Advanced search
Publication Cover
Psychology, Crime & Law Volume 20, 2014 - Issue 5
Submit an article Journal homepage
488
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

SCAN is largely driven by 12 criteria: results from sexual abuse statements

Glynis BogaardDepartment of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The NetherlandsCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Ewout H. MeijerDepartment of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
,
Aldert VrijDepartment of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
,
Nick J. BroersDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
&
Harald MerckelbachDepartment of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Pages 430-449 | Received 16 Aug 2011, Accepted 19 Feb 2013, Published online: 07 May 2013

Citations (9)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (2)

Isabo Goormans, Lore Mergaerts & Christophe Vandeviver. (2022) SCANning for truth. Scholars’ and practitioners’ perceptions on the use(fulness) of Scientific Content Analysis in detecting deception during police interviews. Psychology, Crime & Law 0:0, pages 1-23.
Read now
Miet Vanderhallen, Emma Jaspaert & Geert Vervaeke. (2016) SCAN as an investigative tool. Police Practice and Research 17:3, pages 279-293.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (7)

Siegfried L. Sporer & Jaume Masip. (2023) Millennia of legal content criteria of lies and truths: wisdom or common-sense folly?. Frontiers in Psychology 14.
Crossref
Aldert Vrij, Pär Anders Granhag, Tzachi Ashkenazi, Giorgio Ganis, Sharon Leal & Ronald P. Fisher. (2022) Verbal Lie Detection: Its Past, Present and Future. Brain Sciences 12:12, pages 1644.
Crossref
Bennett Kleinberg, Arnoud Arntz & Bruno Verschuere. (2019) Being accurate about accuracy in verbal deception detection. PLOS ONE 14:8, pages e0220228.
Crossref
Aldert Vrij. 2018. Detecting Concealed Information and Deception. Detecting Concealed Information and Deception 297 327 .
Glynis Bogaard, Ewout H. Meijer, Aldert Vrij & Harald Merckelbach. (2016) Strong, but Wrong: Lay People’s and Police Officers’ Beliefs about Verbal and Nonverbal Cues to Deception. PLOS ONE 11:6, pages e0156615.
Crossref
Glynis Bogaard, Ewout H. Meijer, Aldert Vrij & Harald Merckelbach. (2016) Scientific Content Analysis (SCAN) Cannot Distinguish Between Truthful and Fabricated Accounts of a Negative Event. Frontiers in Psychology 7.
Crossref
Glynis Bogaard, Ewout H. Meijer, Aldert Vrij, Nick J. Broers & Harald Merckelbach. (2014) Contextual Bias in Verbal Credibility Assessment: Criteria-Based Content Analysis, Reality Monitoring and Scientific Content Analysis. Applied Cognitive Psychology 28:1, pages 79-90.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.