Instructional quality in science teacher education: comparing evaluations by chemistry pre-service teachers and their advisors

ABSTRACT

Evaluating and improving instructional quality is important in pre-service teacher education, given it is a crucial factor for students’ learning gains. This process is complex and involves multiple classroom events with various interpretations. Criteria for instructional quality are rarely applied systematically in teacher education, leading to divergent evaluations and hindering comparable development. Comparability has rarely been researched in science pre-service teacher education. Therefore, we compared evaluations from 17 chemistry-specific advisors and 17 science pre-service teachers with regard to their choice of criteria, their respective rating and grading of a videotaped chemistry lesson, in Germany. Their evaluations were compared using the Science Education Perspectives (SEP) framework for instructional quality. Although advisors can be considered evaluation experts, our findings show differences in the choice of criteria, ratings, and how the lesson was graded within and between both groups. Pre-service teachers focused more on aspects of classroom and time management, and gave higher average ratings, whereas their advisors focused more on cognitive activation. Overall, 16 different criteria were used by the majority of participants. These criteria show a strong science-specific focus. Our findings have implications for science pre-service teacher education, showing a need for a common approach in evaluations, with extended observation periods.

KEYWORDS:

• Pre-service teacher education
• instructional quality
• chemistry education

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Ethics statement

All participants were informed about the use of their data and were told they could terminate their participation at any point and gave their oral consent before the study. All participants were informed when the audio recording started and stopped. All data were anonymized after the transcription. There were no further ethics requirements from our institution.

Notes

1 For an English translation and explanation of the three basic dimensions see Praetorius et al. (2018).

2 Full title: Cognitive Activation in the Classroom: The Orchestration of Learning Opportunities for the Enhancement of Insightful Learning in Mathematics.

3 Verordnung über die Ausbildung und Prüfung von Lehrkräften im Vorbereitungsdienst (Regulation for the training and examination of pre-service teachers).

4 ‘Rating’ always refers to the judgement for a criterion (positive/neutral/negative) and the calculated scores. Higher scores equal a more positive rating (see Table 1).

5 Median is reported due to ordinal scaling of grading.