Using peer feedback in a Master's programme: a multiple case study

References

• Berg , E.C. 1999 . The effects of trained peer response ESL students' revision types and writing quality . Journal of Second Language Writing , 8 ( 3 ) : 215 – 41 .
   Google Scholar
• Bloxham , S. and West , A. 2007 . Learning to write in higher education: Students' perceptions of an intervention in developing understanding of assessment criteria . Teaching in Higher Education , 12 ( 1 ) : 77 – 89 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruffee , A. 1984 . Collaborative learning and the “conversation of mankind” . College English , 46 ( 7 ) : 635 – 52 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartney , P. 2010 . Exploring the use of peer assessment as a vehicle for closing the gap between feedback given and feedback used . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 35 ( 5 ) : 551 – 64 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor , U. and Asenavage , K. 1994 . Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How Much Impact on Revision? . Journal of Second Language Writing , 3 ( 3 ) : 257 – 76 .
   Google Scholar
• Flower , L.S. and Hayes , J.R. 1980 . “ The dynamics of composing: Making plans and juggling constraints ” . In Cognitive processes in writing , Edited by: Gregg , L.W. and Steinberg , E.R. 31 – 50 . Hillsdale , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc .
   Google Scholar
• Heywood , J. 2000 . Assessment in higher education , London and Philadelphia : Jessica Kingsley Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Hyland , F. 2000 . ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students . Language Teaching Research , 4 ( 1 ) : 33 – 54 .
   Google Scholar
• Hyland , K. 2003 . Second language writing , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hyland , K. and Hyland , F. 2006 . Feedback in second language writing , New York : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs , G.M. , Curtis , A. , Braine , G. and Huang , S. 1998 . Feedback on student writing: Taking the middle path . Journal of Second Language Writing , 7 ( 3 ) : 307 – 17 .
   Google Scholar
• Keh , C.L. 1990 . Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for implementation . ELT Journal , 44 ( 4 ) : 294 – 304 .
   Google Scholar
• Lave , J. and Wenger , E. 1991 . Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Leki , I. 1990 . “ Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response ” . In Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom , Edited by: Kroll , B. 57 – 98 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Liu , J. and Hansen , J.G. 2002 . Peer response in second language writing classrooms , Ann Arbor , MI : The University of Michigan Press .
   Google Scholar
• Mangelsdorf , K. 1992 . Peer reviews in the ESL composition classroom: What do the students think? . ELT Journal , 46 ( 3 ) : 274 – 84 .
   Google Scholar
• Mendonça , C.O. and Johnson , K.E. 1994 . Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction . TESOL Quarterly , 28 ( 4 ) : 745 – 69 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles , M.B. and Huberman , A.M. 1994 . Qualitative data analysis , Thousand Oaks , CA and London : SAGE .
   Google Scholar
• Min , H.T. 2005 . Training students to become successful peer reviewers . System , 33 ( 2 ) : 293 – 308 .
   Google Scholar
• Nelson , G.L. and Carson , J.G. 1998 . ESL Students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups . Journal of Second Language Writing , 7 ( 2 ) : 113 – 31 .
   Google Scholar
• Nelson , G.L. and Carson , J.G. 2006 . “ Cultural issues in peer response: Revising “culture” . In Feedback in second language writing , Edited by: Hyland , K. and Hyland , F. 42 – 59 . New York : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Nelson , G.L. and Murphy , J.M. 1992 . An L2 writing group: Task and social dimensions . Journal of Second Language Writing , 1 ( 3 ) : 171 – 93 .
   Google Scholar
• Nicol , D. 2010 . From monologue to dialogue: Improving written feedback processes in mass higher education . Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 35 ( 5 ) : 501 – 17 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northedge , A. 2003 . Rethinking teaching in the context of diversity . Teaching in Higher Education , 8 ( 1 ) : 17 – 32 .
   Google Scholar
• Paulus , T.M. 1999 . The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing . Journal of Second Language Writing , 8 ( 3 ) : 265 – 89 .
   Google Scholar
• Peyton , J.K. and Jones , C. 1994 . Implementing writing workshop with ESOL students: Visions and realities . TESOL Quarterly , 28 ( 3 ) : 469 – 87 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spack , R. 1997 . The rhetorical construction of multilingual students . TESOL Quarterly , 31 ( 4 ) : 765 – 74 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley , J. 1992 . Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators . Journal of Second Language Writing , 1 ( 3 ) : 217 – 33 .
   Google Scholar
• Tsui , A.B. and Ng , M. 2000 . Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? . Journal of Second Language Writing , 9 ( 2 ) : 147 – 70 .
   Google Scholar
• Van den Berg , B.A.M. , Admiraal , W. and Pilot , A. 2006 . Designing student peer assessment in higher education: Analysis of written and oral peer feedback . Teaching in Higher Education , 11 ( 2 ) : 135 – 47 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky , L. 1978 . Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes , Cambridge : Harvard University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Zamel , V. 1998 . “ Questioning academic discourse ” . In Negotiating academic literacies: Teaching and learning across languages and cultures , Edited by: Zamel , V. and Spack , R. 187 – 99 . London : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
   Google Scholar
• Zhang , S. 1995 . Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class . Journal of Second Language Writing , 4 ( 3 ) : 209 – 22 .
   Google Scholar
• Zhu , W. 2001 . Interaction and feedback in mixed peer response groups . Journal of Second Language Writing , 10 ( 4 ) : 251 – 76 .
   Google Scholar