761
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Reports

Gender Differences in Lunar‐related Scientific and Mathematical Understandings

Pages 2105-2122 | Published online: 11 Sep 2009

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (8)

Mary F. Lamar, Jennifer Anne Wilhelm & Merryn Cole. (2018) A mixed methods comparison of teachers' lunar modeling lesson implementation and student learning outcomes. The Journal of Educational Research 111:1, pages 108-123.
Read now
Julia D. Plummer, Corinne A. Bower & Lynn S. Liben. (2016) The role of perspective taking in how children connect reference frames when explaining astronomical phenomena. International Journal of Science Education 38:3, pages 345-365.
Read now
Merryn Cole, Jennifer Wilhelm & Hongwei Yang. (2015) Student Moon Observations and Spatial-Scientific Reasoning. International Journal of Science Education 37:11, pages 1815-1833.
Read now
Julia Diane Plummer, Alicia Kocareli & Cynthia Slagle. (2014) Learning to Explain Astronomy Across Moving Frames of Reference: Exploring the role of classroom and planetarium-based instructional contexts. International Journal of Science Education 36:7, pages 1083-1106.
Read now
Julia D. Plummer. (2014) Spatial thinking as the dimension of progress in an astronomy learning progression. Studies in Science Education 50:1, pages 1-45.
Read now
Jennifer Wilhelm, Christa Jackson, Amber Sullivan & Ronald Wilhelm. (2013) Examining Differences Between Preteen Groups’ Spatial-Scientific Understandings: A Quasi-experimental Study. The Journal of Educational Research 106:5, pages 337-351.
Read now
Emma Marsden & Carole J. Torgerson. (2012) Single group, pre- and post-test research designs: Some methodological concerns. Oxford Review of Education 38:5, pages 583-616.
Read now
JuliaD. Plummer, KyleD. Wasko & Cynthia Slagle. (2011) Children Learning to Explain Daily Celestial Motion: Understanding astronomy across moving frames of reference. International Journal of Science Education 33:14, pages 1963-1992.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (18)

Eric J. Blown & Tom G. K. Bryce. (2022) When Is an Interview an Inter View? The Historical and Recent Development of Methodologies Used to Investigate Children’s Astronomy Knowledge. Research in Science Education 52:6, pages 1869-1908.
Crossref
Merryn Cole, Hongwei Yang & Jennifer Anne Wilhelm. (2022) A Project-Based Instruction Approach to Improving Student Lunar Phases Learning Outcomes: A Quantitative Inquiry. Education Sciences 12:11, pages 824.
Crossref
Julia D. Plummer, Patricia Udomprasert, Abha Vaishampayan, Susan Sunbury, Kyungjin Cho, Harry Houghton, Erin Johnson, Erika Wright, Philip M. Sadler & Alyssa Goodman. (2022) Learning to think spatially through curricula that embed spatial training. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 59:7, pages 1134-1168.
Crossref
Akolade Olubunmi Lapite, Jacobus Gideon Maree & Joyce Jordaan. (2022) The effects of the attributional style on the mathematics performance of senior secondary school students. South African Journal of Education 42:3, pages 1-17.
Crossref
Jennifer Wilhelm, Merryn Cole, Emily Driessen, Samantha Ringl, Andromeda Hightower, Javier Gonzalez‐Napoleoni & Jasemine Jones. (2022) Grade level influence in middle school students' spatial‐scientific understandings of lunar phases. School Science and Mathematics 122:3, pages 128-141.
Crossref
Pierre Chastenay & Martin Riopel. (2020) Development and validation of the moon phases concept inventory for middle school. Physical Review Physics Education Research 16:2.
Crossref
Yen-Ruey Kuo, Hsiao-Lin Tuan & Chi-Chin Chin. (2018) The Influence of Inquiry-Based Teaching on Male and Female Students’ Motivation and Engagement. Research in Science Education 50:2, pages 549-572.
Crossref
J. Madden, S. Pandita, J. P. Schuldt, B. Kim, A. S. Won & N. G. Holmes. (2020) Ready student one: Exploring the predictors of student learning in virtual reality. PLOS ONE 15:3, pages e0229788.
Crossref
Yi-Chun Chen, Fang-Ying Yang & Cheng-Chieh Chang. (2020) CONCEPTUALIZING SPATIAL ABILITIES AND THEIR RELATION TO SCIENCE LEARNING FROM A COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE. Journal of Baltic Science Education 19:1, pages 50-63.
Crossref
Cecilia M. S. Ma & Daniel T. L. Shek. (2017) Objective Outcome Evaluation of a Positive Youth Development Program: The Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong. Research on Social Work Practice 29:1, pages 49-60.
Crossref
Jennifer Wilhelm, Ronald Wilhelm & Merryn ColeJennifer Wilhelm, Ronald Wilhelm & Merryn Cole. 2019. Creating Project-Based STEM Environments. Creating Project-Based STEM Environments 45 109 .
Jennifer Wilhelm, Merryn Cole, Cheryl Cohen & Rebecca Lindell. (2018) How middle level science teachers visualize and translate motion, scale, and geometric space of the Earth-Moon-Sun system with their students. Physical Review Physics Education Research 14:1.
Crossref
Merryn Cole, Cheryl Cohen, Jennifer Wilhelm & Rebecca Lindell. (2018) Spatial thinking in astronomy education research. Physical Review Physics Education Research 14:1.
Crossref
Laci Shea Brock, Edward Prather & Chris Impey. (2018) Finding the time: Exploring a new perspective on students’ perceptions of cosmological time and efforts to improve temporal frameworks in astronomy. Physical Review Physics Education Research 14:1.
Crossref
Christa Jackson, Jennifer Anne Wilhelm, Mary Lamar & Merryn Cole. (2015) Gender and Racial Differences: Development of Sixth Grade Students' Geometric Spatial Visualization within an Earth/Space Unit. School Science and Mathematics 115:7, pages 330-343.
Crossref
Julia D. Plummer & L. Maynard. (2014) Building a learning progression for celestial motion: An exploration of students' reasoning about the seasons. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51:7, pages 902-929.
Crossref
I-Ching Chen & Shueh-Cheng Hu. (2013) Applying Computerized Concept Maps in Guiding Pupils to Reason and Solve Mathematical Problems: The Design Rationale and Effect. Journal of Educational Computing Research 49:2, pages 209-223.
Crossref
Julia D. Plummer. 2012. Learning Progressions in Science. Learning Progressions in Science 77 100 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.