57
Views
55
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Logical empiricism and the study of human communication

Pages 169-183 | Published online: 02 Jun 2009

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (40)

Clint G. Graves. (2019) Dialogic inquiry as a mechanism of the constitutive metamodel. Annals of the International Communication Association 43:3, pages 240-256.
Read now
EliseJ. Dallimore. (2000) A Feminist Response to Issues of Validity in Research. Women's Studies in Communication 23:2, pages 157-181.
Read now
VernonD. Miller & MichaelW. Kramer. (1999) A reply to Bullis, Turner, and Clair. Communication Monographs 66:4, pages 390-392.
Read now
J. Dean Farmer. (1998) Scholarly communities and the discipline of the communication discipline. Southern Communication Journal 63:2, pages 169-172.
Read now
JamesW. Chesebro. (1993) Communication and computability: The case of Alan Mathison Turing. Communication Quarterly 41:1, pages 90-121.
Read now
Robert Bostrom & Lewis Donohew. (1992) The case for empiricism: Clarifying fundamental issues in communication theory. Communication Monographs 59:2, pages 109-129.
Read now
Robert Trapp & PamelaJ. Benoit. (1987) An interpretive perspective on argumentation: A research editorial. Western Journal of Speech Communication 51:4, pages 417-430.
Read now
Celeste Michelle Condit. (1987) Democracy and civil rights: The universalizing influence of public argumentation. Communication Monographs 54:1, pages 1-18.
Read now
Gary Cronkhite. (1986) On the focus, scope, and coherence of the study of human symbolic activity. Quarterly Journal of Speech 72:3, pages 231-246.
Read now
Karen Tracy. (1984) Staying on topic: An explication of conversational relevance∗ . Discourse Processes 7:4, pages 447-464.
Read now
TomD. Daniels & KennethD. Frandsen. (1984) Conventional social science inquiry in human communication: Theory and practice. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70:3, pages 223-240.
Read now
JamesW. Chesebro. (1984) The media reality: Epistemological functions of media in cultural systems. Critical Studies in Mass Communication 1:2, pages 111-130.
Read now
H. Lloyd Goodall$suffix/text()$suffix/text(). (1984) The status of communication studies in organizational contexts: One rhetorician's lament after a year‐long odyssey. Communication Quarterly 32:2, pages 133-147.
Read now
MichaelJ. Hyde. (1984) Emotion and human communication: A rhetorical, scientific, and philosophical picture. Communication Quarterly 32:2, pages 120-132.
Read now
Carl Bryan Holmberg. (1984) Stray the course: Technology's impact upon the representative‐elector artifact. Communication Quarterly 32:2, pages 84-90.
Read now
Barbara Warnick. (1983) A rhetorical analysis of episteme shift: Darwin's origin of the species . Southern Speech Communication Journal 49:1, pages 26-42.
Read now
ThomasS. Frentz. (1983) Falsification procedures for behavioral research in communication. Southern Speech Communication Journal 48:3, pages 269-282.
Read now
Wayne Brockriede. (1982) Arguing about human understanding. Communication Monographs 49:3, pages 137-147.
Read now
MichaelE. Pacanowsky & Nick O'Donnell‐Trujillo. (1982) Communication and organizational cultures. Western Journal of Speech Communication 46:2, pages 115-130.
Read now
ErnestG. Bormann. (1982) I. Fantasy and rhetorical vision: Ten years later. Quarterly Journal of Speech 68:3, pages 288-305.
Read now
ErnestG. Bormann. (1980) The paradox and promise of small group communication revisited. Central States Speech Journal 31:3, pages 214-220.
Read now
W. Charles Redding. (1979) Organizational Communication Theory and Ideology: An Overview. Annals of the International Communication Association 3:1, pages 309-341.
Read now
Arthur P. Bochner & Dorothy Lenk Krueger. (1979) Interpersonal Communication Theory and Research: An Overview of Inscrutable Epistemologies and Muddled Concepts. Annals of the International Communication Association 3:1, pages 197-211.
Read now
DavidR. Seibold. (1979) Criticism of communication theory and research: A critical celebration. Central States Speech Journal 30:1, pages 25-39.
Read now
Charles Arthur Willard. (1978) A Reformulation of the Concept of Argument: The Constructivist/Interactionist Foundations of a Sociology of Argument. The Journal of the American Forensic Association 14:3, pages 121-140.
Read now
C. Jack Orr. (1978) Communication, relativism, and student development. Communication Education 27:2, pages 83-98.
Read now
Richard Leo Enos. (1978) The structuring of rhetorical theories: The center of a central tradition. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 8:1, pages 2-7.
Read now
Maria Rita Rudden & DavidE. Switzer. (1978) Studies of nonverbal behavior: An evaluation and recommendation. Communication Quarterly 26:1, pages 2-12.
Read now
Joseph N. Cappella. (1977) Research Methodology in Communication: Review and Commentary. Annals of the International Communication Association 1:1, pages 37-53.
Read now
RobertE. Nofsinger$suffix/text()$suffix/text(). (1977) A peek at conversational analysis. Communication Quarterly 25:3, pages 12-20.
Read now
JesseG. Delia. (1977) Constructivism and the study of human communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech 63:1, pages 66-83.
Read now
JesseG. Delia. (1977) Alternative perspectives for the study of human communication: Critique and response. Communication Quarterly 25:1, pages 46-62.
Read now
RobertL. Scott. (1976) On viewing rhetoric as epistemic: Ten years later. Central States Speech Journal 27:4, pages 258-266.
Read now
ThomasS. Frentz & ThomasB. Farrell. (1976) Language‐action: A paradigm for communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech 62:4, pages 333-349.
Read now
ThomasB. Farrell. (1976) Knowledge, consensus, and rhetorical theory. Quarterly Journal of Speech 62:1, pages 1-14.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (15)

Mike Allen. (2019) Understanding the Practice, Application, and Limitations of Meta-Analysis. American Behavioral Scientist 64:1, pages 74-96.
Crossref
Thomas R. Lindlof. 2008. The International Encyclopedia of Communication. The International Encyclopedia of Communication.
L.Ripley Smith. (1999) Intercultural network theory: a cross-paradigmatic approach to acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 23:4, pages 629-658.
Crossref
Charles Pavitt. (1999) The Third Way: Scientific Realism and Communication Theory. Communication Theory 9:2, pages 162-188.
Crossref
Charles Pavitt. (1999) The Third Way: Scientific Realism and Communication Theory. Communication Theory 9:2, pages 162-188.
Crossref
Rick Clifton Moore. (1999) Where Epistemology Meets Ecology: Can Environmental News Reporting Survive Postmodernism?. Mass Communication <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Society 2:1&2, pages 3-25.
Crossref
Sue DeWine, Anne Maydan Nicotera & Doug Parry. (2016) Argumentativeness and Aggressiveness. Management Communication Quarterly 4:3, pages 386-411.
Crossref
Gloria P. ThomasGary F. Soldow. (2018) A Rules-Based Approach to Competitive Interaction. Journal of Marketing 52:2, pages 63-74.
Crossref
KAREN TRACY. (1983) THE ISSUE-EVENT DISTINCTION: A RULE OF CONVERSATION AND ITS SCOPE CONDITION. Human Communication Research 9:4, pages 320-334.
Crossref
DAVID R. SEIBOLD. 1980. Message–Attitude–Behavior Relationship. Message–Attitude–Behavior Relationship 195 244 .
DANIEL J. O'KEEFE. 1980. Message–Attitude–Behavior Relationship. Message–Attitude–Behavior Relationship 117 148 .
. (1979) Books. Journal of Communication 29:4, pages 192-226.
Crossref
TIMOTHY G. PLAX, EDWARD M. BODAKEN & KENNETH K. SERENO. (1977) ANXIETY AROUSING MESSAGES AND EGO-INVOLVEMENT AS DETERMINANTS OF COMMUNICATIVE PREDISPOSITIONS. Human Communication Research 3:4, pages 335-343.
Crossref
ROBERT L. SCOTT. (1977) COMMUNICATION AS AN INTENTIONAL, SOCIAL SYSTEM. Human Communication Research 3:3, pages 258-268.
Crossref
DAVID L. SWANSON. (1977) THE USES AND MISUSES OF USES AND GRATIFICATIONS. Human Communication Research 3:3, pages 214-221.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.