Citations (37)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (4)
Benedikt Heuckmann & Finja Krüger. (2023) Approaching the risk perception gap: effects of a subject matter knowledge-based intervention in a health context. Journal of Biological Education 57:5, pages 1006-1021.
Read now
Read now
Achilleas Mandrikas, Emily Michailidi & Dimitris Stavrou. (2020) Teaching nanotechnology in primary education. Research in Science & Technological Education 38:4, pages 377-395.
Read now
Read now
M.
Gail Jones, Ron Blonder, Grant
E. Gardner, Virginie Albe, Michael Falvo & Joel Chevrier. (2013) Nanotechnology and Nanoscale Science: Educational challenges. International Journal of Science Education 35:9, pages 1490-1512.
Read now
Read now
Hongxian Ma, Guofang Zhai & Shoji Tsuchida. (2013) Risk Literacy and Risk Perception Among Undergraduates in Mainland China: The Case of BSE. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal 19:2, pages 526-537.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (33)
Ibrohim Ibrohim, Irma Kartika Kusumaningrum, Erti Hamimi, Wira Eka Putra, Joko Utomo, Maisuna Kundariati, Maya Umi Hajar & Nik Ahmad Nizam Bin Nik Malek. (2023) Science students’ literacy and faculty members’ perspective toward nanotechnology: Is it needed in 21<sup>st</sup> century education?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 19:12, pages em2362.
Crossref
Crossref
Kathryn Garthwaite, Sally Birdsall & Bev France. (2023) Exploring risk perceptions: a new perspective on analysis. Cultural Studies of Science Education 18:4, pages 1195-1222.
Crossref
Crossref
Gregor Wolbring. 2023. Democratizing Risk Governance. Democratizing Risk Governance
79
103
.
Serap ÖZ AYDIN, Mesut SAÇKES, Nazlı Ruya TAŞKIN BEDİZEL & Aysun SICAKER. (2022) Development of Basic Biotechnology Knowledge Scale (BBKS) with Rasch Measurement ModelTemel Biyoteknoloji Bilgi Ölçeğinin (TBBÖ) Rasch Ölçüm Modeline Göre Geliştirilmesi. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi 16:2, pages 354-380.
Crossref
Crossref
Burcu Totur Dikmen, Ezgi Bağriaçik & Meryem Yavuz van Giersbergen. (2022) Conhecimento e conscientização de estudantes de enfermagem sobre o uso da nanotecnologia na área da saúde. Acta Paulista de Enfermagem 35.
Crossref
Crossref
Brylle Raphael Uy Bigcas, Maricar Sison Prudente & Socorro Echevarria Aguja. (2022) Improving Health Science Students’ Performance in Nanotechnology Using Socio-Scientific Issues-based Module. Improving Health Science Students’ Performance in Nanotechnology Using Socio-Scientific Issues-based Module.
Anna Spyrtou, Leonidas Manou & Giorgos Peikos. (2021) Educational Significance of Nanoscience–Nanotechnology: Primary School Teachers’ and Students’ Voices after a Training Program. Education Sciences 11:11, pages 724.
Crossref
Crossref
Ankita Rathore & G. Mahesh. (2021) Public perception of nanotechnology: A contrast between developed and developing countries. Technology in Society 67, pages 101751.
Crossref
Crossref
Umran Betul Cebesoy. (2021) Pre-service Science Teachers’ Informal Reasoning Patterns and Risk Perceptions in SSI: Case of Gene Therapy. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 9:4, pages 211-229.
Crossref
Crossref
Nur Aizat Kamarulzaman, Khai Ern Lee, Kim Shyong Siow & Mazlin Mokhtar. (2020) Public benefit and risk perceptions of nanotechnology development: Psychological and sociological aspects. Technology in Society 62, pages 101329.
Crossref
Crossref
Victoria Xenaki, Mihaela Cuida Marthinussen, Daniela Elena Costea, Andreea Cristiana Didilescu, Cristiano Susin, Mihaela Roxana Cimpan & Anne Nordrehaug Åstrøm. (2019) Knowledge about nanotechnology and intention to use nanomaterials: A comparative study among dental students in Norway and Romania. European Journal of Dental Education 24:1, pages 79-87.
Crossref
Crossref
Isabella A. Joubert, Mark Geppert, Stefanie Ess, Reinhard Nestelbacher, Gabriele Gadermaier, Albert Duschl, Arne C. Bathke & Martin Himly. (2020) Public perception and knowledge on nanotechnology: A study based on a citizen science approach. NanoImpact 17, pages 100201.
Crossref
Crossref
Nur Aizat Kamarulzaman, Khai Ern Lee & Kim Shyong Siow. 2020. Concepts and Approaches for Sustainability Management. Concepts and Approaches for Sustainability Management
1
22
.
Sharareh Hekmat & Lindsay Nicole Dawson. (2019) Students’ knowledge and attitudes towards GMOs and nanotechnology. Nutrition & Food Science 49:4, pages 628-638.
Crossref
Crossref
Åsa Boholm & Simon Larsson. (2019) What is the problem? A literature review on challenges facing the communication of nanotechnology to the public. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 21:4.
Crossref
Crossref
Abdelaziz El Moussaouy. 2019. Handbook of Environmental Materials Management. Handbook of Environmental Materials Management
2205
2231
.
Nayareth Quirola, Valentina Marquez, Silvia Tecpan & Samuel E. Baltazar. (2018) Didactic Proposal to include Nanoscience and Nanotechnology at high School curriculum linking Physics, Chemistry and Biology. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1043, pages 012050.
Crossref
Crossref
Tuba Şenel Zor & Oktay Aslan. (2018) The effect of activity-based nanoscience and nanotechnology education on pre-service science teachers’ conceptual understanding. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 20:3.
Crossref
Crossref
Antti Laherto, Frederike Tirre, Ilka Parchmann, Lorenz Kampschulte & Stefan Schwarzer. (2018) SCIENTISTS’ PERCEPTIONS ON THE NATURE OF NANOSCIENCE AND ITS PUBLIC COMMUNICATION. Problems of Education in the 21st Century 76:1, pages 43-57.
Crossref
Crossref
Abdelaziz El Moussaouy. 2018. Handbook of Environmental Materials Management. Handbook of Environmental Materials Management
1
27
.
Grant E. Gardner, M. Gail Jones, Virginie Albe, Ron Blonder, Antti Laherto, Daniel Macher & Manuela Paechter. (2016) Factors Influencing Postsecondary STEM Students’ Views of the Public Communication of an Emergent Technology: a Cross-National Study from Five Universities. Research in Science Education 47:5, pages 1011-1029.
Crossref
Crossref
Brady Michael Jack, Ling Lee, Kuay-Keng Yang & Huann-shyang Lin. (2016) A Science for Citizenship Model: Assessing the Effects of Benefits, Risks, and Trust for Predicting Students’ Interest in and Understanding of Science-Related Content. Research in Science Education 47:5, pages 965-988.
Crossref
Crossref
Seyda Gul. (2017) Development of an Attitude Scale to Measure the Undergraduate Students’ Attitudes Towards Nanobiotechnology. Journal of Science Education and Technology 26:5, pages 519-533.
Crossref
Crossref
Eliyawati, Yayan Sunarya & Ahmad Mudzakir. Enhancing students’ science literacy using solar cell learning multimedia containing science and nano technology. Enhancing students’ science literacy using solar cell learning multimedia containing science and nano technology.
Konrad J. Schönborn, Gunnar E. Höst, Karljohan E. Lundin Palmerius & Jennifer Flint. 2016. Web Design and Development. Web Design and Development
519
536
.
Anna-Leena Kähkönen, Antti Laherto, Anssi Lindell & Suvi Tala. 2016. Global Perspectives of Nanoscience and Engineering Education. Global Perspectives of Nanoscience and Engineering Education
35
81
.
Grant E. Gardner & Angelique Troelstrup. (2015) Students’ Attitudes Toward Gene Technology: Deconstructing a Construct. Journal of Science Education and Technology 24:5, pages 519-531.
Crossref
Crossref
Lynn A. Bryan & Nicholas J. Giordano. (2015) Special issue on Pre-college nanoscale science, engineering, and technology learning. Nanotechnology Reviews 4:1, pages 1-6.
Crossref
Crossref
M. Gail Jones, Grant E. Gardner, Michael Falvo & Amy Taylor. (2015) Precollege nanotechnology education: a different kind of thinking. Nanotechnology Reviews 4:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Jeanne Kriek, Ilsa Basson, Corene Coetzee & Helene Muller. (2014) ’n Vergelykende studie oor kennis en persepsies van radioaktiwiteit. Suid-Afrikaanse Tydskrif vir Natuurwetenskap en Tegnologie 33:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Konrad J. Schönborn, Gunnar E. Höst, Karljohan E. Lundin Palmerius & Jennifer Flint. (2014) Development of an Interactive Immersion Environment for Engendering Understanding about Nanotechnology. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments 5:2, pages 40-56.
Crossref
Crossref
Shu-Fen Lin, Huann-shyang Lin & Yi-ying Wu. (2012) Validation and Exploration of Instruments for Assessing Public Knowledge of and Attitudes toward Nanotechnology. Journal of Science Education and Technology 22:4, pages 548-559.
Crossref
Crossref
Ahmet Kılınç, Edward Boyes & Martin Stanisstreet. (2012) Exploring Students’ Ideas About Risks and Benefits of Nuclear Power Using Risk Perception Theories. Journal of Science Education and Technology 22:3, pages 252-266.
Crossref
Crossref