1,716
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Corporeality and critical disability studies: toward an informed epistemology of embodiment

ORCID Icon
Pages 636-655 | Received 16 Oct 2019, Accepted 07 Apr 2020, Published online: 24 Apr 2020
 

Abstract

This paper forms an intervention into debates about the corporeality of impairment and ‘bodies that matter’ in critical disability studies. Toward informing the epistemology of embodiment present in critical disability studies, it proposes new directions for progression within four set parameters. Firstly, insights from disability might be better re-purposed toward understanding the nature of all human embodiment. Secondly, one must sufficiently address, but not necessarily polarise, materiality and abstraction. Thirdly, within its parent academy, the epistemological approach might adhere to critical disability studies’ conventions, whilst still avoiding present perils and impasses. Fourthly, it is important not to be so exhaustive and conclusive as to eliminate innovation and creative new trajectories. Overall, the sustaining proposition is, that the productive capacity of disability is immense, toward disrupting and re-configuring ableist understandings of the body in the material world.

    Points of interest

  • Writers from a critical disability studies perspective have a particular way of understanding the role of the body in disability.

  • This article considers this way of understanding the body, and then describes four directions for how this understanding could be further developed.

  • The way that critical disability studies understands the role of the body in disability is called ‘epistemology of embodiment’ in this article.

  • This article concludes by saying that disability is a great starting point for understanding the meaning of the body for all human beings.

  • In this context, the article uses the term ‘dis/ability’ instead of ‘disability’ to highlight how people are disabled by interrelations between ability and disability.

Acknowledgements

The constructive advice of the peer-reviewers should be acknowledged.

Disclosure statement

There are no conflicts of interest to declare with respect to this publication.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 479.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.