Advanced search
Publication Cover
Patient Preference and Adherence Volume 12, 2018 - Issue
Submit an article Journal homepage
100
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Waiting for diagnostic colonoscopy: a qualitative exploration of screening participants’ experiences in a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program

Pia Kirkegaard1 Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, DenmarkCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Adrian Edwards1 Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark;2 Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
,
Mette Bach Larsen1 Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
&
Berit Andersen1 Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark;3 Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
Pages 845-852 | Published online: 17 May 2018

Citations (8)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (3)

Ali Janati, Rahim Khodayari-zarnaq, Ahmad Khanijahani, Manouchehr Khoshbaten, Alireza Ghamkhar & Neda Kabiri. (2021) Adherence to the new policy framework of the World Cancer Research Fund International in developing a policy package for the prevention of gastrointestinal cancers in Iran: a Delphi study. Global Health Action 14:1.
Read now
Kaisa Fritzell, Anna Forsberg, Johanna Wangmar, Yvonne Wengström, Matteo Bottai & Rolf Hultcrantz. (2020) Gender, having a positive FIT and type of hospital are important factors for colonoscopy experience in colorectal cancer screening – findings from the SCREESCO study. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 55:11, pages 1354-1362.
Read now
Mette Bach Larsen, Sisse Helle Njor, Thomas Møller Jensen, Peter Ingeholm & Berit Andersen. (2019) Potential for prevention: a cohort study of colonoscopies and removal of adenomas in a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening programme. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 54:8, pages 1008-1014.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (5)

Neda Kabiri, Rahim Khodayari-zarnaq, Manouchehr Khoshbaten, Morteza Arab-Zozani & Ali Janati. (2021) Gastrointestinal cancer prevention policies in Iran: A policy analysis of agenda-setting using Kingdon’s multiple streams. Journal of Cancer Policy 27, pages 100265.
Crossref
SteffieK Naber, MajidA Almadi, Gordon Guyatt, Feng Xie & Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar. (2021) Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening in a low incidence country: The case of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology 27:4, pages 208.
Crossref
Vivy T. Cusumano, Edgar Corona, Diana Partida, Liu Yang, Christine Yu & Folasade P. May. (2020) Patients without colonoscopic follow-up after abnormal fecal immunochemical tests are often unaware of the abnormal result and report several barriers to colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterology 20:1.
Crossref
Pia Kirkegaard, Adrian Edwards & Berit Andersen. (2019) A stitch in time saves nine: Perceptions about colorectal cancer screening after a non-cancer colonoscopy result. Qualitative study. Patient Education and Counseling 102:7, pages 1373-1379.
Crossref
Peter S. Liang & Jason A. Dominitz. (2019) Timing Isn’t Everything for Diagnostic Colonoscopy After Positive Results From a Fecal Immunohistochemical Test. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 17:7, pages 1245-1247.
Crossref

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.