1,007
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Using peer feedback in a Master's programme: a multiple case study

, &
Pages 465-477 | Received 28 Mar 2011, Accepted 16 Oct 2011, Published online: 19 Dec 2011

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (10)

Wei Wei, Choo Mui Cheong, Xinhua Zhu & Qi Lu. (2022) Comparing self-reflection and peer feedback practices in an academic writing task: a student self-efficacy perspective. Teaching in Higher Education 0:0, pages 1-17.
Read now
Naomi Winstone, David Boud, Phillip Dawson & Marion Heron. (2022) From feedback-as-information to feedback-as-process: a linguistic analysis of the feedback literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 47:2, pages 213-230.
Read now
Huda Suleiman Al Qunayeer. (2020) Supporting postgraduates in research proposals through peer feedback in a Malaysian university. Journal of Further and Higher Education 44:7, pages 956-970.
Read now
Ye Han & Yueting Xu. (2020) The development of student feedback literacy: the influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45:5, pages 680-696.
Read now
Murad Abdu Saeed & Kamila Ghazali. (2019) Engaging postgraduates in a peer research group at the research proposal stage in a Malaysian university: support and challenges. Teaching in Higher Education 24:2, pages 180-196.
Read now
Shulin Yu, Yiran Zhang, Yao Zheng, Kaihao Yuan & Limin Zhang. (2019) Understanding student engagement with peer feedback on master’s theses: a Macau study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44:1, pages 50-65.
Read now
Lynn M. Santelmann, Dannelle D. Stevens & Staci B. Martin. (2018) Fostering Master's Students' Metacognition and Self-Regulation Practices for Research Writing. College Teaching 66:3, pages 111-123.
Read now
Deliang Man, Yiqin Xu & John Mitchell O’Toole. (2018) Understanding autonomous peer feedback practices among postgraduate students: a case study in a Chinese university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43:4, pages 527-536.
Read now
Basil Khalifa Costas Derek Cahusac de Caux, Cho Kwong Charlie Lam, Ricky Lau, Cuong Huu Hoang & Lynette Pretorius. (2017) Reflection for learning in doctoral training: writing groups, academic writing proficiency and reflective practice. Reflective Practice 18:4, pages 463-473.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (11)

Caroline Payant & Michael Zuniga. (2022) Learners' flow experience during peer revision in a virtual writing course during the global pandemic. System 105, pages 102715.
Crossref
Lidon Moliner & Francisco Alegre. (2022) COVID-19 Restrictions and Its Influence on Students’ Mathematics Achievement in Spain. Education Sciences 12:2, pages 105.
Crossref
Ahmet Yusuf CEVHER, İsmail KARA, Murat AKBAY, Özlem OKTAY & Yüksel GÖKTAŞ. (2022) AKADEMİK YAZIMDA KULLANILAN GERİ BİLDİRİM ÜZERİNE YAPILAN ÇALIŞMALARIN İNCELENMESİEXAMINING THE RESEARCH STUDIES ON FEEDBACK IN ACADEMIC WRITING. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama 12:1, pages 147-171.
Crossref
Rhys Adams, Phoebe Jackson, Kevin Lenton, Michael Dugdale, Chirs Whittaker, Nathaniel Lasry & Elizabeth S. Charles. (2019) Error detection tasks and peer feedback for engaging physics students. Error detection tasks and peer feedback for engaging physics students.
Filitsa Dingyloudi & Jan-Willem Strijbos. (2018) Just plain peers across social networks: Peer-feedback networks nested in personal and academic networks in higher education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 18, pages 86-112.
Crossref
Michiel Voet, Mario Gielen, Ruth Boelens & Bram De Wever. (2017) Using feedback requests to actively involve assessees in peer assessment: effects on the assessor’s feedback content and assessee’s agreement with feedback. European Journal of Psychology of Education 33:1, pages 145-164.
Crossref
Shulin Yu & Icy Lee. (2016) Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014). Language Teaching 49:4, pages 461-493.
Crossref
Nuwar Mawlawi Diab. (2016) A comparison of peer, teacher and self-feedback on the reduction of language errors in student essays. System 57, pages 55-65.
Crossref
Mario Gielen & Bram De Wever. (2015) Structuring peer assessment: Comparing the impact of the degree of structure on peer feedback content. Computers in Human Behavior 52, pages 315-325.
Crossref
M. Gielen & B. De Wever. (2015) Structuring the peer assessment process: a multilevel approach for the impact on product improvement and peer feedback quality. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 31:5, pages 435-449.
Crossref
Mario Gielen & Bram De Wever. (2015) Scripting the role of assessor and assessee in peer assessment in a wiki environment: Impact on peer feedback quality and product improvement. Computers & Education 88, pages 370-386.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.