References
- Wilson B S, Finley C C, Lawson D T, Wolford R D, Eddington D K, Rabinowitz W M. Better speech recognition with cochlear implant. Nature 1991; 352: 236–238
- Wilson B S, Finley C C, Lawson D T, Wolford R D, Zerbi M. Design and evaluation of a continuous interleaved sampling (CIS) processing strategy for multichannel cochlear implants. J Rehabil ResDev 1993; 30: 116–125
- McKay C M, McDermott H J. Perceptual performance of subjects with cochlear implants using the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor (SMSP) and the Mini Speech Processor (MSP). Ear Hear 1993; 14: 350–367
- Skinner M W, Clark G M, Whitford L A, et al. Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the Nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant system. Am J Otol 1994; 15(Suppl)15–27
- Dillier N, Battmer R D, Döring W H, Müller-Deile J. Multicentric field evaluation of a new speech coding strategy for cochlear implants. Audiology 1995; 34: 145–159
- Otte J, Schuhknecht H F, Kerr A G. Ganglion cell populations in normal and pathological human cochleae. Implications for cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 1978; 88: 1231–1246
- Hartmann R, Klinke R. Response characteristics of nerve fibers to patterned electrical stimulation. Cochlear implants: models of the electrically stimulated ear, J M Miller, F A Spelman. Springer, New York 1989; 135–160
- Hall R D. Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response. Hear Res 1990; 49: 155–168
- Brown C J, Abbas P J, Borland J, Bertschy M R. Electrically evoked whole nerve action potentials in Ineraid cochlear implant users: responses to different stimulating electrode configurations and comparison to psychophysical results. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39: 453–467
- Kiefer J, von Ilberg C, Rupprecht V, Huber-Egener J, Knecht R. Optimized speech understanding with the CIS-speech coding strategy in cochlear implants: the effect of variations in stimulation rate and the number of channels. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2000; 109: 1009–1020
- Cafarelli-Dees D, Dillier N, Lai W K, von Wallenberg E. Neural response telemetry and T & C levels at different stimulation rates. Proceedings of the 5th European Symposium on Paediatric Cochlear Implantation, Antwerp, April 7. 2000, abstract 105
- Abbas P J, Brown C J, Shallop J K, et al. Summary of results using the Nucleus CI 24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear 1999; 20: 45–59
- Brown C J, Abbas P J, Gantz B. Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 1385–1391
- Kiefer J, Müller J, Pfennigdorff T, et al. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the CIS-speech coding strategy (MED-EL Combi-40) compared to the multipeak and spectral peak strategies (Nucleus). ORL J Otorhinolaryn-golRelatSpec 1996; 58: 127–135
- Lawson D T, Wilson B S, Zerbi M, Finley C C. Speech processors for auditory prosthesis. Third quarterly progress report, NIH contract N0LDC-5-2103, 1996
- Fishman K, Shannon R V, Slattery W H. Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant processor. J Speech Hear 1997; 40: 1201–1215