505
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

E-cigarette use perceptions that differentiate e-cigarette susceptibility and use among high school students

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 238-246 | Received 14 Feb 2020, Accepted 15 Sep 2020, Published online: 15 Oct 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Background

E-cigarette use among adolescents is increasingly popular and a growing public health concern.

Objectives

To examine how individual e-cigarette use perceptions differ between adolescents based on e-cigarette use status and susceptibility to future use of e-cigarettes.

Methods

Data were collected using surveys administered across eight Connecticut high schools (grades 9–12), Spring 2015. N = 2592 students (Mage = 16.01, SD = 1.28, Female = 51.7%) reported e-cigarette use and susceptibility and were categorized into non-susceptible never-users (57.8%), susceptible never-users (16.9%) and ever-users (25.4%). Youth also responded to 12 e-cigarette use perceptions describing perceived benefits and risks of e-cigarette use.

Results

A multinomial logistic regression model was used. Eight use perceptions were related to susceptibility or use of e-cigarettes. The benefit-related use perception “feel relaxed” was the only item associated with greater odds of being both susceptible (vs. non-susceptible, p <.001) and an ever-user (vs. susceptible; p <.05). Two other benefit-related use perceptions were related to higher odds of being susceptible to e-cigarette use (“control your weight”; AOR = 1.82, p <.05; “look cool”; AOR = 3.13, p <.05). Results also identified key risk-related use perceptions that related to lower odds of either being susceptible to e-cigarette use (“have a heart attack”; AOR =.43, p <.001) or of ever-use (“have bad breath”; AOR =.28, p <.001; “get lung cancer”; AOR =.58, p <.05).

Conclusion

E-cigarette use perceptions among youth differ by e-cigarette use and susceptibility status. Findings could help identify youth who are vulnerable to e-cigarette use and inform prevention, for example by developing counter-messaging for benefit perceptions associated with susceptibility and ever-use.

Author’s Contribution

AB contributed to the conceptualization of the study, developed and tested the hypotheses reported in the manuscript, ran all statistical analyses, and wrote the primary manuscript draft; KWB, GK, and RW contributed to the conceptualization of the study, the analysis, and critically reviewed drafts of the manuscript; SKS secured study funding, led the development of the self-report survey, contributed to the conceptualization of the study, and critically reviewed drafts of the manuscript; and all authors approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers P50DA036151 and U54DA036151 from the NIDA and FDA Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) and K12DA000167 from NIDA. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or the Food and Drug Administration.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 987.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.