Dense, porous, and fibrous scaffolds composed of PHBV, PCL, and their 75:25 blend: an in vitro morphological and cytochemical characterization

Abstract

In tissue engineering bioresorbable polymers are commonly used to mimetize a damaged tissue characteristics. In spite of that, we did not find a comparative study of the response of the same cell to dense, porous, and fibrous biomaterials. The present work aimed to study the in vitro of pure polymers [poly (ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and poly (hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV)] and their 75:25 blend in dense, porous, and fibrous forms in Vero cells, a fibroblast cell line. The biomaterials were characterized morphologically by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The MTT assay was used for analysis of possible cytotoxicity. Vero cells were cultured on biomaterials for 120 h and submitted to SEM, morphological and cytochemical analyses. The dyes used were crystal violet (morphology), toluidine blue at pH 4.0 (for nucleic acids and glycosaminoglycans) and 2.5 (for glycosaminoglycans only), periodic acid-Schiff reactive (for neutral sugars), xylidine ponceau at pH 2.5 (for total proteins), and picrosirius/hematoxylin (for selective collagen analysis). The biomaterials studied were not considered citocytotoxic. The cells were able to adhere to and proliferate on the substrates. The cytochemical data indicate that the cells have high functional activity, with high protein synthesis on the scaffolds but do not accumulate acid or neutral sugars. The cells on the fibrous polymers appear to be more elongated, following the shape of the fibers. Regarding the scaffold form (porous or fibrous), the in vitro data do not show great superiority of one type to the other. Then, all the polymers tested are suitable for tissue engineering.

Keywords:

• Bioresorbable polymers
• tissue engineering
• biocompatible materials
• cell culture

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to ProPes/UFABC Multi-User Experimental Center (CEM) for permitting the use of their equipment.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).