4,834
Views
61
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspectives

Five rules of thumb for post-ELSI interdisciplinary collaborations

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 73-80 | Received 04 Oct 2015, Accepted 07 Apr 2016, Published online: 07 Jun 2016

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (16)

Tess Doezema. (2023) The promise of ELSI: coproducing the future of life on earth. Science as Culture 32:4, pages 461-485.
Read now
Anna-Sophie Jürgens, Sujatha Raman, Rebecca Hendershott, Tara Roberson, John Noel Viaña & Joan Leach. (2023) He who gets slapped: how can clowning in film interrogate technoscientific culture and help enact the ideals of responsible innovation?. Journal of Responsible Innovation 10:1.
Read now
Edward Prutzer, Maaz Gardezi, Donna M. Rizzo, Mary Emery, Scott Merrill, Benjamin E.K. Ryan, Panagiotis D. Oikonomou, Juan P. Alvez, Damilola T. Adereti, Rubaina Anjum, Appala R. Badireddy, Dwarika Bhattarai, Skye Brugler, Nicholas Cheney, David Clay, Sharon Clay, Ali Dadkhah, Joshua W. Faulkner, Deepak R. Joshi, Christopher Koliba, John McMaine, Semhar Michael, Sardorbek Musayev, Jarlath O’Neil-Dunne, George Pinder, Taylor Ricketts, Andrew W. Schroth, Scott Turnbull & Asim Zia. (2023) Rethinking ‘responsibility’ in precision agriculture innovation: lessons from an interdisciplinary research team. Journal of Responsible Innovation 10:1.
Read now
Anouk Heltzel, J. W. Schuijer, W.L. Willems, F. Kupper & J. E. W. Broerse. (2022) ‘There is nothing nano-specific here’: a reconstruction of the different understandings of responsiveness in responsible nanotechnology innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation 9:2, pages 173-195.
Read now
Marika Hietala & Robbe Geysmans. (2022) Social sciences and radioactive waste management: acceptance, acceptability, and a persisting socio-technical divide. Journal of Risk Research 25:4, pages 423-438.
Read now
David J. Hess, Dasom Lee, Bianca Biebl, Martin Fränzle, Sebastian Lehnhoff, Himanshu Neema, Jürgen Niehaus, Alexander Pretschner & Janos Sztipanovits. (2021) A comparative, sociotechnical design perspective on Responsible Innovation: multidisciplinary research and education on digitized energy and Automated Vehicles. Journal of Responsible Innovation 8:3, pages 421-444.
Read now
Bernd Carsten Stahl, Simisola Akintoye, Lise Bitsch, Berit Bringedal, Damian Eke, Michele Farisco, Karin Grasenick, Manuel Guerrero, William Knight, Tonii Leach, Sven Nyholm, George Ogoh, Achim Rosemann, Arleen Salles, Julia Trattnig & Inga Ulnicane. (2021) From Responsible Research and Innovation to responsibility by design. Journal of Responsible Innovation 8:2, pages 175-198.
Read now
Mario Pansera, Richard Owen, Darian Meacham & Vivienne Kuh. (2020) Embedding responsible innovation within synthetic biology research and innovation: insights from a UK multi-disciplinary research centre. Journal of Responsible Innovation 7:3, pages 384-409.
Read now
Vincenzo Politi & Alexei Grinbaum. (2020) The distribution of ethical labor in the scientific community. Journal of Responsible Innovation 7:3, pages 263-279.
Read now
Elvira Uyarra, Barbara Ribeiro & Lisa Dale-Clough. (2019) Exploring the normative turn in regional innovation policy: responsibility and the quest for public value. European Planning Studies 27:12, pages 2359-2375.
Read now
Michiel Van Oudheusden, Catrinel Turcanu & Susan Molyneux-Hodgson. (2018) Absent, yet present? Moving with ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’ in radiation protection research. Journal of Responsible Innovation 5:2, pages 241-246.
Read now
Cecilie Glerup, Sarah R. Davies & Maja Horst. (2017) ‘Nothing really responsible goes on here’: scientists’ experience and practice of responsibility. Journal of Responsible Innovation 4:3, pages 319-336.
Read now
Erik Fisher. (2017) Responsible innovation in a post-truth moment. Journal of Responsible Innovation 4:1, pages 1-4.
Read now
Erik Fisher. (2016) Navigating responsible innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation 3:1, pages 1-3.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (45)

Mike Fortun. 2023. Genomics with Care. Genomics with Care 311 335 .
Mike Fortun. 2023. Genomics with Care. Genomics with Care 277 309 .
Mike Fortun. 2023. Genomics with Care. Genomics with Care 259 275 .
Mike Fortun. 2023. Genomics with Care. Genomics with Care 253 258 .
Mike Fortun. 2023. Genomics with Care. Genomics with Care 221 251 .
Mike Fortun. 2023. Genomics with Care. Genomics with Care 183 220 .
Mike Fortun. 2023. Genomics with Care. Genomics with Care 141 182 .
Mike Fortun. 2023. Genomics with Care. Genomics with Care 111 140 .
Mike Fortun. 2023. Genomics with Care. Genomics with Care 103 107 .
Mike Fortun. 2023. Genomics with Care. Genomics with Care 80 101 .
Mike Fortun. 2023. Genomics with Care. Genomics with Care 42 79 .
Mike Fortun. 2023. Genomics with Care. Genomics with Care 13 41 .
Mike Fortun. 2023. Genomics with Care. Genomics with Care 1 10 .
Haidan Chen. (2023) Ethics of emerging science and technology needs strengthening interdisciplinary research. Chinese Science Bulletin 68:13, pages 1617-1620.
Crossref
Bernd Carsten Stahl & Lise Bitsch. (2023) Building a responsible innovation toolkit as project legacy. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 8.
Crossref
Paul A. Martin. (2022) The challenge of institutionalised complicity: Researching the pharmaceutical industry in the era of impact and engagement. Sociology of Health & Illness 44:S1, pages 158-178.
Crossref
Daphne Oluwaseun Martschenko. (2021) “The elephant in the room”: social responsibility in the production of sociogenomics research. BioSocieties 17:4, pages 713-731.
Crossref
Ken Komiya, Ryuma Shineha & Naoto Kawahara. (2022) Practice of responsible research and innovation in the formulation and revision of ethical principles of molecular robotics in Japan. SN Applied Sciences 4:11.
Crossref
Yosr Hamdi, Nicola MulderSonia Abdelhak. (2022) Women in Systems Science and Gender Parity: Why and How to Democratize the “Technology, Innovation, and Society Nexus”. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology 26:6, pages 329-338.
Crossref
Vincenzo Politi. (2021) Formal models of the scientific community and the value-ladenness of science. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 11:4.
Crossref
Martijn Wiarda, Geerten van de Kaa, Emad Yaghmaei & Neelke Doorn. (2021) A comprehensive appraisal of responsible research and innovation: From roots to leaves. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 172, pages 121053.
Crossref
Susan van Hees, Carla Greubel, Ellen Moors & Alexander Peine. (2021) Valuation in health and ageing innovation practices. Ageing and Society, pages 1-19.
Crossref
Gregor Wolbring & Fatima Jamal Al-Deen. (2021) Social Role Narrative of Disabled Artists and Both Their Work in General and in Relation to Science and Technology. Societies 11:3, pages 102.
Crossref
Hedda Ransan-Cooper, Björn C. P. Sturmberg, Marnie E. Shaw & Lachlan Blackhall. (2021) Applying responsible algorithm design to neighbourhood-scale batteries in Australia. Nature Energy 6:8, pages 815-823.
Crossref
Jan Mehlich. 2021. Good Chemistry: Methodological, Ethical, and Social Dimensions. Good Chemistry: Methodological, Ethical, and Social Dimensions 337 362 .
Lucy Carter & Aditi Mankad. (2021) The Promises and Realities of Integration in Synthetic Biology: A View From Social Science. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 8.
Crossref
Beth Greenhough, Cressida Jervis Read, Jamie Lorimer, Javier Lezaun, Carmen McLeod, Amber Benezra, Sally Bloomfield, Tim Brown, Megan Clinch, Fulvio D’Acquisto, Anna Dumitriu, Joshua Evans, Nicola Fawcett, Nicolas Fortané, Lindsay J. Hall, César E. Giraldo Herrera, Timothy Hodgetts, Katerina Vicky-Ann Johnson, Claas Kirchhelle, Anna Krzywoszynska, Helen Lambert, Tanya Monaghan, Alex Nading, Brigitte Nerlich, Andrew C. Singer, Erika Szymanski & Jane Wills. (2020) Setting the agenda for social science research on the human microbiome. Palgrave Communications 6:1.
Crossref
Pat Roberts, Joseph Herkert & Jennifer Kuzma. (2020) Responsible innovation in biotechnology: Stakeholder attitudes and implications for research policy. Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 8.
Crossref
Mone Spindler, Sophia Booz, Helya Gieseler, Sebastian Runschke, Sven Wydra & Judith Zinsmaier. 2020. Das geteilte Ganze. Das geteilte Ganze 213 239 .
Julian Stubbe. 2020. Das geteilte Ganze. Das geteilte Ganze 197 211 .
Charles Dupras, Katie Michelle Saulnier & Yann Joly. (2019) Epigenetics, ethics, law and society: A multidisciplinary review of descriptive, instrumental, dialectical and reflexive analyses. Social Studies of Science 49:5, pages 785-810.
Crossref
Nicholas E. Matthews, Laurence Stamford & Philip Shapira. (2019) Aligning sustainability assessment with responsible research and innovation: Towards a framework for Constructive Sustainability Assessment. Sustainable Production and Consumption 20, pages 58-73.
Crossref
Robbie Duschinsky. (2019) Attachment and the archive: barriers and facilitators to the use of historical sociology as complementary developmental science. Science in Context 32:3, pages 309-326.
Crossref
Sandra G. PorterTodd M. Smith. (2019) Bioinformatics for the Masses: The Need for Practical Data Science in Undergraduate Biology. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology 23:6, pages 297-299.
Crossref
Dirk Stemerding, Wieke Betten, Virgil Rerimassie, Zoë Robaey & Frank Kupper. (2019) Future making and responsible governance of innovation in synthetic biology. Futures 109, pages 213-226.
Crossref
Andrew J Millar, Uriel Urquiza, Peter L Freeman, Alastair Hume, Gordon D Plotkin, Oxana Sorokina, Argyris Zardilis & Tomasz Zielinski. (2019) Practical steps to digital organism models, from laboratory model species to ‘Crops in silico. Journal of Experimental Botany 70:9, pages 2403-2418.
Crossref
Matthew Kearnes, Declan Kuch & Angus Johnston. (2018) How to do things with metaphors: engineering life as hodgepodge. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 14:1.
Crossref
Afke Wieke Betten, Virgil Rerimassie, Jacqueline E. W. Broerse, Dirk Stemerding & Frank Kupper. (2018) Constructing future scenarios as a tool to foster responsible research and innovation among future synthetic biologists. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 14:1.
Crossref
Ana Delgado & Heidrun Åm. (2018) Experiments in interdisciplinarity: Responsible research and innovation and the public good. PLOS Biology 16:3, pages e2003921.
Crossref
Carmen McLeod & Brigitte Nerlich. (2017) Synthetic biology, metaphors and responsibility. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 13:1.
Crossref
Carmen McLeod, Brigitte Nerlich & Alison Mohr. (2017) Working with bacteria and putting bacteria to work: The biopolitics of synthetic biology for energy in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science 30, pages 35-42.
Crossref
Daniel Liu. (2017) This is the synthetic biology that is. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 63, pages 89-93.
Crossref
Jan Mehlich. (2017) “Is, ought, should”—scientists’ role in discourse on the ethical and social implications of science and technology. Palgrave Communications 3:1.
Crossref
Phil Macnaghten, Richard Owen & Roland Jackson. (2016) Synthetic biology and the prospects for responsible innovation. Essays in Biochemistry 60:4, pages 347-355.
Crossref
Alex Mankoo, Aoife Spengeman & Danil Mikhailov. (2022) Integrating Ethics into Data Science: Insights from a Product Team. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Crossref