132
Views
34
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Sociodemographic characteristics of nonparticipants in the Danish colorectal cancer screening program: a nationwide cross-sectional study

, , , , , & show all
Pages 345-354 | Published online: 27 Jun 2017

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Read on this site (4)

Marie D. Jørgensen, Ellen M. Mikkelsen, Rune Erichsen & Mette K. Thomsen. (2022) Mental illness and participation in colorectal cancer screening: a scoping review. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 57:10, pages 1216-1226.
Read now
Anna Vera Jørring Pallesen, Jørn Herrstedt, Rudi G. J. Westendorp, Laust Hvas Mortensen & Maria Kristiansen. (2021) Differential effects of colorectal cancer screening across sociodemographic groups in Denmark: a register-based study. Acta Oncologica 60:3, pages 323-332.
Read now
Rebecca Beatrix Clarke, Christina Therkildsen, Mie Agermose Gram, Klaus Kaae Andersen, Lina Steinrud Mørch & Anne Julie Tybjerg. (2020) Use of primary health care and participation in colorectal cancer screening – a Danish national register-based study. Acta Oncologica 59:8, pages 1002-1006.
Read now
Mette Kielsholm Thomsen, Morten Rasmussen, Sisse Helle Njor & Ellen Margrethe Mikkelsen. (2018) Demographic and comorbidity predictors of adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy in the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: a nationwide cross-sectional study. Clinical Epidemiology 10, pages 1733-1742.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (30)

B.R. Chand, L. Phillipson & T. Ha. (2023) Factors influencing organised faecal occult blood test screening participation in culturally and linguistically diverse populations: a scoping review. Public Health 219, pages 67-72.
Crossref
Onur Acar, Ersin Nazlican & Elif Dönmez. (2023) Colorectal cancer screening: understanding the needs of the pre-screening group. Central European Journal of Public Health 31:1, pages 3-8.
Crossref
Mercedes Vanaclocha-Espí, Marina Pinto-Carbó, Javier Martín-Pozuelo, Paula Romeo-Cervera, Rosana Peiró-Pérez, Carmen Barona, Francisco Ortiz, Andreu Nolasco, Susana Castán, Dolores Salas & Ana Molina-Barceló. (2022) Construction of an individual socioeconomic status index for analysing inequalities in colorectal cancer screening. PLOS ONE 17:12, pages e0278275.
Crossref
Sisse Helle Njor, Mette Bach Larsen, Bo Søborg & Berit Andersen. (2022) Colorectal cancer mortality after randomized implementation of FIT-based screening - a nationwide cohort study. Journal of Medical Screening 29:4, pages 241-248.
Crossref
Concetta Paola Pelullo, Livio Torsiello, Giorgia Della Polla, Gabriella Di Giuseppe & Maria Pavia. (2022) Screening for colorectal cancer: awareness and adherence among Italian women. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 34:12, pages 1231-1237.
Crossref
Mette Bach Larsen, Bo Søborg, Sisse Helle Njor, Thomas Møller Jensen, Peter Ingeholm & Berit Andersen. (2022) The relative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening to detect adenomas and cancer in different demographic and socioeconomic groups. A nationwide cohort study. European Journal of Cancer Prevention 31:6, pages 489-496.
Crossref
Mette Bach Larsen, Mette Hedelund, Louisa Flander & Berit Andersen. (2022) The impact of pre-notifications and reminders on participation in colorectal cancer screening – A randomised controlled trial. Preventive Medicine 164, pages 107229.
Crossref
Mette Kielsholm Thomsen, Lars Pedersen, Rune Erichsen, Timothy L. Lash, Henrik T. Sørensen & Ellen M. Mikkelsen. (2022) Risk-stratified selection to colonoscopy in FIT colorectal cancer screening: development and temporal validation of a prediction model. British Journal of Cancer 126:8, pages 1229-1235.
Crossref
Louisa Flander, Evelien Dekker, Berit Andersen, Mette Bach Larsen, Robert J Steele, Nea Malila, Tytti Sarkeala, Manon van der Vlugt, Clasine de Klerk, Bart Knottnerus, Lucinda Bertels, Anke Woudstra, Manon C.W. Spaander, Mirjam Fransen, Sirpa Heinavaara, Mary Dillon, Driss Ait Ouakrim & Mark Jenkins. (2022) What can We Learn From High-Performing Screening Programs to Increase Bowel Cancer Screening Participation in Australia?. Cancer Control 29, pages 107327482211213.
Crossref
Anna Vera Jørring Pallesen, Jørn Herrstedt, Rudi G.J. Westendorp, Laust Hvas Mortensen & Maria Kristiansen. (2020) Do we know the effects of colorectal cancer screening? A short communication on selective uptake and differential effects of colorectal cancer screening in Scandinavia. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 49:8, pages 841-844.
Crossref
Andrew Wang, Briton Lee, Shreya Patel, Evans Whitaker, Rachel B Issaka & Ma Somsouk. (2021) Selection of patients for large mailed fecal immunochemical test colorectal cancer screening outreach programs: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Screening 28:4, pages 379-388.
Crossref
Camilla Rahr Tatari, Berit Andersen, Trine Brogaard, Sara Badre‐Esfahani, Negin Jaafar & Pia Kirkegaard. (2021) The SWIM study: Ethnic minority women's ideas and preferences for a tailored intervention to promote national cancer screening programmes—A qualitative interview study. Health Expectations 24:5, pages 1692-1700.
Crossref
Diane M Harper, Madiha Tariq, Asraa Alhawli, Nadia Syed, Minal Patel & Ken Resnicow. (2021) Cancer risk perception and physician communication behaviors on cervical cancer and colorectal cancer screening. eLife 10.
Crossref
Nikhil Lal, Harpreet KSI Singh, Azeem Majeed & Nikhil Pawa. (2020) The impact of socioeconomic deprivation on the uptake of colorectal cancer screening in London. Journal of Medical Screening 28:2, pages 114-121.
Crossref
Anders Mark-Christensen, Rune Erichsen, Katalin Veres, Søren Laurberg & Henrik Toft Sørensen. (2021) Rectal Cancer Risk and Survival After Total Colectomy for IBD: A Population-Based Study. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 64:5, pages 583-591.
Crossref
Mie Agermose Gram, Christina Therkildsen, Rebecca B Clarke, Klaus K Andersen, Lina S Mørch & Anne Julie Tybjerg. (2021) The influence of marital status and partner concordance on participation in colorectal cancer screening. European Journal of Public Health 31:2, pages 340-346.
Crossref
Elodie Guillaume. 2021. Social Environment and Cancer in Europe. Social Environment and Cancer in Europe 249 259 .
Camilla Rahr Tatari, Berit Andersen, Trine Brogaard, Sara Koed Badre-Esfahani, Negin Jaafar & Pia Kirkegaard. (2020) Perceptions about cancer and barriers towards cancer screening among ethnic minority women in a deprived area in Denmark – a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 20:1.
Crossref
Pernille Gabel, Mette Bach Larsen, Adrian Edwards, Pia Kirkegaard & Berit Andersen. (2020) Effectiveness of a decision aid for colorectal cancer screening on components of informed choice according to educational attainment: A randomised controlled trial. PLOS ONE 15:11, pages e0241703.
Crossref
Petricia Marie Horshauge, Pernille Gabel, Mette Bach Larsen, Pia Kirkegaard, Adrian Edwards & Berit Andersen. (2020) The association between health literacy and colorectal cancer screening uptake in a publicly funded screening program in Denmark: Cross-sectional study. Preventive Medicine Reports 19, pages 101132.
Crossref
Anette Hvenegaard Kjeldgaard, Kim Hørslev-Petersen, Sonja Wehberg, Jens Soendergaard & Jette Primdahl. (2020) Does socioeconomic status make a difference? A register-based study on the extent to which cardiovascular screening in patients with inflammatory arthritis leads to recommended follow-up in general practice. RMD Open 6:2, pages e000940.
Crossref
Pernille Gabel, Adrian Edwards, Pia Kirkegaard, Mette Bach Larsen & Berit Andersen. (2020) The LEAD trial—The effectiveness of a decision aid on decision making among citizens with lower educational attainment who have not participated in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening in Denmark: A randomised controlled trial. Patient Education and Counseling 103:2, pages 359-368.
Crossref
T. H. Degett, J. Christensen, L. A. Thomsen, L. H. Iversen, I. Gögenur & S. O. Dalton. (2020) Nationwide cohort study of the impact of education, income and social isolation on survival after acute colorectal cancer surgery. BJS Open 4:1, pages 133-144.
Crossref
Byung Chang Kim, Minjoo Kang, Eunjung Park, Jeong-Im Shim, Shinhee Kang, Jessie Lee, Ha Jin Tchoe, Kyeong Ae Kong, Duk Hwan Kim, Yu Jin Kim, Kui Son Choi & Chang Mo Moon. (2020) Clinical Factors Associated with Adherence to the Follow-Up Examination after Positive Fecal Occult Blood Test in National Colorectal Cancer Screening. Journal of Clinical Medicine 9:1, pages 260.
Crossref
Ulrik Deding, Henrik Vardinghus-Nielsen, Christian Torp-Pedersen & Henrik Bøggild. (2019) Health educational background as a predictor of non-participation in national colorectal cancer screening: A cross-sectional population study among 886,088 invited Danes. Preventive Medicine 125, pages 69-76.
Crossref
Pernille Gabel, Mette Bach Larsen, Adrian Edwards, Pia Kirkegaard & Berit Andersen. (2019) Knowledge, attitudes, and worries among different health literacy groups before receiving first invitation to colorectal cancer screening: Cross-sectional study. Preventive Medicine Reports 14, pages 100876.
Crossref
Line Hvidberg, Line Flytkjær Virgilsen, Anette Fischer Pedersen & Peter Vedsted. (2019) Cancer beliefs and participation in screening for colorectal cancer: A Danish cohort study based on data from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership and national registers. Preventive Medicine 121, pages 11-17.
Crossref
Ulrik Deding, Anna Sharon Henig, Christian Torp-Pedersen & Henrik Bøggild. (2018) The effects of reminders for colorectal cancer screening: participation and inequality. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 34:1, pages 141-150.
Crossref
Pernille Gabel, Mette Bach Larsen, Pia Kirkegaard, Adrian Edwards & Berit Andersen. (2018) The LEAD trial - the effectiveness of a decision aid on decision making among citizens with lower educational attainment who have not participated in FIT-based colorectal cancer screening in Denmark: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 19:1.
Crossref
Bjørn Hofmann & Michal Stanak. (2018) Nudging in screening: Literature review and ethical guidance. Patient Education and Counseling 101:9, pages 1561-1569.
Crossref