108
Views
21
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Effect of stimulation rate on speech perception in adult users of the Med-El CIS speech processing strategy Efectos de la tasa de estimulación en la percepción del lenguaje en usuarios adultos de la estrategia de procesamiento Med-El CIS

Pages 58-63 | Received 05 Sep 2003, Accepted 31 Mar 2004, Published online: 07 Jul 2009

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (3)

Terry B. Nunn, Dan Jiang, Tim Green, Patrick J. Boyle & Deborah A. Vickers. (2019) A systematic review of the impact of adjusting input dynamic range (IDR), electrical threshold (T) level and rate of stimulation on speech perception ability in cochlear implant users. International Journal of Audiology 58:6, pages 317-325.
Read now
Rolf-Dieter Battmer, Norbert Dillier, Wai Kong Lai, Klaus Begall, Elisabeth Estrada Leypon, Juan C. Falcón González, Manuel Manrique, Constantino Morera, Joachim Müller-Deile, Thomas Wesarg, Andrzej Zarowski, Matthijs J. Killian, Ernst von Wallenberg & Guido F. Smoorenburg. (2010) Speech perception performance as a function of stimulus pulse rate and processing strategy preference for the Cochlear™ Nucleus® CI24RE device: Relation to perceptual threshold and loudness comfort profiles. International Journal of Audiology 49:9, pages 657-666.
Read now
Komal Arora, Pam Dawson, Richard Dowell & Andrew Vandali. (2009) Electrical stimulation rate effects on speech perception in cochlear implants. International Journal of Audiology 48:8, pages 561-567.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (18)

Katelyn A. Berg, Chen Chen, Jack H. Noble, Benoit M. Dawant, Robert T. Dwyer, Robert F. Labadie & René H. Gifford. (2023) Effects of the Number of Channels and Channel Stimulation Rate on Speech Recognition and Sound Quality Using Precurved Electrode Arrays. American Journal of Audiology 32:2, pages 403-416.
Crossref
David Lanthaler, Andreas Griessner, Viktor Steixner, Patrick P. Hubner, Maurizio Ranieri, Samuel Cavuscens, Anissa Boutabla, Clemens M. Zierhofer & Angelica Perez Fornos. (2021) Speech Perception With Novel Stimulation Strategies for CombinedCochleo-Vestibular Systems. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 29, pages 1644-1650.
Crossref
Wiebke Lamping, Tobias Goehring, Jeremy Marozeau & Robert P. Carlyon. (2020) The effect of a coding strategy that removes temporally masked pulses on speech perception by cochlear implant users. Hearing Research 391, pages 107969.
Crossref
Pierre-Antoine Cucis, Christian Berger-Vachon, Ruben Hermann, Fabien Millioz, Eric Truy & Stéphane Gallego. (2019) Hearing in Noise: The Importance of Coding Strategies—Normal-Hearing Subjects and Cochlear Implant Users. Applied Sciences 9:4, pages 734.
Crossref
Kei Sakamoto, Chie Obuchi, Masae Shiroma, Han Matsuda, Emiko Seki, Ryuuichirou Araki & Tetsuo Ikezono. (2018) Speech perception of Natural Fast Speech by Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid Users聴覚障害者における早口の音声聴取に文の有意味性が及ぼす影響. AUDIOLOGY JAPAN 61:3, pages 209-215.
Crossref
Timothy J. Davis & René H. Gifford. (2018) Spatial Release From Masking in Adults With Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Effects of Distracter Azimuth and Microphone Location. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 61:3, pages 752-761.
Crossref
Dominik Riss, Jafar-Sasan Hamzavi, Michaela Blineder, Stefan Flak, Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner, Alexandra Kaider & Christoph Arnoldner. (2016) Effects of Stimulation Rate With the FS4 and HDCIS Coding Strategies in Cochlear Implant Recipients. Otology & Neurotology 37:7, pages 882-888.
Crossref
Jace Wolfe, Mila Morais & Erin Schafer. (2016) Speech Recognition of Bimodal Cochlear Implant Recipients Using a Wireless Audio Streaming Accessory for the Telephone. Otology & Neurotology 37:2, pages e20-e25.
Crossref
Jason Boulet, Mark White & Ian C. Bruce. (2015) Temporal Considerations for Stimulating Spiral Ganglion Neurons with Cochlear Implants. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 17:1, pages 1-17.
Crossref
Paul Bader, Mathias Kals, Reinhold Schatzer, Andreas Griessner & Clemens Zierhofer. (2013) Compensation for channel interaction in a simultaneous cochlear implant coding strategy. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133:6, pages 4124-4132.
Crossref
Fathi Kallel, Rafael Laboissiere, Ahmed Ben Hamida & Christian Berger-Vachon. (2013) Influence of a shift in frequency distribution and analysis rate on phoneme intelligibility in noisy environments for simulated bilateral cochlear implants. Applied Acoustics 74:1, pages 10-17.
Crossref
Stanley Pelosi, Alejandro Rivas, David S. Haynes, Marc L. Bennett, Robert F. Labadie, Andrea Hedley-Williams & George B. Wanna. (2012) Stimulation Rate Reduction and Auditory Development in Poorly Performing Cochlear Implant Users With Auditory Neuropathy. Otology & Neurotology 33:9, pages 1502-1506.
Crossref
Ning Zhou, Li Xu & Bryan E. Pfingst. (2012) Characteristics of detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels as a function of pulse rate in human cochlear implant users. Hearing Research 284:1-2, pages 25-32.
Crossref
Alana E. Kirby & John C. Middlebrooks. (2011) Unanesthetized Auditory Cortex Exhibits Multiple Codes for Gaps in Cochlear Implant Pulse Trains. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 13:1, pages 67-80.
Crossref
Sung Hye ParkEunoak KimHyo-Jeong LeeHyung-Jong Kim. (2012) Effects of Electrical Stimulation Rate on Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users. Korean Journal of Audiology 16:1, pages 6.
Crossref
Gail S. Donaldson, Patricia K. Dawson & Lamar Z. Borden. (2011) Within-Subjects Comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity120 Speech Processing Strategies: Speech Perception and Its Relation to Place-Pitch Sensitivity. Ear & Hearing 32:2, pages 238-250.
Crossref
Philip D. Littlefield, Irena Vujanovic, Jagmeet Mundi, Agnella Izzo Matic & Claus‐Peter Richter. (2010) Laser stimulation of single auditory nerve fibers. The Laryngoscope 120:10, pages 2071-2082.
Crossref
Carl Verschuur. (2009) Modeling the effect of channel number and interaction on consonant recognition in a cochlear implant peak-picking strategy. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125:3, pages 1723-1736.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.