Archival Mocking As Feminist Praxis: A Rhetorical Repurposing of A Vindication of the Rights of Brutes

References

• Abram, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more-than-human world. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, C. J. (1991). Ecofeminism and the eating of animals. Hypatia, 6(1), 125–145. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb00213.x
   Google Scholar
• Anker, P. (2004). Commentary: A vindication of the rights of brutes. Philosophy and Geography, 7(2), 259–264. doi:10.1080/1090377042000285462
   Google Scholar
• Axon, W. (1890). Thomas Taylor, the Platonist: A biographical and bibliographical sketch. London, United Kingdom: n.p. (for private circulation). Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/thomastaylorplat00axonrich/page/n3/mode/2up
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. (1977). Death of the author. In S. Heath (Trans.), Image–music–text (pp. 142–148). New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biesecker, B. (1992). Coming to terms with recent attempts to write women into the history of rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 25(2), 140–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birke, L. (1995). Exploring the boundaries: Feminism, animals, and science. In C. Adams & J. Donovan (Eds.), Animals and women: Feminist theoretical explorations (pp. 32–54). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blake, C. (1997). Afrocentric tokens: Afrocentric methodology in rhetorical analysis. Howard Journal of Communications, 8(1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/10646179709361741
   Google Scholar
• Boas, L. S. (1966). Introduction. In T. Taylor, (Ed.) A vindication of the rights of brutes (pp. x–xv). Gainesville, FL: Scholars’ Facsimiles and Reprints.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. K. (1973). The rhetoric of women’s liberation: An oxymoron. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59(1), 74–86. doi:10.1080/00335637309383155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christ, C. P. (1978). Why women need the goddess. Heresies: A feminist publication, 2(1), 8–13.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. doi:10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, D. (1991). Toward an ecological ethic of care. Hypatia, 6(1), 60–74. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.1991.tb00209.x
   Google Scholar
• Daly, M. (1978). Gyn/ecology: The metaethics of radical feminism. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Man, P. (1996). Aesthetic ideology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, J. (1990). Animal rights and feminist theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 15(2), 350–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan, J., & Adams, C. J. (Eds.). (2007). The feminist care tradition in animal ethics: A reader. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ernst, W. (2005). Let there be irony: Cultural history and media archaeology in parallel lines. Art History, 28(5), 582–603. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8365.2005.00479.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, F. B. (1940). Thomas Taylor, Platonist of the romantic period. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 55(4), 1060–1079.
   Google Scholar
• Gaard, G. (2002). Vegan ecofeminism: A review essay. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 23(3), 117–146. doi:10.1353/fro.2003.0006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaard, G. (2011). Ecofeminism revisited: Rejecting essentialism and re-placing species in a material feminist environmentalism. Feminist Formations, 23(2), 26–53. doi:10.1353/ff.2011.0017
   Google Scholar
• Gates, H. L. Jr. (1988). The signifying monkey: A theory of African American literary criticism. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graban, T. S. (2015). Women’s irony: Rewriting feminist rhetorical histories. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, C. L. (1994). Rhetoricizing alienation: Mary Wollstonecraft and the rhetorical construction of women’s oppression. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 80(3), 293–312. doi:10.1080/00335639409384074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, S. (1974). Woman and nature: The roaring inside her. New York, NY: Open Road Media.
   Google Scholar
• Hust, K. (1996). In suspect terrain: Mary Wollstonecraft confronts Mother Nature in letters written during a short residence in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark. Women’s Studies, 25(5), 483–505. doi:10.1080/00497878.1996.9979132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutcheon, L. (1994). Irony’s edge: The theory and politics of irony. London, United Kingdom: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kein, K. (2015). Recovering our sense of humor: New directions in feminist humor studies. Feminist Studies, 41(3), 671–681. doi:10.15767/feministstudies.41.3.671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitch, S. L. (1987). Feminist literary criticism as irony. Rocky Mountain Review of Language and Literature, 41(1/2), 7–19. doi:10.1353/rmr.1987.0040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lansbury, C. (1985). The old brown dog: Women, workers, and vivisection in Edwardian England. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leneman, L. (1997). The awakened instinct: Vegetarianism and the women’s suffrage movement in Britain. Women’s History Review, 6(2), 271–287. doi:10.1080/09612029700200144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold, A. (1970). A Sand County almanac: With other essays on conservation from Round River. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Plant, J. (1989). Healing our wounds: The power of ecological feminism. Boston, MA: New Society.
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood, V. (1986). Ecofeminism: An overview and discussion of positions and arguments. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 64(1), 120–138. doi:10.1080/00048402.1986.9755430
   Google Scholar
• Rainford, L. (2005). She changes by intrigue: Irony, femininity, and feminism. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Rand, E. J. (2013). Queer critical rhetoric bites back. Western Journal of Communication, 77(5), 533–537. doi:10.1080/10570314.2013.799285
   Google Scholar
• Ruston, S. (2008). Natural rights and natural history in Anna Barbauld and Mary Wollstonecraft. In S. Ruston (Ed.), Literature and science (pp. 53–71). Cambridge, United Kingdom: D. S. Brewer.
   Google Scholar
• Said, E. W. (1993). Culture and imperialism. London, United Kingdom: Chatto & Windus.
   Google Scholar
• Shome, R. (1996). Postcolonial interventions in the rhetorical canon: An “other” view. Communication Theory, 6(1), 40–59. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00119.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, P. (1975). Animal liberation. New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. L. (1998). Morals and their ironies. Journal of Religious Ethics, 26(2), 367–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, J. (2012). “The link which unites man with brutes”: Enlightenment feminism, women, and animals. Intellectual History Review, 22(3), 427–444. doi:10.1080/17496977.2012.695194
   Google Scholar
• Stoler, A. (2009). Along the archival grain: Epistemic anxieties and colonial common sense. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, T. (1792/1966). A vindication of the rights of brutes. Gainesville, FL: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints. (Originally published 1792, London, United Kingdom: Edward Jeffery)
   Google Scholar
• Warren, K. (1987). Feminism and ecology: Making connections. Environmental Ethics, 9(1), 3–20. doi:10.5840/enviroethics19879113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wollstonecraft, M. (1787). Thoughts on the education of daughters: With reflections on female conduct, in the more important duties of life. London, United Kingdom: Joseph Johnson.
   Google Scholar
• Wollstonecraft, M. (1790). A vindication of the rights of men, in a letter to the right honorable Edmund Burke; occasioned by his reflections on the revolution in France. London, United Kingdom: Joseph Johnson.
   Google Scholar
• Wollstonecraft, M. (1796). Letters written during a short residence in Sweden, Norway, and Denmark. London, United Kingdom: Joseph Johnson.
   Google Scholar
• Wollstonecraft, M. (1792/1891). A vindication of the rights of woman: With strictures on political and moral subjects. London, United Kingdom: T. Fisher Unwin. (Originally published 1792, London, United Kingdom: Joseph Johnson)
   Google Scholar
• Yergeau, M. (2018). Authoring autism: On rhetoric and neurological queerness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zelizer, B. (1995). Reading the past against the grain: The shape of memory studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 12(2), 214–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar