Advanced search
Publication Cover
Psychology, Crime & Law Volume 20, 2014 - Issue 5
Submit an article Journal homepage
488
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

SCAN is largely driven by 12 criteria: results from sexual abuse statements

Glynis BogaardDepartment of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The NetherlandsCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Ewout H. MeijerDepartment of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
,
Aldert VrijDepartment of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
,
Nick J. BroersDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
&
Harald MerckelbachDepartment of Clinical Psychological Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Pages 430-449 | Received 16 Aug 2011, Accepted 19 Feb 2013, Published online: 07 May 2013

References

  • Aamodt, M. G., & Custer, H. (2006). Who can best catch a liar? A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception. Forensic Examiner, 15, 6–11. Retrieved from http://www.biomedsearch.com/article/Who-can-best-catch-liar/142682689.html
  • Akehurst, L., Kohken, G., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (1996). Lay persons’ and police officers’ beliefs regarding deceptive behaviour. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10(6), 461–471. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199612)10:6<461::AID-ACP413>3.0.CO;2-2
  • Bockstaele, M. (2008a). De SCAN als middel tot waarheidsvinding [SCAN as a tool for searching the truth]. Het Tijdschrift voor de Politie, 70, 8–13. Retrieved from http://www.websitevoordepolitie.nl/archief/de-scan-als-middel-tot-waarheidsvinding-399.html
  • Bockstaele, M. (2008b). Scientific content analysis (SCAN). Een nuttig instrument bij verhoren? [SCAN: A valuable tool for interrogations?]. In L. Smets & A. Vrij (Eds.), Het analyseren van de geloofwaardigheid van verhoren: Het gebruik van leugendetectiemethoden [The analysis of the credibility of interrogations: The use of lie detection methods] (pp. 105–156). Brussels, Belgium: Politeia.
  • Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 214–234. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2
  • DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 74–118. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
  • Driscoll, L. (1994). A validity assessment of written statements from suspects in criminal investigations using the SCAN technique. Police Studies, 4, 77–88. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/polic17&div=36&g_sent=1&collection=journals
  • Greer, E. (2000). The truth behind legal dominance feminism's “two percent false rape claim” figure. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 33, 947–972. Retrieved from http://ncfm.org/libraryfiles/Children/rape/greer.pdf
  • Gudjonsson, G. H., Sigurdsson, J. F., Asgeirsdottir, B. B., & Sigfusdottir, I. D. (2007). Custodial interrogation: What are the background factors associated with claims of false confession to police? Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 18(2), 266–275. doi:10.1080/14789940701284312
  • Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88(1), 67–85. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.67
  • Lisak, D., Gardinier, L., Nicksa, S. C., & Cote, A. M. (2010). False allegations of sexual assault: An analysis of ten years of reported cases. Violence Against Women, 16(12), 1318–1334. doi:10.1177/1077801210387747
  • Nahari, G., Vrij, A., & Fisher, R. P. (2011). Does the truth come out in the writing? SCAN as a lie detection tool. Law and Human Behavior, 1–11. doi:10.1037/h0093965
  • Newman, M. L., Pennebaker, J. W., Berry, D. S., & Richards, J. M. (2003). Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistics styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5), 665–675. doi:10.1177/0146167203029005010
  • Sapir, A. (2005). The LSI course on scientific content analysis (SCAN). Phoenix, AZ: Laboratory for Scientific Interrogation.
  • Smith, N. (2001). Reading between the lines: An evaluation of the scientific content analysis technique (SCAN). Police Research Series Paper, 135, 1–42. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.114.2971&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  • Sporer, S. L. (1997). The less travelled road to truth: Verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experienced events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11(5), 373–397. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199710)11:5<373::AID-ACP461>3.0.CO;2-0
  • Steller, M., & Köhnken, G. (1989). Criteria based statement analysis. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 217–245). New York: Springer.
  • Strömwall, L. A., & Granhag, P. A. (2003). How to detect deception? Arresting the beliefs of police officers, prosecutors and judges. Psychology, Crime & Law, 9(1), 19–36. doi:10.1080/10683160308138
  • Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria based content analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 3–41. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.3
  • Vrij, A. (2008a). Beliefs about nonverbal and verbal cues to deception. In A. Vrij (Ed.), Detecting lies and deceit (pp. 115–140). Chichester: Wiley.
  • Vrij, A. (2008b). Nonverbal dominance versus verbal accuracy in lie detection: A plea to change police practice. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(10), 1323–1336. doi:10.1177/0093854808321530
  • Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., & Porter, S. (2010). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11(3), 89–121. doi:10.1177/1529100610390861

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.