Characterization of intentional-abuse venlafaxine exposures reported to poison control centers in the United States

ABSTRACT

Background: Venlafaxine use to achieve an amphetamine-like high has been described but data regarding the epidemiology and clinical effects are sparse. Objectives: Describe the prevalence and toxicity of venlafaxine abuse reported to US poison control centers. Methods: This was a retrospective review of venlafaxine exposures reported to the National Poison Data System (NPDS) from 2000 to 2016. Inclusion criteria were: age 12 years and older, reason for exposure intentional-abuse, and either single-substance exposure or venlafaxine was the first substance. The primary outcome was prevalence of intentional-abuse of venlafaxine. Secondary outcomes characterized demographics, geographic distribution, toxicity, and outcomes. Results: Intentional-abuse accounted for 752 of 85,621 venlafaxine exposures. Overall prevalence was 87.8 intentional-abuse exposures/10,000 venlafaxine exposures reported to NPDS (range, 59.3–117.6/10,000). Prevalence decreased from 107/10,000 in 2000 to 59.3/10,000 in 2016. Median age was 23 years and 50% were female. Primary route was ingestion (90.8%) with 4.7% using venlafaxine via inhalation/intranasal insufflation, and 3.7% both routes. There were 227 venlafaxine-only exposures; 54.0% were treated/released from the emergency department, 20% were admitted for medical management, 9.0% to a psychiatric facility, and 17.0% managed at home. Known medical outcomes for single-substance exposures were: no effect (24.0%), minor (39.0%), moderate (33.0%), and major (4.0%); no deaths occurred. Most frequent clinical effects were tachycardia (33.9%), drowsiness (20.7%), and agitation (11.5%). Conclusion: The prevalence of venlafaxine abuse reported to poison control centers has decreased. Medical outcomes are usually not serious. Clinicians should be aware that non-medical use is possible but infrequently reported to poison control centers.

KEYWORDS:

• Venlafaxine
• abuse
• non-medical use
• toxicity
• poison control center
• serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Hyunuk Seung, MS, for his assistance in statistical analysis of the dataset.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.