Advanced search
Publication Cover
Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine
An Open Access Journal
Volume 8, 2020 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
14,287
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

What factors are most influential in increasing cervical cancer screening attendance? An online study of UK-based women

Sarah Wildinga School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UKCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7977-7132View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Sarah Wightonb NHS England and NHS Improvement (North East & Yorkshire), Leeds, UKView further author information
,
Daisy Halligana School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UKView further author information
,
Robert Westc Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UKView further author information
,
Mark Connera School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UKORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6229-8143View further author information
ORCID Icon &
Daryl B. O’Connora School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UKView further author information
Pages 314-328 | Received 31 Jan 2020, Accepted 11 Jul 2020, Published online: 07 Aug 2020

Citations (16)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (1)

Gabriella Stuart & Danielle D’Lima. (2022) Perceived barriers and facilitators to attendance for cervical cancer screening in EU member states: a systematic review and synthesis using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Psychology & Health 37:3, pages 279-330.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (15)

Sarah Wilding, Daryl B. O’Connor & Mark Conner. (2023) Social Norms in Cervical Cancer Screening. Psychological Reports.
Crossref
Paula C. Bermúdez, Marcela Arrivillaga, Kirvis Torres Poveda, Diana M. Castrillón Libreros, Lorena E. Castillo Castillo & Daniela Neira Acevedo. (2023) Barriers to adherence to cytology exam: a case study in low-income Colombian women. BMC Health Services Research 23:1.
Crossref
Edel Harley & Jacqueline Harley. (2023) Overcoming barriers to cervical screening using Beattie’s model of health promotion. Primary Health Care.
Crossref
Takahiro Oike, Naoto Osu, Yuya Yoshimoto, Hideru Obinata, Kazuhiro Yoshikawa, Curtis C. Harris & Tatsuya Ohno. (2023) Pilot study of plasma creatine riboside as a potential biomarker for cervical cancer. Heliyon, pages e16684.
Crossref
Ananth Srinath, Frits van Merode, Shyam Vasudeva Rao & Milena Pavlova. (2023) Barriers to cervical cancer and breast cancer screening uptake in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Health Policy and Planning 38:4, pages 509-527.
Crossref
Sarah Wilding, Sarah Wighton, Robert West, Mark Conner & Daryl B. O'Connor. (2023) A randomised controlled trial of volitional and motivational interventions to improve cervical cancer screening uptake. Social Science & Medicine 322, pages 115800.
Crossref
Gvantsa Guliashvili, Iamze Taboridze, Nana Mebonia, Tamar Alibegashvili, Nata Kazakhashvili & Paata Imnadze. (2023) Evaluation of barriers to cervical cancer screening in Georgia. Central European Journal of Public Health 31:1, pages 9-18.
Crossref
Marie Kotzur, Rana Amiri, Lauren Gatting, Kathryn A. Robb, Jonathan Ling, John D. Mooney & Floor Christie-de Jong. (2023) Adapting Participatory Workshops to a Virtual Setting: Co-Design With Muslim Women of a Faith-Based Intervention to Encourage Cancer Screening Uptake. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 22.
Crossref
Evans Appiah Osei, Stella Appiah, Ezekiel Oti-Boadi, Dorothy Hammond, Dorothy Baffour Awuah, Awube Menlah, Isabella Garti & Michael Baidoo. (2022) Experiences of women awaiting cervical CANCER screening results from selected hospitals in Accra, Ghana. BMC Public Health 22:1.
Crossref
Sarah Wilding, Arianna Prudenzi, Mark Conner & Daryl B. O'Connor. (2022) Do reasoned action approach variables mediate relationships between demographics and cervical cancer screening intentions or behaviour? An online study of women from the UK. Social Science & Medicine 313, pages 115354.
Crossref
Federica Vallone, Daniela Lemmo, Maria Luisa Martino, Anna Rosa Donizzetti, Maria Francesca Freda, Francesco Palumbo, Elvira Lorenzo, Angelo D’Argenzio & Daniela Caso. (2022) Factors promoting breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screenings participation: A systematic review. Psycho-Oncology 31:9, pages 1435-1447.
Crossref
Samantha Groves & Joanna Brooks. (2021) What do young women below national screening age in England think about cervical cancer and cervical screening? A qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing 31:11-12, pages 1588-1597.
Crossref
Ben Young & Kathryn A Robb. (2021) Understanding patient factors to increase uptake of cancer screening: a review. Future Oncology 17:28, pages 3757-3775.
Crossref
J.C. Davies-Oliveira, M.A. Smith, S. Grover, K. Canfell & E.J. Crosbie. (2021) Eliminating Cervical Cancer: Progress and Challenges for High-income Countries. Clinical Oncology 33:9, pages 550-559.
Crossref
Brandon Chua, Viva Ma, Caitlin Asjes, Ashley Lim, Mahsa Mohseni & Hwee Lin Wee. (2021) Barriers to and Facilitators of Cervical Cancer Screening among Women in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18:9, pages 4586.
Crossref

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.