Citations (53)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (5)
Anahuac Valero Haro, Omid Noroozi, Harm Biemans & Martin Mulder. (2022) Argumentation Competence: Students’ Argumentation Knowledge, Behavior and Attitude and their Relationships with Domain-Specific Knowledge Acquisition. Journal of Constructivist Psychology 35:1, pages 123-145.
Read now
Read now
Rosmiati Rosmiati, Liliasari Liliasari, Bayong Tjasyono, Taufik Ramlan Ramalis & Muhammad Satriawan. (2020) Measuring level of reflective thinking of physics pre-service teachers using effective essay argumentation. Reflective Practice 21:4, pages 565-586.
Read now
Read now
Mijung Kim & Wolff-Michael Roth. (2014) Argumentation as/in/for dialogical relation: a case study from elementary school science. Pedagogies: An International Journal 9:4, pages 300-321.
Read now
Read now
Yasemin Ozdem, Hamide Ertepinar, Jale Cakiroglu & Sibel Erduran. (2013) The Nature of Pre-service Science Teachers’ Argumentation in Inquiry-oriented Laboratory Context. International Journal of Science Education 35:15, pages 2559-2586.
Read now
Read now
Jan
Alexis Nielsen. (2012) Co-opting Science: A preliminary study of how students invoke science in value-laden discussions. International Journal of Science Education 34:2, pages 275-299.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (48)
Yanuarius Yanu Dharmawan, Helena Verusha Ali, Bayu Andika Prasatyo & Amaliah Amaliah. (2023) Comparing The Argumentative Essay Formats of Indonesian and Korean Students Using the Toulmin Model. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra 9:2, pages 1099-1114.
Crossref
Crossref
Walter F. Castro & Jorge A. Toro. (2023) Mathematics teacher argumentation in a didactic perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 19:9, pages em2322.
Crossref
Crossref
Max van Haastrecht, Matthieu Brinkhuis, Saskia Wools & Marco Spruit. (2023) VAST: a practical validation framework for e-assessment solutions. Information Systems and e-Business Management.
Crossref
Crossref
Raphael Wess, Burkhard Priemer & Ilka Parchmann. (2023) Professional development programs to improve science teachers’ skills in the facilitation of argumentation in science classroom—a systematic review. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research 5:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Anisa, Ari Widodo, Riandi & Muslim. (2022) Students’ Argumentation in Science Lessons. Science & Education 32:3, pages 669-687.
Crossref
Crossref
Alexandra List & Gala S. Campos Oaxaca. (2023) Comprehension and critique: an examination of students’ evaluations of information in texts. Reading and Writing.
Crossref
Crossref
Hüseyin POLAT & Fatma Bilge EMRE. (2022) Argümantasyon Yönteminin Eleştirel Düşünme Becerileri Üzerine Etkisi: Meta-Analiz ÇalışmasıThe Effect of Argumentation Method on Critical Thinking Skills: Meta-Analysis Study. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 23:3, pages 1624-1643.
Crossref
Crossref
Ayberk BOSTAN SARIOĞLAN & Handan ÜREK. (2022) Öğretmen Adaylarının Pandemi Sürecinde Ortaya Çıkan Kavramlarla İlgili Argümanları ile Bilimin Doğasına Yönelik İnanışlarının ve Eleştirel Düşünme Standartlarının İncelenmesi. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi 13:Özel Sayı 1, pages 225-250.
Crossref
Crossref
Xiaoyan Xu, Yuexin Zhong & Zimeng Shao. (2022) Changes in Argumentation Performance: Effects of Teacher-Student Collaborative Assessment. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics 45:4, pages 491-509.
Crossref
Crossref
Yana Landrieu, Fien De Smedt, Hilde Van Keer & Bram De Wever. (2022) Assessing the Quality of Argumentative Texts: Examining the General Agreement Between Different Rating Procedures and Exploring Inferences of (Dis)agreement Cases. Frontiers in Education 7.
Crossref
Crossref
Sevda DOĞAN DOLAPÇIOĞLU & Gülten KOŞAR. (2021) Thinking through Arguments on Comparative Education Topics: Contemporary Learning Approach in Teacher Education. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research 8:4, pages 196-207.
Crossref
Crossref
Behzad Mirzababaei & Viktoria Pammer-Schindler. (2021) Developing a Conversational Agent’s Capability to Identify Structural Wrongness in Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Model of Arguments. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 4.
Crossref
Crossref
D Hadianto, V S Damaianti, Y Mulyati & A Sastromiharjo. (2021) Enhancing scientific argumentation skill through partnership comprehensive literacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2098:1, pages 012015.
Crossref
Crossref
Umair Munir Hashmi, Radzuwan Ab Rashid & Rabia Munir. (2021) On the Psychology of Argument: A Structural Analysis of Former Muslims' Postings Within Malaysian Social Media. Frontiers in Psychology 12.
Crossref
Crossref
Maria Jafari & Anke Meisert. (2019) Activating Students’ Argumentative Resources on Socioscientific Issues by Indirectly Instructed Reasoning and Negotiation Processes. Research in Science Education 51:S2, pages 913-934.
Crossref
Crossref
Yakub IŞIKER & İrfan EMRE. (2021) The İmpact of Argumentation-Based İnstruction on Academic Achievements and Scientific Process Skills of Primary School Students and Their Attitudes towards the Science CourseArgümantasyon Tabanlı Öğretimin İlkokul Öğrencilerinin Akademik Başarılarına, Bilimsel Süreç Becerilerine ve Fen Bilimlerine Yönelik Tutumlarına Etkisi*. Uluslararası Eğitim Araştırmacıları Dergisi 4:1, pages 1-14.
Crossref
Crossref
Mustafa TÜYSÜZ & Ümmüye Nur TÜZÜN. (2020) Astronomi-Kimya Düşünce Deneyleri Temelli Argümantasyonun Özel Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Eleştirel Düşünme Becerileri Üzerine EtkisiThe Effect of Astronomy-Chemistry Thought Experiments Based on Argumentation on Critical Thinking Skills of Gifted Students. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 22:3, pages 818-836.
Crossref
Crossref
Esther F. de Waard, Gjalt T. Prins & Wouter R. van Joolingen. (2020) Pre-university students’ perceptions about the life cycle of bioplastics and fossil-based plastics. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 21:3, pages 908-921.
Crossref
Crossref
Kia Ditlevsen, Cecilie Glerup, Peter Sandøe & Jesper Lassen. (2020) Synthetic livestock vaccines as risky interference with nature? Lay and expert arguments and understandings of “naturalness”. Public Understanding of Science 29:3, pages 289-305.
Crossref
Crossref
Chen-Yu Chen, Hui-Ju Huang, Chi-Jui Lien & Yu-Ling Lu. (2020) Effects of Multi-Genre Digital Game-Based Instruction on Students’ Conceptual Understanding, Argumentation Skills, and Learning Experiences. IEEE Access 8, pages 110643-110655.
Crossref
Crossref
R M Probosari, F Widyastuti, S Sajidan, S Suranto & B A Prayitno. (2019) Improving scientific argumentation: opportunities and barriers analysis in inquiry-based scientific reading. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1280:3, pages 032005.
Crossref
Crossref
Aylin YAZICIOĞLU & Vesile ALKAN. (2019) Teaching Social Studies Lesson Based on Toulmin Discussion Model. Anadolu Journal Of Educational Sciences International, pages 352-395.
Crossref
Crossref
Aylin YAZICIOĞLU & Vesile ALKAN. (2019) Teaching Social Studies Lesson Based on Toulmin Discussion Model. Anadolu Journal Of Educational Sciences International, pages 352-395.
Crossref
Crossref
Yosan Setyo Utomo, Ashadi & Sarwanto. (2019) Argumentation Skills Profile on 8th Grade Students using Toulmin’s Argument Pattern on Controversial Topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1233, pages 012095.
Crossref
Crossref
A R Pratami, T Widhiyanti & A Widodo. (2019) Analysis on senior high school’s reasoning skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1157, pages 022027.
Crossref
Crossref
Mijung Kim & Wolff-Michael Roth. (2018) Dialogical argumentation in elementary science classrooms. Cultural Studies of Science Education 13:4, pages 1061-1085.
Crossref
Crossref
Robert Gunnarsson, Björn Hellquist, Helge Strömdahl & Dusan Zelic. (2018) Secondary school science teachers' arguments for the particulate nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55:4, pages 503-525.
Crossref
Crossref
Esmaeel Abdollahzadeh, Mohammad Amini Farsani & Maryam Beikmohammadi. (2017) Argumentative Writing Behavior of Graduate EFL Learners. Argumentation 31:4, pages 641-661.
Crossref
Crossref
Fayyaz Ahmad Faize, Waqar Husain & Farhat Nisar. (2017) A Critical Review of Scientific Argumentation in Science Education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 14:1.
Crossref
Crossref
Ana Llinares & Tom Morton. 2017. Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL. Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL
125
144
.
Sujata S. Kathpalia & Eng Kiat See. (2016) Improving argumentation through student blogs. System 58, pages 25-36.
Crossref
Crossref
Ian Bruce. (2016) Constructing critical stance in University essays in English literature and sociology. English for Specific Purposes 42, pages 13-25.
Crossref
Crossref
Maryam Eftekhari, Elaheh Sotoudehnama & S. Susan Marandi. (2016) Computer-aided argument mapping in an EFL setting: does technology precede traditional paper and pencil approach in developing critical thinking?. Educational Technology Research and Development 64:2, pages 339-357.
Crossref
Crossref
Chih-Chao Hsu, Chiung-Hui Chiu, Chun-Hsu Lin & Tzone-I. Wang. (2015) Enhancing skill in constructing scientific explanations using a structured argumentation scaffold in scientific inquiry. Computers & Education 91, pages 46-59.
Crossref
Crossref
Paul Stapleton & Yanming (Amy) Wu. (2015) Assessing the quality of arguments in students' persuasive writing: A case study analyzing the relationship between surface structure and substance. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 17, pages 12-23.
Crossref
Crossref
Nadja Belova, Ingo Eilks & Timo Feierabend. (2013) THE EVALUATION OF ROLE-PLAYING IN THE CONTEXT OF TEACHING CLIMATE CHANGE. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 13:S1, pages 165-190.
Crossref
Crossref
Mijung Kim, Robert Anthony & David Blades. (2014) Decision Making Through Dialogue: a Case Study of Analyzing Preservice Teachers’ Argumentation on Socioscientific Issues. Research in Science Education 44:6, pages 903-926.
Crossref
Crossref
Fulan Liu & Paul Stapleton. (2014) Counterargumentation and the cultivation of critical thinking in argumentative writing: Investigating washback from a high-stakes test. System 45, pages 117-128.
Crossref
Crossref
Charlotte Pezaro, Tony Wright & Robyn Gillies. (2014) Pre-service primary teachers' argumentation in socioscientific issues. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 2:2A, pages 58-69.
Crossref
Crossref
M. K. Juntunen & M. K. Aksela. (2014) Improving students' argumentation skills through a product life-cycle analysis project in chemistry education. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 15:4, pages 639-649.
Crossref
Crossref
Fabrizio Macagno & Aikaterini Konstantinidou. (2012) What Students’ Arguments Can Tell Us: Using Argumentation Schemes in Science Education. Argumentation 27:3, pages 225-243.
Crossref
Crossref
Aikaterini Konstantinidou & Fabrizio Macagno. (2012) Understanding Students’ Reasoning: Argumentation Schemes as an Interpretation Method in Science Education. Science & Education 22:5, pages 1069-1087.
Crossref
Crossref
Omid Noroozi, Armin Weinberger, Harm J.A. Biemans, Martin Mulder & Mohammad Chizari. (2013) Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL. Computers & Education 61, pages 59-76.
Crossref
Crossref
Jan Alexis Nielsen. (2011) Dialectical Features of Students’ Argumentation: A Critical Review of Argumentation Studies in Science Education. Research in Science Education 43:1, pages 371-393.
Crossref
Crossref
S. Simon, S Johnson, S. Cavell & T. Parsons. (2012) Promoting argumentation in primary science contexts: an analysis of students' interactions in formal and informal learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 28:5, pages 440-453.
Crossref
Crossref
Andy R. Cavagnetto. (2010) Argument to Foster Scientific Literacy. Review of Educational Research 80:3, pages 336-371.
Crossref
Crossref
Isabel Martins. (2009) Argumentation in texts from a teacher education journal: An exercise of analysis based upon the Bakhtinian concepts of genre and social language. Educación Química 20:2, pages 126-136.
Crossref
Crossref
Fabrizio Macagno & Aikaterini Konstantinidou. (2012) What Students’ Arguments Can Tell Us: Using Argumentation Schemes in Science Education. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Crossref
Crossref