1,781
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Radioactive waste management – technocratic dominance in an age of participation

Pages 149-155 | Published online: 14 Sep 2010

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (7)

Dries Dingenen & Anne Bergmans. (2023) Power and participation in the field of radioactive waste disposal. Critical Policy Studies 17:3, pages 409-427.
Read now
Marika Hietala & Robbe Geysmans. (2022) Social sciences and radioactive waste management: acceptance, acceptability, and a persisting socio-technical divide. Journal of Risk Research 25:4, pages 423-438.
Read now
Thomas Kaiserfeld & Arne Kaijser. (2021) Changing the System Culture: Mobilizing the Social Sciences in the Swedish Nuclear Waste System. Nuclear Technology 207:9, pages 1456-1468.
Read now
Mei-Fang Fan. (2019) Risk discourses and governance of high-level radioactive waste storage in Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 62:2, pages 327-341.
Read now
Anne Bergmans, Göran Sundqvist, Drago Kos & Peter Simmons. (2015) The participatory turn in radioactive waste management: deliberation and the social–technical divide. Journal of Risk Research 18:3, pages 347-363.
Read now
Catharina Landström & Anne Bergmans. (2015) Long-term repository governance: a socio-technical challenge. Journal of Risk Research 18:3, pages 378-391.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (20)

Martin Durdovic. (2023) Counter-strategizing after a dialogue failure: Stakeholder involvement and nuclear waste disposal in the Czech Republic. Energy Research & Social Science 103, pages 103198.
Crossref
Julian Brigstocke, Patrick Bresnihan, Leila Dawney & Naomi Millner. (2021) Geographies of authority. Progress in Human Geography 45:6, pages 1356-1378.
Crossref
Erik Laes & Gunter Bombaerts. (2021) Political Mediation in Nuclear Waste Management: a Foucauldian Perspective. Philosophy & Technology 34:4, pages 1287-1309.
Crossref
Mika Kari, Matti Kojo & Markku Lehtonen. (2021) Role of the host communities in final disposal of spent nuclear fuel in Finland and Sweden. Progress in Nuclear Energy 133, pages 103632.
Crossref
Abdulsamad Alhousali, Salmane Bourekkadi, Mohamed Azougagh, Hamid Boukhal, Elmehdi Alibrahimi & Chakir Elmahjoub. (2021) The role of scientific research on nuclear radiation waste management and preserving environment. E3S Web of Conferences 234, pages 00089.
Crossref
Mito Akiyoshi, John Whitton, Ioan Charnley-Parry & William F. Lawless. 2021. Systems Engineering and Artificial Intelligence. Systems Engineering and Artificial Intelligence 509 533 .
Matthew CottonMatthew Cotton. 2021. Virtual Reality, Empathy and Ethics. Virtual Reality, Empathy and Ethics 43 69 .
Matthew Cotton. (2018) Environmental Justice as Scalar Parity: Lessons From Nuclear Waste Management. Social Justice Research 31:3, pages 238-259.
Crossref
Matthew Kearnes & Lauren Rickards. (2017) Earthly graves for environmental futures: Techno-burial practices. Futures 92, pages 48-58.
Crossref
Tapio Litmanen, Mika Kari, Matti Kojo & Barry D. Solomon. (2017) Is there a Nordic model of final disposal of spent nuclear fuel? Governance insights from Finland and Sweden. Energy Research & Social Science 25, pages 19-30.
Crossref
Aleksandra Wagner, Tiffany Grobelski & Marcin Harembski. (2016) Is energy policy a public issue? Nuclear power in Poland and implications for energy transitions in Central and East Europe. Energy Research & Social Science 13, pages 158-169.
Crossref
Dina Abbott & Gordon WilsonDina Abbott & Gordon Wilson. 2015. The Lived Experience of Climate Change. The Lived Experience of Climate Change 201 221 .
Göran Sundqvist. (2014) ‘Heating up’ or ‘Cooling Down’? Analysing and Performing Broadened Participation in Technoscientific Conflicts. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 46:9, pages 2065-2079.
Crossref
Dina Abbott & Gordon Wilson. (2014) Climate change: lived experience, policy and public action. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management 6:1, pages 5-18.
Crossref
Matthew CottonMatthew Cotton. 2014. Ethics and Technology Assessment: A Participatory Approach. Ethics and Technology Assessment: A Participatory Approach 99 128 .
Matthew CottonMatthew Cotton. 2014. Ethics and Technology Assessment: A Participatory Approach. Ethics and Technology Assessment: A Participatory Approach 1 23 .
Grégoire Lits. (2013) Analyse du rôle des chercheurs en sciences sociales dans la gestion des déchets radioactifs. VertigO:Volume 13 Numéro 2.
Crossref
Lucie de Carvalho. (2013) Le complexe nucléaire de Sellafield au cœur des controverses : le fait technologique entre experts et profanes. VertigO:Volume 13 Numéro 2.
Crossref
Evaristo Bonano, Peter Swift, Gordon Appel & Paul Meacham. (2012) Can Repository Scientists and Social Scientists Work Together to Find Solutions to Nuclear Waste Management Problems? A Repository Scientist's Perspective. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 2:1, pages 1-18.
Crossref
Göran Sundqvist & Mark Elam. (2012) Public Involvement Designed to Circumvent Public Concern? The “Participatory Turn” in European Nuclear Activities. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 1:4, pages 203-229.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.