1,716
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Dancing with the devil: formative peer assessment and academic performance

&
Pages 646-659 | Published online: 17 Jun 2013

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (14)

Ying Cui, Christian D. Schunn & Xiaosong Gai. (2022) Peer feedback and teacher feedback: a comparative study of revision effectiveness in writing instruction for EFL learners. Higher Education Research & Development 41:6, pages 1838-1854.
Read now
David Nicol & Suzanne McCallum. (2022) Making internal feedback explicit: exploiting the multiple comparisons that occur during peer review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47:3, pages 424-443.
Read now
Hannah Dickson, Joel Harvey & Nigel Blackwood. (2019) Feedback, feedforward: evaluating the effectiveness of an oral peer review exercise amongst postgraduate students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44:5, pages 692-704.
Read now
Georgeta Ion, Angelina Sánchez Martí & Ingrid Agud Morell. (2019) Giving or receiving feedback: which is more beneficial to students’ learning?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44:1, pages 124-138.
Read now
Indira N. Z. Day, Floris M. van Blankenstein, Michiel Westenberg & Wilfried Admiraal. (2018) A review of the characteristics of intermediate assessment and their relationship with student grades. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43:6, pages 908-929.
Read now
Maya Usher & Miri Barak. (2018) Peer assessment in a project-based engineering course: comparing between on-campus and online learning environments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43:5, pages 745-759.
Read now
William Guariento, Anna Rolinska & Nazmi Al-Masri. (2018) Constructive content-based feedback in EAP contexts: lessons from a cross-border engineering-related pre-sessional course. Higher Education Research & Development 37:3, pages 514-532.
Read now
Chie Adachi, Joanna Tai & Phillip Dawson. (2018) A framework for designing, implementing, communicating and researching peer assessment. Higher Education Research & Development 37:3, pages 453-467.
Read now
Tina Bering Keiding & Ane Qvortrup. (2018) Higher education journals as didactic frameworks. Higher Education Research & Development 37:1, pages 72-87.
Read now
Bart Huisman, Nadira Saab, Jan van Driel & Paul van den Broek. (2017) Peer feedback on college students’ writing: exploring the relation between students’ ability match, feedback quality and essay performance. Higher Education Research & Development 36:7, pages 1433-1447.
Read now
Hui-Chun Chu, Jun-Ming Chen & Chieh-Lun Tsai. (2017) Effects of an online formative peer-tutoring approach on students’ learning behaviors, performance and cognitive load in mathematics. Interactive Learning Environments 25:2, pages 203-219.
Read now
Robert Nelson & Phillip Dawson. (2017) Competition, education and assessment: connecting history with recent scholarship. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42:2, pages 304-315.
Read now
Mohammad Salehi & Zahra Sayyar Masoule. (2017) An investigation of the reliability and validity of peer, self-, and teacher assessment. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 35:1, pages 1-15.
Read now
Genevieve Simpson & Julian Clifton. (2016) Assessing postgraduate student perceptions and measures of learning in a peer review feedback process. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 41:4, pages 501-514.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (9)

Hui-Tzu Min & Yi-Min Chiu. (2021) The Relative Effects of Giving Versus Receiving Comments on Students’ Revision in an EFL Writing Class「給予」與「接收」同儕評論對以英語為外語之學生寫作修改效益之比較. English Teaching & Learning 46:4, pages 293-320.
Crossref
Eleni Meletiadou. (2022) Learners' Perceptions of Peer Assessment. International Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development 5:1, pages 1-14.
Crossref
Yi Zhang, Zhongling Pi, Louqi Chen, Xinjing Zhang & Jiumin Yang. (2021) Online peer assessment improves learners’ creativity:not only learners’ roles as an assessor or assessee, but also their behavioral sequence matter. Thinking Skills and Creativity 42, pages 100950.
Crossref
Indira N. Z. Day, Wilfried Admiraal & Nadira Saab. 2021. Student Retention and Success in Higher Education. Student Retention and Success in Higher Education 217 249 .
Buthayna Eilouti. (2020) Reinventing the wheel: A tool for design quality evaluation in architecture. Frontiers of Architectural Research 9:1, pages 148-168.
Crossref
Renée M. Filius, Renske A.M. Kleijn, Sabine G. Uijl, Frans J. Prins, Harold V.M. Rijen & Diederick E. Grobbee. (2019) Audio peer feedback to promote deep learning in online education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 35:5, pages 607-619.
Crossref
Jennie Sivenbring. (2017) Kamratrespons som formativ bedömning för lärande. Högre utbildning 7:1.
Crossref
Yasemin Demiraslan Çevik. (2015) Assessor or assessee? Investigating the differential effects of online peer assessment roles in the development of students’ problem-solving skills. Computers in Human Behavior 52, pages 250-258.
Crossref
Laurent Moccozet & Camille Tardy. (2015) An assessment for learning framework with peer assessment of group works. An assessment for learning framework with peer assessment of group works.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.