Corporeality and critical disability studies: toward an informed epistemology of embodiment

References

• Altermark, Niklas. 2017. Citizenship Inclusion and Intellectual Disability: Biopolitics Post-Institutionalisation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, Margaret, Roy Bhaskar, Andrew Collier, Tony Lawson, and Alan Norrie. 2013. Critical Realism: Essential Readings. Routledge: London.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, Len. 2013. Disability, Politics and the Struggle for Change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhasker, Roy, Sean Esbjörn-Hargens, Nicholas Hedlund, and Mervyn Hartwig. 2015. Metatheory for the Twenty-First Century: Critical Realism and Integral Theory in Dialogue. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, Rosie. 2013. The Posthuman. London: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, Rosie. 2019. “A Theoretical Framework for the Critical Posthumanities.” Theory, Culture & Society 36 (6): 31–61. . doi:10.1177/0263276418771486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, Levi. 2011. The Democracy of Objects. London: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, Alan. 2016. Social Research Methods. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bukharin, Nikolai. 2011. Historical Materialism: A System of Sociology. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burr, Vivian. 2015. Social Constructionism. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith. 2014. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex”. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge Dictionary. 2019. “Definition of Abstract.” Accessed 28 September 2019. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/abstract
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge Dictionary. 2020. “Definition of Intuition.” Accessed 19 January 2020. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/intuition
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Fiona Kumari. 2001. “Inciting Legal Fictions: ‘Disability’s’ Date with Ontology and the Ableist Body of Law.” Griffith Law Review 10 (1): 42–62.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Fiona Kumari. 2008a. “Exploring Internalized Ableism Using Critical Race Theory.” Disability & Society 23 (2): 151–116. doi:10.1080/09687590701841190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, Fiona Kumari. 2008b. “Refusing Able(Ness): A Preliminary Conversation about Ableism.” M/C – Media and Culture 11 (3): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Fiona Kumari. 2009. Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Fiona Kumari. 2014. “Ableism as Transformative Practice.” In Rethinking anti ‐Discriminatory and anti ‐Oppressive Theories for Social Work Practice, edited by Christine Cocker and Trish Hafford Letchfield, 78–92. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Fiona Kumari. 2018. “Refocusing on the Paradigm Shift from Disability to Studies in Ableism.” In Disability in South Asia: Knowledge and Experience, edited by Anita Ghai, 39–57. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Fiona Kumari. 2019. “Precision Ableism: A Studies in Ableism Approach to Developing Histories of Disability and Abledment.” Rethinking History 23 (2): 138–156. doi:10.1080/13642529.2019.1607475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cluley, Victoria, Rachel Fyson, and Alison Pilnick. 2020. “Theorising Disability: A Practical and Representative Ontology of Learning Disability.” Disability & Society 35 (2): 235–257. doi:10.1080/09687599.2019.1632692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colligan, Sumi Elaine. 1999. “Wherein Lie the “Secrets of Life”? An Argument against Biological Essentialism.” International Journal of Sexuality and Gender Studies 4 (1): 73–85. doi:10.1023/A:1023206524922.
   Google Scholar
• Corker, Mairian, and Tom Shakespeare. 2002. Disability/Postmodernity: Embodying Disability Theory. New York, NY: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• DeLanda, Manuel. 2013. Intensive Science & Virtual Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, Katie, Rosemarie Garland-Thompson, Kent Mike, and Robertson Rachel, eds. 2018. Manifestos for the Future of Critical Disability Studies. Vol. 1. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elshabrawy Ahmad Hassanein, Elsayed. 2015. Inclusion, Disability and Culture. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Feely, Michael. 2016. “Disability Studies after the Ontological Turn: A Return to the Material World and Material Bodies without a Return to Essentialism.” Disability & Society 31 (7): 863–883. doi:10.1080/09687599.2016.1208603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, Susan. 2017. “Engaging with Materialism and Material Reality: Critical Disability Studies and Economic Recession.” Disability & Society 32 (2): 143–159. doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.1284650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, Susan. 2019a. “Exploring Internal Critique: Theoretically Developed Critical Commentary on the Self-Appraisal of Critical Disability Studies.” Disability & Society. Advance online Publication. doi:10.1080/09687599.2019.1702508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, Susan. 2019b. “Theorizing Disability in Child Protection: Applying Critical Disability Studies to the Elevated Risk of Abuse for Disabled Children.” Disability & Society. Advance online Publication. doi:10.1080/09687599.2019.1669433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, Susan, and Caroline McGregor. 2017. “Disabled Children and Child Protection: Learning from the Literature through a Non-Tragedy Lens.” Child Care in Practice 23 (3): 258–274. doi:10.1080/13575279.2016.1259157.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, John. 1996. The Immaterial Self: A Defence of the Cartesian Dualist Conception of the Mind. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, Mark. 2015. “Narrative as a Mode of Understanding: Method, Theory, Praxis.” In The Handbook of Narrative Analysis, edited by Anna De Fina and Alexandra Georgakopoulou, 21–38. West Sussex: John Wiley Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 1996. Freakery: Cultural Spectacles of the Extraordinary Body. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 2009. Staring: How We Look. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, Barbara E. 2019. “Worlding Disability: Categorizations, Labels, and the Making of People.” AJOB Neuroscience 10 (2): 85–87. doi:10.1080/21507740.2019.1618413.
   Google Scholar
• Gilliard, Chris, and Paul Higgs. 2014. Ageing, Corporeality and Embodiment. London: Anthem Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, Dan, and Katherine Runswick-Cole. 2010. “Emancipating Play: Dis/Abled Children, Development and Deconstruction.” Disability & Society 25 (4): 499–512. doi:10.1080/09687591003755914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, Dan. 2011. Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, Dan. 2016. Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, Dan. 2013. “Dis/Entangling Critical Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 28 (5): 631–644. doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.717884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, Dan, Rebecca Lawthom, Kirsty Liddiard, and Katherine Runswick-Cole. 2019. “Provocations for Critical Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 34 (6): 972–997. doi:10.1080/09687599.2019.1566889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodley, Dan. 2014. Dis/Ability Studies: Theorising Disablism and Ableism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Groff, Ruth. 2013. Ontology Revisited: Metaphysics in Social and Political Philosophy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, Graham. 2018. Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. London: Penguin UK.
   Google Scholar
• Horrigan, Paul. 2007. Epistemology: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Knowledge. New York: IUniverse publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hubber, Sonya. 2019. “A Day in the Grammar of Disease.” In Bodies of Truth: Personal Narratives on Illness, edited by Dinty W. Moore, Erin Murphy, and Renée K. Nicholson, 46–48. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Bill. 2007. “Being Disabled: Towards a Critical Social Ontology for Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 22 (7): 673–684. doi:10.1080/09687590701659527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCarthy-Jones, Simon, Joel Krueger, Frank Larei, Matthew Broome, and Charles Fernyhough. 2014. “Stop, Look, Listen: The Need for Philosophical Phenomenological Perspectives on Auditory Verbal Hallucinations.” In Current Perspectives on the Mechanisms of Auditory Hallucinations in Clinical and Non-Clinical Populations, edited by Johanna C. Badcock, Frank Larøi, Paul Allen, and Kelly M. Diederen, 18–27. Lausanne, Switzerland: Frontiers Media SA.
   Google Scholar
• Marion, Jean-Luc. 2018. On Descartes’ Passive Thought: The Myth of Cartesian Dualism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, Deborah. 2014. Disability: Controversial Debates and Psychosocial Perspectives. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meekosha, Helen, and Russell Shuttleworth. 2009. “What’s so ‘Critical’ about Critical Disability Studies?” Australian Journal of Human Rights 15 (1): 47–75. doi:10.1080/1323238X.2009.11910861.
   Google Scholar
• Minich, Julie Avril. 2016. “Enabling Whom? Critical Disability Studies Now.” Lateral 5 (1). https://csalateral.org/issue/5-1/forum-alt-humanities-critical-disability-studies-now-minich/.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, David T., Susan Antebi, and Sharon L. Snyder. 2019. The Matter of Disability: Materiality, Biopolitics, Crip Affect. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monforte, Javier, Víctor Pérez-Samaniego, and Brett Smith. 2018. “Traveling Material↔Semiotic Environments of Disability, Rehabilitation, and Physical Activity.” Qualitative Health Research. 00 (0): 1–13. https://csalateral.org/issue/5-1/forum-alt-humanities-critical-disability-studies-now-minich/.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morera, Esteve. 2014. Gramcsi, Materialism and Philosophy. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moser, Ingunn. 2009. “A Body That Matters? The Role of Embodiment in the Recomposition of Life after a Road Traffic Accident.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 11 (2): 83–99. doi:10.1080/15017410902830520.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Paul. 2011. The Sustainable Self: A Personal Approach to Sustainability Education. Gateshead, UK: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, Mike, and Colin Barnes. 2012. The New Politics of Disablement. Basingstoke Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Risjord, Mark. 2016. Normativity and Naturalism in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosqvist, Hanna, Hisayo Katsui, and Janice McLaughlin. 2017. “(Dis)Abling Practices and Theories?: Exploring Chronic Illness in Disability Studies.” Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 19 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1080/15017419.2016.1269535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlands, Mark. 2014. Externalism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schalk, Sami. 2017. “Critical Disability Studies as Methodology.” Lateral 6 (1). https://csalateral.org/issue/6-1/forum-alt-humanities-critical-disability-studies-methodology-schalk/.
   Google Scholar
• Scotland, James. 2012. “Exploring the Philosophical Underpinnings of Research: Relating Ontology and Epistemology to the Methodology and Methods of the Scientific, Interpretive, and Critical Research Paradigms.” English Language Teaching 5 (9): 9–16. doi:10.5539/elt.v5n9p9.
   Google Scholar
• Seibers, Tobin. 2006. “Disability in Theory: From Social Constructionism to the New Realism of the Body.” In The Disability Studies Reader, edited by Lennard Davis, 173–185. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seibers, Tobin. 2008. Disability Theory. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, Tom. 2013. Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick, Margrit. 2012. “Critical Disability Studies: Rethinking the Conventions for the Age of Postmodernity.” In Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by Nick Watson, Alan Roulstone, and Carol Thomas, 452–464. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick, Margrit. 2015a. Leaky Bodies and Boundaries: Feminism, Postmodernism and (Bio)Ethics. Abington: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick, Margrit. 2015b. “Staying Alive: Affect, Identity and Anxiety in Organ Transplantation.” Body & Society 21 (3): 20–41. doi:10.1177/1357034X15585886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shilling, Chris. 2013. The Body and Social Theory. 3rd ed. London: SAGE Publications
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, David. 2010. Doing Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Swain, John, and Sally French. 2000. “Towards an Affirmation Model of Disability.” Disability & Society 15 (4): 569–582. doi:10.1080/09687590050058189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, Elizabeth Johnston, and Mary Ersek. 1995. “Ethical and Spiritual Dimensions of Cancer Pain Management.” In Cancer Pain Management, edited by Deborah B. McGuire, Connie Henke Yarbro, and Betty Ferrell, 41–61. Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Carol. 2007. Sociologies of Disability and Illness: Contested Ideas in Disability Studies and Medical Sociology. London: Red Globe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Titchkosky, Tanya, and Rod Michalko. 2012. “The Body as the Problem of Individuality: A Phenomenological Disability Studies Approach.” In Disability and Social Theory, edited by Dan Goodley, Bill Hughes and Lennard Davis, 172–142. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Vehmas, Simo, and Nick Watson. 2016. “Exploring Normativity in Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 31 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1080/09687599.2015.1120657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Simon J. 1999. “Is Anybody There? Critical Realism, Chronic Illness and the Disability Debate.” Sociology of Health and Illness 21 (6): 797–819. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.00184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar