Abstract
My ironic rereading of Thomas Taylor’s Vindication of the Rights of Brutes accomplishes five tasks: First, I provide readers with an introduction to Thomas Taylor (one of protofeminist Mary Wollstonecraft’s harshest critics) and the satiric text he wrote specifically to undermine her. Second, I assess how the inherent instability of textual meaning provides a rationale for ironically reclaiming a text in the service of feminist emancipation (and, in the case of Taylor’s Vindication, animal emancipation). Third, I offer the ecological metaphor of “repurposing” as justification for what I call “mocking as method.” Fourth, using this ironic methodology, I ironize Taylor’s already-ironic Vindication by reading it literally, thus rhetorically repurposing Taylor’s textual garbage into a coherent vegan ecofeminist argument for animal rights. Finally, I theorize mocking as method as a rhetorical tool suitable not only for advancing vegan ecofeminist argumentation, but also for feminist criticism writ large. By attending to the instability of meaning in a text’s ever-changing contexts, mocking as method moves critics from simply trashing a garbage text toward rhetorically repurposing it to advance arguments for social justice. If done well, this technique not only avoids wasting a text but can empower the marginalized and contribute to the composition of complex, sustainable rhetorical canons.
Notes
1 Critiques of early ecofeminist theory included some theorists’ tendencies to (1) argue for women’s inherent closeness to nature (Griffin, Citation1974); (2) disregard the racial and class differences of women for the sake of universal (and at times culturally appropriated) “goddess” sisterhood (Christ, Citation1978); (3) engage in cisnormativity (Daly, Citation1978); and (4) refuse critical interrogations of an abstract, pristine, and overly romanticized concept of “nature” and “wilderness” (Plant, Citation1989).