524
Views
121
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Towards Modifying Children's Ideas about Electric Current

Pages 73-82 | Published online: 07 Jul 2006

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (29)

Eleni–Maria Valkanou & Ioannis Starakis. (2023) Exploring k5 students’ learning pathways regarding water’s electrical conductivity. Research in Science & Technological Education 0:0, pages 1-24.
Read now
Martin Hänze, Marion Müller & Roland Berger. (2018) Cross-age tutoring: how to promote tutees’ active knowledge-building. Educational Psychology 38:7, pages 915-926.
Read now
Şengül Atasoy & Serap Ergin. (2017) The effect of concept cartoon-embedded worksheets on grade 9 students’ conceptual understanding of Newton’s Laws of Motion. Research in Science & Technological Education 35:1, pages 58-73.
Read now
Ian Abrahams, Matt Homer, Rachael Sharpe & Mengyuan Zhou. (2015) A comparative cross-cultural study of the prevalence and nature of misconceptions in physics amongst English and Chinese undergraduate students. Research in Science & Technological Education 33:1, pages 111-130.
Read now
Clotilde Mercier-Dequidt & Ludovic Morge. (2014) Analyse epistémique et didactique d’une nouvelle analogie pour enseigner l’électrocinétique. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 14:2, pages 187-206.
Read now
Guadalupe Martinez-Borreguero, Ángel Luis Pérez-Rodríguez, María Isabel Suero-López & Pedro José Pardo-Fernández. (2013) Detection of Misconceptions about Colour and an Experimentally Tested Proposal to Combat them. International Journal of Science Education 35:8, pages 1299-1324.
Read now
Ji Shen & MarciaC. Linn. (2011) A Technology‐Enhanced Unit of Modeling Static Electricity: Integrating scientific explanations and everyday observations. International Journal of Science Education 33:12, pages 1597-1623.
Read now
Esme Bridget Glauert. (2009) How Young Children Understand Electric Circuits: Prediction, explanation and exploration. International Journal of Science Education 31:8, pages 1025-1047.
Read now
Ji Shen, Patrick C. Gibbons, John F. Wiegers & Ann P. McMahon. (2007) Using Research Based Assessment Tools in Professional Development in Current Electricity. Journal of Science Teacher Education 18:3, pages 431-459.
Read now
Shyan‐Jer Lee. (2007) Exploring Students’ Understanding Concerning Batteries—Theories and Practices. International Journal of Science Education 29:4, pages 497-516.
Read now
Chia‐Hsing Tsai, Hsueh‐Yu Chen, Ching‐Yang Chou & Kuen‐Der Lain. (2007) Current as the Key Concept of Taiwanese Students’ Understandings of Electric Circuits. International Journal of Science Education 29:4, pages 483-496.
Read now
Igal Galili & Yaron Lehavi. (2006) RESEARCH REPORT. International Journal of Science Education 28:5, pages 521-541.
Read now
Salih Ates. (2005) The effectiveness of the learning‐cycle method on teaching DC circuits to prospective female and male science teachers. Research in Science & Technological Education 23:2, pages 213-227.
Read now
Beverley Bell. (2005) Pedagogies developed in the learning in science projects and related theses. International Journal of Science Education 27:2, pages 159-182.
Read now
Vassiliki Pilatou & Heleni Stavridou. (2004) RESEARCH REPORT. International Journal of Science Education 26:6, pages 697-715.
Read now
TinaA. Grotzer. (2003) Learning to Understand the Forms of Causality Implicit in Scientifically Accepted Explanations. Studies in Science Education 39:1, pages 1-74.
Read now
Laurent Liégeois & Etienne Mullet. (2002) High school students' understanding of resistance in simple series electric circuits. International Journal of Science Education 24:6, pages 551-564.
Read now
Noriaki Asami, Julien King & Martin Monk. (2000) Tuition and Memory: Mental models and cognitive processing in Japanese children's work on d.c. electrical circuits. Research in Science & Technological Education 18:2, pages 141-154.
Read now
A. Tarciso Borges & JohnK. Gilbert. (1999) Mental models of electricity. International Journal of Science Education 21:1, pages 95-117.
Read now
DanielP. Shepardson & ElizabethB. Moje. (1999) The role of anomalous data in restructuring fourth graders' frameworks for understanding electric circuits. International Journal of Science Education 21:1, pages 77-94.
Read now
Mark Cosgrove. (1995) A study of science‐in‐the‐making as students generate an analogy for electricity. International Journal of Science Education 17:3, pages 295-310.
Read now
Marilyn Fleer. (1994) Determining Children's Understanding of Electricity. The Journal of Educational Research 87:4, pages 248-253.
Read now
Paul Webb. (1992) Primary science teachers’ understandings of electric current. International Journal of Science Education 14:4, pages 423-429.
Read now
Martin Monk. (1990) A Genetic Epistemological Analysis of Data on Children's Ideas about DC Electrical Circuits. Research in Science & Technological Education 8:2, pages 133-143.
Read now
RichardT. White & RichardF. Gunstone. (1989) Metalearning and conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education 11:5, pages 577-586.
Read now
D. Psillos, P. Koumaras & O. Valassiades. (1987) Pupils’ Representations of Electric Current before, during and after Instruction on DC Circuits. Research in Science & Technological Education 5:2, pages 185-199.
Read now
Samuel Johsua & Jean‐Jacques Dupin. (1986) Is the systematization of hypothetico‐deductive reasoning possible in a class situation?. European Journal of Science Education 8:4, pages 381-388.
Read now
D. M. Shipstone. (1984) A study of children's understanding of electricity in simple DC circuits. European Journal of Science Education 6:2, pages 185-198.
Read now
JohnK. Gilbert & D.Michael Watts. (1983) Concepts, Misconceptions and Alternative Conceptions: Changing Perspectives in Science Education. Studies in Science Education 10:1, pages 61-98.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (92)

Konstantinos T. Kotsis. (2023) Alternative ideas about concepts of physics, a timelessly valuable tool for physics education. Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education 3:2, pages 83-97.
Crossref
Leonardo Colletti, Soufiane Krik, Paolo Lugli & Federico Corni. (2023) Teaching and Investigating on Modelling through Analogy in Primary School. Education Sciences 13:9, pages 872.
Crossref
Kylie A. Peppler, R. Mishael Sedas & Naomi Thompson. (2023) Paper Circuits vs. Breadboards: Materializing Learners’ Powerful Ideas Around Circuitry and Layout Design. Journal of Science Education and Technology 32:4, pages 469-492.
Crossref
Janan Saba, Elon Langbeheim, Hagit Hel‐Or & Sharona T. Levy. (2022) Identifying aspects of complex and technological systems in the mental models of students who constructed computational models of electric circuits. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 60:4, pages 681-723.
Crossref
Mónica Baptista & Iva Martins. (2023) Effect of a STEM approach on students’ cognitive structures about electrical circuits. International Journal of STEM Education 10:1.
Crossref
Andrea Alessandrini. (2022) A Study of Students Engaged in Electronic Circuit Wiring in an Undergraduate Course. Journal of Science Education and Technology 32:1, pages 78-95.
Crossref
Laı CHIN SIONG, Ong YUNN TYUG, Fatin Aliah PHANG & Jaysuman PUSPPANATHAN. (2023) The Use of Concept Cartoons in Overcoming The Misconception in Electricity Concepts. Participatory Educational Research 10:1, pages 310-329.
Crossref
Giuseppe Fera & Marisa Michelini. 2023. Physics Teacher Education. Physics Teacher Education 135 150 .
Gregor Wrobel, Robert Scheffler & Timo Kehrer. (2021) Rethinking the Traditional Design of Meta-Models: Layout Matters for the Graphical Modeling of Technical Systems. Rethinking the Traditional Design of Meta-Models: Layout Matters for the Graphical Modeling of Technical Systems.
Jan-Philipp Burde, Thomas Sean Weatherby & Arthur Kronenberger. (2021) An analogical simulation for teaching electric circuits: a rationale for use in lower secondary school. Physics Education 56:5, pages 055010.
Crossref
Ana Villanueva, Ziyi Liu, Yoshimasa Kitaguchi, Zhengzhe Zhu, Kylie Peppler, Thomas Redick & Karthik Ramani. (2021) Towards modeling of human skilling for electrical circuitry using augmented reality applications. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 18:1.
Crossref
R Rahmawati, N Y Rustaman, I Hamidah & D Rusdiana. (2021) The profile of prospective physics teachers’ conceptual change based on cognitive style dimensions through collaborative learning on electricity and magnetism topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1940:1, pages 012113.
Crossref
Jared Carpendale & Anne Hume. (2020) Content representations to support out-of-field physics teachers. Physics Education 55:6, pages 065021.
Crossref
Xiaowei Tang, Andrew Elby & David Hammer. (2020) The tension between pattern‐seeking and mechanistic reasoning in explanation construction: A case from Chinese elementary science classroom. Science Education 104:6, pages 1071-1099.
Crossref
Enrique Suárez. (2020) “Estoy Explorando Science”: Emergent bilingual students problematizing electrical phenomena through translanguaging. Science Education 104:5, pages 791-826.
Crossref
F. J. Ruíz Rodríguez & J. P. Torreglosa. (2020) Evaluating the effect of using synchronous machine simulations to support traditional teaching methodology in electrical engineering degree courses. Computer Applications in Engineering Education 28:3, pages 556-567.
Crossref
Emmanuel Fokides & Alexandra Papoutsi. (2019) Using Makey-Makey for teaching electricity to primary school students. A pilot study. Education and Information Technologies 25:2, pages 1193-1215.
Crossref
Yu-Liang Ting & Yaming Tai. 2020. Cognitive Cities. Cognitive Cities 18 26 .
Christine Margaret Preston. (2017) Effect of a Diagram on Primary Students’ Understanding About Electric Circuits. Research in Science Education 49:5, pages 1433-1456.
Crossref
Belkız CAYMAZ & Abdullah AYDIN. (2019) Ortak Bilgi Yapılandırma Modelinin Yedinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Elektrik Enerjisi Ünitesine İlişkin Kavramsal Anlamalarına EtkisiThe Effect of Common Knowledge Construction Model on Seventh Graders Students’ Conceptual Understanding Related Electrical Energy Unit. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi 27:5, pages 1955-1975.
Crossref
Kayla DesPortes & Betsy DiSalvo. (2019) Trials and Tribulations of Novices Working with the Arduino. Trials and Tribulations of Novices Working with the Arduino.
Gonca HARMAN & Aytekin ÇÖKELEZ. (2019) Lamba Parlaklığı Konusunun Öğretiminde Analoji Kullanımının EtkisiThe Effect of Using Analogy on the Teaching of Bulb’s Brightness. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi 27:4, pages 1574-1594.
Crossref
Garry Falloon. (2019) Using simulations to teach young students science concepts: An Experiential Learning theoretical analysis. Computers & Education 135, pages 138-159.
Crossref
Gonca HARMAN & Aytekin ÇÖKELEZ. (2019) Lamba Parlaklığını Etkileyen Değişkenler ile Değişkenleri Belirlemenin Öğretiminde Analoji Kullanımının EtkisiThe Effect of Using Analogy on the Teaching of Varıables Affecting on the Brightness of a Bulb with Identifying Variables. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 32:1, pages 93-119.
Crossref
Kylie Peppler, Karen Wohlwend, Naomi Thompson, Verily Tan & AnnMarie Thomas. (2018) Squishing Circuits: Circuitry Learning with Electronics and Playdough in Early Childhood. Journal of Science Education and Technology 28:2, pages 118-132.
Crossref
Irena Dvořáková & Leoš Dvořák. (2018) Electricity and magnetism step by step and optics step by step: optional special labs in first years of pre-service teacher training. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1076, pages 012003.
Crossref
Katherine Wade‐Jaimes, Kadir Demir & Azhar Qureshi. (2018) Modeling strategies enhanced by metacognitive tools in high school physics to support student conceptual trajectories and understanding of electricity. Science Education 102:4, pages 711-743.
Crossref
Natalia Kucirkova & Garry Falloon. (2018) iPad apps and visual methodologies: Empirical and ethical issues in achieving authentic data. Research in Learning Technology 26:0.
Crossref
Meryem GÖRECEK BAYBARS. (2018) FEN BİLGİSİ ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ METALLERİN ELEKTRİK İLETKENLİĞİ İLE İLGİLİ ZİHİNSEL MODELLERİThe Determination of the Mental Models of Pre-Service Science Teachers about Electrical Conductivity of the Metals. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama 14:1, pages 36-47.
Crossref
Thomas Wilhelm & Martin Hopf. 2018. Schülervorstellungen und Physikunterricht. Schülervorstellungen und Physikunterricht 115 138 .
Roland Berger, Marion Müller & Martin Hänze. (2017) Konzeption und Evaluation von Tutor-Trainings zur Förderung der intrinsischen Motivation der Tutoren und der Autonomieförderung ihrer Tutees im Cross-age TutoringConception and Evaluation of Tutor-Trainings to Promote Tutors’ Intrinsic Motivation, and Tutees’ Autonomy in Cross-age Tutoring. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften 23:1, pages 225-239.
Crossref
Breanne K. Litts, Yasmin B. Kafai, Debora A. Lui, Justice T. Walker & Sari A. Widman. (2017) Stitching Codeable Circuits: High School Students’ Learning About Circuitry and Coding with Electronic Textiles. Journal of Science Education and Technology 26:5, pages 494-507.
Crossref
Colby Tofel-Grehl, Deborah Fields, Kristin Searle, Cathy Maahs-Fladung, David Feldon, Grace Gu & Chongning Sun. (2017) Electrifying Engagement in Middle School Science Class: Improving Student Interest Through E-textiles. Journal of Science Education and Technology 26:4, pages 406-417.
Crossref
Gonca HARMAN. (2017) Basit Elektrik Devresinde Lamba Parlaklığını Etkileyen Değişkenlerin Hidrolik Sistem Modeli (HSM) Kullanılarak Öğretimi. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, pages 418-432.
Crossref
Elham Beheshti, David Kim, Gabrielle Ecanow & Michael S. Horn. (2017) Looking Inside the Wires. Looking Inside the Wires.
Breanne K. Litts, Yasmin B. Kafai, Debora Lui, Justice Walker & Sari Widman. (2017) Understanding High School Students' Reading, Remixing, and Writing Codeable Circuits for Electronic Textiles. Understanding High School Students' Reading, Remixing, and Writing Codeable Circuits for Electronic Textiles.
Kamilah Osman. 2017. Overcoming Students' Misconceptions in Science. Overcoming Students' Misconceptions in Science 223 242 .
Chee Leong Wong & Hye-Eun Chu. 2017. Multiple Representations in Physics Education. Multiple Representations in Physics Education 183 206 .
Kylie Peppler. 2016. Handbook of Research on the Societal Impact of Digital Media. Handbook of Research on the Societal Impact of Digital Media 268 290 .
Carol J. Callinan. 2016. Insights from Research in Science Teaching and Learning. Insights from Research in Science Teaching and Learning 107 120 .
Elham Beheshti, Mmachi Obiorah & Michael S. Horn. (2015) "Let's dive into it!". "Let's dive into it!".
Harman Gonca & Cokelez Aytekin. (2015) Teaching the effect of variables on the brightness of a light bulb in a simple electrical circuit using a pneumatic system model (PSM). International Journal of Physical Sciences 10:6, pages 215-221.
Crossref
Yannis Hadzigeorgiou. 2015. Research in Early Childhood Science Education. Research in Early Childhood Science Education 67 97 .
Elham Beheshti, Asmaa Aljuhani & Michael S. Horn. (2014) Electrons to light bulbs: Understanding electricity with a multi-level simulation environment. Electrons to light bulbs: Understanding electricity with a multi-level simulation environment.
Jiyeon Na & Jinwoong Song. (2013) Why Everyday Experience? Interpreting Primary Students’ Science Discourse from the Perspective of John Dewey. Science & Education 23:5, pages 1031-1049.
Crossref
Matteo Leone. (2014) History of Physics as a Tool to Detect the Conceptual Difficulties Experienced by Students: The Case of Simple Electric Circuits in Primary Education. Science & Education 23:4, pages 923-953.
Crossref
Giuseppe Fera. 2014. Frontiers of Fundamental Physics and Physics Education Research. Frontiers of Fundamental Physics and Physics Education Research 561 566 .
Serap Ergin & Şengül Atasoy. (2013) COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF 4MAT TEACHING METHOD IN REMOVING PUPILS’ PHYSICS MISCONCEPTIONS OF ELECTRICITY. Journal of Baltic Science Education 12:6, pages 730-746.
Crossref
Bekele Gashe Dega, Jeanne Kriek & Temesgen Fereja Mogese. (2012) Categorization of Alternative Conceptions in Electricity and Magnetism: the Case of Ethiopian Undergraduate Students. Research in Science Education 43:5, pages 1891-1915.
Crossref
Kylie Peppler & Diane Glosson. (2012) Stitching Circuits: Learning About Circuitry Through E-textile Materials. Journal of Science Education and Technology 22:5, pages 751-763.
Crossref
Kylie Peppler. (2013) STEAM-Powered Computing Education: Using E-Textiles to Integrate the Arts and STEM. Computer 46:9, pages 38-43.
Crossref
Rachel E. Scherr, Hunter G. Close, Eleanor W. Close, Virginia J. Flood, Sarah B. McKagan, Amy D. Robertson, Lane Seeley, Michael C. Wittmann & Stamatis Vokos. (2013) Negotiating energy dynamics through embodied action in a materially structured environment. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 9:2.
Crossref
Elham Beheshti, Colin Fitzpatrick, Alexis Hope, Anne Marie Piper & Michael Horn. (2013) Circuit in pieces. Circuit in pieces.
Veera Kallunki. (2012) How to Measure Qualitative Understanding of DC-Circuit Phenomena - Taking a Closer Look at the External Representations of 9-Year-Olds. Research in Science Education 43:2, pages 827-845.
Crossref
Hitoshi MIYATA. (2012) How Does a Bulb Circuit Material with Zero Context Affect Students' Cognition?Zeroの文脈に基づく豆電球回路教材が中学生の認識に及ぼす影響. Journal of Research in Science Education 53:2, pages 305-316.
Crossref
Charilaos Tsihouridis, Denis Vavougios & George S. Ioannidis. (2012) The use of calculating packages for electrical circuit problem solving by Secondary education students: A comparative educational evaluation. The use of calculating packages for electrical circuit problem solving by Secondary education students: A comparative educational evaluation.
Ibtesam Azaiza, Varda Bar, Yaser Awad & Mahmood Khalil. (2012) Pupils’ Explanations of Natural Phenomena and Their Relationship to Electricity. Creative Education 03:08, pages 1354-1365.
Crossref
Abdeljalil Métioui & Jude Levasseur. (2011) Analyse des raisonnements d’élèves sur les circuits en courant continu et les lois de KirchhoffAnalysis of the reasoning of pupils on DC and the laws of KirchhoffAnalyse von Schlussfolgerungen bei Schülern über Gleichstromkreise und die Kirchhoffschen RegelnAnálisis de los razonamientos de alumnos sobre los circuitos en corriente continua y las leyes de Kirchhoff. RDST:3, pages 155-178.
Crossref
Charilaos Tsihouridis, Marianthi Batsila, Denis Vavougios & George S. Ioannidis. (2011) Enhancing and assisting laboratory teaching of electrical circuits using ICT: An evaluation of educational software. Enhancing and assisting laboratory teaching of electrical circuits using ICT: An evaluation of educational software.
Özlem Altınkaynak Yaylacı, Havva Yamak & Nusret Kavak. (2011) Examining pre-service science teachers’ opinions about holistic approach in science: Electrical energy example. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 15, pages 2764-2770.
Crossref
Tomi Jaakkola, Sami Nurmi & Koen Veermans. (2010) A comparison of students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits in simulation only and simulation‐laboratory contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48:1, pages 71-93.
Crossref
??? HONG Young-Sik. (2010) Effect of Simple Voltaic Cell Fabrication Class on the Formation of Electricity Concept. Korean Journal of Elementary Education 21:1, pages 13-23.
Crossref
John K. Gilbert. (2008) Roger Osborne (1940–1985), University of Waikato, New Zealand. Cultural Studies of Science Education 4:2, pages 315-322.
Crossref
Sare Şengül & Seçil Örnek Tükenmez. (2009) The effects of dramatization method on elementary school students’ levels of maths attidutes and achivements. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 1:1, pages 2131-2135.
Crossref
T. Jaakkola & S. Nurmi. (2008) Fostering elementary school students’ understanding of simple electricity by combining simulation and laboratory activities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 24:4, pages 271-283.
Crossref
류수경, Hyun Sook Chang & CHOIKYUNGHEE. (2008) The Effects of Self-generated Analogies on the Concept of Photoelectric Effect in「Modern Physics」Unit of High School Physics Course. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction 12:1, pages 83-96.
Crossref
Z.C. Zacharia. (2007) Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: an effort to enhance students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23:2, pages 120-132.
Crossref
Michael Jabot & David Henry. (2010) Mental Models of Elementary and Middle School Students in Analyzing Simple Battery and Bulb Circuts. School Science and Mathematics 107:1, pages 371-381.
Crossref
Mustafa Baser. (2006) Effects of Conceptual Change and Traditional Confirmatory Simulations on Pre-Service Teachers’ Understanding of Direct Current Circuits. Journal of Science Education and Technology 15:5-6, pages 367-381.
Crossref
Esen Uzuntiryaki & Ömer Geban. (2005) Effect of conceptual change approach accompanied with concept mapping on understanding of solution concepts. Instructional Science 33:4, pages 311-339.
Crossref
Mei-Hung Chiu & Jing-Wen Lin. (2005) Promoting fourth graders' conceptual change of their understanding of electric current via multiple analogies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42:4, pages 429-464.
Crossref
Shu-Nu Chang & Mei-Hung Chiu. (2005) The Development of Authentic Assessments to Investigate Ninth Graders? Scientific Literacy: In the Case of Scientific Cognition Concerning the Concepts of Chemistry and Physics. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 3:1, pages 117-140.
Crossref
Carla Van Boxtel. 2004. Dialogic Learning. Dialogic Learning 125 143 .
Özlem S. Çakir, Ömer Geban & Nejla Yürük. (2006) Effectiveness of conceptual change text‐oriented instruction on students' understanding of cellular respiration concepts. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 30:4, pages 239-243.
Crossref
F. Solano, J. Gil, A.L. Pérez & M.I. Suero. (2002) [NO TITLE AVAILABLE]. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física 24:4, pages 460-470.
Crossref
Daniel P. Shepardson. 2001. Assessment in Science. Assessment in Science 67 82 .
Yasuo MATSUMORI. (2000) Children's Logic in Judging the Truth of Propositions Concerning Concepts of Biology生物概念に関する命題文の真偽判断に適用される子どもの論理の推定 : コメット法による評価シートの記述理由を手がかりにして. Journal of Research in Science Education 41:2, pages 31-40.
Crossref
Carla van Boxtel, Jos van der Linden & Gellof Kanselaar. (2000) Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction 10:4, pages 311-330.
Crossref
Kevin Carlton. (1999) Teaching electric current and electrical potential. Physics Education 34:6, pages 341-345.
Crossref
Bob Kibble. (1999) How do you picture electricity?. Physics Education 34:4, pages 226-229.
Crossref
A. Tarciso Borges. (1999) COMO EVOLUEM OS MODELOS MENTAIS. Ensaio Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências (Belo Horizonte) 1:1, pages 66-92.
Crossref
Gerard D. Thijs & Ed Van Den Berg. (1995) Cultural factors in the origin and remediation of alternative conceptions in physics. Science & Education 4:4, pages 317-347.
Crossref
Daniel P. Shepardson & Elizabeth B. Moje. (2006) The nature of fourth graders' understandings of electric circuits. Science Education 78:5, pages 489-514.
Crossref
Lynette Schaverien & Mark Cosgrove. (1994) Technology learning 2: Towards reawakening the technologists within primary teachers. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 5:1, pages 51-68.
Crossref
Shoju TONISHI & Toshimasa ITO. (1993) STUDENT'S CONSTRUCTION OF MISCONCEPTION IN UNDERSTANDING NATURE: WHAT THE BUBBLES IN THE BOILING WATER ARE MADE FROM?自然認知に関わる誤概念の形成一沸騰している水中のあわの正体一. Bulletin of Society of Japan Science Teaching 33:3, pages 19-27.
Crossref
Richard Boohan. 1993. Learning Electricity and Electronics with Advanced Educational Technology. Learning Electricity and Electronics with Advanced Educational Technology 173 195 .
R. Boohan. (2008) DIAG: a program to diagnose students' conceptual models in science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 8:4, pages 206-220.
Crossref
Philip Adey. (1992) Alternative constructs and cognitive development: Commonalities, divergences, and possibilities for evidence. Research in Science Education 22:1, pages 1-10.
Crossref
David Shipstone. (1988) Pupils' understanding of simple electrical circuits. Some implications for instruction. Physics Education 23:2, pages 92-96.
Crossref
Catherine Ameh. (1986) Common sense answers in physics. Research in Science Education 16:1, pages 31-39.
Crossref
Michael J. Webb. (2010) Analogies and Their Limitations. School Science and Mathematics 85:8, pages 645-650.
Crossref
William Butts. (1985) Children's understanding of electric current in three countries. Research in Science Education 15:1, pages 127-130.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.