Citations (77)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (18)
Tuuli Vilhunen, Matti Kojo, Tapio Litmanen & Behnam Taebi. (2022) Perceptions of justice influencing community acceptance of spent nuclear fuel disposal. A case study in two Finnish nuclear communities . Journal of Risk Research 25:8, pages 1023-1046.
Read now
Read now
Ashleigh Brady & Neelam Naikar. (2022) Development of Rasmussen’s risk management framework for analysing multi-level sociotechnical influences in the design of envisioned work systems. Ergonomics 65:3, pages 485-518.
Read now
Read now
Jisoo Kim, Junseop Shim & Ji Hyung Park. (2021) Exploring the role of citizen participation in the policy acceptance process: the case of Korean nuclear facilities. Journal of Asian Public Policy 0:0, pages 1-22.
Read now
Read now
Yong Liu, Caiyun Cui, Chunqin Zhang, Bo Xia, Qing Chen & Martin Skitmore. (2021) Effects of economic compensation on public acceptance of waste-to-energy incineration projects: an attribution theory perspective. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 64:9, pages 1515-1535.
Read now
Read now
Dong-Young Kim & Jaehwan Jung. (2019) Cultural attributes and risk perception: the moderating role of different types of research and development. Journal of Risk Research 22:2, pages 161-176.
Read now
Read now
Agata Stasik. (2018) Global controversies in local settings: anti-fracking activism in the era of Web 2.0. Journal of Risk Research 21:12, pages 1562-1578.
Read now
Read now
Catherine Mei Ling Wong & Stewart Lockie. (2018) Sociology, risk and the environment: a material-semiotic approach. Journal of Risk Research 21:9, pages 1077-1092.
Read now
Read now
Danielle E. Endres, Brian Cozen, Joshua Trey Barnett, Megan O’Byrne & Tarla Rai Peterson. (2016) Communicating Energy in a Climate (of) Crisis. Annals of the International Communication Association 40:1, pages 419-447.
Read now
Read now
Jungeun Yang. (2015) The influence of culture on Koreans’ risk perception. Journal of Risk Research 18:1, pages 69-92.
Read now
Read now
Tapio Litmanen, Barry D. Solomon & Mika Kari. (2014) The utmost ends of the nuclear fuel cycle: Finnish perceptions of the risks of uranium mining and nuclear waste management. Journal of Risk Research 17:8, pages 1037-1059.
Read now
Read now
Jeffrey B. Jacquet & Richard C. Stedman. (2014) The risk of social-psychological disruption as an impact of energy development and environmental change. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 57:9, pages 1285-1304.
Read now
Read now
Corinne Moser, Michael Stauffacher, Pius Krütli & Roland
W. Scholz. (2012) The influence of linear and cyclical temporal representations on risk perception of nuclear waste: an experimental study. Journal of Risk Research 15:5, pages 459-476.
Read now
Read now
Pius Krütli, Michael Stauffacher, Thomas Flüeler & RolandW. Scholz. (2010) Functional‐dynamic public participation in technological decision‐making: site selection processes of nuclear waste repositories. Journal of Risk Research 13:7, pages 861-875.
Read now
Read now
Urban Strandberg & Mats Andrén. (2009) Editorial: Nuclear waste management in a globalised world. Journal of Risk Research 12:7-8, pages 879-895.
Read now
Read now
Matthew Cotton. (2009) Ethical assessment in radioactive waste management: a proposed reflective equilibrium‐based deliberative approach. Journal of Risk Research 12:5, pages 603-618.
Read now
Read now
Maarten Wolsink & Jeroen Devilee. (2009) The motives for accepting or rejecting waste infrastructure facilities. Shifting the focus from the planners' perspective to fairness and community commitment. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 52:2, pages 217-236.
Read now
Read now
Mark Chong. (2005) Perception of the risks and benefits of Bt eggplant by Indian farmers. Journal of Risk Research 8:7-8, pages 617-634.
Read now
Read now
Lennart Sjöberg & Elisabeth Engelberg. (2005) Lifestyles, and Risk Perception Consumer Behavior. International Review of Sociology 15:2, pages 327-362.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (59)
Stacia Ryder, Chad Walker, Susana Batel, Hannah Devine-Wright, Patrick Devine-Wright & Fin Sherry-Brennan. (2023) Do the ends justify the means? Problematizing social acceptance and instrumentally-driven community engagement in proposed energy projects. Socio-Ecological Practice Research 5:2, pages 189-204.
Crossref
Crossref
Linda Steg. (2023) Psychology of Climate Change. Annual Review of Psychology 74:1, pages 391-421.
Crossref
Crossref
Lucas Schwarz. (2022) Is It All about a Science-Informed Decision? A Quantitative Approach to Three Dimensions of Justice and Their Relation in the Nuclear Waste Repository Siting Process in Germany. Societies 12:6, pages 179.
Crossref
Crossref
Matti Kojo, Tuuli Vilhunen, Mika Kari, Tapio Litmanen & Markku Lehtonen. (2022) The Art of Being Ethical and Responsible: Print Media Debate on Final Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel in Finland and Sweden. Social Justice Research 35:2, pages 157-187.
Crossref
Crossref
Masashi Nishikawa. (2021) Neutral respondents’ perceptions about geological disposal facilities. Energy Reports 7, pages 5119-5129.
Crossref
Crossref
Hwanseok Song, Hang Lu & Katherine A. McComas. (2020) The Role of Fairness in Early Characterization of New Technologies: Effects on Selective Exposure and Risk Perception. Risk Analysis 41:9, pages 1614-1629.
Crossref
Crossref
David M Konisky, Stephen Ansolabehere & Sanya Carley. (2020) Proximity, NIMBYism, and Public Support for Energy Infrastructure. Public Opinion Quarterly 84:2, pages 391-418.
Crossref
Crossref
Hyoyeun Jun & Yan Jin. (2021) The Conceptualization of Risk Tolerance and Scale Development for Measuring Publics’ Tolerance of Individual Health Risks. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research 4, pages 29-72.
Crossref
Crossref
Douglas Bessette, Michelle Rutty, Grant Gunn, Volodymyr Tarabara & Robert Richardson. (2021) The perceived risk of the Line 5 Pipeline and spills under ice. Journal of Great Lakes Research 47:1, pages 226-235.
Crossref
Crossref
M. P. Ram Mohan & Sreenath K. Namboodhiry. (2020) An exploration of public risk perception and governmental engagement of nuclear energy in India. Journal of Public Affairs 20:3.
Crossref
Crossref
Mengmeng Xu & Boqiang Lin. (2020) Exploring the “not in my backyard” effect in the construction of waste incineration power plants - based on a survey in metropolises of China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 82, pages 106377.
Crossref
Crossref
Cheng Miao & Xilin Liu. (2020) Characterization of acceptable risk for debris flows in China: Comparison in debris-flow prone areas and nonprone areas. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 42, pages 101405.
Crossref
Crossref
Sven Ove Hansson. 2013. The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. The International Encyclopedia of Ethics
1
6
.
Hye Kyung Kim & Yungwook Kim. (2018) Risk Information Seeking and Processing About Particulate Air Pollution in South Korea: The Roles of Cultural Worldview. Risk Analysis 39:5, pages 1071-1087.
Crossref
Crossref
Wei Li, Huiling Zhong, Nan Jing & Lu Fan. (2019) Research on the impact factors of public acceptance towards NIMBY facilities in China - A case study on hazardous chemicals factory. Habitat International 83, pages 11-19.
Crossref
Crossref
Seungkook Roh & Jin Won Lee. (2018) Differentiated effects of risk perception dimensions on nuclear power acceptance in South Korea. Energy Policy 122, pages 727-735.
Crossref
Crossref
Yong Liu, Chenjunyan Sun, Bo Xia, Caiyun Cui & Vaughan Coffey. (2018) Impact of community engagement on public acceptance towards waste-to-energy incineration projects: Empirical evidence from China. Waste Management 76, pages 431-442.
Crossref
Crossref
Klinsky Sonja & Winkler Harald. (2018) Building equity in: strategies for integrating equity into modelling for a 1.5°C world. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 376:2119, pages 20160461.
Crossref
Crossref
Guo Zheng & Wei Liu. (2018) Same projects, different endings—Comparative case studies on NIMBY facility construction in Beijing. Cities 73, pages 63-70.
Crossref
Crossref
Hien Ho & Tsunemi Watanabe. (2018) The Roles of Three Types of Knowledge and Perceived Uncertainty in Explaining Risk Perception, Acceptability, and Self-Protective Response—A Case Study on Endocrine Disrupting Surfactants. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15:2, pages 296.
Crossref
Crossref
Catherine Mei Ling WongCatherine Mei Ling Wong. 2018. Energy, Risk and Governance. Energy, Risk and Governance
107
151
.
Catherine Mei Ling WongCatherine Mei Ling Wong. 2018. Energy, Risk and Governance. Energy, Risk and Governance
29
54
.
Qunying Xiao, Huijun Liu & Marcus W. Feldman. (2017) How does trust affect acceptance of a nuclear power plant (NPP): A survey among people living with Qinshan NPP in China. PLOS ONE 12:11, pages e0187941.
Crossref
Crossref
Behnam Taebi. (2017) Bridging the Gap between Social Acceptance and Ethical Acceptability. Risk Analysis 37:10, pages 1817-1827.
Crossref
Crossref
Klas Borell & Åsa Westermark. (2016) Siting of human services facilities and the not in my back yard phenomenon: a critical research review. Community Development Journal.
Crossref
Crossref
Linda Steg. (2016) Values, Norms, and Intrinsic Motivation to Act Proenvironmentally. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 41:1, pages 277-292.
Crossref
Crossref
Yongxiang Wang & Jingping Li. (2016) A causal model explaining Chinese university students' acceptance of nuclear power. Progress in Nuclear Energy 88, pages 165-174.
Crossref
Crossref
Thurka Sangaramoorthy, Amelia M. Jamison, Meleah D. Boyle, Devon C. Payne-Sturges, Amir Sapkota, Donald K. Milton & Sacoby M. Wilson. (2016) Place-based perceptions of the impacts of fracking along the Marcellus Shale. Social Science & Medicine 151, pages 27-37.
Crossref
Crossref
Caroline PatsiasCaroline Patsias. 2016. Une chronique de la démocratie ordinaire. Une chronique de la démocratie ordinaire
241
258
.
Miguel Ángel López-Navarro, Jaume Llorens-Monzonís & Vicent Tortosa-Edo. (2016) Residents' behaviour as a function of cognitive appraisals and affective responses toward a petrochemical industrial complex. Journal of Cleaner Production 112, pages 1645-1657.
Crossref
Crossref
E. Carina H. Keskitalo, Annika Nordlund & Urban Lindgren. (2015) Environmental Impact Assessment as a social process: The case of nuclear waste storage in SwedenL’évaluation de l’impact environnemental en tant que processus social. Le cas du stockage des déchets nucléaires en Suède. Cybergeo.
Crossref
Crossref
Goda Perlaviciute & Linda Steg. (2014) Contextual and psychological factors shaping evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives: Integrated review and research agenda. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 35, pages 361-381.
Crossref
Crossref
양정은. (2014) The Influence of Culture on Koreans’ Risk Perception and Communication An Exploratory Study. Journal of Public Relations 18:1, pages 107-150.
Crossref
Crossref
Meredith Frances Dobbie & Rebekah Ruth Brown. (2014) A Framework for Understanding Risk Perception, Explored from the Perspective of the Water Practitioner. Risk Analysis 34:2, pages 294-308.
Crossref
Crossref
Yosep Song, Daewook Kim & Dongsub Han. (2013) Risk communication in South Korea: Social acceptance of nuclear power plants (NPPs). Public Relations Review 39:1, pages 55-56.
Crossref
Crossref
Judith I. M. de Groot, Linda Steg & Wouter Poortinga. (2013) Values, Perceived Risks and Benefits, and Acceptability of Nuclear Energy. Risk Analysis 33:2, pages 307-317.
Crossref
Crossref
Sven Ove Hansson. 2013. International Encyclopedia of Ethics. International Encyclopedia of Ethics.
Maarten Wolsink. 2013. Renewable Energy Systems. Renewable Energy Systems
1785
1821
.
Patrick Ronde & Caroline Hussler. (2012) De l’impact de la localisation résidentielle sur la perception et l’acceptation du risque nucléaire : une analyse sur données françaises (avant Fukushima)Living in the vicinity of nuclear power stations: a specific perception and acceptance of related risks?. Cybergeo.
Crossref
Crossref
Nicolás C. Bronfman, Raquel B. Jiménez, Pilar C. Arévalo & Luis A. Cifuentes. (2012) Understanding social acceptance of electricity generation sources. Energy Policy 46, pages 246-252.
Crossref
Crossref
Pius Krütli, Michael Stauffacher, Dario Pedolin, Corinne Moser & Roland W. Scholz. (2012) The Process Matters: Fairness in Repository Siting For Nuclear Waste. Social Justice Research 25:1, pages 79-101.
Crossref
Crossref
Maarten Wolsink. 2012. Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology. Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology
12218
12254
.
Judith I. M. de Groot & Linda Steg. 2011. Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste: A Comparative Assessment. Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste: A Comparative Assessment
339
363
.
James J. Cochran, Louis A. CoxJr.Jr., Pinar Keskinocak, Jeffrey P. Kharoufeh & J. Cole SmithKatherine V. Kortenkamp & Colleen F. Moore. 2011. Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science.
Barry D. Solomon, Mats Andrén & Urban Strandberg. (2012) Three Decades of Social Science Research on High‐Level Nuclear Waste: Achievements and Future Challenges. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 1:4, pages 13-47.
Crossref
Crossref
Judith I. M. De Groot & Linda Steg. (2010) Morality and Nuclear Energy: Perceptions of Risks and Benefits, Personal Norms, and Willingness to Take Action Related to Nuclear Energy. Risk Analysis 30:9, pages 1363-1373.
Crossref
Crossref
Christopher R. Jones & J. Richard Eiser. (2009) Identifying predictors of attitudes towards local onshore wind development with reference to an English case study. Energy Policy 37:11, pages 4604-4614.
Crossref
Crossref
Ji Bum Chung & Hong-Kyu Kim. (2009) Competition, economic benefits, trust, and risk perception in siting a potentially hazardous facility. Landscape and Urban Planning 91:1, pages 8-16.
Crossref
Crossref
Mikael Jensen. (2007) Lifestyle: suggesting mechanisms and a definition from a cognitive science perspective. Environment, Development and Sustainability 11:1, pages 215-228.
Crossref
Crossref
Ji Bum Chung, Hong-Kew Kim & Sam Kew Rho. (2008) Analysis of Local Acceptance of a Radioactive Waste Disposal Facility. Risk Analysis 28:4, pages 1021-1032.
Crossref
Crossref
Mattias Viklund & Lennart Sjöberg. (2008) An Expectancy-Value Approach to Determinants of Trust. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38:2, pages 294-313.
Crossref
Crossref
Maarten Wolsink. (2007) Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 11:6, pages 1188-1207.
Crossref
Crossref
Hélène Hermansson. (2006) The Ethics of NIMBY Conflicts. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10:1, pages 23-34.
Crossref
Crossref
Maarten Wolsink. (2006) Invalid theory impedes our understanding: a critique on the persistence of the language of NIMBY. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 31:1, pages 85-91.
Crossref
Crossref
Mattias Viklund. (2004) Energy policy options—from the perspective of public attitudes and risk perceptions. Energy Policy 32:10, pages 1159-1171.
Crossref
Crossref
Lennart Sjoberg*. (2004) Local Acceptance of a High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository. Risk Analysis 24:3, pages 737-749.
Crossref
Crossref
Lennart Sjoberg. (2003) Attitudes and Risk Perceptions of Stakeholders in a Nuclear Waste Siting Issue. Risk Analysis 23:4, pages 739-749.
Crossref
Crossref
Lennart Sjöberg. (2002) Communication du risque entre les experts et le public : intentions et perceptionsRisk communication between Experts and the Public: Perceptions and Intentions. Questions de communication:2, pages 19-35.
Crossref
Crossref
Lennart Sjöberg. (2002) Are Received Risk Perception Models Alive and Well?. Risk Analysis 22:4, pages 665-669.
Crossref
Crossref