Citations (62)
Keep up to date with the latest research on this topic with citation updates for this article.
Read on this site (20)
Tytti Willberg, Ville Sivonen, Saija Hurme, Antti A. Aarnisalo, Heikki Löppönen & Aarno Dietz. (2020) The long-term learning effect related to the repeated use of the Finnish matrix sentence test and the Finnish digit triplet test. International Journal of Audiology 59:10, pages 753-762.
Read now
Read now
Barbra H.B. Timmer, Louise Hickson & Stefan Launer. (2015) Adults with mild hearing impairment: Are we meeting the challenge?. International Journal of Audiology 54:11, pages 786-795.
Read now
Read now
Piers Dawes, Rachel Hopkins & Kevin J. Munro. (2013) Placebo effects in hearing-aid trials are reliable. International Journal of Audiology 52:7, pages 472-477.
Read now
Read now
Maggie Vance, Stuart Rosen & Mike Coleman. (2009) Assessing speech perception in young children and relationships with language skills. International Journal of Audiology 48:10, pages 708-717.
Read now
Read now
Michael A. Akeroyd. (2008) Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults. International Journal of Audiology 47:sup2, pages S53-S71.
Read now
Read now
Gitte Keidser, Anna O'Brien, Lyndal Carter, Margot McLelland & Ingrid Yeend. (2008) Variation in preferred gain with experience for hearing-aid users. International Journal of Audiology 47:10, pages 621-635.
Read now
Read now
Stuart Gatehouse, Graham Naylor & Claus Elberling. (2006) Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings – 1. Patterns of benefit. International Journal of Audiology 45:3, pages 130-152.
Read now
Read now
Kevin J. Munro & Mark E. Lutman. (2005) Sound quality judgements of new hearing instrument users over a 24-week post-fitting period
Juicios sobre la calidad del sonido en nuevos usuarios de auxiliares auditivos durante un período de 24 semanas después de la adaptación. International Journal of Audiology 44:2, pages 92-101.
Read now
Read now
Kevin J. Munro & Mark E. Lutman. (2005) The influence of visual feedback on closed-set word test performance over time. International Journal of Audiology 44:12, pages 701-705.
Read now
Read now
Abigail J. Milchard & Helen E. Cullington. (2004) An investigation into the effect of limiting the frequency bandwidth of speech on speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users. International Journal of Audiology 43:6, pages 356-362.
Read now
Read now
Adrian Davis. (2003) Population study of the ability to benefit from amplification and the provision of a hearing aid in 55–74-year-old first-time hearing aid users. International Journal of Audiology 42:sup2, pages 39-52.
Read now
Read now
Stuart Gatehouse, Graham Naylor & Clous Elberling. (2003) Benefits from hearing aids in relation to the interaction between the user and the environment. International Journal of Audiology 42:sup1, pages 77-85.
Read now
Read now
Donald E. Hayes & Karen L. Cormier. (2000) Double blind comparison of three hearing aid circuits with new hearing aid users. Scandinavian Audiology 29:1, pages 10-19.
Read now
Read now
Adrian Davis, Dai Stephens, Anita Rayment & Kevin Thomas. (1992) Hearing impairments in middle age: The acceptability, benefit and cost of detection (ABCD). British Journal of Audiology 26:1, pages 1-14.
Read now
Read now
Carl Ludvigsen. (1992) Comparison of Certain Measures of Speech and Noise Level. Scandinavian Audiology 21:1, pages 23-29.
Read now
Read now
Gitte Keidser. (1991) Computerized Measurement of Speech Intelligibility II.: Normative Data from a ‘Closed Response’ Test. Scandinavian Audiology 20:3, pages 153-158.
Read now
Read now
Stuart Gatehouse. (1991) The contribution of central auditory factors to auditory disability. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 111:sup476, pages 182-188.
Read now
Read now
Stuart Gatehouse. (1989) A pseudo free-field measure of auditory disability. British Journal of Audiology 23:4, pages 317-322.
Read now
Read now
S. Robinson, M. A. Cane & M. E. Lutman. (1989) Relative benefits of stepped and constant bore earmoulds: A crossover trial. British Journal of Audiology 23:3, pages 221-228.
Read now
Read now
Roger Green, Simon Day & John Bamford. (1989) A comparative evaluation of four hearing aid selection procedures. I—Speech discrimination measures of benefit. British Journal of Audiology 23:3, pages 185-199.
Read now
Read now
Articles from other publishers (42)
Eunju Koo, Sungkwan Ahn & Kyoungwon Lee. (2022) Change in Preferred Gain, Word Recognition Scores, and Sound Qualities as Hearing Aid Wearing Period. Audiology and Speech Research 18:3, pages 141-148.
Crossref
Crossref
Jérémie Ginzburg, Annie Moulin, Lesly Fornoni, Francesca Talamini, Barbara Tillmann & Anne Caclin. (2021) Development of auditory cognition in 5‐ to 10‐year‐old children: Focus on musical and verbal short‐term memory. Developmental Science 25:3.
Crossref
Crossref
Samuel Evans & Stuart Rosen. (2022) Who is Right? A Word-Identification-in-Noise Test for Young Children Using Minimal Pair Distracters. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 65:1, pages 159-168.
Crossref
Crossref
Erik Witte, Jonas Ekeroot & Susanne Köbler. (2021) The development of linguistic stimuli for the Swedish Situated Phoneme test. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, pages 1-38.
Crossref
Crossref
Jason Geller, Ann Holmes, Adam Schwalje, Joel I. Berger, Phillip E. Gander, Inyong Choi & Bob McMurray. (2021) Validation of the Iowa Test of Consonant Perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 150:3, pages 2131-2153.
Crossref
Crossref
Jingjing Xu & Robyn M. Cox. (2021) Interactions between Cognition and Hearing Aid Compression Release Time: Effects of Linguistic Context of Speech Test Materials on Speech-in-Noise Performance. Audiology Research 11:2, pages 129-149.
Crossref
Crossref
Dominique WrightJean-Pierre Gagné. (2021) Acclimatization to Hearing Aids by Older Adults. Ear & Hearing 42:1, pages 193-205.
Crossref
Crossref
Yu-Hsiang Wu, Elizabeth Stangl, Octav Chipara, Anna Gudjonsdottir, Jacob Oleson & Ruth Bentler. (2020) Comparison of In-Situ and Retrospective Self-Reports on Assessing Hearing Aid Outcomes. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 31:10, pages 746-762.
Crossref
Crossref
Joshua M. Alexander. (2019) The S-SH Confusion Test and the Effects of Frequency Lowering. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 62:5, pages 1486-1505.
Crossref
Crossref
Nicholas A. Dewyer, Patpong JiradejvongJennifer Henderson SabesCharles J. Limb. (2018) Automated smartphone audiometry: Validation of a word recognition test app. The Laryngoscope 128:3, pages 707-712.
Crossref
Crossref
Jani A. Johnson, Jingjing Xu & Robyn M. Cox. (2016) Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life II: Speech Understanding and Listening Effort. Ear & Hearing 37:5, pages 529-540.
Crossref
Crossref
Antje Heinrich, Helen Henshaw & Melanie A. Ferguson. (2016) Only Behavioral But Not Self-Report Measures of Speech Perception Correlate with Cognitive Abilities. Frontiers in Psychology 7.
Crossref
Crossref
Alexandra MacPherson & Michael A. Akeroyd. (2014) Variations in the Slope of the Psychometric Functions for Speech Intelligibility: A Systematic Survey. Trends in Hearing 18, pages 233121651453772.
Crossref
Crossref
Piers Dawes, Kevin J. Munro, Sridhar Kalluri & Brent Edwards. (2014) Auditory acclimatization and hearing aids: Late auditory evoked potentials and speech recognition following unilateral and bilateral amplification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 135:6, pages 3560-3569.
Crossref
Crossref
Srikanta K. Mishra & Mark E. Lutman. (2014) Top-Down Influences of the Medial Olivocochlear Efferent System in Speech Perception in Noise. PLoS ONE 9:1, pages e85756.
Crossref
Crossref
Michael A. Akeroyd & Fiona H. Guy. (2011) The effect of hearing impairment on localization dominance for single-word stimuli. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130:1, pages 312-323.
Crossref
Crossref
William M. Whitmer & Michael A. Akeroyd. (2011) Level Discrimination of Speech Sounds by Hearing-Impaired Individuals With and Without Hearing Amplification. Ear & Hearing 32:3, pages 391-398.
Crossref
Crossref
Francis Kuk, Chi-Chuen Lau, Petri Korhonen, Bryan Crose, Heidi Peeters & Denise Keenan. (2010) Development of the ORCA Nonsense Syllable Test. Ear & Hearing 31:6, pages 779-795.
Crossref
Crossref
Kevin J. Munro. (2008) Reorganization of the Adult Auditory System: Perceptual and Physiological Evidence From Monaural Fitting of Hearing Aids. Trends in Amplification 12:3, pages 254-271.
Crossref
Crossref
Stuart Gatehouse & Michael A. Akeroyd. (2008) The Effects of Cueing Temporal and Spatial Attention on Word Recognition in a Complex Listening Task in Hearing-Impaired Listeners. Trends in Amplification 12:2, pages 145-161.
Crossref
Crossref
Kevin J. Munro. (2008) Reorganization of the Adult Auditory System: Perceptual and Physiological Evidence From Monaural Fitting of Hearing Aids. Trends in Amplification 12:2, pages 85-102.
Crossref
Crossref
R. Rajan & K.E. Cainer. (2008) Ageing without hearing loss or cognitive impairment causes a decrease in speech intelligibility only in informational maskers. Neuroscience 154:2, pages 784-795.
Crossref
Crossref
Kathryn E. Cainer, C. James & R. Rajan. (2008) Learning speech-in-noise discrimination in adult humans. Hearing Research 238:1-2, pages 155-164.
Crossref
Crossref
Pauline Smith, Alison Riley, Adrian Davis, Wendy Davies & Ellen Jeffs. (2008) Study finds compliant eartips can be used instead of custom earmolds. The Hearing Journal 61:2, pages 27-28.
Crossref
Crossref
Mary Rudner, Catharina Foo, Jerker Rönnberg & Thomas Lunner. (2007) Phonological Mismatch Makes Aided Speech Recognition in Noise Cognitively Taxing: Retracted Article. Ear & Hearing 28:6, pages 879-892.
Crossref
Crossref
Ward R. Drennan, Stuart Gatehouse, Patrick Howell, Dianne Van Tasell & Steven Lund. (2005) Localization and Speech-Identification Ability of Hearing-Impaired Listeners Using Phase-Preserving Amplification. Ear & Hearing 26:5, pages 461-472.
Crossref
Crossref
Jan Zera. (2004) Speech intelligibility measured by adaptive maximum-likelihood procedure. Speech Communication 42:3-4, pages 313-328.
Crossref
Crossref
Kevin J. Munro & Mark E. Lutman. (2003) The effect of speech presentation level on measurement of auditory acclimatization to amplified speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 114:1, pages 484-495.
Crossref
Crossref
R. Arelhi & D.R. Campbell. (2003) A MATLAB simnlink implementation of speech masking based on the MPEG psychoacoustic model 1. A MATLAB simnlink implementation of speech masking based on the MPEG psychoacoustic model 1.
D.R. Campbell & P.W. Shields. (2003) Speech enhancement using sub-band adaptive Griffiths–Jim signal processing. Speech Communication 39:1-2, pages 97-110.
Crossref
Crossref
Paul W. Shields & Douglas R. Campbell. (2001) Improvements in intelligibility of noisy reverberant speech using a binaural subband adaptive noise-cancellation processing scheme. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 110:6, pages 3232-3242.
Crossref
Crossref
Karen Croot, John R. Hodges, John Xuereb & Karalyn Patterson. (2000) Phonological and Articulatory Impairment in Alzheimer's Disease: A Case Series. Brain and Language 75:2, pages 277-309.
Crossref
Crossref
A. Hussain. (2000) Intelligibility assessment of a multi-band speech enhancement scheme. Intelligibility assessment of a multi-band speech enhancement scheme.
Paul W. Shields & Douglas R. Campbell. (1998) Intelligibility improvements obtained by an enhancement method applied to speech corrupted by noise and reverberation. Speech Communication 25:1-3, pages 165-175.
Crossref
Crossref
Karen Croot, Karalyn Patterson & John R. Hodges. (1998) Single Word Production in Nonfluent Progressive Aphasia. Brain and Language 61:2, pages 226-273.
Crossref
Crossref
P.W. Shields & D.R. Campbell. (1998) Multi-microphone noise cancellation for improvement of hearing aid performance. Multi-microphone noise cancellation for improvement of hearing aid performance.
Gabrielle H. Saunders & Kathleen M. Cienkowski. (1997) Acclimatization to Hearing Aids. Ear and Hearing 18:2, pages 129-139.
Crossref
Crossref
P.W. Shields & D.R. Campbell. (1997) Multi-microphone sub-band adaptive signal processing for improvement of hearing aid performance: primarily results using normal hearing volunteers. Multi-microphone sub-band adaptive signal processing for improvement of hearing aid performance: primarily results using normal hearing volunteers.
Ian H. Robertson, Tony Ward, Valerie Ridgeway & Ian Nimmo-Smith. (2009) The structure of normal human attention: The Test of Everyday Attention. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2:6, pages 525-534.
Crossref
Crossref
John R. Hodges & Karalyn Patterson. (2009) Nonfluent progressive aphasia and semantic dementia: A comparative neuropsychological study. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2:6, pages 511-524.
Crossref
Crossref
S D G Stephens, D E Callaghan, S Hogan, R Meredith, A Rayment & A Davis. (2018) Acceptability of Binaural Hearing Aids: A Cross-Over Study. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 84:5, pages 267-269.
Crossref
Crossref
W. V. CARLIN & G. G. BROWNING. (1990) Hearing disability and hearing aid benefit related to type of hearing impairment. Clinical Otolaryngology 15:1, pages 63-67.
Crossref
Crossref