Advanced search
Publication Cover
Communication Monographs Volume 70, 2003 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
2,676
Views
210
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A meta-analysis of the effects of viewing U.S. presidential debates

William L. Benoit
,
Glenn J. Hansen
&
Rebecca M. Verser
Pages 335-350 | Published online: 24 Jun 2010

Citations (210)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (79)

Josh C. Bramlett, Joel Lansing Reed & Mitchell S. McKinney. (2024) The rhetoric of democracy in United States Senate campaign debates. Communication and Democracy 58:1, pages 70-95.
Read now
Freddie J. Jennings, Josh C. Bramlett, Kaleb Turner & Benjamin Figueroa. (2024) How partisan social identity shapes evaluations of candidate brand elements on campaign websites. Communication Quarterly 72:1, pages 79-98.
Read now
Jonas Lefevere, Ine Goovaerts & Emma Turkenburg. (2023) Changing the Subject: An Analysis of Candidates’ Issue Emphasis in Televised Election Debates, 1985-2019. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 67:5, pages 755-774.
Read now
Darby Gilliland, Benjamin R. Warner, Astrid Villamil & Fred J. Jennings. (2023) Intergroup Bias in Political Decision Making. Communication Studies 74:5, pages 428-446.
Read now
Freddie J. Jennings, Kelsey Wexler, Gabrielle Willingham & Kate Kenski. (2022) Fostering learning among women: the democratic outcomes of elaborative primes. Communication Quarterly 70:5, pages 519-536.
Read now
R. Lance Holbert, Elizabeth S. Baik, Meghnaa Tallapragada, Colleen M. Tolan, Heather L. LaMarre & Bruce W. Hardy. (2022) “Balancing Field-General and Subfield-Specific Contributions When Addressing, Utilizing, or Assessing a Theory’s Explanatory Power”. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 66:4, pages 515-539.
Read now
Xiao Wang & Yang Yu. (2022) The impact of moral framing in the 2016 U.S. presidential debates on moral judgments and self-transcendent emotions in tweets. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 19:3, pages 316-330.
Read now
Michael F. Mascolo. (2022) Bridging Partisan Divides: Dialectical Engagement and Deep Sociality. Journal of Constructivist Psychology 35:3, pages 877-903.
Read now
Lindita Camaj. (2021) Real time political deliberation on social media: can televised debates lead to rational and civil discussions on broadcasters’ Facebook pages?. Information, Communication & Society 24:13, pages 1907-1924.
Read now
Freddie J. Jennings, Josh C. Bramlett, Kate Kenski & Isabel I. Villanueva. (2021) Presidential debate learning as a gateway to opinion articulation, communication intentions, and information seeking. Argumentation and Advocacy 57:3-4, pages 236-252.
Read now
Josh C. Bramlett. (2021) Battles for branding: a political marketing approach to studying televised candidate debates. Communication Quarterly 69:3, pages 280-300.
Read now
Heejo Keum & Jaeho Cho. (2021) Presidential debates and voter decision making. The Social Science Journal 0:0, pages 1-12.
Read now
Constantine Boussalis & Travis G. Coan. (2021) Facing the Electorate: Computational Approaches to the Study of Nonverbal Communication and Voter Impression Formation. Political Communication 38:1-2, pages 75-97.
Read now
Josh C. Bramlett. (2021) Examining the normative and persuasive effects of televised U.S. Senate debates. Argumentation and Advocacy 57:1, pages 37-56.
Read now
Ine Goovaerts & Sofie Marien. (2020) Uncivil Communication and Simplistic Argumentation: Decreasing Political Trust, Increasing Persuasive Power?. Political Communication 37:6, pages 768-788.
Read now
Freddie J. Jennings, Benjamin R. Warner, Mitchell S. McKinney, Cassandra C. Kearney, Michelle E. Funk & Josh C. Bramlett. (2020) Learning from Presidential Debates: Who Learns the Most and Why?. Communication Studies 71:5, pages 896-910.
Read now
John M. Kephart$suffix/text()$suffix/text(). (2020) Contesting presidential masculinity: “fatherhood” as a rhetorical strategy in the 2012 general election debates. Argumentation and Advocacy 56:4, pages 223-240.
Read now
Sofie Marien, Ine Goovaerts & Stephen Elstub. (2020) Deliberative qualities in televised election debates: the influence of the electoral system and populism. West European Politics 43:6, pages 1262-1284.
Read now
Nathan Walter, Jonathan Cohen, R. Lance Holbert & Yasmin Morag. (2020) Fact-Checking: A Meta-Analysis of What Works and for Whom. Political Communication 37:3, pages 350-375.
Read now
Benjamin R. Warner, Mitchell S. McKinney, Josh C. Bramlett, Freddie J. Jennings & Michelle Elizabeth Funk. (2020) Reconsidering partisanship as a constraint on the persuasive effects of debates. Communication Monographs 87:2, pages 137-157.
Read now
Kathryn J. McGarr. (2020) The Importance of Historical Perspective and Archival Methods in Political Communication Research. Political Communication 37:1, pages 110-116.
Read now
Ran Wei, Ven-Hwei Lo & Yicheng Zhu. (2019) Need for Orientation and Third-Person Effects of the Televised Debates in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Mass Communication and Society 22:5, pages 565-583.
Read now
Kimberly Gross, Ethan Porter & Thomas J. Wood. (2019) Identifying Media Effects Through Low-Cost, Multiwave Field Experiments. Political Communication 36:2, pages 272-287.
Read now
Lindita Camaj & Temple Northup. (2019) Dual-Screening the Candidate Image during Presidential Debates: The Moderating Role of Twitter and Need to Evaluate for the Effects on Candidate Perceptions. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 63:1, pages 20-38.
Read now
David E. Silva, Myiah J. Hutchens, Rebecca R. Donaway & Michael A. Beam. (2018) 300 Million Clicks and Political Engagement via Facebook in the 2016 American Presidential Election: How Online Activity Changes Across Time and Sources. Mass Communication and Society 21:6, pages 742-762.
Read now
Nicholas W. Robinson & R. Lance Holbert. (2018) Taking sides in the war on news: exploring curvilinear associations and group differences related to perceptions of news media as threat. Journal of Applied Communication Research 46:6, pages 684-702.
Read now
Jürgen Maier, Thorsten Faas, Berthold Rittberger, Jessica Fortin-Rittberger, Kalliope Agapiou Josifides, Susan Banducci, Paolo Bellucci, Magnus Blomgren, Inta Brikse, Karol Chwedczuk-Szulc, Marina Costa Lobo, Mikołaj Cześnik, Anastasia Deligiaouri, Tomaž Deželan, Wouter deNooy, Aldo Di Virgilio, Florin Fesnic, Danica Fink-Hafner, Marijana Grbeša, Carmen Greab, Andrija Henjak, David Nicolas Hopmann, David Johann, Gábor Jelenfi, Jurate Kavaliauskaite, Zoltan Kmetty, Sylvia Kritzinger, Pedro C. Magalhães, Vincent Meyer, Katia Mihailova, Mihail Mirchev, Ville Pitkänen, Aine Ramonaite, Theresa Reidy, Marek Rybar, Carmen Sammut, José Santana-Pereira, Guna Spurava, Lia-Paschalia Spyridou, Adriana Stefanel, Václav Štětka, Aleksander Surdej, Róbert Tardos, Dimitris Trimithiotis, Christiano Vezzoni, Aneta Világi & Gergo Zavecz. (2018) This time it’s different? Effects of the Eurovision Debate on young citizens and its consequence for EU democracy – evidence from a quasi-experiment in 24 countries. Journal of European Public Policy 25:4, pages 606-629.
Read now
Jacob W. Wrasse, Dan Schill & Rita Kirk. (2018) Meeting the commander-in-waiting: Undecided voters and the 2016 vice-presidential debate. Argumentation and Advocacy 54:1-2, pages 139-158.
Read now
Benjamin R. Warner, Josh C. Bramlett, Sopheak Hoeun, Didarul I. Manik & Joshua P. Bolton. (2018) Presidential primary debates compared: timing of debate and size of candidate field as moderators of debate effects. Argumentation and Advocacy 54:1-2, pages 122-138.
Read now
William L. Benoit. (2018) Issue ownership in the 2016 presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy 54:1-2, pages 95-103.
Read now
Jeffrey A. Gottfried, Bruce W. Hardy, R. Lance Holbert, Kenneth M. Winneg & Kathleen Hall Jamieson. (2017) The Changing Nature of Political Debate Consumption: Social Media, Multitasking, and Knowledge Acquisition. Political Communication 34:2, pages 172-199.
Read now
Andrew Chadwick, Ben O’Loughlin & Cristian Vaccari. (2017) Why People Dual Screen Political Debates and Why It Matters for Democratic Engagement. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 61:2, pages 220-239.
Read now
Tsfira Grebelsky-Lichtman. (2016) The Role of Verbal and Nonverbal Behavior in Televised Political Debates. Journal of Political Marketing 15:4, pages 362-387.
Read now
Jeremy Saks, Jordan L. Compton, Ashley Hopkins & Kareem El Damanhoury. (2016) Dialed In: Continuous Response Measures in Televised Political Debates and Their Effect on Viewers. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 60:2, pages 231-247.
Read now
Scott W. Dunn, Sheena L. Butler, Katelyn Meeks & James Collier. (2015) Communication Quarterly Rockin’ the Gubernatorial Vote?: Young People’s Normative Democratic Attitudes and Behaviors in a Low-Involvement Election. Communication Quarterly 63:5, pages 603-619.
Read now
Jason Turcotte. (2015) The News Norms and Values of Presidential Debate Agendas: An Analysis of Format and Moderator Influence on Question Content. Mass Communication and Society 18:3, pages 239-258.
Read now
Kristen D. Landreville, Caitlin White & Sam Allen. (2015) Tweets, Polls, and Quotes: Gatekeeping and Bias in On-Screen Visuals During the Final 2012 Presidential Debate. Communication Studies 66:2, pages 146-164.
Read now
Patrick C. Meirick & Stephanie Schartel Dunn. (2015) Obama as Exemplar: Debate Exposure and Implicit and Explicit Racial Affect. Howard Journal of Communications 26:1, pages 57-73.
Read now
Jason Turcotte. (2014) Debates and the Disincentives of Democracy. Journalism Practice 8:6, pages 772-788.
Read now
WilliamL. Benoit & JenniferM. Benoit-Bryan. (2014) A Functional Analysis of UK Debates in Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales. Western Journal of Communication 78:5, pages 653-667.
Read now
J. Brian Houston, MitchellS. McKinney, Joshua Hawthorne & MatthewL. Spialek. (2013) Frequency of Tweeting During Presidential Debates: Effect on Debate Attitudes and Knowledge. Communication Studies 64:5, pages 548-560.
Read now
BenjaminR. Warner & MitchellS. McKinney. (2013) To Unite and Divide: The Polarizing Effect of Presidential Debates. Communication Studies 64:5, pages 508-527.
Read now
Yun Son Choi & William L. Benoit. (2013) A Functional Analysis of the 2007 and 2012 French Presidential Debates. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 42:3, pages 215-227.
Read now
WilliamL. Benoit & JenniferM. Benoit-Bryan. (2013) Debates Come to the United Kingdom: A Functional Analysis of the 2010 British Prime Minister Election Debates. Communication Quarterly 61:4, pages 463-478.
Read now
ThomasP. Boyle. (2013) 2008 Presidential Campaign Media Predictors: Interest, Issue Knowledge and Candidate Likeability. Atlantic Journal of Communication 21:2, pages 95-107.
Read now
Amber E. Boydstun, Rebecca A. Glazier & Matthew T. Pietryka. (2013) Playing to the Crowd: Agenda Control in Presidential Debates. Political Communication 30:2, pages 254-277.
Read now
J. Brian Houston, Joshua Hawthorne, Matthew L. Spialek, Molly Greenwood & Mitchell S. McKinney. (2013) Tweeting During Presidential Debates: Effect on Candidate Evaluations and Debate Attitudes. Argumentation and Advocacy 49:4, pages 301-311.
Read now
Jason T. Peifer & R. Lance Holbert. (2013) Developing a Systematic Assessment of Humor in the Context of the 2012 U.S. General Election Debates. Argumentation and Advocacy 49:4, pages 286-300.
Read now
Mark Glantz, William L. Benoit & David Airne. (2013) A Functional Analysis of 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Debates. Argumentation and Advocacy 49:4, pages 275-285.
Read now
Mitchell S. McKinney & Benjamin R. Warner. (2013) Do Presidential Debates Matter? Examining a Decade of Campaign Debate Effects. Argumentation and Advocacy 49:4, pages 238-258.
Read now
Sean Richey & J. Benjamin Taylor. (2012) Who Advocates? Determinants of Political Advocacy in Presidential Election Years. Political Communication 29:4, pages 414-427.
Read now
David M. Rhea. (2012) There They Go Again: The Use of Humor in Presidential Debates 1960–2008. Argumentation and Advocacy 49:2, pages 115-131.
Read now
Jaeho Cho & Yerheen Ha. (2012) On the Communicative Underpinnings of Campaign Effects: Presidential Debates, Citizen Communication, and Polarization in Evaluations of Candidates. Political Communication 29:2, pages 184-204.
Read now
William L. Benoit, Jayne R. Henson & Leigh Anne Sudbrock. (2011) A Functional Analysis of 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Debates. Argumentation and Advocacy 48:2, pages 97-110.
Read now
Linda Bos, Wouter van der Brug & Claes de Vreese. (2011) How the Media Shape Perceptions of Right-Wing Populist Leaders. Political Communication 28:2, pages 182-206.
Read now
Nick Geidner & R. Lance Holbert. (2011) A Meeting of Broadcast and Post-Broadcast Media in the 2004 American Presidential Election. Communication Research Reports 28:1, pages 43-51.
Read now
Nora Galli de' Paratesi & Luca Giuliano. (2009) Pronoun morphology, modality and semantics of political communication in presidential debate of two Italian political leaders. International Review of Sociology 19:3, pages 401-410.
Read now
R. Lance Holbert & WilliamL. Benoit. (2009) A Theory of Political Campaign Media Connectedness. Communication Monographs 76:3, pages 303-332.
Read now
TimothyR. Levine, KelliJ. Asada & Chris Carpenter. (2009) Sample Sizes and Effect Sizes are Negatively Correlated in Meta-Analyses: Evidence and Implications of a Publication Bias Against NonSignificant Findings. Communication Monographs 76:3, pages 286-302.
Read now
Jaeho Cho, DhavanV. Shah, Seungahn Nah & Dominique Brossard. (2009) “Split Screens” and “Spin Rooms”: Debate Modality, Post-Debate Coverage, and the New Videomalaise. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 53:2, pages 242-261.
Read now
LindsayM. Timmerman, Mike Allen, Jill Jorgensen, Jennifer Herrett-Skjellum, MichaelR. Kramer & DanielJ. Ryan. (2008) A Review and Meta-Analysis Examining the Relationship of Music Content with Sex, Race, Priming, and Attitudes. Communication Quarterly 56:3, pages 303-324.
Read now
R. Lance Holbert & GlennJ. Hansen. (2008) Stepping Beyond Message Specificity in the Study of Emotion as Mediator and Inter-Emotion Associations Across Attitude Objects: Fahrenheit 9/11, Anger, and Debate Superiority. Media Psychology 11:1, pages 98-118.
Read now
EranN. Ben-Porath. (2007) Question Bias and Violations of Comparability in Intraparty Debates: Iowa and New Hampshire, 2004. Communication Quarterly 55:4, pages 375-396.
Read now
WilliamL. Benoit. (2007) Determinants of Defense in Presidential Debates. Communication Research Reports 24:4, pages 319-325.
Read now
William L. Benoit, LeAnn M. Brazeal & David Airne. (2007) A Functional Analysis of Televised U.S. Senate and Gubernatorial Campaign Debates. Argumentation and Advocacy 44:2, pages 75-89.
Read now
William L. Benoit & Jayne R. Henson. (2007) A Functional Analysis of the 2006 Canadian and 2007 Australian Election Debates. Argumentation and Advocacy 44:1, pages 36-48.
Read now
R. Lance Holbert, GlennJ. Hansen, ScottE. Caplan & Steve Mortensen. (2007) Presidential Debate Viewing and Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9–11: A Study of Affect-as-Transfer and Passionate Reasoning. Media Psychology 9:3, pages 673-694.
Read now
Rene Ziegler, Friederike Arnold & Michael Diehl. (2007) Communication Modality and Biased Processing: A Study on the Occasion of the German 2002 Election TV Debate. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 29:2, pages 175-184.
Read now
WilliamL. Benoit, Wei-Chun Wen & Tzu-hsiang Yu. (2007) A Functional Analysis of 2004 Taiwanese Political Debates. Asian Journal of Communication 17:1, pages 24-39.
Read now
R. Lance Holbert, GlennJ. Hansen, Steve Mortensen & ScottE. Caplan. (2006) An Analysis of the Relative Influences of Fahrenheit 9/11 and Presidential Debate Viewing on Shifting Confidence in President George W. Bush. Communication Research Reports 23:3, pages 209-216.
Read now
Paul R. Brewer & Xiaoxia Cao. (2006) Candidate Appearances on Soft News Shows and Public Knowledge About Primary Campaigns. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 50:1, pages 18-35.
Read now
GlennJ. Hansen & WilliamL. Benoit. (2005) Presidential campaigning on the web: The influence of candidate world wide web sites in the 2000 general election. Southern Communication Journal 70:3, pages 219-228.
Read now
Cheolhan Lee & WilliamL. Benoit. (2005) A Functional Analysis of the 2002 Korean Presidential Debates. Asian Journal of Communication 15:2, pages 115-132.
Read now
William L. Benoit & David Airne. (2005) A Functional Analysis of American Vice Presidential Debates. Argumentation and Advocacy 41:4, pages 225-236.
Read now
Danette Ifert Johnson. (2005) Feminine style in presidential debate discourse, 1960–2000. Communication Quarterly 53:1, pages 3-20.
Read now
William L. Benoit, Kevin A. Stein & Glenn J. Hansen. (2004) Newspaper Coverage of Presidential Debates. Argumentation and Advocacy 41:1, pages 17-27.
Read now
WilliamL. Benoit & GlennJ. Hansen. (2004) The changing media environment of presidential campaigns. Communication Research Reports 21:2, pages 164-173.
Read now
William L. Benoit, Glenn J. Hansen & Kevin A. Stein. (2004) Newspaper Coverage of Presidential Primary Debates. Argumentation and Advocacy 40:4, pages 246-258.
Read now
William L. Benoit & Glenn J. Hansen. (2004) Issue Ownership in Primary and General Presidential Debates. Argumentation and Advocacy 40:3, pages 143-154.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (131)

Sophie Taylor & Sergiu Gherghina. (2024) Loving a good fight: personality traits and reactions to conflict in TV debates. British Politics.
Crossref
R Lance Holbert, Hyunjin Song, Morgan E Ellithorpe, Heather L LaMarre, Elizabeth S Baik & Colleen M Tolan. (2024) Pulling the field out of a “One Variable, One Role” mindset: maximizing the theoretical value of interaction terms in communication’s mediation models. Human Communication Research 50:2, pages 240-253.
Crossref
Andreas Graefe. (2024) Limits of Domain Knowledge in Election Forecasting: A Comparison of Poll Averages and Expert Forecasts. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 36:1.
Crossref
Emma Turkenburg & Ine Goovaerts. (2022) Food for Thought: A Longitudinal Investigation of Reflection-Promoting Speech in Televised Election Debates (1985–2019). Political Studies 72:1, pages 67-89.
Crossref
Benjamin R. Warner, Jihye Park, Go-Eun Kim, Mitchell S. McKinney & Wm. Bryan Paul. (2021) Do Presidential Primary Debates Increase Political Polarization?. American Behavioral Scientist 68:1, pages 80-96.
Crossref
Jürgen Maier. 2024. Wahlen und Wähler. Wahlen und Wähler 281 302 .
Freddie J. Jennings, Brandon Bouchillon, Josh C. Bramlett, Austin D. Eubanks, Patrick A. Stewart & Jason M. Miller. (2023) Visual overload: The influence of broadcast social media visuals on televised debate viewing outcomes. Journal of Visual Political Communication 10:2, pages 151-172.
Crossref
David E. Clementson, Wenqing Zhao & Sohyun Park. (2023) How Intense Language Hurts a Politician's Trustworthiness: Voter Norms of a Political Debate via Language Expectancy Theory. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 42:4, pages 407-430.
Crossref
Felix Ettensperger, Thomas Waldvogel, Uwe Wagschal & Samuel Weishaupt. (2023) How to convince in a televised debate: the application of machine learning to analyze why viewers changed their winner perception during the 2021 German chancellor discussion. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10:1.
Crossref
José Santana-Pereira & Susana Rogeiro Nina. (2023) Does Exposure to Televised Debates Change the Weight of Different Criteria for Candidate Assessment? A Quasi-Experiment in the Context of the 2014 Spitzenkandidaten Debate. Social Sciences 12:8, pages 428.
Crossref
Jürgen Maier. (2022) What factors explain the broadcasting of televised election debates? Empirical evidence from Germany. European Journal of Communication 38:3, pages 272-286.
Crossref
Ine Goovaerts & Emma Turkenburg. (2022) How Contextual Features Shape Incivility Over Time: An Analysis of the Evolution and Determinants of Political Incivility in Televised Election Debates (1985–2019). Communication Research 50:4, pages 480-507.
Crossref
Jiahao Tian & Michael D. Porter. (2022) Changing presidential approval: Detecting and understanding change points in interval censored polling data. Stat 11:1.
Crossref
Pascal D. König, Thomas Waldvogel, Uwe Wagschal, Bernd Becker, Linus Feiten & Samuel Weishaupt. (2022) The emotional valence of candidate ratings in televised debates. Communications 47:3, pages 422-449.
Crossref
Simon Richter & Sebastian Stier. (2021) Learning about the unknown Spitzenkandidaten : The role of media exposure during the 2019 European Parliament elections . European Union Politics 23:2, pages 309-329.
Crossref
Pascal D. König & Thomas Waldvogel. (2021) What matters for keeping or losing support in televised debates. European Journal of Communication 37:3, pages 312-329.
Crossref
Amin Dalimunte & Fengwei Wen. (2022) Shaping political image through politeness strategies in the presidential debates. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society) 7:1, pages 102-109.
Crossref
Freddie J. Jennings, Robert H. Wicks, Mitchell S. McKinney & Kate Kenski. (2021) Closing the Knowledge Gap: How Issue Priming Before Presidential Debate Viewing Encourages Learning and Opinion Articulation. American Behavioral Scientist 66:3, pages 292-306.
Crossref
Kevin Koidl. 2022. Computer-Mediated Communication. Computer-Mediated Communication.
Thomas Waldvogel, Pascal König, Uwe Wagschal, Bernd Becker & Samuel Weishaupt. (2022) It’s the emotion, stupid! Emotional responses to televised debates and their impact on voting intention. Open Political Science 5:1, pages 13-28.
Crossref
Victoria Asbury-Kimmel, Keng-Chi Chang, Katherine T McCabe, Kevin Munger & Tiago Ventura. (2021) The Effect of Streaming Chat on Perceptions of Political Debates. Journal of Communication 71:6, pages 947-974.
Crossref
Christian Kock. (2021) Evaluating Public Deliberation: Including the Audience Perspective. Journal of Deliberative Democracy 17:2.
Crossref
Stacey Frank Kanihan, Patrick C. Meirick & Claire M. Segijn. (2020) Thinking, Knowing, or Thinking You Know: The Relationship Between Multiscreening and Political Learning. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 98:4, pages 1104-1128.
Crossref
Irene Palacios & Christine Arnold. (2021) Do Spitzenkandidaten debates matter? Effects on voters’ cognitions and evaluations of candidates and issues. Politics 41:4, pages 486-503.
Crossref
CONSTANTINE BOUSSALIS, TRAVIS G. COAN, MIRYA R. HOLMAN & STEFAN MÜLLER. (2021) Gender, Candidate Emotional Expression, and Voter Reactions During Televised Debates. American Political Science Review 115:4, pages 1242-1257.
Crossref
Jihye Park, Benjamin R. Warner, Mitchell S. McKinney, Cassandra Kearney, Michael W. Kearney & Go-Eun Kim. (2021) Partisan Identity and Affective Polarization in Presidential Debates. American Behavioral Scientist, pages 000276422110465.
Crossref
Dieter Stiers & Anna Kern. (2020) Cyclical accountability. Public Choice 189:1-2, pages 31-49.
Crossref
Rosmery Ramos-Sandoval & Amparo Blazquez-Soriano. (2021) Politics and Social Media: Reaction to the presidential debates during the Peruvian electoral campaign according to Twitter. Politics and Social Media: Reaction to the presidential debates during the Peruvian electoral campaign according to Twitter.
Henrik D. Kugelberg. (2022) Public Justification Versus Public Deliberation: The Case for Reconciliation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 51:6, pages 468-473.
Crossref
Thomas Waldvogel, Thomas Metz, Uwe Wagschal, Bernd Becker, Linus Feiten & Samuel Weishaupt. (2021) Assessing the Impact of Political Involvement on the Reliability and Validity of Virtualized Real-time-response Measurement. Statistics, Politics and Policy 12:1, pages 53-86.
Crossref
Daniel Argyle, Lisa P. Argyle, Vlad Eidelman & Philip Resnik. (2021) Debate Reaction Ideal Points: Political Ideology Measurement Using Real-Time Reaction Data. Statistics, Politics and Policy 12:1, pages 5-28.
Crossref
Ryan Lloyd, André BelloLucio Rennó. (2020) Preaching to the Choir? Presidential Debates and Patterns of Persuasion in a Multiparty Presidential System. Public Opinion Quarterly 84:4, pages 892-914.
Crossref
Hyun Jung Yun. (2020) Polls and Elections : Beyond Political Capital: Do Social and Economic Capital Matter? . Presidential Studies Quarterly 51:2, pages 404-425.
Crossref
Eleni Mousena & Nikolaos Raptis. 2021. Education at the Intersection of Globalization and Technology. Education at the Intersection of Globalization and Technology.
Gustav Meibauer. (2020) Ambiguous specificity: The production of foreign policy bullshit in electoral contexts. Politics 41:1, pages 15-30.
Crossref
Patrícia Rossini, Jennifer Stromer-Galley & Feifei Zhang. (2020) Exploring the Relationship Between Campaign Discourse on Facebook and the Public’s Comments: A Case Study of Incivility During the 2016 US Presidential Election. Political Studies 69:1, pages 89-107.
Crossref
Korinna Lindemann & Lukas F. Stoetzer. (2021) The effect of televised candidate debates on the support for political parties. Electoral Studies 69, pages 102243.
Crossref
Susana Rogeiro Nina & José Santana-Pereira. (2020) Feasting Our Eyes on the Candidates: Visual Cues in Televised Debates Prime Personality Traits of Lesser Known Candidates and Promote Learning. The International Journal of Press/Politics 26:1, pages 236-255.
Crossref
Andreas Graefe. (2020) Of Issues and Leaders: Forecasting the 2020 US Presidential Election. PS: Political Science & Politics 54:1, pages 70-72.
Crossref
Thomas Waldvogel & Thomas Metz. (2020) Measuring Real-Time Response in Real-Life Settings. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 32:4, pages 659-675.
Crossref
Yun-jung Choi, Yoojin Chung, Ho Young Yoon, Minjung Kim, Na Young Kim, Chen Lu, Ju-yeon Sin, Ju-hee Lee, Na-young Kim, Eun Yeo & Jewon Kang. (2020) Analysis of the 19th Presidential TV Debate Using Deep Learning Based Video Processing Algorithms : Analysis of the frequency, facial expression and gaze. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies 64:5, pages 319-372.
Crossref
Andreas C. Goldberg & Carolin Ischen. (2020) Be there or be square – The impact of participation and performance in the 2017 Dutch TV debates and its coverage on voting behaviour. Electoral Studies 66, pages 102171.
Crossref
Thomas Waldvogel. (2020) Applying Virtualized Real-Time Response Measurement on TV-Discussions with Multi-Person Panels. Statistics, Politics and Policy 11:1, pages 23-58.
Crossref
Concha Pérez-Curiel & Mar García-Gordillo. (2020) Del debate electoral en TV al ciberdebate en Twitter. Encuadres de influencia en las elecciones generales en España (28A). El profesional de la información.
Crossref
Masaki Shibata. (2020) Why do politicians cite others in political debates?. Journal of Language and Politics 19:4, pages 604-623.
Crossref
Nick Anstead. (2016) WITHDRAWN: A Different Beast? Televised Election Debates in Parliamentary Democracies. The International Journal of Press/Politics 25:2, pages NP2-NP20.
Crossref
Andrea McDonnell. (2020) Clinton stated, Trump exclaimed!. Journal of Language and Politics 19:1, pages 71-88.
Crossref
Thomas Waldvogel. (2020) Alles Wut? Der Einfluss von Emotionen auf die Wahrnehmung und Wirkung von TV-Debatten am Beispiel der Bundestagswahl 2017All anger? The role of emotions for the perception and effects of TV debates using the example of the 2017 federal elections in Germany. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 30:1, pages 53-86.
Crossref
Maria Cheng. (2019) Acclaims, attacks, defenses: Critical discourse analysis of Ma Ying-jeou’s 2012 Taiwan presidential debates discourse. Discourse & Society 31:1, pages 19-43.
Crossref
Lukas P. Otto, Isabella Glogger & Michaela Maier. (2019) Personalization 2.0? – Testing the personalization hypothesis in citizens’, journalists’, and politicians’ campaign Twitter communication. Communications 44:4, pages 359-381.
Crossref
Philipp Schmid & Cornelia Betsch. (2019) Effective strategies for rebutting science denialism in public discussions. Nature Human Behaviour 3:9, pages 931-939.
Crossref
Yunjuan Luo, Hansel Burley, Alexander Moe & Mingxiao Sui. (2018) A Meta-Analysis of News Media’s Public Agenda-Setting Effects, 1972-2015. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 96:1, pages 150-172.
Crossref
Uwe Wagschal, Thomas Waldvogel, Thomas Metz, Samuel Weishaupt, Linus Feiten, Bernd Becker & Kamal Singh. 2019. Die Bundestagswahl 2017. Die Bundestagswahl 2017 461 482 .
Harry Ph. Sophocleous & Andreas Masouras. 2019. Strategic Innovative Marketing and Tourism. Strategic Innovative Marketing and Tourism 459 467 .
Nathan Walter, Michael J Cody, Larry Zhiming Xu & Sheila T Murphy. (2018) A Priest, a Rabbi, and a Minister Walk into a Bar: A Meta-Analysis of Humor Effects on Persuasion. Human Communication Research 44:4, pages 343-373.
Crossref
Andreas Graefe. (2023) Predicting elections: Experts, polls, and fundamentals. Judgment and Decision Making 13:4, pages 334-344.
Crossref
Jochen Mayerl & Thorsten Faas. (2017) Campaign dynamics of cognitive accessibility of political judgments: measuring the impact of campaigns and campaign events using response latencies in two German rolling cross section studies. Quality & Quantity 52:4, pages 1575-1592.
Crossref
Jiyoung Lee & Yunjung Choi. (2018) Expanding affective intelligence theory through social viewing: Focusing on the South Korea's 2017 presidential election. Computers in Human Behavior 83, pages 119-128.
Crossref
William L. Benoit. (2018) Production of Image Repair Strategies in the 2016 American Presidential Debates. Langage et société N° 164:2, pages 25-38.
Crossref
Jared Alan Stewart. (2018) In Through the Out Door: Examining the Use of Outsider Appeals in Presidential Debates. Presidential Studies Quarterly 48:1, pages 93-109.
Crossref
Pablo Barberá & Thomas Zeitzoff. (2018) The New Public Address System: Why Do World Leaders Adopt Social Media?. International Studies Quarterly 62:1, pages 121-130.
Crossref
Jürgen Maier & Carolin Jansen. (2018) Steigert die Rezeption von TV-Duellen das Vertrauen in die Spitzenkandidaten?Does the Reception of Televised Debates Increase Trust in Candidates?. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 28:1, pages 1-30.
Crossref
Scott P. Robertson. 2018. Social Media and Civic Engagement. Social Media and Civic Engagement.
Hyun Jung Yun. (2017) Selling Political Brands and Building Candidate Relational Equity in American Campaign Tournaments. American Studies 40:2, pages 127-170.
Crossref
Duncan Shaw, Chris M. Smith & Judy Scully. (2017) Why did Brexit happen? Using causal mapping to analyse secondary, longitudinal data. European Journal of Operational Research 263:3, pages 1019-1032.
Crossref
Adam J. Schiffer. (2017) Debates and Partisan Enthusiasm Before the 2012 Republican Primaries. Presidential Studies Quarterly 47:2, pages 293-310.
Crossref
Stewart Davidson, Stephen Elstub, Robert Johns & Alastair Stark. (2016) Rating the debates: The 2010 UK party leaders’ debates and political communication in the deliberative system. British Politics 12:2, pages 183-208.
Crossref
Freddie J. Jennings, Calvin R. Coker, Mitchell S. McKinney & Benjamin R. Warner. (2017) Tweeting Presidential Primary Debates: Debate Processing Through Motivated Twitter Instruction. American Behavioral Scientist 61:4, pages 455-474.
Crossref
Kenneth Winneg & Kathleen Hall Jamieson. (2017) Learning From the 2016 U.S. General Election Presidential Debates. American Behavioral Scientist 61:4, pages 362-378.
Crossref
Amanda L. Wintersieck. (2017) Debating the Truth. American Politics Research 45:2, pages 304-331.
Crossref
Aaron C. Weinschenk. (2017) Polls and Elections : Conventional Wisdom: Political Learning During Presidential Nominating Conventions . Presidential Studies Quarterly 47:1, pages 186-203.
Crossref
Byungkyu Lee & Peter Bearman. (2017) Important Matters in Political Context. Sociological Science 4, pages 1-30.
Crossref
Zim Nwokora & Lara M. Brown. (2016) Narratives of a Race. American Politics Research 45:1, pages 33-62.
Crossref
Thomas Waldvogel & Thomas Metz. 2017. Neue Trends in den Sozialwissenschaften. Neue Trends in den Sozialwissenschaften 307 331 .
Ines C. Vogel & Lukas Otto. 2017. Merkel gegen Steinbrück. Merkel gegen Steinbrück 87 103 .
Kareem Darwish, Walid Magdy & Tahar Zanouda. 2017. Social Informatics. Social Informatics 143 161 .
Justin Ward Kirk. (2016) Mitt Romney in Denver. Journal of Argumentation in Context 5:3, pages 227-248.
Crossref
Marta Rzepecka. (2016) Analyzing Televised Presidential General Election Debates. Ad Americam 17, pages 197-209.
Crossref
Hyun Jung Yun, Amy Jasperson & Blake Farrar. (2016) The Cumulative Effects of Televised Debates on Voters’ Assessments of Candidates across Red, Blue, and Purple Political Battlegrounds in the 2012 American Presidential Election. American Studies 39:2, pages 211-239.
Crossref
Andreas Graefe. (2016) Issue-handling beats leadership: Issues and Leaders model predicts Clinton will defeat Trump. Research & Politics 3:4, pages 205316801667936.
Crossref
Nick Anstead. (2016) A Different Beast? Televised Election Debates in Parliamentary Democracies. The International Journal of Press/Politics 21:4, pages 508-526.
Crossref
Patrick A. Stewart, Austin D. Eubanks & Jason Miller. (2016) “Please Clap”: Applause, Laughter, and Booing during the 2016 GOP Presidential Primary Debates. PS: Political Science & Politics 49:04, pages 696-700.
Crossref
Jorge Gallardo-Camacho & Eva Lavín. (2016) El interés de la audiencia por las intervenciones televisivas de Pablo Iglesias: estrategia comunicativa de Podemos. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico 22:1, pages 273-286.
Crossref
Maria Cheng. (2015) The power of persuasion: Modality and issue framing in the 2012 Taiwan Presidential Debates. Discourse & Society 27:2, pages 172-194.
Crossref
William L. Benoit. 2015. The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication. The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication 1 10 .
William L. Benoit & Mark Glantz. 2016. Die US-Präsidentschaftswahl 2012. Die US-Präsidentschaftswahl 2012 289 306 .
Riccardo Fusaroli, Marcus Perlman, Alan Mislove, Alexandra Paxton, Teenie Matlock & Rick Dale. (2015) Timescales of Massive Human Entrainment. PLOS ONE 10:4, pages e0122742.
Crossref
Javier Sierra Rodríguez. (2015) Atrapados por nuestras predisposiciones ante los debates electorales por televisión. Revista Mexicana de Opinión Pública 18, pages 28-50.
Crossref
William Benoit & Jennifer M. Benoit-Bryan. (2014) A functional analysis of the 2010 Australian Prime Minister debate. Journal of Argumentation in Context 3:2, pages 153-168.
Crossref
Antti Pirhonen. (2014) Metaphor as a focal concept in sound design. Metaphor as a focal concept in sound design.
Amber E. Boydstun, Jessica T. Feezell, Rebecca A. Glazier, Timothy P. Jurka & Matthew T. Pietryka. (2014) Colleague Crowdsourcing: A Method for Fostering National Student Engagement and Large-N Data Collection. PS: Political Science & Politics 47:04, pages 829-834.
Crossref
Jeffrey A. Gottfried, Bruce W. Hardy, Kenneth M. Winneg & Kathleen Hall Jamieson. (2014) All Knowledge Is Not Created Equal: Knowledge Effects and the 2012 Presidential Debates. Presidential Studies Quarterly 44:3, pages 389-409.
Crossref
Scott Clifford. (2014) Linking Issue Stances and Trait Inferences: A Theory of Moral Exemplification. The Journal of Politics 76:3, pages 698-710.
Crossref
Mitchell S. McKinney, Leslie A. Rill & Esther Thorson. (2013) Civic Engagement Through Presidential Debates. American Behavioral Scientist 58:6, pages 755-775.
Crossref
Tyler Borchers & Jerry L. Miller. (2013) Bain & Political Capital in the 2012 GOP Primary Debates. American Behavioral Scientist 58:4, pages 574-590.
Crossref
Dan Schill & Rita Kirk. (2013) Courting the Swing Voter. American Behavioral Scientist 58:4, pages 536-555.
Crossref
Ji won Kim. (2014) Scan and click: The uses and gratifications of social recommendation systems. Computers in Human Behavior 33, pages 184-191.
Crossref
Andreas Graefe. (2014) Accuracy of Vote Expectation Surveys in Forecasting Elections. Public Opinion Quarterly 78:S1, pages 204-232.
Crossref
Amber E. Boydstun, Rebecca A. Glazier, Matthew T. Pietryka & Philip Resnik. (2014) Real-Time Reactions to a 2012 Presidential Debate. Public Opinion Quarterly 78:S1, pages 330-343.
Crossref
Andreas Graefe. (2013) Issue and leader voting in U.S. presidential elections. Electoral Studies 32:4, pages 644-657.
Crossref
Joshua Hawthorne, J. Brian Houston & Mitchell S. McKinney. (2013) Live-Tweeting a Presidential Primary Debate. Social Science Computer Review 31:5, pages 552-562.
Crossref
Cheolhan Lee. (2013) Political Discourse Analysis in the 2011 Seoul Mayoral Debates. Journal of Political Communication null:30, pages 159-185.
Crossref
Amber E. Boydstun, Rebecca A. Glazier & Claire Phillips. (2013) Agenda Control in the 2008 Presidential Debates. American Politics Research 41:5, pages 863-899.
Crossref
Jürgen Maier & Michaela Maier. 2013. Politische Kommunikation in der repräsentativen Demokratie der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Politische Kommunikation in der repräsentativen Demokratie der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 149 164 .
Valentino Zurloni & Luigi Anolli. 2013. Multimodal Communication in Political Speech. Shaping Minds and Social Action. Multimodal Communication in Political Speech. Shaping Minds and Social Action 245 257 .
William L. Benoit & Jayne R. Henson. 2012. The International Encyclopedia of Media Studies. The International Encyclopedia of Media Studies.
Raymond J. Pingree, Rosanne M. Scholl & Andrea M. Quenette. (2012) Effects of Postdebate Coverage on Spontaneous Policy Reasoning. Journal of Communication 62:4, pages 643-658.
Crossref
H. G. Boomgaarden, R. Vliegenthart & C. H. de Vreese. (2011) A Worldwide Presidential Election: The Impact of the Media on Candidate and Campaign Evaluations. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 24:1, pages 42-61.
Crossref
Jaeho Cho & Syng Pom Choy. (2011) From Podium to Living Room. Communication Research 38:6, pages 778-804.
Crossref
Kate Kenski & Kathleen Hall Jamieson. (2010) Presidential and Vice Presidential Debates in 2008: A Profile of Audience Composition. American Behavioral Scientist 55:3, pages 307-324.
Crossref
Kristen D. LandrevilleR. Lance HolbertHeather L. LaMarre. (2010) The Influence of Late-Night TV Comedy Viewing on Political Talk: A Moderated-Mediation Model. The International Journal of Press/Politics 15:4, pages 482-498.
Crossref
J. R. Henson & W. L. Benoit. (2009) Functional Federalism in Political Campaign Debates. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 39:4, pages 696-706.
Crossref
R. Lance Holbert, Heather L. LaMarre & Kristen D. Landreville. (2009) Fanning the Flames of a Partisan Divide. Communication Research 36:2, pages 155-177.
Crossref
. 2009. Handbook of Statistics - Sample Surveys: Design, Methods and Applications. Handbook of Statistics - Sample Surveys: Design, Methods and Applications 597 650 .
황성욱 & 윌리엄베노이트. (2008) Political Discourse Analysis in the 2006 Seoul Mayoral Debates. Journal of Political Communication null:11, pages 267-301.
Crossref
William L. Benoit & R. Lance Holbert. (2008) Empirical Intersections in Communication Research: Replication, Multiple Quantitative Methods, and Bridging the Quantitative-Qualitative Divide. Journal of Communication 58:4, pages 615-628.
Crossref
Lauren Feldman & Vincent Price. (2008) Confusion or Enlightenment?. Communication Research 35:1, pages 61-87.
Crossref
Kim L. Fridkin, Patrick J. Kenney, Sarah Allen Gershon, Karen Shafer & Gina Serignese Woodall. (2007) Capturing the Power of a Campaign Event: The 2004 Presidential Debate in Tempe. The Journal of Politics 69:3, pages 770-785.
Crossref
Toril Aalberg & Anders Todal Jenssen. (2007) Do Television Debates in Multiparty Systems affect Viewers? A Quasi‐ experimental Study with First‐time Voters. Scandinavian Political Studies 30:1, pages 115-135.
Crossref
Tony Berber Sardinha. (2007) Metáforas de Lula e Alckmin nos debates de 2006 em uma perspectiva da Lingüística de Corpus. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 7:2, pages 139-164.
Crossref
GivenName> L. Benoit & Andrew A. Klyukovski. (2006) A Functional Analysis of 2004 Ukrainian Presidential Debates. Argumentation 20:2, pages 209-225.
Crossref

Displaying 200 of 210 citing articles. Use the download link below to view the full list of citing articles.

Download full citations list

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.