Publication Cover
Assistive Technology
The Official Journal of RESNA
Volume 31, 2019 - Issue 3
940
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

What are the preferred characteristics of a service robot for the elderly? A multi-country focus group study with older adults and caregivers

, MSc, , PhD & , PhD
Pages 147-157 | Accepted 29 Oct 2017, Published online: 11 Dec 2017

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (3)

Smriti Pande & Kriti Priya Gupta. (2023) Indian customers’ acceptance of service robots in restaurant services. Behaviour & Information Technology 42:12, pages 1946-1967.
Read now
Maggie MacNeil, Emily Hirslund, Leonardo Baiocco-Romano, Ayse Kuspinar & Paul Stolee. (2023) A scoping review of the use of intelligent assistive technologies in rehabilitation practice with older adults. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 0:0, pages 1-32.
Read now
Oscar Hengxuan Chi, Gregory Denton & Dogan Gursoy. (2020) Artificially intelligent device use in service delivery: a systematic review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management 29:7, pages 757-786.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (21)

Saeed Badghish, Aqueeb Sohail Shaik, Nidhi Sahore, Shalini Srivastava & Ayesha Masood. (2024) Can transactional use of AI-controlled voice assistants for service delivery pickup pace in the near future? A social learning theory (SLT) perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 198, pages 122972.
Crossref
Induni N Weerarathna, David Raymond & Anurag Luharia. (2023) Human-Robot Collaboration for Healthcare: A Narrative Review. Cureus.
Crossref
Doris Langegger & Irmela Gnass. (2023) Pflegeunterstützende Maßnahmen durch robotische SystemeNursing support measures provided by robotic systems. HeilberufeScience.
Crossref
Nadine Andrea Felber, Yi Jiao Tian, Félix Pageau, Bernice Simone Elger & Tenzin Wangmo. (2023) Mapping ethical issues in the use of smart home health technologies to care for older persons: a systematic review. BMC Medical Ethics 24:1.
Crossref
Mingyang Shao, Michael Pham-Hung, Silas Franco Dos Reis Alves, Matt Snyder, Kasra Eshaghi, Beno Benhabib & Goldie Nejat. (2023) Long-Term Exercise Assistance: Group and One-on-One Interactions between a Social Robot and Seniors. Robotics 12:1, pages 9.
Crossref
Marina Ringwald, Paulina Theben, Ken Gerlinger, Annika Hedrich & Barbara Klein. (2023) How Should Your Assistive Robot Look Like? A Scoping Review on Embodiment for Assistive Robots. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems 107:1.
Crossref
Wendy A. Rogers, Travis Kadylak & Megan A. Bayles. (2021) Maximizing the Benefits of Participatory Design for Human–Robot Interaction Research With Older Adults. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 64:3, pages 441-450.
Crossref
Anna Esposito, Marialucia Cuciniello, Terry Amorese, Alessandro Vinciarelli & Gennaro Cordasco. (2022) Humanoid and android robots in the imaginary of adolescents, young adults and seniors. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing.
Crossref
Niels Christian Mossfeldt Nickelsen & Johan Simonsen Abildgaard. (2022) The entwinement of policy, design and care scripts: Providing alternative choice‐dependency situations with care robots. Sociology of Health & Illness.
Crossref
Rachel Young, Karen Sage, David Broom, Katherine Broomfield, Gavin Church & Christine Smith. (2021) Using nominal group technique to advance power assisted exercise equipment for people with stroke. Research Involvement and Engagement 7:1.
Crossref
Kathleen Murphy, Erica Di Ruggiero, Ross Upshur, Donald J. Willison, Neha Malhotra, Jia Ce Cai, Nakul Malhotra, Vincci Lui & Jennifer Gibson. (2021) Artificial intelligence for good health: a scoping review of the ethics literature. BMC Medical Ethics 22:1.
Crossref
Jeongeun Kim, Sukwha Kim, Seongheui Kim, Euehun Lee, Yoonjeong Heo, Cheol-Yong Hwang, Yun-Young Choi, Hyoun-Joong Kong, Hyeongju Ryu & Hyeongsuk Lee. (2021) Companion robots for older adults: Rodgers’ evolutionary concept analysis approach. Intelligent Service Robotics 14:5, pages 729-739.
Crossref
M.T.H. Van Otterdijk, M.M.E. Neggers, J. Torresen & E.I. Barakova. (2021) Preferences of Seniors for Robots Delivering a Message With Congruent Approaching Behavior. Preferences of Seniors for Robots Delivering a Message With Congruent Approaching Behavior.
Oscar Hengxuan Chi, Shizhen Jia, Yafang Li & Dogan Gursoy. (2021) Developing a formative scale to measure consumers’ trust toward interaction with artificially intelligent (AI) social robots in service delivery. Computers in Human Behavior 118, pages 106700.
Crossref
Sara Shu & Benjamin KP Woo. (2021) Use of technology and social media in dementia care: Current and future directions. World Journal of Psychiatry 11:4, pages 109-123.
Crossref
Stephanie Lehmann, Esther Ruf & Sabina Misoch. 2021. HCI International 2021 - Posters. HCI International 2021 - Posters 148 155 .
Francesco Panico, Gennaro Cordasco, Carl Vogel, Luigi Trojano & Anna Esposito. (2020) Ethical issues in assistive ambient living technologies for ageing well. Multimedia Tools and Applications 79:47-48, pages 36077-36089.
Crossref
Alexander P. Henkel, Martina Čaić, Marah Blaurock & Mehmet Okan. (2020) Robotic transformative service research: deploying social robots for consumer well-being during COVID-19 and beyond. Journal of Service Management 31:6, pages 1131-1148.
Crossref
Natasa Koceska, Saso Koceski, Pierluigi Beomonte Zobel, Vladimir Trajkovik & Nuno Garcia. (2019) A Telemedicine Robot System for Assisted and Independent Living. Sensors 19:4, pages 834.
Crossref
Christian Buhtz, Denny Paulicke, Julian Hirt, Karsten Schwarz, Dietrich Stoevesandt, Gabriele Meyer & Patrick Jahn. (2018) Robotische Systeme zur pflegerischen Versorgung im häuslichen Umfeld: ein Scoping Review. Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 137-138, pages 1-8.
Crossref
G. W. Malith Manuhara, M. A. Viraj J. Muthugala & A. G. Buddhika P. Jayasekara. (2018) Design and Development of an Interactive Service Robot as a Conversational Companion for Elderly People. Design and Development of an Interactive Service Robot as a Conversational Companion for Elderly People.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.