Citations (51)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (14)
Sonia M. R. Vasconcelos, Hatisaburo Masuda, Martha Sorenson, Francisco Prosdocimi, Marisa Palácios, Edson Watanabe, José Carlos Pinto, José Roberto Lapa e Silva, Adalberto Vieyra, André Pinto, Jesús Mena-Chalco, Mauricio Sant’Ana & Miguel Roig. (2023) Perceptions of plagiarism among PhDs across the sciences, engineering, humanities, and arts: Results from a national survey in Brazil. Accountability in Research 30:7, pages 407-438.
Read now
Read now
Teresa Diaz Gonçalves. (2023) On the Inconsistency between Practice and Reporting in Science: The Genesis of Scientific Articles. Social Epistemology 37:5, pages 684-697.
Read now
Read now
Rea Roje, Vicko Tomić, Ivan Buljan & Ana Marušić. (2023) Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts. Accountability in Research 30:6, pages 293-330.
Read now
Read now
B. Siegerink, L.A. Pet, F.R. Rosendaal & M.Y.H.G. Erkens. (2023) The argument for adopting a jurisprudence platform for scientific misconduct. Accountability in Research 0:0, pages 1-12.
Read now
Read now
Chien Chou, In Jae Lee & Jun Fudano. (2023) The present situation of and challenges in research ethics and integrity promotion: Experiences in East Asia. Accountability in Research 0:0, pages 1-24.
Read now
Read now
Michael D. Reisig, Michaela Flippin & Kristy Holtfreter. (2022) Toward the development of a perceived IRB violation scale. Accountability in Research 29:5, pages 309-323.
Read now
Read now
Rea Roje, Andrea Reyes Elizondo, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Ivan Buljan & Ana Marušić. (2022) Factors influencing the promotion and implementation of research integrity in research performing and research funding organizations: A scoping review. Accountability in Research 0:0, pages 1-39.
Read now
Read now
Melody Herr. (2019) Responding to Research Misconduct: A Primer for LIS Professionals. Science & Technology Libraries 38:3, pages 272-287.
Read now
Read now
David B. Resnik. (2019) Is it time to revise the definition of research misconduct?. Accountability in Research 26:2, pages 123-137.
Read now
Read now
Dan Li & Gustaaf Cornelis. (2018) How do researchers perceive research misbehaviors? A transcultural case study of Chinese and Flemish researchers. Accountability in Research 25:6, pages 350-369.
Read now
Read now
David B. Resnik, Kevin C. Elliott, Patricia A. Soranno & Elise M. Smith. (2017) Data-Intensive Science and Research Integrity. Accountability in Research 24:6, pages 344-358.
Read now
Read now
Viroj Wiwanitkit. (2016) Research Misconduct Policies: Rule or Person as a Model?. Accountability in Research 23:4, pages 254-255.
Read now
Read now
Ying Sun & Rui Tian. (2016) Dishonest Academic Conduct: From the Perspective of the Utility Function. Accountability in Research 23:3, pages 139-162.
Read now
Read now
David B. Resnik, Lisa M. Rasmussen & Grace E. Kissling. (2015) An International Study of Research Misconduct Policies. Accountability in Research 22:5, pages 249-266.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (37)
Rahma Menshawey, Esraa Menshawey & Bilal A. Mahamud. (2023) A Mummers Farce – Retractions of Medical Papers Conducted in Egyptian Institutions. Journal of Academic Ethics.
Crossref
Crossref
Nicole Shu Ling Yeo-Teh & Bor Luen Tang. (2023) Post-publication Peer Review with an Intention to Uncover Data/Result Irregularities and Potential Research Misconduct in Scientific Research: Vigilantism or Volunteerism?. Science and Engineering Ethics 29:4.
Crossref
Crossref
Shenghui Li, Wenyan Xu & Jingqi Yin. (2023) Cross-cultural differences in retracted publications of male and female from a global perspective. Scientometrics 128:7, pages 3805-3826.
Crossref
Crossref
Baoguo Xie, Xinrou Zhang, Xueyuan Gao & Xiaoxue Zhou. (2023) Are Callings Always Ethically Good? Why and When Occupational Calling Inhibits Unethical Decision-Making Among Researchers. Journal of Business Ethics.
Crossref
Crossref
Matthias Fink, Johannes Gartner, Rainer Harms & Isabella Hatak. (2022) Ethical Orientation and Research Misconduct Among Business Researchers Under the Condition of Autonomy and Competition. Journal of Business Ethics 183:2, pages 619-636.
Crossref
Crossref
David B. Resnik. 2023. Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Volume II. Handbook of Bioethical Decisions. Volume II
25
36
.
Katrin Frisch, Felix Hagenström & Nele Reeg. 2022. Wissenschaftliche Fairness. Wissenschaftliche Fairness.
Taraswi Banerjee, Kathy Partin & David B. Resnik. (2022) Authorship Issues When Articles are Retracted Due to Research Misconduct and Then Resubmitted. Science and Engineering Ethics 28:4.
Crossref
Crossref
Samuel Asiedu Owusu, Grace Addison, Barbara Redman, Lisa Kearns, Paul Amuna & Amos Laar. (2021) Assessment of the Operational Characteristics of Research Ethics Committees in Ghana. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 17:1-2, pages 114-128.
Crossref
Crossref
Rana Abu Farha, Tareq Mukattash & Wael Al-Delaimy. (2020) Predictors of Plagiarism Research Misconduct: A Study of Postgraduate Pharmacy Students in Jordan. Journal of Academic Ethics 19:4, pages 541-553.
Crossref
Crossref
Driss El Kadiri Boutchich. (2021) Impact of ethics on research productivity in higher education. International Journal of Ethics Education 6:2, pages 253-271.
Crossref
Crossref
Kirtisudha Mishra & Aashima Dabas. (2021) Publication Ethics. Indian Pediatrics 58:8, pages 781-785.
Crossref
Crossref
George Sangster & Jolanda A. Luksenburg. (2021) Scientific data laundering: Chimeric mitogenomes of a sparrowhawk and a nightjar covered-up by forged phylogenies. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 96, pages 104263.
Crossref
Crossref
Abdulghani Muthanna & Ahmed Alduais. (2020) A Thematic Review on Research Integrity and Research Supervision: Relationships, Crises and Critical Messages. Journal of Academic Ethics 19:1, pages 95-113.
Crossref
Crossref
Samuel V. Bruton, Mitch Brown & Donald F. Sacco. (2019) Ethical Consistency and Experience: An Attempt to Influence Researcher Attitudes Toward Questionable Research Practices Through Reading Prompts. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 15:3, pages 216-226.
Crossref
Crossref
Hugh Desmond. (2019) Professionalism in Science: Competence, Autonomy, and Service. Science and Engineering Ethics 26:3, pages 1287-1313.
Crossref
Crossref
Alex Mabou Tagne, Niccolò Cassina, Alessia Furgiuele, Elisa Storelli, Marco Cosentino & Franca Marino. (2020) Perceptions and Attitudes about Research Integrity and Misconduct: a Survey among Young Biomedical Researchers in Italy. Journal of Academic Ethics 18:2, pages 193-205.
Crossref
Crossref
AdedoyinAdekunle Adesanya. (2020) A proposed research misconduct policy for universities and postgraduate colleges in developing countries. Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal 27:3, pages 250.
Crossref
Crossref
Loreta Tauginienė, Inga Gaižauskaitė, Salim Razi, Irene Glendinning, Shivadas Sivasubramaniam, Franca Marino, Marco Cosentino, Alla Anohina-Naumeca & Julius Kravjar. (2019) Enhancing the Taxonomies Relating to Academic Integrity and Misconduct. Journal of Academic Ethics 17:4, pages 345-361.
Crossref
Crossref
William Bülow & Gert Helgesson. (2018) Criminalization of scientific misconduct. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 22:2, pages 245-252.
Crossref
Crossref
George C. Banks, James G. Field, Frederick L. Oswald, Ernest H. O’Boyle, Ronald S. Landis, Deborah E. Rupp & Steven G. Rogelberg. (2018) Answers to 18 Questions About Open Science Practices. Journal of Business and Psychology 34:3, pages 257-270.
Crossref
Crossref
Christopher A Mebane, John P Sumpter, Anne Fairbrother, Thomas P Augspurger, Timothy J Canfield, William L Goodfellow, Patrick D Guiney, Anne LeHuray, Lorraine Maltby, David B Mayfield, Michael J McLaughlin, Lisa S Ortego, Tamar Schlekat, Richard P Scroggins & Tim A Verslycke. (2019) Scientific integrity issues in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: Improving research reproducibility, credibility, and transparency. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 15:3, pages 320-344.
Crossref
Crossref
David B. Resnik. (2019) Citizen Scientists as Human Subjects: Ethical Issues. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 4:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Johannes Stricker & Armin Günther. (2019) Scientific Misconduct in Psychology. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 227:1, pages 53-63.
Crossref
Crossref
Christa Van Zyl, Francis Kombe, Patrick Okonta & Theresa Rossouw. 2019. Social Science Research Ethics in Africa. Social Science Research Ethics in Africa
143
164
.
Claudia S. Plottel, Lois Mannon, Frederick G. More, Stuart D. Katz & Judith S. Hochman. (2019) Design, implementation, and evaluation of PINDAR, a novel short program on GCP for academic medical center principal investigators conducting human subject research. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 2:6, pages 343-349.
Crossref
Crossref
GabrielUche Pascal Iloh, AgwuNkwa Amadi, MiracleErinma Chukwuonye & EzinneUchamma Godswill-Uko. (2018) Plagiarism in a resource-constrained context: A cross-sectional study of post-graduate medical college trainees and fellows in a tertiary health institution in South East Nigeria. Archives of Medicine and Health Sciences 6:2, pages 270.
Crossref
Crossref
David B. ResnikDavid B. Resnik. 2018. The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects. The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects
149
163
.
David B. ResnikDavid B. Resnik. 2018. The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects. The Ethics of Research with Human Subjects
235
256
.
Barbara K. Redman. (2016) Commentary: Legacy of the Commission on Research Integrity. Science and Engineering Ethics 23:2, pages 555-563.
Crossref
Crossref
Nick Butler, Helen Delaney & Sverre Spoelstra. (2017) The Gray Zone: Questionable Research Practices in the Business School. Academy of Management Learning & Education 16:1, pages 94-109.
Crossref
Crossref
HamzaH Khan, ZarakH Khan, Bilal Zafar & MuhammadB Malik. (2017) Plagiarism: a global dilemma. Benha Medical Journal 34:1, pages 58.
Crossref
Crossref
Liisa Räsänen & Erja Moore. (2016) Critical evaluation of the guidelines of the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity and of their application. Research Integrity and Peer Review 1:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Samuel J. Leistedt & Paul Linkowski. (2016) Fraud, individuals, and networks: A biopsychosocial model of scientific frauds. Science & Justice 56:2, pages 109-112.
Crossref
Crossref
David B. Resnik. 2016. Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics
2606
2615
.
Bjørn Hofmann, Gert Helgesson, Niklas Juth & Søren Holm. (2015) Scientific Dishonesty. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 10:4, pages 380-388.
Crossref
Crossref
David B. Resnik. 2017. Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics
1
11
.