref
Chao-hsiu Chen. (2010) The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self- and peer-assessment system. Computers & Education 55:1, pages 229-236.
Crossref
Paul Resta & Haekyung Lee. 2010. Virtual Teamwork. Virtual Teamwork 45 64 .
Vicki H.M. Dale, Barbara Wieland, Birgit Pirkelbauer & Amanda Nevel. (2009) Value and Benefits of Open-Book Examinations as Assessment for Deep Learning in a Post-graduate Animal Health Course. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education 36:4, pages 403-410.
Crossref
Yildiray Cinar & Ayse A. Bilgin. (2009) A Study on Peer Assessment of Teamwork Projects in Undergraduate Petroleum Engineering Education. A Study on Peer Assessment of Teamwork Projects in Undergraduate Petroleum Engineering Education.
Pelin Bicen & Debra A. Laverie. (2009) Group-Based Assessment as a Dynamic Approach to Marketing Education. Journal of Marketing Education 31:2, pages 96-108.
Crossref
Gavin T.L. Brown, S. Earl Irving, Elizabeth R. Peterson & Gerrit H.F. Hirschfeld. (2009) Use of interactive–informal assessment practices: New Zealand secondary students' conceptions of assessment. Learning and Instruction 19:2, pages 97-111.
Crossref
D. Royce Sadler. 2009. Assessment, Learning and Judgement in Higher Education. Assessment, Learning and Judgement in Higher Education 1 19 .
D.E. Paré & S. Joordens. (2008) Peering into large lectures: examining peer and expert mark agreement using peerScholar, an online peer assessment tool. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 24:6, pages 526-540.
Crossref
Amanda Chapman & Sue Bloxham. (2004) Improving student achievement in a multidisciplinary context. LATISS: Learning and Teaching in the Social Sciences 1:3, pages 181-188.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.