1,508
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editor's Choice paper

Is your health malleable or fixed? The influence of implicit theories on health-related attitudes and behaviour

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 1421-1439 | Received 29 May 2019, Accepted 24 Apr 2020, Published online: 13 May 2020
 

Abstract

Objective: Implicit theories of health describe the extent to which health is perceived as a fixed (entity theory) versus malleable (incremental theory) characteristic. In four studies, it was investigated how these theories correspond to health-related attitudes and behaviours.

Design: In Study 1 (N = 130), the relationship of implicit theories of health and health-related behaviours was assessed via self-reports. To investigate their causal influence on health-related attitudes (Study 2; N = 357) and hypothetical food choices (Study 3; N = 351), implicit theories of health were manipulated using fictitious newspaper articles. In Study 4 (N = 235), the relationship of implicit theories and health behaviours in daily life was investigated using experience sampling.

Results: Study 1 showed that a stronger incremental theory is positively associated with health behaviours like eating healthily or engaging in physical activity. Studies 2 and 3 revealed that a manipulation of implicit theories of health changes health-related attitudes and hypothetical food choices via an internal health locus of control. Study 4 showed that individuals with a stronger incremental theory reported more health-promoting behaviours in daily life.

Conclusion: These findings extend the knowledge about implicit theories as they show that they are highly relevant for health promotion.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Lisa Segbert, Isabel Skuplik, and Leonie Wiegmann for their indispensable practical support.

Disclosure statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Notes

1 Raw frequencies of behaviours cannot be used because most participants did not answer all signals (e.g. because they were busy or missed the signal).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by an Advanced Postdoc Grant from the University of Cologne awarded to S. Dohle.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 458.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.