Advanced search
Publication Cover
Information, Communication & Society Volume 16, 2013 - Issue 3: AoIR Special Issue
Submit an article Journal homepage
14,101
Views
207
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

NATIONAL POLITICS ON TWITTER

Structures and topics of a networked public sphere

Julian Ausserhofer FH Joanneum University of Applied Sciences, Department of Journalism and Public Relations, Alte Poststraße 152, Graz, 8020, AustriaCorrespondence[email protected]
&
Axel Maireder FH Joanneum University of Applied Sciences, Department of Journalism and Public Relations, Alte Poststraße 152, Graz, 8020, Austria
Pages 291-314 | Received 04 Sep 2012, Accepted 30 Nov 2012, Published online: 04 Jan 2013

Citations (207)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (41)

Paulo Ravecca, Marcela Schenck, Bruno Fonseca & Diego Forteza. (2023) What are they doing right? Tweeting right-wing intersectionality in Latin America. Globalizations 20:1, pages 38-59.
Read now
Anna Calasanti & Bailey Gerrits. (2023) “You’re not my nanny!” Responses to racialized women leaders during COVID-19. Politics, Groups, and Identities 11:1, pages 169-186.
Read now
Nara Park & Jihyun Ham. (2022) Does public opinion shape public policy? Effect of citizen dissent on legislative outcomes. The Information Society 38:4, pages 269-289.
Read now
Alexandra Goritz, Johannes Schuster, Helge Jörgens & Nina Kolleck. (2022) International Public Administrations on Twitter: A Comparison of Digital Authority in Global Climate Policy. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 24:3, pages 271-295.
Read now
Rafael Carrasco Polaino, Montse Mera Fernández & Sonia Parratt Fernández. (2022) Journalists and Engagement on Twitter and Climate Change: Tweet Authors, Formats, and Content During COP25. Journalism Practice 16:2-3, pages 486-501.
Read now
Juho Vesa, Petro Poutanen, Reijo Sund & Mika Vehka. (2022) An effective ‘weapon’ for the weak? Digital media and interest groups’ media success. Information, Communication & Society 25:2, pages 258-277.
Read now
Phoebe Maares, Fabienne Lind & Esther Greussing. (2021) Showing off Your Social Capital: Homophily of Professional Reputation and Gender in Journalistic Networks on Twitter. Digital Journalism 9:4, pages 500-517.
Read now
Carolina Plescia, Sylvia Kritzinger & Patricia Oberluggauer. (2020) Parties’ issue strategies on the drawing board: the 2017 Austrian case. West European Politics 43:3, pages 639-664.
Read now
Pei Zheng & Saif Shahin. (2020) Live tweeting live debates: How Twitter reflects and refracts the US political climate in a campaign season. Information, Communication & Society 23:3, pages 337-357.
Read now
Stefanie Walter & Michael Brüggemann. (2020) Opportunity makes opinion leaders: analyzing the role of first-hand information in opinion leadership in social media networks. Information, Communication & Society 23:2, pages 267-287.
Read now
Heather Robertson & Harry Dugmore. (2019) “But is it Journalism?” Reflections on Online Informational Roles and Content Creation Practices of a Sample of South African Lawyers. African Journalism Studies 40:3, pages 107-122.
Read now
Yan Su & Porismita Borah. (2019) Who is the agenda setter? Examining the intermedia agenda-setting effect between Twitter and newspapers. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 16:3, pages 236-249.
Read now
Sanja Kapidzic, Christoph Neuberger, Stefan Stieglitz & Milad Mirbabaie. (2019) Interaction and Influence on Twitter . Digital Journalism 7:2, pages 251-272.
Read now
John Fellenor, Julie Barnett, Clive Potter, Julie Urquhart, J.D. Mumford & C.P. Quine. (2018) The social amplification of risk on Twitter: the case of ash dieback disease in the United Kingdom. Journal of Risk Research 21:10, pages 1163-1183.
Read now
Tobias R. Keller & Katharina Kleinen-von Königslöw. (2018) Pseudo-discursive, mobilizing, emotional, and entertaining: identifying four successful communication styles of political actors on social media during the 2015 Swiss national elections. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 15:4, pages 358-377.
Read now
Gunn Enli & Chris-Adrian Simonsen. (2018) ‘Social media logic’ meets professional norms: Twitter hashtags usage by journalists and politicians. Information, Communication & Society 21:8, pages 1081-1096.
Read now
Marla A. Parker & Barry Bozeman. (2018) Social Media as a Public Values Sphere. Public Integrity 20:4, pages 386-400.
Read now
Mert Ozer, Mehmet Yigit Yildirim & Hasan Davulcu. (2018) Implicit negative link detection on online political networks via matrix tri-factorizations. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 24:2, pages 63-87.
Read now
Andrea Pavón-Guinea. (2018) The empirical factors of Twitter adoption by world governments: the impact of regime type and time on diffusion. The Journal of International Communication 24:1, pages 138-161.
Read now
Anamaria Dutceac Segesten & Michael Bossetta. (2017) A typology of political participation online: how citizens used Twitter to mobilize during the 2015 British general elections. Information, Communication & Society 20:11, pages 1625-1643.
Read now
Igor Vobič, Alem Maksuti & Tomaž Deželan. (2017) Who Leads the Twitter Tango?. Digital Journalism 5:9, pages 1134-1154.
Read now
Julia Metag & Adrian Rauchfleisch. (2017) Journalists’ Use of Political Tweets. Digital Journalism 5:9, pages 1155-1172.
Read now
Jonathan M. Cox. (2017) The source of a movement: making the case for social media as an informational source using Black Lives Matter. Ethnic and Racial Studies 40:11, pages 1847-1854.
Read now
Cristina Rosales Sánchez, Massimo Craglia & Arnold K. Bregt. (2017) New data sources for social indicators: the case study of contacting politicians by Twitter. International Journal of Digital Earth 10:8, pages 829-845.
Read now
Wenhong Chen, Fangjing Tu & Pei Zheng. (2017) A transnational networked public sphere of air pollution: analysis of a Twitter network of PM2.5 from the risk society perspective. Information, Communication & Society 20:7, pages 1005-1023.
Read now
Peter Van Aelst, Patrick van Erkel, Evelien D’heer & Raymond A. Harder. (2017) Who is leading the campaign charts? Comparing individual popularity on old and new media. Information, Communication & Society 20:5, pages 715-732.
Read now
John A. Scherpereel, Jerry Wohlgemuth & Margaret Schmelzinger. (2017) The Adoption and Use of Twitter as a Representational Tool among Members of the European Parliament. European Politics and Society 18:2, pages 111-127.
Read now
Salla-Maaria Laaksonen, Matti Nelimarkka, Mari Tuokko, Mari Marttila, Arto Kekkonen & Mikko Villi. (2017) Working the fields of big data: Using big-data-augmented online ethnography to study candidate–candidate interaction at election time. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 14:2, pages 110-131.
Read now
Tanja Bosch. (2017) Twitter activism and youth in South Africa: the case of #RhodesMustFall. Information, Communication & Society 20:2, pages 221-232.
Read now
Cornelius Puschmann, Marco Toledo Bastos & Jan-Hinrik Schmidt. (2017) Birds of a feather petition together? Characterizing e-petitioning through the lens of platform data. Information, Communication & Society 20:2, pages 203-220.
Read now
Joachim Åström & Martin Karlsson. (2016) The feminine style, the male influence, and the paradox of gendered political blogspace. Information, Communication & Society 19:11, pages 1636-1652.
Read now
Tanya Filer & Rolf Fredheim. (2016) Sparking debate? Political deaths and Twitter discourses in Argentina and Russia. Information, Communication & Society 19:11, pages 1539-1555.
Read now
Rita Marchetti & Diego Ceccobelli. (2016) Twitter and Television in a Hybrid Media System. Journalism Practice 10:5, pages 626-644.
Read now
S. Mo Jang & Josh Pasek. (2015) Assessing the Carrying Capacity of Twitter and Online News. Mass Communication and Society 18:5, pages 577-598.
Read now
Dhiraj Murthy. (2015) Twitter and elections: are tweets, predictive, reactive, or a form of buzz?. Information, Communication & Society 18:7, pages 816-831.
Read now
Evelien D'heer & Pieter Verdegem. (2015) What social media data mean for audience studies: a multidimensional investigation of Twitter use during a current affairs TV programme. Information, Communication & Society 18:2, pages 221-234.
Read now
Regina G. Lawrence, Logan Molyneux, Mark Coddington & Avery Holton. (2014) Tweeting Conventions. Journalism Studies 15:6, pages 789-806.
Read now
Stine Lomborg & Anja Bechmann. (2014) Using APIs for Data Collection on Social Media. The Information Society 30:4, pages 256-265.
Read now
Deen Freelon. (2014) On the Interpretation of Digital Trace Data in Communication and Social Computing Research. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 58:1, pages 59-75.
Read now
Todd Graham, Marcel Broersma, Karin Hazelhoff & Guido van 't Haar. (2013) BETWEEN BROADCASTING POLITICAL MESSAGES AND INTERACTING WITH VOTERS. Information, Communication & Society 16:5, pages 692-716.
Read now
Christian Christensen. (2013) WAVE-RIDING AND HASHTAG-JUMPING. Information, Communication & Society 16:5, pages 646-666.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (166)

Datu Buyung Agusdinata, Hallie Eakin, Nicole Darnall, Bohan Jiang & Hugo Romero. (2023) Advancing recognition justice in telecoupled critical mineral supply chains: The promise of social media. Energy Research & Social Science 104, pages 103264.
Crossref
Chamil Rathnayake & Daniel D Suthers. (2023) A template for mapping emotion expression within hashtag publics. Communication and the Public 8:3, pages 135-155.
Crossref
Christiana Karayianni & Charis Psaltis. (2022) Tweet for peace: Twitter as a medium for developing a peace discourse in the hands of the Greek-Cypriot and Turkish-Cypriot leaders. Online Information Review 47:5, pages 925-943.
Crossref
Michael Haman. (2023) Political communication on social media in Latin America: unequal use of Twitter by members of parliament. El Profesional de la información.
Crossref
Viviana Chiu Sik Wu & Weiai Wayne Xu. (2023) Who Leads and Who Echoes? Tracing Message Similarity Network of #ClimateChange Advocacy on Twitter. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, pages 089976402311740.
Crossref
Moch Faisal Karim, Reza Rahutomo, Ida Bagus Kerthyayana Manuaba, Kartika Purwandari, Tirta Nugraha Mursitama & Bens Pardamean. (2023) Free trade as domestic, economic, and strategic issues: a big data analytics approach. Journal of Big Data 10:1.
Crossref
Jose Ramon Saura, Daniel Palacios-Marqués & Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano. (2023) Privacy concerns in social media UGC communities: Understanding user behavior sentiments in complex networks. Information Systems and e-Business Management.
Crossref
Tal Samuel-Azran & Moran Yarchi. (2023) The “gender affinity effect” behind female politicians' social media support: facebook civil talk during Israel's 2021 elections. Online Information Review.
Crossref
Azi Lev-On. (2023) A big-data analysis of the communication patterns of parliament members with the public on Facebook: top-down, non-inclusive and non-egalitarian. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Crossref
Karin van Es, Daan van der Weijden & Jeroen Bakker. (2023) The multifaceted and situated data center imaginary of Dutch Twitter. Big Data & Society 10:1, pages 205395172311550.
Crossref
María Esperanza Casullo & Rodolfo E. Colalongo. (2022) The populist body in the age of social media: A comparative study of populist and non-populist representation. Thesis Eleven 173:1, pages 62-81.
Crossref
Marino De Luca. (2021) Who and what is their ‘people’? How British political leaders appealed to the people during the 2019 election. British Politics 17:4, pages 430-451.
Crossref
Dewi Kartika Sari, Wahyudi Kumorotomo & Novi Kurnia. (2022) Delivery structure of nationalism message on Twitter in the context of Indonesian netizens. Social Network Analysis and Mining 12:1.
Crossref
Nili Steinfeld & Azi Lev-On. (2022) A big-data analysis of the communication patterns of parliament members with the public on Facebook: top-down, non-inclusive and non-egalitarian. Aslib Journal of Information Management.
Crossref
Haesoo Kim, HaeEun Kim, Juho Kim & Jeong-woo Jang. (2022) When Does it Become Harassment?. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6:CSCW2, pages 1-32.
Crossref
Verónica González-List. (2022) There is a group of political tweeters that nobody is studying: the detached. Linguistic Frontiers 5:2, pages 25-40.
Crossref
Rebecca Adler-Nissen & Kristin Anabel Eggeling. (2022) Blended Diplomacy: The Entanglement and Contestation of Digital Technologies in Everyday Diplomatic Practice. European Journal of International Relations 28:3, pages 640-666.
Crossref
Ilgar Seyidov. 2022. Research Anthology on Social Media's Influence on Government, Politics, and Social Movements. Research Anthology on Social Media's Influence on Government, Politics, and Social Movements 513 528 .
Hua Pang, Jun Liu & Jiahui Lu. (2022) Tackling fake news in socially mediated public spheres: A comparison of Weibo and WeChat. Technology in Society 70, pages 102004.
Crossref
Verónica Israel-Turim, Josep Lluís Micó-Sanz & Miriam Diez Bosch. (2022) Who Did Spanish Politicians Start Following on Twitter? Homophilic Tendencies among the Political Elite. Social Sciences 11:7, pages 292.
Crossref
Kai-Cheng Yang, Pik-Mai Hui & Filippo Menczer. (2022) How Twitter data sampling biases U.S. voter behavior characterizations. PeerJ Computer Science 8, pages e1025.
Crossref
Francesco Vincenzo Surano, Maurizio Porfiri & Alessandro Rizzo. (2021) Analysis of lockdown perception in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. The European Physical Journal Special Topics 231:9, pages 1625-1633.
Crossref
Carlo Romano Marcello Alessandro Santagiustina & Massimo Warglien. (2022) The architecture of partisan debates: The online controversy on the no-deal Brexit. PLOS ONE 17:6, pages e0270236.
Crossref
Felix Rusche. (2022) Few voices, strong echo: Measuring follower homogeneity of politicians’ Twitter accounts. New Media & Society, pages 146144482210998.
Crossref
Johann Gründl. (2020) Populist ideas on social media: A dictionary-based measurement of populist communication. New Media & Society 24:6, pages 1481-1499.
Crossref
Yu Tian & Jeongwon Yang. (2022) Deny or bolster? A comparative study of crisis communication strategies between Trump and Cuomo in COVID-19. Public Relations Review 48:2, pages 102182.
Crossref
Jiaojiao Ji, Matthew Robbins, Jieyu Ding Featherstone, Christopher Calabrese & George A. Barnett. (2022) Comparison of public discussions of gene editing on social media between the United States and China. PLOS ONE 17:5, pages e0267406.
Crossref
Nahia Idoiaga Mondragon, Maria Dosil Santamaria, Maitane Belasko Txertudi & Israel Alonso Saez. (2020) Image-based Abuse: Debate and Reflections on the “Iveco Case” in Spain on Twitter. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 37:9-10, pages NP7178-NP7201.
Crossref
Tobias Heidenreich, Jakob-Moritz Eberl, Fabienne Lind & Hajo G Boomgaarden. (2022) Discontentment trumps Euphoria: Interacting with European Politicians’ migration-related messages on social media. New Media & Society, pages 146144482210746.
Crossref
Pascal Horni & Joël Galey. 2022. Digitale Transformation der öffentlichen Verwaltung in der Schweiz. Digitale Transformation der öffentlichen Verwaltung in der Schweiz 173 192 .
Christian Nuernbergk. 2022. Handbuch Politische Kommunikation. Handbuch Politische Kommunikation 713 724 .
Adam Worrall, Ana Ndumu & Lynette Hammond Gerido. 2022. Information for a Better World: Shaping the Global Future. Information for a Better World: Shaping the Global Future 149 174 .
Luis Bouza García & Jorge Tuñón Navarro. 2022. Tracing the Politicisation of the EU. Tracing the Politicisation of the EU 159 183 .
Stergios Fotopoulos & Luciano Morganti. 2022. Tracing the Politicisation of the EU. Tracing the Politicisation of the EU 139 158 .
Huu Dat Tran. (2021) Studying the Community of Trump Supporters on Twitter during the 2020 US Presidential Election via Hashtags #maga and #trump2020. Journalism and Media 2:4, pages 709-731.
Crossref
Mario Bisiada. (2021) Discursive structures and power relations in Covid-19 knowledge production. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8:1.
Crossref
Anna Tous-Rovirosa & Daria Dergacheva. (2021) #EsteVirusloParamosUnidos: War-like political communication on Twitter. Creating homogeneous communities in the Covid-19 crisis. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico 27:4, pages 1227-1241.
Crossref
Evan Frederick, Ann Pegoraro & Jimmy Sanderson. (2021) Sport in the Age of Trump: An Analysis of Donald Trump’s Tweets. International Journal of Sport Communication 14:3, pages 356-378.
Crossref
Aimei Yang, Ian Myoungsu Choi, Andrés Abeliuk & Adam Saffer. (2021) The Influence of Interdependence in Networked Publics Spheres: How Community-Level Interactions Affect the Evolution of Topics in Online Discourse. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 26:3, pages 148-166.
Crossref
Darren R. Halpin, Bert Fraussen & Robert Ackland. (2020) Which Audiences Engage With Advocacy Groups on Twitter? Explaining the Online Engagement of Elite, Peer, and Mass Audiences With Advocacy Groups. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 50:4, pages 842-865.
Crossref
Emily A. Erikson. (2020) A networked public: formal and relational approaches to the public sphere. Kybernetes 50:4, pages 919-928.
Crossref
Bruno Wüest, Christian Mueller & Thomas Willi. (2019) Controlled networking: Organizational cohesion and programmatic coherence of Swiss parties on Twitter. Party Politics 27:3, pages 581-596.
Crossref
Helmut Gruber. 2021. Approaches to Internet Pragmatics. Approaches to Internet Pragmatics 259 285 .
Renee Perelmutter. 2021. Approaches to Internet Pragmatics. Approaches to Internet Pragmatics 235 256 .
Gabriele Giacomini. (2021) The paradox of pluralism: A key to interpreting the online public sphere in the time of ‘encastellation’. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies 13:1, pages 141-148.
Crossref
August De Mulder & Steve Paulussen. (2021) Mediakritiek of anti-journalistiek?. Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap 49:3.
Crossref
Ilgar Seyidov. 2021. Handbook of Research on New Media Applications in Public Relations and Advertising. Handbook of Research on New Media Applications in Public Relations and Advertising 258 273 .
Pere FRANCH & Josep-Lluís MICÓ. (2021) Políticos y periodistas: un bucle endogámico en los medios sociales: dominios compartidos en Twitter por diputados y periodistas españoles. Transinformação 33.
Crossref
Christian Nuernbergk. 2020. Handbuch Politische Kommunikation. Handbuch Politische Kommunikation 1 13 .
Mallak Alkhathlan, M. L. Tlachac, Lane Harrison & Elke Rundensteiner. 2021. Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021. Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021 373 395 .
Danula Hettiachchi, Tanay Arora & Jorge Goncalves. 2021. Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021. Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2021 476 497 .
Zafer KIYAN & Uğur KOCAGER. (2020) Türkiye’de Twitter’ın Kamusal Tartışmalardaki Rolü Üzerine Bir AraştırmaTwitter-Based Public Discussions in Turkey: A Communicative Analysis. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi:34, pages 464-489.
Crossref
Nurcan TÖRENLİ & Zafer KIYAN. (2020) SOSYAL MEDYA EKSENLİ İLETİŞİM ARAŞTIRMALARI: KONULAR, KURAMLAR, YÖNTEMLER. Moment Journal.
Crossref
Ümit ATABEK. (2020) Twitterda Yerel Siyasal İletişim: Türkiye’de İki Farklı Tarz. Galatasaray Üniversitesi İleti-ş-im Dergisi.
Crossref
Johannes Schuster & Nina Kolleck. (2020) The Global Diffusion of Social Innovations – An Analysis of Twitter Communication Networks Related to Inclusive Education. Frontiers in Education 5.
Crossref
Tobias R. Keller. (2020) To Whom Do Politicians Talk and Listen?. Computational Communication Research 2:2, pages 175-202.
Crossref
Theo Lynn, Pierangelo Rosati & Binesh Nair. (2020) Calculated vs. Ad Hoc Publics in the #Brexit Discourse on Twitter and the Role of Business Actors. Information 11:9, pages 435.
Crossref
Olga Brunnerová & Jakub Charvát. (2020) Online Political Communication Research Methods. Politics in Central Europe 16:2, pages 433-454.
Crossref
Senaka Fernando, Julio Amador Díaz López, Ovidiu Şerban, Juan Gómez-Romero, Miguel Molina-Solana & Yike Guo. (2020) Towards a large-scale twitter observatory for political events. Future Generation Computer Systems 110, pages 976-983.
Crossref
Daniel Vogler & Florian Meissner. (2020) How users tweet about a cyber attack: An explorative study using machine learning and social network analysis. Journal of Digital Media & Policy 11:2, pages 195-214.
Crossref
Todd Graham & Julia Schwanholz. (2020) Politicians and political parties’ use of social media in-between elections. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies 9:2, pages 91-103.
Crossref
Cornelius Puschmann, Julian Ausserhofer & Josef Šlerka. (2020) Converging on a nativist core? Comparing issues on the Facebook pages of the Pegida movement and the Alternative for Germany. European Journal of Communication 35:3, pages 230-248.
Crossref
Liron Lavi. (2020) Time and Meaning-Making in the “Hybrid” Media: Evidence From the 2016 U.S. Election. Journal of Communication 70:2, pages 195-218.
Crossref
Rafael Prieto Curiel, Stefano Cresci, Cristina Ioana Muntean & Steven Richard Bishop. (2020) Crime and its fear in social media. Palgrave Communications 6:1.
Crossref
Elena Georgiadou, Spyros Angelopoulos & Helen Drake. (2020) Big data analytics and international negotiations: Sentiment analysis of Brexit negotiating outcomes. International Journal of Information Management 51, pages 102048.
Crossref
Roel During, Marcel Pleijte, Rosalie I. van Dam & Irini E. Salverda. 2020. Open Government. Open Government 1469 1487 .
Francisco SEGADO-BOJ. (2020) Research on social media and journalism (2003-2017): a bibliometric and content review. Transinformação 32.
Crossref
Kalyan Sahu, Yu Bai & Yoonsuk Choi. (2020) Supervised Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Handle of President Trump with Data Visualization Technique. Supervised Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Handle of President Trump with Data Visualization Technique.
Jessica MegarryJessica Megarry. 2020. The Limitations of Social Media Feminism. The Limitations of Social Media Feminism 133 182 .
Joanne Marras Tate, Vincent Russell, Rachel Larsen & Ellie Busch. 2020. Twitter, the Public Sphere, and the Chaos of Online Deliberation. Twitter, the Public Sphere, and the Chaos of Online Deliberation 25 51 .
Marco MoriniMarco Morini. 2020. Lessons from Trump’s Political Communication. Lessons from Trump’s Political Communication 1 26 .
Iina Hellsten & Loet Leydesdorff. (2019) Automated analysis of actor–topic networks on twitter: New approaches to the analysis of socio‐semantic networks. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 71:1, pages 3-15.
Crossref
Yan Su. (2019) Exploring the effect of Weibo opinion leaders on the dynamics of public opinion in China: A revisit of the two-step flow of communication. Global Media and China 4:4, pages 493-513.
Crossref
Morgan Vigil-Hayes, Nicholet Deschine Parkhurst & Marisa Duarte. (2019) Complex, Contemporary, and Unconventional. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3:CSCW, pages 1-27.
Crossref
Cinthya M. Cevallos Ludena, Jack F. Bravo-Torres, Paul E. Vintimilla-Tapia, Esteban F. Ordonez-Morales, Gabriel A. Leon-Paredes & Pablo L. Gallegos-Segovia. (2019) Ecuadorian mass media on Twitter during the 30-S. Ecuadorian mass media on Twitter during the 30-S.
Izhak Berkovich & Amit Avigur-EshelIzhak Berkovich & Amit Avigur-Eshel. 2019. Digital Protest and Activism in Public Education: Reactions to Neoliberal Restructuring in Israel. Digital Protest and Activism in Public Education: Reactions to Neoliberal Restructuring in Israel 1 9 .
Denise J. Wilkins, Andrew G. Livingstone & Mark Levine. (2019) Whose tweets? The rhetorical functions of social media use in developing the Black Lives Matter movement. British Journal of Social Psychology 58:4, pages 786-805.
Crossref
Andrea Ceron & Sergio Splendore. (2019) ‘Cheap Talk’? Second screening and the irrelevance of TV political debates. Journalism 20:8, pages 1108-1123.
Crossref
Kokil Jaidka, Alvin Zhou & Yphtach Lelkes. (2019) Brevity is the Soul of Twitter: The Constraint Affordance and Political Discussion. Journal of Communication 69:4, pages 345-372.
Crossref
James Usher, Lucia Morales & Pierpaolo Dondio. (2019) BREXIT: A Granger Causality of Twitter Political Polarisation on the FTSE 100 Index and the Pound. BREXIT: A Granger Causality of Twitter Political Polarisation on the FTSE 100 Index and the Pound.
Rafael Prieto Curiel, Carmen Cabrera Arnau, Mara Torres Pinedo, Humberto González Ramírez & Steven R. Bishop. (2019) Temporal and spatial analysis of the media spotlight. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 75, pages 254-263.
Crossref
Jane O’Boyle. (2018) Twitter diplomacy between India and the United States: Agenda-building analysis of tweets during presidential state visits. Global Media and Communication 15:1, pages 121-134.
Crossref
Lorena Recalde, Jonathan Mendieta, Ludovico Boratto, Luis Teran, Carmen Vaca & Gabriela Baquerizo. (2019) Who You Should Not Follow: Extracting Word Embeddings from Tweets to Identify Groups of Interest and Hijackers in Demonstrations. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing 7:2, pages 206-217.
Crossref
Niklas Kühl, Marc Goutier, Axel Ensslen & Patrick Jochem. (2019) Literature vs. Twitter: Empirical insights on customer needs in e-mobility. Journal of Cleaner Production 213, pages 508-520.
Crossref
Sina Dabiri & Kevin Heaslip. (2019) Developing a Twitter-based traffic event detection model using deep learning architectures. Expert Systems with Applications 118, pages 425-439.
Crossref
Birgir Guðmundsson. (2019) Logics of the Icelandic Hybrid Media System: Snapchat and media-use before the 2016 and 2017 Althing elections. Nordicom Review 40:1, pages 43-59.
Crossref
Frederic Guerrero-Solé & Hibai Lopez-Gonzalez. (2017) Government Formation and Political Discussions in Twitter: An Extended Model for Quantifying Political Distances in Multiparty Democracies. Social Science Computer Review 37:1, pages 3-21.
Crossref
Martin Emmer. 2019. Handbuch Organisationssoziologie. Handbuch Organisationssoziologie 1 24 .
Martin Emmer. 2019. Handbuch Online-Kommunikation. Handbuch Online-Kommunikation 369 392 .
Michael Higgins. 2019. Trump’s Media War. Trump’s Media War 129 141 .
Lone Sorensen, Heather Ford, Walid Al-Saqaf & Tanja Bosch. 2019. Media, Communication and the Struggle for Democratic Change. Media, Communication and the Struggle for Democratic Change 229 254 .
Radomir Bolgov, Igor Chernov, Igor Ivannikov & Dmitry Katsy. 2019. Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia. Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia 374 383 .
Jürgen Pfeffer, Katja Mayer & Fred Morstatter. (2018) Tampering with Twitter’s Sample API. EPJ Data Science 7:1.
Crossref
Shuning Lu, Wenhong Chen, Xiaoqian Li & Pei Zheng. (2018) The Chinese Smog Crisis as Media Event: Examining Twitter Discussion of the Documentary Under the Dome . Policy & Internet 10:4, pages 483-508.
Crossref
Barbara Pfetsch, Maria Löblich & Christiane Eilders. (2018) Dissonante Öffentlichkeiten als Perspektive kommunikationswissenschaftlicher TheoriebildungDissonant public spheres—a new perspective in communication theory. Publizistik 63:4, pages 477-495.
Crossref
Jingrong Tong & Landong Zuo. 2018. Tweeting the Environment #Brexit. Tweeting the Environment #Brexit 161 188 .
Alexandros Kleftodimos, Georgios Lappas, Amalia Triantafyllidou & Anastasia Yannacopoulou. (2018) Investigating the Greek political Twittersphere: Greek MPs and their Twitter network. Investigating the Greek political Twittersphere: Greek MPs and their Twitter network.
Mehita Iqani. (2017) Happy birthday Mama Winnie! The cultural politics of nostalgic portraits on the Twitter feed of @WinnieMandela. International Journal of Cultural Studies 21:5, pages 520-538.
Crossref
Jiyoung Chae. (2018) Reexamining the relationship between social media and happiness: The effects of various social media platforms on reconceptualized happiness. Telematics and Informatics 35:6, pages 1656-1664.
Crossref
Chamil Rathnayake & Daniel D. Suthers. (2018) Twitter Issue Response Hashtags as Affordances for Momentary Connectedness. Social Media + Society 4:3, pages 205630511878478.
Crossref
Yoiver Andrey Giraldo Quintero. (2018) Interacción a partir de los mensajes sobre corrupción publicados en Twitter por los precandidatos a la presidencia de Colombia (2018-2022). Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Sociales 9:2, pages 440-476.
Crossref
Tuotuo Qi, Tianmei Wang, Yanlin Ma, Wei Zhang & Yanchun Zhu. (2018) A scientometric analysis of e-participation research. International Journal of Crowd Science 2:2, pages 136-148.
Crossref
Ulrike Klinger. (2018) Aufstieg der Semiöffentlichkeit: Eine relationale PerspektiveThe rise of semi-public spheres: A relational perspective. Publizistik 63:2, pages 245-267.
Crossref
Chelsea Liu. (2018) Social media as a student response system: new evidence on learning impact. Research in Learning Technology 26:0.
Crossref
Michael Johann & Lars Bülow. (2018) Die Verbreitung von Internet-Memes. kommunikation@gesellschaft 19:2.
Crossref
John A. Scherpereel, Jerry Wohlgemuth & Audrey Lievens. (2018) Does Institutional Setting Affect Legislators’ Use of Twitter?. Policy & Internet 10:1, pages 43-60.
Crossref
Christian Strippel, Annekatrin Bock, Christian Katzenbach, Merja Mahrt, Lisa Merten, Christian Nuernbergk, Christian Pentzold, Cornelius Puschmann & Annie Waldherr. (2018) Die Zukunft der Kommunikationswissenschaft ist schon da, sie ist nur ungleich verteiltThe future of communication science is already here, it’s just not evenly distributed. Publizistik 63:1, pages 11-27.
Crossref
C. A. Piña-García, J. Mario Siqueiros-García, E. Robles-Belmont, Gustavo Carreón, Carlos Gershenson & Julio Amador Díaz López. (2017) From neuroscience to computer science: a topical approach on Twitter. Journal of Computational Social Science 1:1, pages 187-208.
Crossref
Todd Graham, Daniel Jackson & Marcel Broersma. 2018. Managing Democracy in the Digital Age. Managing Democracy in the Digital Age 137 157 .
Pieter Verdegem & Evelien D’heer. 2018. Managing Democracy in the Digital Age. Managing Democracy in the Digital Age 119 135 .
Júnia Ortiz, Solange Hamrin, Camilo Aggio & Edson Dalmonte. (2017) Television experience and political discussion on Twitter: exploring online conversations during the 2014 Brazilian presidential elections. Galáxia (São Paulo):36, pages 45-58.
Crossref
Joyojeet Pal & A'Ndre Gonawela. (2017) Studying political communication on Twitter: the case for small data. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 18, pages 97-102.
Crossref
Chamil Rathnayake & Jenifer S. Winter. (2017) Examining the Link Between Social Media Uses and Gratifications, and Political Tolerance and Dogmatism. Policy & Internet 9:4, pages 444-466.
Crossref
S Mo Jang, Yong Jin Park & Hoon Lee. (2016) Round-trip agenda setting: Tracking the intermedia process over time in the ice bucket challenge. Journalism 18:10, pages 1292-1308.
Crossref
André Luiz de Paiva, André Spuri Garcia & Valderí de Castro Alcântara. (2017) Disputas Discursivas sobre Corrupção no Brasil: Uma Análise Discursivo-Crítica no Twitter. Revista de Administração Contemporânea 21:5, pages 627-647.
Crossref
Alexander Jones Gross, Dhiraj Murthy & Lav R. Varshney. (2017) Pace of Life in Cities and the Emergence of Town Tweeters. SAGE Open 7:4, pages 215824401774511.
Crossref
Todd P. Newman. (2016) Tracking the release of IPCC AR5 on Twitter: Users, comments, and sources following the release of the Working Group I Summary for Policymakers. Public Understanding of Science 26:7, pages 815-825.
Crossref
Hassan Atifi & Michel Marcoccia. (2017) Exploring the role of viewers’ tweets in French TV political programs: Social TV as a new agora?. Discourse, Context & Media 19, pages 31-38.
Crossref
Kamil DEMİRHAN. (2017) TÜRKİYE’DE 2017 ANAYASA REFERANDUMU SÜRECİNDE SİYASAL İLETİŞİM ARACI OLARAK TWİTTER KULLANIMI. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi 5:2, pages 262-280.
Crossref
Stefano De Marco, Jose Manuel Robles & Mirko Antino. (2017) Reasons to Participate: The Role of Political Attitudes in Digital Activism. International Review of Social Psychology 30:1, pages 131.
Crossref
Lorena Recalde & Aigul Kaskina. (2017) Who is suitable to be followed back when you are a Twitter interested in Politics?. Who is suitable to be followed back when you are a Twitter interested in Politics?.
Katerina Gorkovenko, Nick Taylor & Jon Rogers. (2017) Social Printers. Social Printers.
David Gunnarsson Lorentzen & Jan Nolin. (2016) Approaching Completeness. Social Science Computer Review 35:2, pages 277-286.
Crossref
Freddie J. Jennings, Calvin R. Coker, Mitchell S. McKinney & Benjamin R. Warner. (2017) Tweeting Presidential Primary Debates: Debate Processing Through Motivated Twitter Instruction. American Behavioral Scientist 61:4, pages 455-474.
Crossref
Shannon C. McGregor & Chris J. Vargo. (2017) Election-related talk and agenda-setting effects on Twitter. The Agenda Setting Journal 1:1, pages 44-62.
Crossref
Axel Maireder, Brian E. Weeks, Homero Gil de Zúñiga & Stephan Schlögl. (2016) Big Data and Political Social Networks. Social Science Computer Review 35:1, pages 126-141.
Crossref
John S. Liu, Mei Hsiu-Ching Ho & Louis Y. Y. Lu. (2017) Recent Themes in Social Networking Service Research. PLOS ONE 12:1, pages e0170293.
Crossref
Roel During, Marcel Pleijte, Rosalie I. van Dam & Irini E. Salverda. 2017. Handbook of Research on Citizen Engagement and Public Participation in the Era of New Media. Handbook of Research on Citizen Engagement and Public Participation in the Era of New Media 304 322 .
Alex Frame. 2017. La communication politique. La communication politique 175 202 .
Chamil Rathnayake & Daniel D. Suthers. (2017) Twitter Issue Response Hashtags as Affordances for Momentary Connectedness. Twitter Issue Response Hashtags as Affordances for Momentary Connectedness.
Martin Emmer. 2017. Handbuch Soziale Medien. Handbuch Soziale Medien 81 99 .
Lobna Azaza, Sergey Kirgizov, Marinette Savonnet, ?ric Leclercq, Nicolas Gastineau & Rim Faiz. (2016) Information fusion-based approach for studying influence on Twitter using belief theory. Computational Social Networks 3:1.
Crossref
Adrian Rauchfleisch & Julia Metag. (2016) The special case of Switzerland: Swiss politicians on Twitter. New Media & Society 18:10, pages 2413-2431.
Crossref
Evelien D’heer & Pieter Verdegem. (2016) @THEVIEWER: Analyzing the offline and online impact of a dedicated conversation manager in the newsroom of a public broadcaster. New Media & Society 18:10, pages 2287-2304.
Crossref
Mariam Adedoyin-Olowe, Mohamed Medhat Gaber, Carlos M. Dancausa, Frederic Stahl & João Bártolo Gomes. (2016) A rule dynamics approach to event detection in Twitter with its application to sports and politics. Expert Systems with Applications 55, pages 351-360.
Crossref
Todd Graham, Dan Jackson & Marcel Broersma. (2014) New platform, old habits? Candidates’ use of Twitter during the 2010 British and Dutch general election campaigns. New Media & Society 18:5, pages 765-783.
Crossref
Se Jung Park, Ji Young Park, Yon Soo Lim & Han Woo Park. (2016) Expanding the presidential debate by tweeting: The 2012 presidential election debate in South Korea. Telematics and Informatics 33:2, pages 557-569.
Crossref
Bengü Hosch-Dayican, Chintan Amrit, Kees Aarts & Adrie Dassen. (2014) How Do Online Citizens Persuade Fellow Voters? Using Twitter During the 2012 Dutch Parliamentary Election Campaign. Social Science Computer Review 34:2, pages 135-152.
Crossref
Katerina Gorkovenko & Nick Taylor. (2016) Politics at Home. Politics at Home.
Segah Sak. 2016. Innovative Methods in Media and Communication Research. Innovative Methods in Media and Communication Research 59 74 .
Tim Highfield & Axel Bruns. 2015. The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics. The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics 338 350 .
Anders Olof Larsson & Øyvind Ihlen. (2015) Birds of a feather flock together? Party leaders on Twitter during the 2013 Norwegian elections. European Journal of Communication 30:6, pages 666-681.
Crossref
José Manuel Robles, Cristóbal Torres-Albero, Mirko Antino & Stefano De Marco. (2015) The use of digital social networks from an analytical sociology perspective: The case of Spain. Rationality and Society 27:4, pages 492-512.
Crossref
Alessandra Micalizzi & Manuela Farinosi. (2015) #decadenza su Twitter: un caso di naming e shaming online?. SOCIOLOGIA DELLA COMUNICAZIONE:49, pages 83-104.
Crossref
Maurice Vergeer. (2015) Twitter and Political Campaigning. Sociology Compass 9:9, pages 745-760.
Crossref
Damian Trilling. (2014) Two Different Debates? Investigating the Relationship Between a Political Debate on TV and Simultaneous Comments on Twitter. Social Science Computer Review 33:3, pages 259-276.
Crossref
Alex Frame & Gilles Brachotte. (2015) Le tweet stratégique: Use of Twitter as a PR tool by French politicians. Public Relations Review 41:2, pages 278-287.
Crossref
Sun Hyoung Kim & Sounman Hong. (2015) Political ideology matter in online salience?. Political ideology matter in online salience?.
S. Mo Jang & P. Sol Hart. (2015) Polarized frames on “climate change” and “global warming” across countries and states: Evidence from Twitter big data. Global Environmental Change 32, pages 11-17.
Crossref
Daniel Gayo-Avello. (2015) Social Media, Democracy, and Democratization. IEEE MultiMedia 22:2, pages 10-16.
Crossref
Martin Dolezal. (2015) Online Campaigning by Austrian Political Candidates: Determinants of Using Personal Websites, Facebook, and Twitter. Policy & Internet 7:1, pages 103-119.
Crossref
Francisco Segado-Boj, Jesús Díaz-Campo & Beatriz Lloves-Sobrado. (2015) Líderes latinoamericanos en Twitter. Viejas costumbres para nuevos medios en tiempos de crisis políticas. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social:70, pages 156-173.
Crossref
Jan-Hendrik Passoth. 2015. Die qualitative Analyse internetbasierter Daten. Die qualitative Analyse internetbasierter Daten 261 280 .
Martin Emmer. 2014. Handbuch Soziale Medien. Handbuch Soziale Medien 1 19 .
Troels Andreasen, Henning Christiansen & Mads Kæmsgaard Eberholst. 2015. Modeling and Using Context. Modeling and Using Context 477 482 .
Andreas JungherrAndreas Jungherr. 2015. Analyzing Political Communication with Digital Trace Data. Analyzing Political Communication with Digital Trace Data 69 106 .
Anders Olof Larsson & Hallvard Moe. (2014) Triumph of the Underdogs? Comparing Twitter Use by Political Actors During Two Norwegian Election Campaigns. SAGE Open 4:4, pages 215824401455901.
Crossref
Axel Maireder & Stephan Schlögl. (2014) 24 hours of an #outcry: The networked publics of a socio-political debate. European Journal of Communication 29:6, pages 687-702.
Crossref
Evelien D’heer & Pieter Verdegem. (2014) Conversations about the elections on Twitter: Towards a structural understanding of Twitter’s relation with the political and the media field. European Journal of Communication 29:6, pages 720-734.
Crossref

Displaying 200 of 207 citing articles. Use the download link below to view the full list of citing articles.

Download full citations list

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.