Citations (23)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (6)
Rea Roje, Vicko Tomić, Ivan Buljan & Ana Marušić. (2023) Development and implementation of research integrity guidance documents: Explorative interviews with research integrity experts. Accountability in Research 30:6, pages 293-330.
Read now
Read now
Lisa M. Rasmussen. (2023) Why and how to incorporate issues of race/ethnicity and gender in research integrity education. Accountability in Research 0:0, pages 1-24.
Read now
Read now
Kuei-Chiu Chen & Laurel L. Hester. (2023) A dramatized method for teaching undergraduate students responsible research conduct. Accountability in Research 30:3, pages 176-198.
Read now
Read now
N. Sira, M. Decker, F. Kordtomeikel, A. Winkens, C. Leicht-Scholten & D. Groß. (2022) Chore or desire? Students’ response to online lessons in scientific integrity. Accountability in Research 0:0, pages 1-18.
Read now
Read now
Vicko Tomić, Ivan Buljan & Ana Marušić. (2022) Development of consensus on essential virtues for ethics and research integrity training using a modified Delphi approach. Accountability in Research 0:0, pages 1-24.
Read now
Read now
Rea Roje, Andrea Reyes Elizondo, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Ivan Buljan & Ana Marušić. (2022) Factors influencing the promotion and implementation of research integrity in research performing and research funding organizations: A scoping review. Accountability in Research 0:0, pages 1-39.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (17)
Amy Koerber, Jesse C. Starkey, Karin Ardon-Dryer, R. Glenn Cummins, Lyombe Eko & Kerk F. KeeR. Glenn Cummins, Amy Koerber, Jesse C. Starkey, Karin Ardon-Dryer, Lyombe Eko & Kerk F. Kee. 2023. The Predatory Paradox. The Predatory Paradox
201
236
.
V.T Nguyen, M. K. Sharp, C. Superchi, G. Baron, K. Glonti, D. Blanco, M. Olsen, T.T Vo Tat, C. Olarte Parra, A. Névéol, D. Hren, P. Ravaud & I. Boutron. (2023) Biomedical doctoral students’ research practices when facing dilemmas: two vignette-based randomized control trials. Scientific Reports 13:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Daniel Pizzolato & Kris Dierickx. (2023) A multi-dimensional learning strategy to foster research integrity. Research Ethics.
Crossref
Crossref
Daniel Pizzolato & Kris Dierickx. (2022) Research Integrity Supervision Practices and Institutional Support: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Academic Ethics 21:3, pages 427-448.
Crossref
Crossref
Daniel Pizzolato & Kris Dierickx. (2023) The Mentor’s Role in Fostering Research Integrity Standards Among New Generations of Researchers: A Review of Empirical Studies. Science and Engineering Ethics 29:3.
Crossref
Crossref
Natalie Evans, Armin Schmolmueller, Margreet Stolper, Giulia Inguaggiato, Astrid Hooghiemstra, Ruzica Tokalic, Daniel Pizzolato, Nicole Foeger, Ana Marušić, Marc van Hoof, Dirk Lanzerath, Bert Molewijk, Kris Dierickx & Guy Widdershoven on. (2023)
VIRT
2
UE: A European train-the-trainer programme for teaching research integrity
. Research Ethics, pages 174701612311612.
Crossref
Crossref
Steven De Peuter & Stijn Conix. (2023) Fostering a research integrity culture: Actionable advice for institutions. Science and Public Policy 50:1, pages 133-145.
Crossref
Crossref
Elisa Garcia-Garcia & Xavier Eekhout. 2023. Ethics and Responsible Research and Innovation in Practice. Ethics and Responsible Research and Innovation in Practice
137
154
.
Ana Marušić. 2023. Ethics and Responsible Research and Innovation in Practice. Ethics and Responsible Research and Innovation in Practice
173
187
.
Mona F. Giersberg & Franck L. B. Meijboom. (2022) Caught on Camera: On the Need of Responsible Use of Video Observation for Animal Behavior and Welfare Research. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 9.
Crossref
Crossref
Krishma Labib, Natalie Evans, Rea Roje, Panagiotis Kavouras, Andrea Reyes Elizondo, Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner, Ivan Buljan, Tine Ravn, Guy Widdershoven, Lex Bouter, Costas Charitidis, Mads P Sørensen & Joeri Tijdink. (2022) Education and training policies for research integrity: Insights from a focus group study. Science and Public Policy 49:2, pages 246-266.
Crossref
Crossref
Ulrike Felt & Florentine Frantz. (2022) RESPONSE_ABILITY A Card-Based Engagement Method to Support Researchers’ Ability to Respond to Integrity Issues. Science and Engineering Ethics 28:2.
Crossref
Crossref
Marc van Hoof, Natalie Evans, Giulia Inguaggiato, Ana Marušić, Bert Gordijn, Kris Dierickx, David van Zeggeren, Harald Dunnik, Alexander Gesinn, Lex Bouter & Guy Widdershoven. (2023) The Embassy of Good Science – a community driven initiative to promote ethics and integrity in research. Open Research Europe 2, pages 27.
Crossref
Crossref
Fenneke Blom, Susan Maria Johanna Berentsen & Rob van der Sande. (2022) How to set the agenda for training in responsible conduct of research using the target audience as a narrative guide. FACETS 7, pages 1258-1275.
Crossref
Crossref
Daniel Pizzolato & Kris Dierickx. (2021) Stakeholders' perspectives on research integrity training practices: a qualitative study. BMC Medical Ethics 22:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Shila Abdi, Steffen Fieuws, Benoit Nemery & Kris Dierickx. (2021) Do we achieve anything by teaching research integrity to starting PhD students?. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Marcel A. G. van der Heyden. (2021) The 1-h fraud detection challenge. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology 394:8, pages 1633-1640.
Crossref
Crossref