1,102
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

What makes students contribute more peer feedback? The role of within-course experience with peer feedback

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 972-983 | Published online: 12 Sep 2021
 

Abstract

The success of peer feedback approaches to instruction depends upon students contributing in-depth feedback to their peers. Prior researchers have examined the role of general attitudes towards peer feedback, but how experiences, especially the performance information during peer feedback, influence the subsequent amount of feedback that students provide to peers has received little attention. This study investigated what experience factors from one assignment predicted growth or declines in the amount of peer feedback provided on the next assignment in a course with many peer feedback assignments. Data on peer feedback experiences and behaviors across multiple assignments were taken from students across two programming courses (N = 149). Negative binomial regression analyses reveal three experiences in the prior assignment predicted growth in length of comments provided to peers: receiving more comments, doing well on the task, and receiving recognition for good reviewing (when not doing well). Implications for practice are presented.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes on contributors

Zheng Zong, a doctor candidate in the School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, China. His research interests included peer assessment, text mining, education management and natural language processing.

Dr. Christian D. Schunn, a professor and senior cognitive scientist working with Learning Research & Development Center (LRDC) at the University of Pittsburgh. His research interest extends to a wide range of cognitive studies involving STEM reasoning and learning, web-based peer interaction and instruction, neuroscience of complex learning, and engagement and learning. He is the founder of an online peer review system (SWoRD), which is widely used in USA, China, and some European countries.

Dr. Yanqing Wang, an associate professor working with the School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, China. He is the founder of an information system (EduPCR), which is dedicated to peer code review in educational contexts. His recent research interests include peer assessment, peer code review, reviewer assignment problem, gamification of peer learning, and integer linear programming.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 830.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.