Advanced search
Publication Cover
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science Volume 23, 2009 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,364
Views
36
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Cutting the Gordian Knot of Demarcation

Sven Ove HanssonCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 237-243 | Published online: 29 Sep 2009

Citations (36)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (6)

Stefaan Blancke & Maarten Boudry. (2021) Pseudoscience as a Negative Outcome of Scientific Dialogue: A Pragmatic-Naturalistic Approach to the Demarcation Problem. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 34:3, pages 183-198.
Read now
Sven Ove Hansson. (2020) Disciplines, Doctrines, and Deviant Science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 33:1, pages 43-52.
Read now
Angelo Fasce. (2019) Are Pseudosciences Like Seagulls? A Discriminant Metacriterion Facilitates the Solution of the Demarcation Problem. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 32:3-4, pages 155-175.
Read now
Kåre Letrud. (2019) The Gordian Knot of Demarcation: Tying Up Some Loose Ends. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 32:1, pages 3-11.
Read now
Chris William Callaghan. (2019) Lakatos revisited: Innovation and ‘Novel facts’ as a foundational logic for the social sciences in an era of ‘Post-truth’ and pseudoscience. Cogent Business & Management 6:1.
Read now
Maarten Boudry, Stefaan Blancke & Massimo Pigliucci. (2015) What makes weird beliefs thrive? The epidemiology of pseudoscience. Philosophical Psychology 28:8, pages 1177-1198.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (30)

Stéphanie Debray. (2024) On the edges of science. Metascience.
Crossref
Olivier Sartenaer. (2023) A Contextualist Solution to the Demarcation Problem. Journal for General Philosophy of Science.
Crossref
David B. Resnik & Kevin C. Elliott. (2023) Science, Values, and the New Demarcation Problem. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 54:2, pages 259-286.
Crossref
Angelo Fasce. (2022) The explanation-polarisation model: Pseudoscience spreads through explanatory satisfaction and group polarisation. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 10:2, pages 693-705.
Crossref
Kåre Letrud. (2022) Do we Know it When we See it? A Review of ‘Pseudoscience’ Patterns of Usage. Episteme, pages 1-18.
Crossref
Maarten Boudry. (2021) Diagnosing Pseudoscience – by Getting Rid of the Demarcation Problem. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 53:2, pages 83-101.
Crossref
Inkeri Koskinen & Kristina Rolin. (2022) Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate roles for values in transdisciplinary research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 91, pages 191-198.
Crossref
Diego Romero-Maltrana & Sergio Duarte. (2020) A New Way to Explore the Nature of Science: Meta-categories Rather Than Lists. Research in Science Education 52:1, pages 239-257.
Crossref
Sindhuja Bhakthavatsalam & Weimin Sun. (2021) A Virtue Epistemological Approach to the Demarcation Problem. Science & Education 30:6, pages 1421-1452.
Crossref
Íñigo Ongay de Felipe. (2021) The Universality of Science and Traditional Chinese Medicine. Science & Education 30:6, pages 1353-1370.
Crossref
Jinwoong Song, Jieun Chun & Jiyeon Na. (2021) Why People Trust Something Other than Science. Science & Education 30:6, pages 1387-1419.
Crossref
Tina Lasisi. (2021) The constraints of racialization: How classification and valuation hinder scientific research on human variation. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 175:2, pages 376-386.
Crossref
Angelo Fasce, Diego Avendaño & Jesús Adrián‐Ventura. (2021) Revised and short versions of the pseudoscientific belief scale. Applied Cognitive Psychology 35:3, pages 828-832.
Crossref
Michael R. MatthewsMichael R. Matthews. 2021. History, Philosophy and Science Teaching: A Personal Story. History, Philosophy and Science Teaching: A Personal Story 205 233 .
Sven Ove Hansson. (2020) With all this Pseudoscience, Why so Little Pseudotechnology?. Axiomathes 30:6, pages 685-696.
Crossref
Miguel Ángel Fuertes-Prieto, Santiago Andrés-Sánchez, Diego Corrochano-Fernández, Carmen Urones-Jambrina, Mª Laura Delgado-Martín, Pablo Herrero-Teijón & Camilo Ruiz. (2020) Pre-service Teachers’ False Beliefs in Superstitions and Pseudosciences in Relation to Science and Technology. Science & Education 29:5, pages 1235-1254.
Crossref
Angelo Fasce, Jesús Adrián-Ventura & Diego Avendaño. (2020) Do as the Romans do: On the authoritarian roots of pseudoscience. Public Understanding of Science 29:6, pages 597-613.
Crossref
Myriam Martí-Sánchez & Vanessa Roger-Monzó. (2020) El discurso ‘aspiracional’ de las terapias alternativas y complementarias en las revistas femeninas españolas (2015-2016). Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico 26:3, pages 1067-1078.
Crossref
Diego Romero-Maltrana, Federico Benitez, Francisco Vera & Rodrigo Rivera. (2017) The ‘Nature of Science’ and the Perils of Epistemic Relativism. Research in Science Education 49:6, pages 1735-1757.
Crossref
Alper Bilgehan YARDIMCI. (2019) Bilim ve Sözde Bilim: Bilimsel Topluluğun Doğasının Belirlenmesi ve Sözde Bilimin Ayırt Edilmesine Yönelik Sosyal Bir Ölçüt. Kaygı. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Felsefe Dergisi, pages 567-588.
Crossref
Angelo Fasce & Alfonso Picó. (2019) Science as a Vaccine. Science & Education 28:1-2, pages 109-125.
Crossref
Michael R. MatthewsMichael R. Matthews. 2019. Feng Shui: Teaching About Science and Pseudoscience. Feng Shui: Teaching About Science and Pseudoscience 269 289 .
David Duarte. 2019. Legal Interpretation and Scientific Knowledge. Legal Interpretation and Scientific Knowledge 211 251 .
Anthony Lock. (2017) Scienticity and Artistry Across All Subjects. Philosophia 46:2, pages 355-377.
Crossref
. 2018. Risque et expertise. Risque et expertise 105 112 .
Michael R. Matthews. 2018. History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. History, Philosophy and Science Teaching 3 41 .
Sven Ove Hansson. (2017) Science denial as a form of pseudoscience. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 63, pages 39-47.
Crossref
Vendula Kovářová. (2016) W. W. BARTLEY: RECONSIDERING THE PROBLEM OF DEMARCATION BETWEEN SCIENCE AND METAPHYSICS. E-LOGOS 23:2, pages 10-26.
Crossref
Sergi Cortiñas-Rovira, Felipe Alonso-Marcos, Carles Pont-Sorribes & Eudald Escribà-Sales. (2014) Science journalists’ perceptions and attitudes to pseudoscience in Spain. Public Understanding of Science 24:4, pages 450-465.
Crossref
Emilio Lobato, Jorge Mendoza, Valerie Sims & Matthew Chin. (2014) Examining the Relationship Between Conspiracy Theories, Paranormal Beliefs, and Pseudoscience Acceptance Among a University Population. Applied Cognitive Psychology 28:5, pages 617-625.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.