Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Responsible Innovation Volume 3, 2016 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
4,821
Views
61
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspectives

Five rules of thumb for post-ELSI interdisciplinary collaborations

Andrew S. BalmerSociology and the Morgan Centre for Research into Everyday Lives, University of Manchester, Manchester, UKCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Jane CalvertScience, Technology and Innovation Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UKView further author information
,
Claire MarrisDepartment of Social Science, Health & Medicine, King’s College London, London, UKView further author information
,
Susan Molyneux-HodgsonDepartment of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UKView further author information
,
Emma FrowSchool of Biological & Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA;The Consortium for Science, Policy & Outcomes, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USAView further author information
,
Matthew KearnesEnvironmental Humanities, School of Humanities and Languages, University of New South Wales, Sydney, AustraliaView further author information
,
Kate BulpinSociology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UKView further author information
,
Pablo SchyfterScience, Technology and Innovation Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UKView further author information
,
Adrian MackenzieCentre for Science Studies, Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UKView further author information
&
Paul MartinDepartment of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UKView further author information
 show all
Pages 73-80 | Received 04 Oct 2015, Accepted 07 Apr 2016, Published online: 07 Jun 2016

References

  • Balmer, A. S., and K. Bulpin. 2013. “Left to their Own Devices: Post-ELSI, Ethical Equipment and the International Genetically Engineered Machine (iGEM) Competition.” BioSocieties 8 (3): 311–335. doi: 10.1057/biosoc.2013.13
  • Balmer, A. S., K. Bulpin, J. Calvert, M. Kearnes, A. Mackenzie, C. Marris, P. Martin, S. Molyneux-Hodgson, and P. Schyfter. 2012. “ Towards a Manifesto for Experimental Collaborations between Social and Natural Scientists.” Accessed https://experimentalcollaborations.wordpress.com/about/.
  • Balmer, A. S., K. Bulpin, and S. Molyneux-Hodgson. 2016. Synthetic Biology: A Sociology of Changing Practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Balmer, A. S., J. Calvert, C. Marris, S. Molyneux-Hodgson, E. Frow, M. Kearnes, K. Bulpin, P. Schyfter, A. Mackenzie, and P. Martin. 2015. “Taking Roles in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: Reflections on working in Post-ELSI Spaces.” Science and Technology Studies 28 (3): 3–25.
  • Barben, D., E. Fisher, C. Selin, and D. H. Guston. 2008. “Anticipatory Goverance of Nanotechnology: Foresight, Engagement and Integration.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and J. Wacjman, 3rd ed., 979–1000. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Calvert, J., and P. Martin. 2009. “The Role of Social Scientists in Synthetic Biology.” EMBO Reports 10 (3): 201–204. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.15
  • Derrida, J. 2000. Of Hospitality: Anne Dufourmantelle Invited Jacques Derrida to Respond. Translated by Rachel Bowlby. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Fisher, E., and G. Maricle. 2015. “Higher-level Responsiveness? Socio-Technical Integration within US and UK Nanotechnology Research Priority Setting.” Science and Public Policy 42 (1): 72–85. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scu017
  • Fitzgerald, D., and F. Callard. 2014. “Social Science and Neuroscience Beyond Interdisciplinarity: Experimental Entanglements.” Theory, Culture & Society 32 (1): 3–32. doi: 10.1177/0263276414537319
  • Fitzgerald, D., M. M. Littlefield, K. J. Knudsen, J. Tonks, and M. J. Dietz. 2014. “Ambivalence, Equivocation and the Politics of Experimental Knowledge: A Transdisciplinary Neuroscience Encounter.” Social Studies of Science 44 (5): 701–721. doi: 10.1177/0306312714531473
  • Fortun, M. 2005. “For an Ethics of Promising, or: A Few Kind Words about James Watson.” New Genetics and Society 24 (2): 157–174. doi: 10.1080/14636770500184792
  • Gieryn, T. F. 1983. “Boundary-work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48 (6): 781–795. doi: 10.2307/2095325
  • Ginsberg, A. D., J. Calvert, P. Schyfter, A. Elfick, and D. Endy. 2014. Synthetic Aesthetics: Investigating Synthetic Biology’s Designs on Nature. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Jasanoff, S. 2007. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Klein, J. T. 1990. Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
  • Nordmann, A., and A. Rip. 2009. “Mind the Gap Revisited.” Nature Nanotechnology 4 (5): 273–274. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2009.26
  • Owen, R., J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, eds. 2013. Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Painter, J. 2012. “The Politics of the Neighbour.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 30: 515–533. doi: 10.1068/d21110
  • Rabinow, P., and G. Bennett. 2012. Designing Human Practices: An Experiment with Synthetic Biology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • van Rijswijk, H. 2012. “Neighbourly Injuries: Proximity in Tort Law and Virginia Woolf’s Theory of Suffering.” Feminist Legal Studies 20: 39–60. doi: 10.1007/s10691-012-9195-8
  • Schot, J., and A. Rip. 1997. “The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54 (2–3): 251–268. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00180-1
  • Star, S. L., and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology,‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.” Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420. doi: 10.1177/030631289019003001
  • Viseu, A. 2015. “Integration of Social Science into Research is Crucial.” Nature 525: 291. doi: 10.1038/525291a
  • Wilsdon, J., and R. Willis. 2004. See-through Science. Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream. London: DEMOS.
Supercharge Your Next Research Paper: Research and write your next paper with Jenni AI.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.