Advanced search
Publication Cover
Audiology Volume 40, 2001 - Issue 1
Journal homepage
425
Views
79
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Comparison of Speech Recognition with Different Speech Coding Strategies (SPEAK, CIS, and ACE) and Their Relationship to Telemetric Measures of Compound Action Potentials in the Nucleus CI 24M Cochlear Implant System:Comparación del reconocimiento del lenguaje utilizando diferentes estrategias (SPEAK, CIS y ACE) y su relación con mediciones telemétricas de potenciales de acción compuestos, con el sistema de implante coclear nucleus CI24M

Jan Kiefer Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
,
Steffen Hohl Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
,
Ekkehard Stürzebecher Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
,
Thomas Pfennigdorff Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
&
Wolfgang Gstöettner Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
Pages 32-42 | Received 24 Jul 2000, Accepted 15 Nov 2000, Published online: 07 Jul 2009

Citations (79)

Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.

Subscribe to citation updates

Read on this site (10)

Saransh Jain & P.G. Vipin Ghosh. (2018) Acoustic simulation of cochlear implant hearing: Effect of manipulating various acoustic parameters on intelligibility of speech. Cochlear Implants International 19:1, pages 46-53.
Read now
Rose Thomas Kalathottukaren, Suzanne C. Purdy & Elaine Ballard. (2015) Prosody perception and musical pitch discrimination in adults using cochlear implants. International Journal of Audiology 54:7, pages 444-452.
Read now
Tan Lee, Shing Yu, Meng Yuan, Terence Ka Cheong Wong & Ying-Yee Kong. (2014) The effect of enhancing temporal periodicity cues on Cantonese tone recognition by cochlear implantees. International Journal of Audiology 53:8, pages 546-557.
Read now
Bart Vaerenberg, Vincent Péan, Guillaume Lesbros, Geert De Ceulaer, Karen Schauwers, Kristin Daemers, Dan Gnansia & Paul J Govaerts. (2013) Combined electric and acoustic hearing performance with Zebra® speech processor: Speech reception, place, and temporal coding evaluation. Cochlear Implants International 14:3, pages 150-157.
Read now
Valerie Looi, Philip Winter, Ilona Anderson & Catherine Sucher. (2011) A music quality rating test battery for cochlear implant users to compare the FSP and HDCIS strategies for music appreciation. International Journal of Audiology 50:8, pages 503-518.
Read now
Lennart Magnusson. (2011) Comparison of the fine structure processing (FSP) strategy and the CIS strategy used in the MED-EL cochlear implant system: Speech intelligibility and music sound quality. International Journal of Audiology 50:4, pages 279-287.
Read now
Diane S. Lazard, Philippe Bordure, Geneviève Lina-Granade, Jacques Magnan, Renaud Meller, Bernard Meyer, Emilien Radafy, Pierre-Eric Roux, Dan Gnansia, Vincent Péan & Eric Truy. (2010) Speech perception performance for 100 post-lingually deaf adults fitted with Neurelec cochlear implants: Comparison between Digisonic® Convex and Digisonic® SP devices after a 1-year follow-up. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 130:11, pages 1267-1273.
Read now
Taina Tuulikki Välimaa & Heikki Juhani Löppönen. (2008) Comparison of the body-worn CIS-PRO+ and the behind-the-ear-worn TEMPO+ cochlear implant systems in Finnish-speaking adult CI users: any differences in results with experienced listeners?. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 128:9, pages 984-991.
Read now
Andreas Buechner, Carolin Frohne-Buechner, Lutz Gaertner, Anke Lesinski-Schiedat, Rolf-Dieter Battmer & Thomas Lenarz. (2006) Evaluation of Advanced Bionics high resolution mode. International Journal of Audiology 45:7, pages 407-416.
Read now
Martin Kompis, Martin Jenk, Mattheus W. Vischer, Eberhard Seifert, Rudolf Häusler & Martin Kompis. (2002) Intra-and intersubject comparison of cochlear implant systems using the Esprit and the Tempo+ behind-the-ear speech processor: Comparacion intra e inter-personal de los sistemas de implante coclear utilizando los procesadores de lenguaje retroauriculares Esprit y Tempo+. International Journal of Audiology 41:8, pages 555-562.
Read now

Articles from other publishers (69)

Lakshay Khurana, Tamas Harczos, Tobias Moser & Lukasz Jablonski. (2023) En route to sound coding strategies for optical cochlear implants. iScience 26:10, pages 107725.
Crossref
Michelle L. Hughes. (2023) Electrically evoked compound action potential polarity sensitivity, refractory-recovery, and behavioral multi-pulse integration as potential indices of neural health in cochlear-implant recipients. Hearing Research 433, pages 108764.
Crossref
Tina Gabrovec, Jana Dragar, Domen Guzelj, Petra Povalej Bržan & Janez Rebol. (2023) Comparison of Perioperative Electrophysiological Measurements and Postoperative Results in Cochlear Implantation with a Slim Straight Electrode. Applied Sciences 13:5, pages 3292.
Crossref
Mohammad Maarefvand. 2023. Latest Advances in Cochlear Implant Technologies and Related Clinical Applications [Working Title]. Latest Advances in Cochlear Implant Technologies and Related Clinical Applications [Working Title].
Kavassery Venkateswaran Nisha, Neelamegarajan Devi & Sampath Sridhar. 2023. Advances in Speech and Music Technology. Advances in Speech and Music Technology 217 236 .
Jeffrey Skidmore, Brittney L. Carter, William J. RiggsShuman He. (2021) The Effect of Advanced Age on the Electrode-Neuron Interface in Cochlear Implant Users. Ear & Hearing 43:4, pages 1300-1315.
Crossref
Yu Dong, Jeroen J. Briaire, H. Christiaan Stronks & Johan H.M. Frijns. (2022) Short- and long-latency components of the eCAP reveal different refractory properties. Hearing Research 420, pages 108522.
Crossref
Robert P. Carlyon & Tobias Goehring. (2021) Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 22:5, pages 481-508.
Crossref
Oleg V. Kolokolov, Aleksandr O. Kuznetsov, Anton S. Machalov & Alla A. Grigoreva. (2021) Comparison of sound perception using CIS and ACE sound coding strategies in cochlear implants. Science and Innovations in Medicine 6:3, pages 8-12.
Crossref
Tom Gajecki & Waldo Nogueira. (2021) Enhancement of interaural level differences for bilateral cochlear implant users. Hearing Research 409, pages 108313.
Crossref
Nengheng Zheng, Yupeng Shi, Yuyong Kang & Qinglin Meng. (2021) A Noise-Robust Signal Processing Strategy for Cochlear Implants Using Neural Networks. A Noise-Robust Signal Processing Strategy for Cochlear Implants Using Neural Networks.
Ram C. M. C. Shekar & John H. L. Hansen. (2021) An evaluation framework for research platforms to advance cochlear implant/hearing aid technology: A case study with CCi-MOBILE. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 149:1, pages 229-245.
Crossref
Enoch Hsin-Ho Huang, Chao-Min Wu & Hung-Ching Lin. (2021) Combination and Comparison of Sound Coding Strategies Using Cochlear Implant Simulation With Mandarin Speech. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering 29, pages 2407-2416.
Crossref
H. C. Stronks, J. J. Briaire & J. H. M. Frijns. (2020) The Temporal Fine Structure of Background Noise Determines the Benefit of Bimodal Hearing for Recognizing Speech. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 21:6, pages 527-544.
Crossref
Daniel Kipping, Benjamin Krüger & Waldo Nogueira. (2020) The role of electroneural versus electrophonic stimulation on psychoacoustic electric-acoustic masking in cochlear implant users with residual hearing. Hearing Research 395, pages 108036.
Crossref
Pierre-Antoine Cucis, Christian Berger-Vachon, Ruben Hermann, Fabien Millioz, Eric Truy & Stéphane Gallego. (2019) Hearing in Noise: The Importance of Coding Strategies—Normal-Hearing Subjects and Cochlear Implant Users. Applied Sciences 9:4, pages 734.
Crossref
Xiaoan Sun, Sui Huang & Ningyuan Wang. 2019. Neural Interface: Frontiers and Applications. Neural Interface: Frontiers and Applications 167 206 .
Sridhar Srinivasan, Bernhard Laback, Piotr Majdak & Bertrand Delgutte. (2018) Introducing Short Interpulse Intervals in High-Rate Pulse Trains Enhances Binaural Timing Sensitivity in Electric Hearing. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 19:3, pages 301-315.
Crossref
Shuman HeBahar S. ShahsavaraniTyler C. McFaydenHaibo WangKatherine E. GillLei XuXiuhua ChaoJianfen LuoRuijie WangNancy He. (2018) Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency. Ear & Hearing 39:2, pages 238-250.
Crossref
Ji Eun Choi, Jong Ho Won, Cheol Hee Kim, Yang-Sun Cho, Sung Hwa Hong & Il Joon Moon. (2018) Relationship between spectrotemporal modulation detection and music perception in normal-hearing, hearing-impaired, and cochlear implant listeners. Scientific Reports 8:1.
Crossref
Blake S. Wilson & Michael F. Dorman. 2018. Neuromodulation. Neuromodulation 1209 1221 .
Risto Näätänen, Bjørn Petersen, Ritva Torppa, Eila Lonka & Peter Vuust. (2017) The MMN as a viable and objective marker of auditory development in CI users. Hearing Research 353, pages 57-75.
Crossref
Sungmin LeeGavin M. Bidelman. (2017) Objective Identification of Simulated Cochlear Implant Settings in Normal-Hearing Listeners Via Auditory Cortical Evoked Potentials. Ear & Hearing 38:4, pages e215-e226.
Crossref
Shuman He, Holly F. B. Teagle & Craig A. Buchman. (2017) The Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential: From Laboratory to Clinic. Frontiers in Neuroscience 11.
Crossref
Ruben H. M. van Eijl, Patrick J. Buitenhuis, Inge Stegeman, Sjaak F. L. Klis & Wilko Grolman. (2017) Systematic review of compound action potentials as predictors for cochlear implant performance. The Laryngoscope 127:2, pages 476-487.
Crossref
Jos J. Eggermont. 2017. Hearing Loss. Hearing Loss 307 347 .
Sungmin Lee & Lisa Lucks Mendel. (2016) Effect of the Number of Maxima and Stimulation Rate on Phoneme Perception Patterns Using Cochlear Implant Simulation. Clinical Archives of Communication Disorders 1:1, pages 87-100.
Crossref
Nicolas Palanca-Castan, Geneviève Laumen, Darrin Reed & Christine Köppl. (2016) The Binaural Interaction Component in Barn Owl (Tyto alba) Presents few Differences to Mammalian Data. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 17:6, pages 577-589.
Crossref
Reinhold Schatzer, Inna Koroleva, Andreas Griessner, Sergey Levin, Vladislav Kusovkov, Yuri Yanov & Clemens Zierhofer. (2015) Speech perception with interaction-compensated simultaneous stimulation and long pulse durations in cochlear implant users. Hearing Research 322, pages 99-106.
Crossref
Bernhard Laback, Katharina Egger & Piotr Majdak. (2015) Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants. Hearing Research 322, pages 138-150.
Crossref
Rainer Beutelmann, Geneviève Laumen, Daniel Tollin & Georg M. Klump. (2015) Amplitude and phase equalization of stimuli for click evoked auditory brainstem responses. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 137:1, pages EL71-EL77.
Crossref
Clémence Bayard, Cécile Colin & Jacqueline Leybaert. (2014) How is the McGurk effect modulated by Cued Speech in deaf and hearing adults?. Frontiers in Psychology 5.
Crossref
Dayse Távora-Vieira & Gunesh P. Rajan. (2014) Assessment of Fine Structure Processing Strategies in Unilaterally Deafened Cochlear Implant Users. International Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 03:06, pages 347-353.
Crossref
Oldooz Hazrati & Philipos C. Loizou. (2013) Reverberation suppression in cochlear implants using a blind channel-selection strategy. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133:6, pages 4188-4196.
Crossref
Obaid ur Rehman Qazi, Bas van Dijk, Marc Moonen & Jan Wouters. (2013) Understanding the effect of noise on electrical stimulation sequences in cochlear implants and its impact on speech intelligibility. Hearing Research 299, pages 79-87.
Crossref
Christina L. Runge, Christy B. Erbe, Mark T. McNally, Courtney Van Dusen, David R. Friedland, Anne E. Kwitek & Joseph E. Kerschner. (2013) A Novel Otoferlin Splice-Site Mutation in Siblings with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder. Audiology and Neurotology 18:6, pages 374-382.
Crossref
O. ur Rehman Qazi, B. van Dijk, M. Moonen & J. Wouters. (2012) Speech Understanding Performance of Cochlear Implant Subjects Using Time–Frequency Masking-Based Noise Reduction. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 59:5, pages 1364-1373.
Crossref
Chung-Feng Hwang, Hsiao-Chuan Chen, Chao-Hui Yang, Jyh-Ping Peng & Chia-Hui Weng. (2012) Comparison of Mandarin tone and speech perception between advanced combination encoder and continuous interleaved sampling speech-processing strategies in children. American Journal of Otolaryngology 33:3, pages 338-344.
Crossref
Edward R. Lee, David R. Friedland & Christina L. Runge. (2012) Recovery From Forward Masking in Elderly Cochlear Implant Users. Otology & Neurotology 33:3, pages 355-363.
Crossref
Andreas Bahmer & Uwe Baumann. (2012) Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for cochlear ECAP recording: I. Amplitude growth functions. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 205:1, pages 202-211.
Crossref
Matthew L. Carlson, Colin L.W. Driscoll, René H. Gifford & Sean O. McMenomey. (2012) Cochlear Implantation: Current and Future Device Options. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 45:1, pages 221-248.
Crossref
Yanfei Lin, Qin Gong, Xin Xi, Mengdi Hong & Aiting Chen. (2011) Chinese disyllables tone perceptual characteristics and the effect of stimulation rate on tone recognition in cochlear implants. Chinese disyllables tone perceptual characteristics and the effect of stimulation rate on tone recognition in cochlear implants.
Kostas Kokkinakis, Oldooz Hazrati & Philipos C. Loizou. (2011) A channel-selection criterion for suppressing reverberation in cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 129:5, pages 3221-3232.
Crossref
Tova Most, Tamar Harel, Talma Shpak & Michal Luntz. (2011) Perception of Suprasegmental Speech Features via Bimodal Stimulation: Cochlear Implant on One Ear and Hearing Aid on the Other. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 54:2, pages 668-678.
Crossref
Susan L. Fulmer, Christina L. Runge, Jamie W. Jensen & David R. Friedland. (2010) Rate of Neural Recovery in Implanted Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 144:2, pages 274-279.
Crossref
Andrew Botros & Colleen Psarros. (2010) Neural Response Telemetry Reconsidered: II. The Influence of Neural Population on the ECAP Recovery Function and Refractoriness. Ear & Hearing 31:3, pages 380-391.
Crossref
Yu-Tuan Chang, Hui-Mei Yang, Yi-Hui Lin, Shu-Hui Liu & Jiunn-Liang Wu. (2009) Tone Discrimination and Speech Perception Benefit in Mandarin-Speaking Children Fit With HiRes Fidelity 120 Sound Processing. Otology & Neurotology 30:6, pages 750-757.
Crossref
David M. Landsberger & Arthi G. Srinivasan. (2009) Virtual channel discrimination is improved by current focusing in cochlear implant recipients. Hearing Research 254:1-2, pages 34-41.
Crossref
Joshua S. Stohl, Chandra S. Throckmorton & Leslie M. Collins. (2009) Investigating the effects of stimulus duration and context on pitch perception by cochlear implant users. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126:1, pages 318-326.
Crossref
Blake S. Wilson & Michael F. Dorman. 2009. Neuromodulation. Neuromodulation 713 722 .
Taryn Davids, Jerome Valero, Blake C. Papsin, Robert V. Harrison & Karen A. Gordon. (2008) Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses of pediatric cochlear implant users. Part II: Rate effects. Hearing Research 244:1-2, pages 15-24.
Crossref
Blake S. Wilson & Michael F. Dorman. (2008) Cochlear implants: A remarkable past and a brilliant future. Hearing Research 242:1-2, pages 3-21.
Crossref
Yi Hu & Philipos C. Loizou. (2008) A new sound coding strategy for suppressing noise in cochlear implants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124:1, pages 498-509.
Crossref
Andreas Büchner, Waldo Nogueira, Bernd Edler, Rolf-Dieter Battmer & Thomas Lenarz. (2008) Results from a Psychoacoustic Model-Based Strategy for the Nucleus-24 and Freedom Cochlear Implants. Otology & Neurotology 29:2, pages 189-192.
Crossref
Blake S. Wilson & Michael F. Dorman. (2008) Interfacing Sensors With the Nervous System: Lessons From the Development and Success of the Cochlear Implant. IEEE Sensors Journal 8:1, pages 131-147.
Crossref
Olgierd Stieler & Zofia Obrębowska. (2008) Ocena percepcji mowy w funkcji zaprogramowanej ilości maksimów spektralnych u pacjentów dorosłych z implantem ślimakowym. Otolaryngologia Polska 62:6, pages 769-772.
Crossref
Lucas H. M. Mens. (2016) Advances in Cochlear Implant Telemetry: Evoked Neural Responses, Electrical Field Imaging, and Technical Integrity. Trends in Amplification 11:3, pages 143-159.
Crossref
T. Most & M. Peled. (2007) Perception of Suprasegmental Features of Speech by Children With Cochlear Implants and Children With Hearing Aids. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 12:3, pages 350-361.
Crossref
Yojiro Seki, N. Samejima & A. Komatsuzaki. 2007. Operative Neuromodulation. Operative Neuromodulation 431 435 .
David M. Landsberger & Colette M. McKay. (2005) Perceptual differences between low and high rates of stimulation on single electrodes for cochlear implantees. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117:1, pages 319-327.
Crossref
Birger Kollmeier & Helmut Riedel. 2005. Auditory Signal Processing. Auditory Signal Processing 361 368 .
Hung Thai-Van, Eric Truy, Basile Charasse, Florent Boutitie, Jean-Marc Chanal, Nadine Cochard, Jean-Pierre Piron, Sébastien Ribas, Olivier Deguine, Bernard Fraysse, Michel Mondain, Alain Uziel & Lionel Collet. (2004) Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting. Clinical Neurophysiology 115:12, pages 2811-2824.
Crossref
Blake S. Wilson. 2004. Cochlear Implants: Auditory Prostheses and Electric Hearing. Cochlear Implants: Auditory Prostheses and Electric Hearing 14 52 .
Andy J. Beynon, Ad F. M. Snik & Paul van den Broek. (2003) Comparison of Different Speech Coding Strategies Using a Disability-Based Inventory and Speech Perception Tests in Quiet and in Noise. Otology & Neurotology 24:3, pages 392-396.
Crossref
Torsten Dau. (2003) The importance of cochlear processing for the formation of auditory brainstem and frequency following responses. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 113:2, pages 936-950.
Crossref
Taina T. Välimaa, Taisto K. Määttä, Heikki J. Löppönen & Martti J. Sorri. (2002) Phoneme Recognition and Confusions With Multichannel Cochlear Implants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 45:5, pages 1055-1069.
Crossref
Enrico Pasanisi, Andrea Bacciu, Vincenzo Vincenti, Maurizio Guida, Maria Teresa Berghenti, Anna Barbot, Francesco Panu & Salvatore Bacciu. (2002) Comparison of speech perception benefits with SPEAK and ACE coding strategies in pediatric Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant recipients. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 64:2, pages 159-163.
Crossref
Valter Ciocca, Alexander L. Francis, Rani Aisha & Lena Wong. (2002) The perception of Cantonese lexical tones by early-deafened cochlear implantees. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111:5, pages 2250-2256.
Crossref
Yojiro Seki. (2002) Restoration of Hearing : Comparing Auditory Brainstem Implant to Cochlear Implant. Japanese Journal of Neurosurgery 11:5, pages 320-325.
Crossref

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.