658
Views
75
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Mode Effect: A Literature Review of Human and Technological Issues in Computerized Testing

Pages 1-24 | Published online: 13 Nov 2009

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (12)

Andrew Valentine, Iouri Belski & Margaret Hamilton. (2022) Influence of using a pen-and-paper or computer-based approach on engineering students’ self-efficacy during idea generation. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education 27:1, pages 16-25.
Read now
Stacy K. Boote, David N. Boote & Steven Williamson. (2021) Assessing Graph Comprehension on Paper and Computer with MBA Students: A Crossover Experimental Study. Cogent Education 8:1.
Read now
Alvaro J. Arce-Ferrer & Okan Bulut. (2019) Effects of Data-Collection Designs in the Comparison of Computer-Based and Paper-Based Tests. The Journal of Experimental Education 87:4, pages 661-679.
Read now
Robert Mason & Kyle Huff. (2019) The effect of format and device on the performance and usability of web-based questionnaires. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 22:3, pages 271-280.
Read now
Dennis Beck, Angela R. Watson & Robert Maranto. (2019) Do Testing Conditions Explain Cyber Charter Schools’ Failing Grades?. American Journal of Distance Education 33:1, pages 46-58.
Read now
Wolfgang Lenhard, Ulrich Schroeders & Alexandra Lenhard. (2017) Equivalence of Screen Versus Print Reading Comprehension Depends on Task Complexity and Proficiency. Discourse Processes 54:5-6, pages 427-445.
Read now
Xiao-Ling Zou & Yan-Min Chen. (2016) Effects of test media on different EFL test-takers in writing scores and in the cognitive writing process. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 25:1, pages 79-99.
Read now
Heather Hayes & Susan E. Embretson. (2013) The Impact of Personality and Test Conditions on Mathematical Test Performance. Applied Measurement in Education 26:2, pages 77-88.
Read now
HyeK. Pae. (2012) Convergence and discriminant: assessing multiple traits using multiple methods. Educational Research and Evaluation 18:6, pages 571-596.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (63)

Verónica Freire-Palacios, Kléber Jaramillo-Galarza, Jessica Quito-Calle & Lenin Orozco-Cantos. (2023) La inteligencia artificial en la gamificación para promover la salud mental de los estudiantes universitarios: una revisión de alcance. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología 3, pages 639.
Crossref
Timo Gnambs & Wolfgang Lenhard. (2023) Remote Testing of Reading Comprehension in 8-Year-Old Children: Mode and Setting Effects. Assessment, pages 107319112311593.
Crossref
Ángela Conejero, Josué Rico-Picó, Sebastián Moyano, Ángela Hoyo & M. Rosario Rueda. (2023) Predicting behavioral and brain markers of inhibitory control at preschool age from early measures of executive attention. Frontiers in Psychology 14.
Crossref
Ence Surahman & Tzu‐Hua Wang. (2022) Academic dishonesty and trustworthy assessment in online learning: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 38:6, pages 1535-1553.
Crossref
Katarzyna Polak, Jerzy Stanisław Gielecki & Anna Żurada. (2022) Tablet‐assisted objective structured spotter practical examination (TOSSPE): Advantages of an innovative anatomy spotter examination method for medical student assessment. Anatomical Sciences Education 15:6, pages 1060-1073.
Crossref
Gülay ÇETİNTAV, Emel ALTUN TOT & Ramazan YILMAZ. (2022) Derste Teknoloji Kullanımının TIMSS 2019 Sonuçlarına Etkisinin Veri Madenciliği İle AnaliziData Mining Analysis of the Effect of Technology Use in the Course on TIMSS 2019 Results. Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri Dergisi 4:1, pages 26-43.
Crossref
Katrina Perry, Kane Meissel & Mary F. Hill. (2022) Rebooting assessment. Exploring the challenges and benefits of shifting from pen-and-paper to computer in summative assessment. Educational Research Review 36, pages 100451.
Crossref
Andrew Valentine, Paul Vrbik & Richard Thomas. (2022) A systematic review of paper-based versus computer-based testing in engineering and computing education. A systematic review of paper-based versus computer-based testing in engineering and computing education.
Francesca Borgonovi & Magdalena Pokropek. (2021) The evolution of the association between ICT use and reading achievement in 28 countries. Computers and Education Open 2, pages 100047.
Crossref
Chun-gi Min. (2021) The Direction of Developing Courses and Assessment Tools for Enhancing Creativity Aligned with Critical Thinking. The Korean Association of General Education 15:5, pages 325-342.
Crossref
Tzu-Hua Wang, Chien-Hui Kao & Hsiang-Chun Chen. (2021) Factors Associated with the Equivalence of the Scores of Computer-Based Test and Paper-and-Pencil Test: Presentation Type, Item Difficulty and Administration Order. Sustainability 13:17, pages 9548.
Crossref
Stefan Gaillard, Zoril A. Oláh, Stephan Venmans & Michael Burke. (2021) Countering the Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Underpinnings Behind Susceptibility to Fake News: A Review of Current Literature With Special Focus on the Role of Age and Digital Literacy. Frontiers in Communication 6.
Crossref
Mariana H.G. Monje, Rebecca L.M. Fuller, Esther Cubo, Tiago A. Mestre, Ai Huey Tan, Julie C. Stout, Shazia Ali, Lana Chahine, Kathy Dujardin, Cheryl J. Fitzer‐Attas, Jinyoung Youn, Bastiaan R. Bloem, Fay B. Horak, Aristide Merola, Ralf Reilmann, Serene S. Paul, Earl Ray Dorsey, Walter Maetzler, Alberto J. Espay, Pablo Martinez‐Martin, Glenn T. Stebbins & Álvaro Sánchez‐Ferro. (2020) Toward e‐Scales : Digital Administration of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society Rating Scales . Movement Disorders Clinical Practice 8:2, pages 208-214.
Crossref
Jenny Grant Rankin. 2020. Accessibility and Diversity in Education. Accessibility and Diversity in Education 843 863 .
Lanlan Mu & James Cole. (2019) Behavior-Based Student Typology: A View from Student Transition from High School to College. Research in Higher Education 60:8, pages 1171-1194.
Crossref
H Jati, R D Ristanto & Nurkhamid. (2019) Implementation of CBT (Computer-Based Test) System on Aptitude Test Development Using C4.5 Algorithm as Potential Detection Tool for Choosing High School Major. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1413:1, pages 012037.
Crossref
Luca Salmieri & Orazio Giancola. (2019) Strumentazioni e pratiche digitali nella valutazione degli apprendimenti. RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione:70, pages 75-97.
Crossref
Ulf Kroehne, Sarah Buerger, Carolin Hahnel & Frank Goldhammer. (2019) Construct Equivalence of PISA Reading Comprehension Measured With Paper‐Based and Computer‐Based Assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 38:3, pages 97-111.
Crossref
Andrea Nardi & Maria Ranieri. (2018) Comparing paper‐based and electronic multiple‐choice examinations with personal devices: Impact on students' performance, self‐efficacy and satisfaction. British Journal of Educational Technology 50:3, pages 1495-1506.
Crossref
Jiajun Guo. (2019) Web-Based Creativity Assessment System that Collects Both Verbal and Figural Responses: Its Problems and Potentials. International Journal of Information and Education Technology 9:1, pages 27-34.
Crossref
Remco Feskens, Jean-Paul Fox & Robert Zwitser. 2019. Theoretical and Practical Advances in Computer-based Educational Measurement. Theoretical and Practical Advances in Computer-based Educational Measurement 231 247 .
Shannon K. T. Bailey, Alexis R. Neigel, Lindsay Y. Dhanani & Valerie K. Sims. (2017) Establishing Measurement Equivalence Across Computer- and Paper-Based Tests of Spatial Cognition. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 60:3, pages 340-350.
Crossref
Shannon Washburn, James Herman & Randolph Stewart. (2017) Evaluation of performance and perceptions of electronic vs. paper multiple-choice exams. Advances in Physiology Education 41:4, pages 548-555.
Crossref
Yael Sidi, Maya Shpigelman, Hagar Zalmanov & Rakefet Ackerman. (2017) Understanding metacognitive inferiority on screen by exposing cues for depth of processing. Learning and Instruction 51, pages 61-73.
Crossref
Bülent BAŞARAN, Murat YALMAN & Serdar ERKAN. (2017) Evaluation of Students’ Attitudes towards e-Exams and Use of Technology in Theology Distance Undergraduate Education Programsİlahiyat Uzaktan Eğitim Lisans Tamamlama Programlarında Teknoloji Kullanımı ve e-Sınavlara Yönelik Öğrenci Tutumlarının Değerlendirmesi. Hitit Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 16:31, pages 277-299.
Crossref
Jenny Grant Rankin. 2017. Handbook of Research on Classroom Diversity and Inclusive Education Practice. Handbook of Research on Classroom Diversity and Inclusive Education Practice 444 464 .
Guangming Ling. (2017) Are TOEFL iBT® writing test scores related to keyboard type? A survey of keyboard-related practices at testing centers. Assessing Writing 31, pages 1-12.
Crossref
Fabienne M. van der Kleij, Adrie J. Visscher, Linda Staman & Theo J. H. M. Eggen. 2017. Monitoring the Quality of Education in Schools. Monitoring the Quality of Education in Schools 77 92 .
Dongmei Li, Qing Yi & Deborah J. Harris. 2017. Quantitative Psychology. Quantitative Psychology 357 371 .
Andrew J. Notebaert. (2017) The effect of images on item statistics in multiple choice anatomy examinations. Anatomical Sciences Education 10:1, pages 68-78.
Crossref
Ryan G. Horn, Samuel E. Kaminsky & Tara S. Behrend. (2016) Don't Forget To Properly Use Your Signal: Driving Down New Roads to Selection Decisions. Industrial and Organizational Psychology 9:3, pages 666-671.
Crossref
Yael Sidi, Yael Ophir & Rakefet Ackerman. (2015) Generalizing screen inferiority - does the medium, screen versus paper, affect performance even with brief tasks?. Metacognition and Learning 11:1, pages 15-33.
Crossref
Amanda J. Meyer, Stanley I. Innes, Norman J. Stomski & Anthony J. Armson. (2016) Student performance on practical gross anatomy examinations is not affected by assessment modality. Anatomical Sciences Education 9:2, pages 111-120.
Crossref
Richard Walker & Zoe Handley. (2016) Designing for learner engagement with computer-based testing. Research in Learning Technology 24:1, pages 30083.
Crossref
Kyle C. Huff. (2015) The comparison of mobile devices to computers for web-based assessments. Computers in Human Behavior 49, pages 208-212.
Crossref
A. James Illingworth, Neil A. Morelli, John C. Scott & Scott L. Boyd. (2014) Internet-Based, Unproctored Assessments on Mobile and Non-Mobile Devices: Usage, Measurement Equivalence, and Outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology 30:2, pages 325-343.
Crossref
Debayan Dhar & Pradeep Yammiyavar. (2015) A Cross-cultural Study of Navigational Mechanisms in Computer Based Assessment Environment. Procedia Computer Science 45, pages 862-871.
Crossref
ShinSangKeun. (2014) The effect of the marking function on test takers’ performance and their perception in a computer-based reading test. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction 18:4, pages 1305-1321.
Crossref
Fabienne M. Van der Kleij, Theo J.H.M. Eggen & Ronald J.H. Engelen. (2014) Towards valid score reports in the Computer Program LOVS: A redesign study. Studies in Educational Evaluation 43, pages 24-39.
Crossref
Mark Wadley, Salome Bwayo Weaver, Clarence Curry & Clarice Carthon. (2014) Pharmacy students’ perceptions of ExamSoft® as the primary assessment tool in an integrated therapeutics course. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning 6:6, pages 815-821.
Crossref
Sascha Wüstenberg, Matthias Stadler, Jarkko Hautamäki & Samuel Greiff. (2014) The Role of Strategy Knowledge for the Application of Strategies in Complex Problem Solving Tasks. Technology, Knowledge and Learning 19:1-2, pages 127-146.
Crossref
Neil A. Morelli, Robert P. Mahan & A. James Illingworth. (2014) Establishing the Measurement Equivalence of Online Selection Assessments Delivered on Mobile versus Nonmobile Devices. International Journal of Selection and Assessment 22:2, pages 124-138.
Crossref
Monirosadat Hosseini, Mohamad Jafre Zainol Abidin & Mostafa Baghdarnia. (2014) Comparability of Test Results of Computer based Tests (CBT) and Paper and Pencil Tests (PPT) among English Language Learners in Iran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98, pages 659-667.
Crossref
Brad Jackel. 2014. Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrammatic Representation and Inference 71 77 .
Michael J. Kolen & Robert L. BrennanMichael J. Kolen & Robert L. Brennan. 2014. Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking. Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking 283 369 .
Paul Yovanoff, Jane Squires & Suzanne McManus. (2013) Adaptation From Paper–Pencil to Web-Based Administration of a Parent-Completed Developmental Questionnaire for Young Children. Infants & Young Children 26:4, pages 318-332.
Crossref
Tsung-Hsun Tsai & Chingwei David Shin. (2012) A Score Comparability Study for the NBDHE. Evaluation & the Health Professions 36:2, pages 228-239.
Crossref
Stephen Stoynoff. (2012) Research agenda: Priorities for future research in second language assessment. Language Teaching 45:2, pages 234-249.
Crossref
Arne Evers, José Muñiz, Dave Bartram, Dusica Boben, Jens Egeland, José R. Fernández-Hermida, Örjan Frans, Grazina Gintiliené, Carmen Hagemeister, Peter Halama, Dragos Iliescu, Aleksandra Jaworowska, Paul Jiménez, Marina Manthouli, Krunoslav Matesic, Mark Schittekatte, H. Canan Sümer & Tomáš Urbánek. (2012) Testing Practices in the 21st Century. European Psychologist 17:4, pages 300-319.
Crossref
Scott T. Frein. (2011) Comparing In-Class and Out-of-Class Computer-Based Tests to Traditional Paper-and-Pencil Tests in Introductory Psychology Courses. Teaching of Psychology 38:4, pages 282-287.
Crossref
Ulrich Schroeders & Oliver Wilhelm. (2011) Equivalence of Reading and Listening Comprehension Across Test Media. Educational and Psychological Measurement 71:5, pages 849-869.
Crossref
Ulrich Schroeders & Oliver Wilhelm. (2011) Computer usage questionnaire: Structure, correlates, and gender differences. Computers in Human Behavior 27:2, pages 899-904.
Crossref
Jing Chen, Sheida White, Michael McCloskey, Jaleh Soroui & Young Chun. (2011) Effects of computer versus paper administration of an adult functional writing assessment. Assessing Writing 16:1, pages 49-71.
Crossref
William D. Anderson & Miles Patterson. (2010) The Role of Psychological Distance in the Formation of Fairness Judgments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 40:11, pages 2888-2903.
Crossref
Yungwei Hao. (2010) Does multimedia help students answer test items?. Computers in Human Behavior 26:5, pages 1149-1157.
Crossref
Ulrich Schroeders & Oliver Wilhelm. (2010) Testing Reasoning Ability with Handheld Computers, Notebooks, and Paper and Pencil. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 26:4, pages 284-292.
Crossref
Alvaro J. Arce-FerrerElvira Martínez Guzmán. (2009) Studying the Equivalence of Computer-Delivered and Paper-Based Administrations of the Raven Standard Progressive Matrices Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement 69:5, pages 855-867.
Crossref
Panagiotis Siozos, George Palaigeorgiou, George Triantafyllakos & Theofanis Despotakis. (2009) Computer based testing using “digital ink”: Participatory design of a Tablet PC based assessment application for secondary education. Computers & Education 52:4, pages 811-819.
Crossref
Stephen Stoynoff. (2009) Recent developments in language assessment and the case of four large-scale tests of ESOL ability. Language Teaching 42:1, pages 1-40.
Crossref
. (2008) The Effect of Web-based Just-in-Time Teaching on the Inorganic Chemistry Course. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 52:6, pages 703-711.
Crossref
Christopher Kevin Wong & Maryanne Driscoll. (2008) A Modified Jigsaw Method: An Active Learning Strategy to Develop the Cognitive and Affective Domains Through Curricular Review. Journal of Physical Therapy Education 22:1, pages 15-23.
Crossref
J.T. Norris, R. Pauli & D.E. Bray. (2007) Mood change and computer anxiety: A comparison between computerised and paper measures of negative affect. Computers in Human Behavior 23:6, pages 2875-2887.
Crossref
José Muñiz & Dave Bartram. (2007) Improving International Tests and Testing. European Psychologist 12:3, pages 206-219.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.