Kason Ka Ching Cheung, Jack K. H. Pun & Xuehua Fu. (2023) Development and Validation of a Reading in Science Holistic Assessment (RISHA): a Rasch Measurement Study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.
Crossref
Rola Khishfe. (2022) Improving Students’ Conceptions of Nature of Science: A Review of the Literature. Science & Education 32:6, pages 1887-1931.
Crossref
Antonio García-Carmona. (2022) Improving Preservice Primary Teachers’ Understanding of the Nature of Methods of Science Through Reflective Reading of News Articles. Science & Education 32:6, pages 1847-1867.
Crossref
Peter Nagy, Areej Mawasi, Ed Finn & Ruth Wylie. (2023) The Chimera, the Robot Artist, and the Cardboard Hand. Science & Education.
Crossref
Ha My Anna Mang, Hye-Eun Chu, Sonya N. Martin & Chan-Jong Kim. (2023) Developing an Evaluation Rubric for Planning and Assessing SSI-Based STEAM Programs in Science Classrooms. Research in Science Education.
Crossref
Kimberly Carroll Steward, David Gosselin, Mark Chandler & Cory T. Forbes. (2023) Student Outcomes of Teaching About Socio-scientific Issues in Secondary Science Classrooms: Applications of EzGCM. Journal of Science Education and Technology.
Crossref
Shuo Ban & Siti Nur Diyana Mahmud. (2023) Research and Trends in Socio-Scientific Issues Education: A Content Analysis of Journal Publications from 2004 to 2022. Sustainability 15:15, pages 11841.
Crossref
Diego Corrochano Fernández, Alejandro Gómez-Gonçalves & Beatriz Sánchez-Barbero. (2023) Effectiveness of Interdisciplinary Instruction in Pre-service Teacher Education for Sustainability: Issues From the Big History and the Study of Climate Change. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability 25:1, pages 5-21.
Crossref
Lucas Menke, Sarah Voss, Jerrid Kruse & Kinsey Zacharski. (2022) Investigating the Knowledge Domains Science Teachers Use When Considering a Socioscientific Issue. Research in Science Education 53:3, pages 477-492.
Crossref
Elif Ece Adal & Jale Cakiroglu. (2022) Investigation of Preservice Science Teachers’ Nature of Science Understanding and Decision Making on Socioscientific Issue through the Fractal Model. Science & Education 32:2, pages 529-565.
Crossref
Lidia Casado-Ledesma, Isabel Cuevas & Elena Martín. (2021) Learning science through argumentative synthesis writing and deliberative dialogues: a comprehensive and effective methodology in secondary education. Reading and Writing 36:4, pages 965-996.
Crossref
Rola Khishfe. (2022) Relationship Between Nature of Science and Argumentation: a Follow-Up Study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 21:4, pages 1081-1102.
Crossref
Banu Avsar Erumit & Tugba Yuksel. (2022) Developing and Using Physical Dynamic Models On Socioscientific Issues to Present Nature Of Science Ideas. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 21:4, pages 1031-1056.
Crossref
Diego Posada. 2023. SDGs in the Americas and Caribbean Region. SDGs in the Americas and Caribbean Region
595
622
.
Eren ZORLU & Seyit ATEŞ. (2022) Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Karar Verme Biçimlerinin ve İnformal Muhakeme Becerilerinin İncelenmesiExamining the Decision Making Styles and Informal Reasoning Skills of Secondary School Students. Eğitim ve Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi 9:2, pages 352-378.
Crossref
Ayberk BOSTAN SARIOĞLAN & Handan ÜREK. (2022) Öğretmen Adaylarının Pandemi Sürecinde Ortaya Çıkan Kavramlarla İlgili Argümanları ile Bilimin Doğasına Yönelik İnanışlarının ve Eleştirel Düşünme Standartlarının İncelenmesi. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 13:Özel Sayı 1, pages 225-250.
Crossref
Molly Trendell Nation & Allan Feldman. (2022) Climate Change and Political Controversy in the Science Classroom. Science & Education 31:6, pages 1567-1583.
Crossref
Achmad Rante, Eli Rohaeti & Sri Wening. (2022) Development of Attitude Assessment Instruments Towards Socio-Scientific Issues in Chemistry Learning. European Journal of Educational Research 11:4, pages 1947-1958.
Crossref
Jean Bosco Bugingo, Lakhan Lal Yadav, Innocent Sebasaza Mugisha & K. K. Mashood. (2022) Improving Teachers’ and Students’ Views on Nature of Science Through Active Instructional Approaches: a Review of the Literature. Science & Education.
Crossref
Rainer Bromme. (2022) Informiertes Vertrauen in Wissenschaft: Lehren aus der COVID-19 Pandemie für das Verständnis naturwissenschaftlicher Grundbildung (scientific literacy)Informed trust in science: lessons from the COVID 19 pandemic for the conceptualization of science literacy. Unterrichtswissenschaft 50:3, pages 331-345.
Crossref
Savannah R. Graham & Hayat Hokayem. (2022) Pre-Service Teachers Nature of Science Views After Engaging with COVID-19 as a Socioscientific Issue. Eurasian Journal of Science and Environmental Education 2:2, pages 29-34.
Crossref
Hicran ÖZKUL. (2022) Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının sosyobilimsel konulara yönelik tutum ve görüşlerinin incelenmesiExamination of attitudes and opinions of primary school teacher candidates towards socioscientific issues. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 25:47, pages 21-39.
Crossref
Antonio García-Carmona. (2021) Spanish Science Teacher Educators’ Preparation, Experiences, and Views About Nature of Science in Science Education. Science & Education 31:3, pages 685-711.
Crossref
Jiyeong Mun, Mijung Kim & Sung-Won Kim. (2022) How Seventh-Grade Students Experience the Complexity of Socioscientific Issues Through Decision Making on the Autonomous Vehicle Issue. Asia-Pacific Science Education 8:1, pages 43-71.
Crossref
Jessica Shuk Ching Leung. (2020) A Practice-Based Approach to Learning Nature of Science through Socioscientific Issues. Research in Science Education 52:1, pages 259-285.
Crossref
Jerrid Kruse, Isaiah Kent-Schneider, Sarah Voss, Kinsey Zacharski & Molly Rockefeller. (2020) Investigating the Effect of NOS Question Type on Students’ NOS Responses. Research in Science Education 52:1, pages 61-78.
Crossref
Hongcui Du & Alexandra List. (2022) Reasoning about text-based evidence. Contemporary Educational Psychology 68, pages 102038.
Crossref
Diego Posada. 2022. SDGs in the Americas and Caribbean Region. SDGs in the Americas and Caribbean Region
1
28
.
Oktay Kızkapan & Oğuzhan Nacaroğlu. (2021) Gifted Students' Views and Argument Structures on a Socio-Scientific Issue: Cloning. Acta Didactica Napocensia 14:2, pages 376-391.
Crossref
Antonio García-Carmona. (2021) Learning about the nature of science through the critical and reflective reading of news on the COVID-19 pandemic. Cultural Studies of Science Education 16:4, pages 1015-1028.
Crossref
Jerrid Kruse, Isaiah Kent-Schneider, Sarah Voss, Kinsey Zacharski & Molly Rockefeller. (2021) Investigating Student Nature of Science Views as Reflections of Authentic Science. Science & Education 30:5, pages 1211-1231.
Crossref
Poliana Maia, Rosária Justi & Monique Santos. (2021) Aspects About Science in the Context of Production and Communication of Knowledge of COVID-19. Science & Education 30:5, pages 1075-1098.
Crossref
Muhammed SALMAN & Turan GÜVEN. (2021) The Evolution Usefulness Scale: Development, Reliability, and ValidityEvrim Yararlılık Ölçeği : Geliştirme, Güvenirlilik ve Geçerlilik Çalışmaları. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi 29:3, pages 778-788.
Crossref
Frank Cabrera. (2021) Second philosophy and testimonial reliability: Philosophy of science for STEM students. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11:3.
Crossref
Eija Yli-Panula, Eero Laakkonen & Marja Vauras. (2021) High-School Students’ Topic-Specific Epistemic Beliefs about Climate Change: An Assessment-Related Study. Education Sciences 11:8, pages 440.
Crossref
David Woitkowski, Leonie Rochell & Anna B. Bauer. (2021) German university students’ views of nature of science in the introductory phase. Physical Review Physics Education Research 17:1.
Crossref
Premnadh M. Kurup, Ralph Levinson & Xia Li. (2021) Informed-Decision Regarding Global Warming and Climate Change Among High School Students in the United Kingdom. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 21:1, pages 166-185.
Crossref
Gillian Roehrig, Khomson Keratithamkul & Benny Mart R. Hiwatig. 2021. Socioscientific Issues-Based Instruction for Scientific Literacy Development. Socioscientific Issues-Based Instruction for Scientific Literacy Development
256
278
.
Dilek Karisan & Umran Betul Cebesoy. 2021. Socioscientific Issues-Based Instruction for Scientific Literacy Development. Socioscientific Issues-Based Instruction for Scientific Literacy Development
223
254
.
Hyunok Lee & Hyunju Lee. 2021. Socioscientific Issues-Based Instruction for Scientific Literacy Development. Socioscientific Issues-Based Instruction for Scientific Literacy Development
162
190
.
Elly Sri Wahyuni, Sri Rahayu & Yahmin. The effect of socioscientific issues embedded in explanation-driven inquiry (EDI) learning model on high school students’ conceptual understanding of reaction rate. The effect of socioscientific issues embedded in explanation-driven inquiry (EDI) learning model on high school students’ conceptual understanding of reaction rate.
Merve KOCAGÜL SAĞLAM & Gül ÜNAL ÇOBAN. (2020) Öğrencilerde Bilimsel Akıl Yürütme Becerilerini Geliştirme Konusunda Fen Bilimleri Öğretmenlerinin İhtiyaçlarının Belirlenmesi. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, pages 1-27.
Crossref
Rebecca L. Hite. (2020) A content analysis of pre-college lesson plans on human evolution. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research 2:1.
Crossref
Núria Roca & Maite Garcia-Valles. (2020) Trainee Teacher Experience in Geoscience Education: Can We Do Better?. Geoheritage 12:4.
Crossref
Bülent AYDOĞDU, Tuğba SELANİK AY & Nil DUBAN. (2020) Öğretmen Adayları Tarafından Tasarlanan Disiplinlerarası Ders Planlarında Sosyo-Bilimsel Konular ve Girişimcilik: Bir Karma Yöntem Araştırması. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education.
Crossref
Esra Capkinoglu, Serkan Yilmaz & Gulsen Leblebicioglu. (2019) Quality of argumentation by seventh‐graders in local socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 57:6, pages 827-855.
Crossref
Zeynep ÇEPNİ & Yılmaz GEÇİT. (2020) SOSYAL BİLGİLER ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ SOSYOBİLİMSEL KONULARA YÖNELİK TUTUM VE GÖRÜŞLERİSOCIAL STUDIES TEACHER CANDIDATES' ATTITUDES AND VIEWS REGARDING SOCIO-SCIENTIFIC ISSUES. lnternational Journal of Geography and Geography Education:42, pages 133-154.
Crossref
Demet ŞAHİN KALYON & Mehmet Fatih TAŞAR. (2020) DÖRDÜNCÜ VE BEŞİNCİ SINIF ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN ARGÜMAN YAPILARI. Avrasya Uluslararası Araştırmalar Dergisi 8:22, pages 39-71.
Crossref
Kason Ka Ching Cheung. (2020) Exploring the Inclusion of Nature of Science in Biology Curriculum and High-Stakes Assessments in Hong Kong. Science & Education 29:3, pages 491-512.
Crossref
Hsin-Yi Chang, Jyh-Chong Liang & Chin-Chung Tsai. (2020) Students’ Context-Specific Epistemic Justifications, Prior Knowledge, Engagement, and Socioscientific Reasoning in a Mobile Augmented Reality Learning Environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology 29:3, pages 399-408.
Crossref
Hyunok Lee, Hyunju Lee & Dana L. Zeidler. (2019) Examining tensions in the socioscientific issues classroom: Students' border crossings into a new culture of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 57:5, pages 672-694.
Crossref
J H Nunaki, S I R Siagian, E Nusantari, N Y Kandowangko & I Damopolii. (2020) Fostering students’ process skills through inquiry-based science learning implementation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1521:4, pages 042030.
Crossref
Shuaicheng Tong, Sharon L. Karackattu & Matthew J. Traum. (2020) Deflategate: Classroom Thermophysics Investigation via Simultaneous Pressure and Temperature Measurement Inside a Football. Deflategate: Classroom Thermophysics Investigation via Simultaneous Pressure and Temperature Measurement Inside a Football.
Johanna Rosalí Reyes. 2020. Global Approaches to Sustainability Through Learning and Education. Global Approaches to Sustainability Through Learning and Education
154
170
.
William F. McComas, Michael P. Clough & Noushin Nouri. 2020. Nature of Science in Science Instruction. Nature of Science in Science Instruction
67
111
.
Deborah Hanuscin, Mojtaba Khajeloo & Benjamin C. Herman. 2020. Nature of Science in Science Instruction. Nature of Science in Science Instruction
409
423
.
Michael P. Clough, Benjamin C. Herman & Joanne K. Olson. 2020. Nature of Science in Science Instruction. Nature of Science in Science Instruction
239
251
.
Jessica S. C. Leung, Ka Lok Wong & Kennedy K. H. Chan. 2020. Science Teacher Education for Responsible Citizenship. Science Teacher Education for Responsible Citizenship
21
39
.
Ashley R Alred & Jenny Marie Dauer. (2019) Understanding Factors related to Undergraduate Student Decision-making about a Complex Socio-scientific Issue: Mountain Lion Management. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 16:2.
Crossref
Siripun Siribunnam, Radka Bednarova & Prasart Nuangchalerm. (2019) The effect of SSI overlap STEM Education on Secondary Students’ Socio-scientific decision making. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1340:1, pages 012006.
Crossref
Matthew A. Cannady, Paulette Vincent-Ruz, Joo Man Chung & Christian D. Schunn. (2019) Scientific sensemaking supports science content learning across disciplines and instructional contexts. Contemporary Educational Psychology 59, pages 101802.
Crossref
Cathy Ellen Mehl, Hui Jin & Kenneth F. Llort. (2019) Student Decision Making in a Scenario-based Investigation of an Ecosystem. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 16:1.
Crossref
Tamara S. Hancock, Patricia J. Friedrichsen, Andrew T. Kinslow & Troy D. Sadler. (2019) Selecting Socio-scientific Issues for Teaching. Science & Education 28:6-7, pages 639-667.
Crossref
Claudia Haagen-Schützenhöfer & Manuela Kopper. (2019) Light pollution – an interesting context for teaching and learning optics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1287:1, pages 012013.
Crossref
Jacob Pleasants, Michael P. Clough, Joanne K. Olson & Glen Miller. (2019) Fundamental Issues Regarding the Nature of Technology. Science & Education 28:3-5, pages 561-597.
Crossref
Norman G. Lederman. (2019) Contextualizing the Relationship Between Nature of Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry. Science & Education 28:3-5, pages 249-267.
Crossref
Ryan Summers & Fouad Abd-El-Khalick. (2019) Examining the Representations of NOS in Educational Resources. Science & Education 28:3-5, pages 269-289.
Crossref
Jordi Domènech-Casal. (2019) Escalas de certidumbre y balanzas de argumentos. Una experiencia de construcción de marcos epistemológicos para el trabajo con Pseudociencias en secundaria. Ápice. Revista de Educación Científica 3:2, pages 37-53.
Crossref
Iris Alkaher & Nurit Carmi. (2019) Is Population Growth an Environmental Problem? Teachers’ Perceptions and Attitudes towards Including It in Their Teaching. Sustainability 11:7, pages 1994.
Crossref
Su-Chi Fang, Ying-Shao Hsu & Shu-Sheng Lin. (2018) Conceptualizing Socioscientific Decision Making from a Review of Research in Science Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 17:3, pages 427-448.
Crossref
José Antonio Pineda-Alfonso & Elisa Navarro-Medina. 2019. Handbook of Research on Education for Participative Citizenship and Global Prosperity. Handbook of Research on Education for Participative Citizenship and Global Prosperity
481
499
.
Nejla Atabey, Mustafa Sami Topçu & Ayşe Çiftçi. (2018) Sosyobilimsel Konu Senaryolarının İncelenmesi: Bir İçerik Analizi Çalışması. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi 9:16, pages 59-59.
Crossref
Mary F. Durham, Jennifer K. Knight, Emily K. Bremers, Jameson D. DeFreece, Alex R. Paine & Brian A. Couch. (2018) Student, instructor, and observer agreement regarding frequencies of scientific teaching practices using the Measurement Instrument for Scientific Teaching-Observable (MISTO). International Journal of STEM Education 5:1.
Crossref
Krystal M. Perkins, Nora Munguia, Rafael Moure-Eraso, Bernd Delakowitz, Biagio F. Giannetti, Gengyuan Liu, Mohammad Nurunnabi, Markus Will & Luis Velazquez. (2018) International perspectives on the pedagogy of climate change. Journal of Cleaner Production 200, pages 1043-1052.
Crossref
Dina Tsybulsky. (2018) Comparing the Impact of Two Science-as-Inquiry Methods on the NOS Understanding of High-School Biology Students. Science & Education 27:7-8, pages 661-683.
Crossref
Mercedes Jaén García, Patricia Esteve Guirao & Isabel Banos-González. (2018) Problemáticas ambientales en las que confluyen ciclos biogeoquímicos. Propuesta para la educación secundaria. Ápice. Revista de Educación Científica 2:1, pages 30-39.
Crossref
Nathalie Panissal. 2018. La démarche d'enquête. La démarche d'enquête
103
113
.
Dilek KARIŞAN, Özgül YILMAZ-TÜZÜN & Dana ZEİDLER. (2018) Pre-service teachers’ reflective judgment skills in the context of socio-scientific issues based inquiry laboratory courseÖğretmen adaylarının sosyo-bilimsel konular temelli fen laboratuvarı dersindeki yansıtıcı muhakeme becerileri. Turkish Journal of Education 7:2, pages 99-116.
Crossref
Keiichi Kobayashi. (2018) Effects of conflicting scientific arguments on belief change: Argument evaluation and expert consensus perception as mediators. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 48:4, pages 177-187.
Crossref
Benjamin C. Herman. (2018) Students' environmental NOS views, compassion, intent, and action: Impact of place-based socioscientific issues instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55:4, pages 600-638.
Crossref
Ann M. Novak & David F. Treagust. (2018) Adjusting claims as new evidence emerges: Do students incorporate new evidence into their scientific explanations?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55:4, pages 526-549.
Crossref
Elie Rached. (2018) Les modes de raisonnement informel des élèves de lycée lors de prises de décision en classe sur une question socio-scientifique1Higher secondary students’ informal reasoning modes during classroom decision-making on a socio-scientific issue. Recherches en éducation:32.
Crossref
Keiichi Kobayashi. (2018) The Impact of Perceived Scientific and Social Consensus on Scientific Beliefs. Science Communication 40:1, pages 63-88.
Crossref
Ali Yiğit Kutluca & Abdullah Aydın. (2017) Argümantasyon ile Bilimin Doğası Arasındaki İlişkiye Yönelik Araştırma Eğilimlerinin İncelenmesi. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi.
Crossref
Mary F. Durham, Jennifer K. Knight & Brian A. Couch. (2017) Measurement Instrument for Scientific Teaching (MIST): A Tool to Measure the Frequencies of Research-Based Teaching Practices in Undergraduate Science Courses. CBE—Life Sciences Education 16:4, pages ar67.
Crossref
Jacquie L. Bay, Mark H. Vickers, Helen A. Mora, Deborah M. Sloboda & Susan M. Morton. (2017) Adolescents as agents of healthful change through scientific literacy development: A school-university partnership program in New Zealand. International Journal of STEM Education 4:1.
Crossref
Nilay Ozturk & Ozgul Yilmaz-Tuzun. (2016) Preservice Science Teachers’ Epistemological Beliefs and Informal Reasoning Regarding Socioscientific Issues. Research in Science Education 47:6, pages 1275-1304.
Crossref
Mastura Halim & Rohaida Mohd Saat. (2017) EXPLORING STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING IN MAKING A DECISION ON A SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUE USING A PERSUASIVE GRAPHIC ORGANISER. Journal of Baltic Science Education 16:5, pages 813-824.
Crossref
김영현, 정영란 & 이은항. (2017) Analysis of High School Student's Value Judgement and Patterns of Change in Decision-Making on Socioscientific issues (SSI). Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction 21:5, pages 498-511.
Crossref
Ayşe Öztürk. (2017) An investigation of prospective science teachers' socio-scientific argumentation processes in terms of metacognition: A causal-comparative study. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi 7:4, pages 547-582.
Crossref
A. Y. Kutluca & A. Aydın. (2017) Changes in Pre-service Science Teachers’ Understandings After Being Involved in Explicit Nature of Science and Socioscientific Argumentation Processes. Science & Education 26:6, pages 637-668.
Crossref
Ali Yigit KUTLUCA & Abdullah AYDIN. (2017) Fen Bilimleri Öğretmen Adaylarının Sosyobilimsel Argümantasyon Kalitelerinin İncelenmesi: Konu Bağlamının Etkisi. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, pages 458-480.
Crossref
Muhamad Ikhwan Mat Saad, Sadiah Baharom & Siti Eshah Mokhsein. (2017) Scientific reasoning skills based on socio-scientific issues in the biology subject. International Journal of ADVANCED AND APPLIED SCIENCES 4:3, pages 13-18.
Crossref
Y H Adisendjaja, N Y Rustaman, S Redjeki & D Satori. (2017) Science Teachers’ Understanding of Scientific Inquiry In Teacher Professional Development. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 812, pages 012054.
Crossref
Yeung Chung Lee. 2017. Chinese Science Education in the 21st Century: Policy, Practice, and Research. Chinese Science Education in the 21st Century: Policy, Practice, and Research
179
200
.
Andrew T. Kinslow & Troy D. Sadler. 2017. Animals and Science Education. Animals and Science Education
169
185
.
Laurence Simonneaux & Jean Simonneaux. 2017. Science and Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies and Environments. Science and Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies and Environments
565
587
.
Christine V. McDonald. 2017. Science Education: A Global Perspective. Science Education: A Global Perspective
7
43
.
Mehmet ali Uzelgun, Marcin Lewiński & Paula Castro. (2016) Favorite Battlegrounds of Climate Action. Science Communication 38:6, pages 699-723.
Crossref
Hanno Michel & Irene Neumann. (2017) Nature of Science and Science Content Learning. Science & Education 25:9-10, pages 951-975.
Crossref
Leon Walls. (2016) Awakening a dialogue: A critical race theory analysis of U. S. nature of science research from 1967 to 2013. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53:10, pages 1546-1570.
Crossref
Rosária Justi & Paula Cristina Cardoso Mendonça. (2016) Discussion of the Controversy Concerning a Historical Event Among Pre-service Teachers. Science & Education 25:7-8, pages 795-822.
Crossref
Antonio García-Carmona & José Antonio Acevedo Díaz. (2016) Learning About the Nature of Science Using Newspaper Articles with Scientific Content. Science & Education 25:5-6, pages 523-546.
Crossref
Kostas Kampourakis. (2016) The “general aspects” conceptualization as a pragmatic and effective means to introducing students to nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53:5, pages 667-682.
Crossref
Hyunok Lee & Hyunju Lee. (2016) Contextualized Nature of Technology in Socioscientific Issues. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education 36:2, pages 303-315.
Crossref
Shiang-Yao Liu. 2016. Science Education Research and Practices in Taiwan. Science Education Research and Practices in Taiwan
371
386
.
Chun-Ju Huang. 2016. Science Education Research and Practices in Taiwan. Science Education Research and Practices in Taiwan
279
297
.
Italo Testa, Sara Lombardi, Gabriella Monroy & Elena Sassi. 2016. Iterative Design of Teaching-Learning Sequences. Iterative Design of Teaching-Learning Sequences
101
125
.
LEEMA BERLAND & KATHLEEN CRUCET. (2016) Epistemological Trade-Offs: Accounting for Context When Evaluating Epistemological Sophistication of Student Engagement in Scientific Practices. Science Education 100:1, pages 5-29.
Crossref
Yoonsook Chung & Sung-Won Kim. (2015) Transfer of Students' Understanding of NOS through SSI Instruction. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education 35:5, pages 895-905.
Crossref
Hunkoog Jho. (2015) A Literature Review of Studies on Decision-making in Socio-scientific Issues. Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education 35:5, pages 791-804.
Crossref
Jessica Shuk Ching Leung, Alice Siu Ling Wong & Benny Hin Wai Yung. (2014) Understandings of Nature of Science and Multiple Perspective Evaluation of Science News by Non-science Majors. Science & Education 24:7-8, pages 887-912.
Crossref
김선영. (2015) The effects of preservice biology teachers' argumentation on bioethical issues. BIOLOGY EDUCATION 43:1, pages 27-36.
Crossref
Brian A. Couch, Tanya L. Brown, Tyler J. Schelpat, Mark J. Graham & Jennifer K. Knight. (2015) Scientific Teaching: Defining a Taxonomy of Observable Practices. CBE—Life Sciences Education 14:1, pages ar9.
Crossref
KALYPSO IORDANOU & COSTAS P. CONSTANTINOU. (2015) Supporting Use of Evidence in Argumentation Through Practice in Argumentation and Reflection in the Context of SOCRATES Learning Environment. Science Education 99:2, pages 282-311.
Crossref
Hyunok Lee & Hyunju Lee. (2015) Analysis of Students' Socioscientific Decision-Making from the Nature of Technology Perspectives. Journal of The Korean Association For Research In Science Education 35:1, pages 169-177.
Crossref
Randy L. Bell & Tyler L. St.Clair. 2015. Research in Early Childhood Science Education. Research in Early Childhood Science Education
125
141
.
BENJAMIN C. HERMAN. (2015) The Influence of Global Warming Science Views and Sociocultural Factors on Willingness to Mitigate Global Warming. Science Education 99:1, pages 1-38.
Crossref
Barbara Bader, Isabelle Arseneau & Geneviève Therriault. (2014) Conception des sciences d’élèves de 4e secondaire engagés dans une démarche interdisciplinaire d’enseignement des sciences sur les changements climatiques. Éducation relative à l'environnement:Volume 11.
Crossref
Ora Kahana & Tali Tal. (2014) Understanding of high-achieving science students on the nature of science. International Journal of STEM Education 1:1.
Crossref
Kalypso Iordanou & C.P. Constantinou. (2014) Developing pre-service teachers' evidence-based argumentation skills on socio-scientific issues. Learning and Instruction 34, pages 42-57.
Crossref
Laurence Simonneaux, Jean Simonneaux & Habib Chouchane. 2014. Recherches en éducation. Recherches en éducation
13
31
.
Michel Fabre, Annick Weil-Barais & Constantin Xypas. 2014. Les problèmes complexes flous en éducation. Les problèmes complexes flous en éducation
153
163
.
Tom G. K. Bryce & Stephen P. Day. (2013) Scepticism and doubt in science and science education: the complexity of global warming as a socio-scientific issue. Cultural Studies of Science Education 9:3, pages 599-632.
Crossref