Citations (16)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (5)
Apollonya Maria Porcelli & Jordan Fox Besek. (2022) Sub-disciplining science in sociology: Bridges and barriers between environmental STS and environmental sociology. Environmental Sociology 8:2, pages 149-160.
Read now
Read now
Amanda Machin. (2020) The agony of nuclear: sustaining democratic disagreement in the anthropocene. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 16:1, pages 286-297.
Read now
Read now
Tanesha A. Thomas. (2020) Enduring rust: the persistence of low-tech pollution amidst New York’s high-tech revolution. Environmental Sociology 6:2, pages 207-218.
Read now
Read now
T.W. Dondanville & Michael L. Dougherty. (2020) Porousness and Peru’s moratorium on genetically modified organisms: stakeholder epistemologies and neoliberal science. Environmental Sociology 6:1, pages 107-119.
Read now
Read now
Stewart Lockie. (2015) Emergent themes? A year in the life of Environmental Sociology. Environmental Sociology 1:4, pages 237-240.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (11)
Gabriel Sigmund, Marlene Ågerstrand, Alexandre Antonelli, Thomas Backhaus, Tomas Brodin, Miriam L. Diamond, Walter R. Erdelen, David C. Evers, Thilo Hofmann, Thorsten Hueffer, Adelene Lai, Joao P. M. Torres, Leonie Mueller, Allison L. Perrigo, Matthias C. Rillig, Andreas Schaeffer, Martin Scheringer, Kristin Schirmer, Ahmed Tlili, Anna Soehl, Rita Triebskorn, Penny Vlahos, Colette vom Berg, Zhanyun Wang & Ksenia J. Groh. (2023) Addressing chemical pollution in biodiversity research. Global Change Biology 29:12, pages 3240-3255.
Crossref
Crossref
Yun-Chung Ting & Thung-Hong Lin. (2021) For security or sustainability? Investigating the global nexus of nuclear power, democracies, and civil society. Energy Research & Social Science 81, pages 102284.
Crossref
Crossref
. 2021. La fabrique des non‐problèmes. La fabrique des non‐problèmes
153
168
.
Lauren Richter, Alissa Cordner & Phil Brown. (2020) Producing Ignorance Through Regulatory Structure: The Case of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS). Sociological Perspectives 64:4, pages 631-656.
Crossref
Crossref
Grace M. Wickham & Thomas E. Shriver. (2021) Emerging contaminants, coerced ignorance and environmental health concerns: The case of per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Sociology of Health & Illness 43:3, pages 764-778.
Crossref
Crossref
Scott Frickel & Florencia Arancibia. 2021. Handbook of Environmental Sociology. Handbook of Environmental Sociology
457
476
.
Rolf Lidskog & Göran Sundqvist. (2018) Environmental Expertise as Group Belonging. Nature and Culture 13:3, pages 309-331.
Crossref
Crossref
Lauren Richter, Alissa Cordner & Phil Brown. (2018) Non-stick science: Sixty years of research and (in)action on fluorinated compounds. Social Studies of Science 48:5, pages 691-714.
Crossref
Crossref
Kristen Lyons & Naomi Smith. (2017) Governing with Ignorance: Understanding the Australian Food Regulator’s Response to Nano Food. NanoEthics 12:1, pages 27-38.
Crossref
Crossref
Dean Curran. (2017) The Treadmill of Production and the Positional Economy of Consumption. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie 54:1, pages 28-47.
Crossref
Crossref
Chen Chen, Travis Waller & Sharon L. Walker. (2017) Visualization of transport and fate of nano and micro-scale particles in porous media: modeling coupled effects of ionic strength and size. Environmental Science: Nano 4:5, pages 1025-1036.
Crossref
Crossref