Abstract
Reliable but accessible measures to capture body composition are highly important as the world is in an era of obesity-increase. The most used measure, the body mass index (BMI), nevertheless, has been judged as non-reliable to estimate body fat percentage (BF%). The present manuscript assessed the criticisms of BMI as a predictor of BF% and the BMI-based categories of nutritional status. 4164 children/adolescents from 9 to 18 years of age from Porto Velho, Brazil, had their anthropometric and skinfold measures taken. Controlling for socioeconomic status, school (private, public), sex and age, we compared proposed models/variables in the literature relating BMI and BF%. We evaluated the functions and the residual data to understand the variability of BF% estimate per BMI and evaluated three possible categorisations from BMI to predict BF% nutritional status. The function utilising (linear) BMI was the best to predict BF% (R2 = 0.70) with a variability of only 6.49% around the function. Nevertheless, no categorisation of nutritional status was reliable to predict the nutritional status of individuals. BMI is reliable to estimate BF%. Nevertheless, new normative values must be proposed; the original categorisation fails to capture the nutritional status of children/adolescents from this region.
Disclosure statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Charles William Lafe for his help on the latest version of the manuscript.
Notes
1 Available at http://www.abep.org/criterio-brasil as of December 17, 2018.