Does PBL improve student performance in a multidimensional way? A proposal for a moderated mediation model

ABSTRACT

This article identifies the profiles of students whose performance is improved by the PBL method, and the influence of certain student-dependent factors that lead to improvement. Effects on performance vary from one student to another, so we distinguish between outcomes among low-performing, average-performing, and high-performing students. To explain the differences in performance improvement among these types of students, it is necessary to analyze factors that depend on students themselves. This article proposes a mediation/moderation model that reveals the influence of prior knowledge, prior motivation, and effort on the performance improvement that PBL brings about among the three types of students. Our findings show that PBL is especially effective among low-performing students as it results in substantial improvements in their performance levels, making them less dependent on prior knowledge, prior motivation, and the amount of effort made. Performance levels do not improve among high-performing students, for whom obtaining excellent results is observed to depend more on their prior cognitive baggage.

KEYWORDS:

• Business education
• educational outcomes
• problem-based learning
• quantile regression
• university

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1 Information was collected using a self-administered survey that guaranteed the privacy of students and their anonymous, confidential, and voluntary participation. Students were asked for their consent to participate.

Additional information

Funding

The authors acknowledge financial support from the Econometrics Research Group (Basque Government grant IT-1356-19), Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness and the ERDF (project ECO2016-76203-C2-1-P) and FESIDE Foundation; Fundación Emilio Soldevilla para la Investigación y el Desarrollo en Economía de la Empresa.