Abstract
We examine how brand advertising invokes a performance enhancement effect for owned brands that is purely advertising and brand driven and unrelated to material product differences, akin to a placebo effect. Using three field studies, we demonstrate that advertisers may selectively invoke the performance enhancement effect among owners of branded products through brand advertising. Our findings show that exposure to brand advertising can increase performance (i.e., exercise duration in our studies) in excess of 20%. Moreover, we show that brand advertising elicits this enhancement effect only when the target, owned brand is in use and that heightened motivation underlies this effect. Furthermore, the enhancement effect, while sizable, does not last into perpetuity. Instead, we show that consumers acclimate over extended periods of exposure to the brand advertising, consistent with psychological habituation theory. These findings point to the importance of ongoing, novel brand advertising over the product ownership life cycle.
Notes
1 Follow up ANCOVAs for time spent working out explored whether the brand salience*congruence interaction was qualified by gender. No higher order 3-way interaction emerged for either self-reported time (F(1,166) = 0.07, p > .70) or tracked time (F(1,166) = 0.22, p > .60), indicating that the observed interaction effects did not vary based upon gender.
2 We also estimated a model including both the gear and workout expectation composites as additional control variables (besides gender and age). The main results remained unchanged.
3 We also estimated a negative binomial regression model to account for potential over-dispersion and obtained consistent results.