Publication Cover
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
An International Journal of Physical Therapy
Volume 40, 2024 - Issue 3
495
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Reports

Pain neuroscience education and graded exposure versus Pilates and postural education: A pilot study in an occupational context

, PT, MSc, , PT, DPT, PhD & , PT, PhD
Pages 456-467 | Received 16 Apr 2022, Accepted 02 Sep 2022, Published online: 16 Sep 2022
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Pain neuroscience education (PNE) and graded exposure have not been explored in occupational settings for low back pain (LBP).

Aim

To pilot feasibility and assess preliminary effectiveness of PNE and graded exposure for LBP.

Methods

A pilot study where workers were randomized to either PNE and graded exposure or Pilates and postural education. Both interventions consisted of weekly individual face-to-face sessions for 8 weeks (a total of 8 sessions). The primary outcome was pain intensity. Secondary outcomes were disability, catastrophizing, fear-avoidance, sleep, endurance of back extensor muscles, and patient’s perceived impression of change.

Results

Seventeen participants entered the PNE and graded exposure group and 20 the Pilates and postural education group. PNE and graded exposure were feasible to implement. Between-group comparisons suggest higher improvements in the PNE group for extensor muscle endurance (p < .001, η2p = .29), pain catastrophizing (p < .001; η2p = .56) and fear-avoidance related to physical activity (p < .001; η2p = .48) and work (p < .001; η2p = .47). In the PNE group, at least 13 (76.5%) participants reported being at least “moderately better” against 6 (30%) participants in the Pilates group.

Conclusion

PNE and graded exposure can be successfully implemented in an occupational context and is potentially more beneficial than Pilates and postural education for extensor muscle endurance, catastrophizing, and fear avoidance and similarly as beneficial for pain intensity and disability. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.

Acknowledgments

This article was supported by National Funds through FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia within CINTESIS, R&D Unit (reference UIDB/4255/2020).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The author(s) reported there is no funding associated with the work featured in this article.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 325.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.