895
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Maternal caffeine consumption during pregnancy and risk of low birth weight: a dose–response meta-analysis of cohort studies

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 224-233 | Published online: 05 Jul 2021
 

Abstract

Background & Objectives

Earlier published studies on maternal caffeine intake during pregnancy in relation to the risk of low birth weight (LBW) (birth weight <2500 g) have indicated conflicting findings. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to examine the association between maternal caffeine intake and risk of LBW.

Methods

We searched for relevant articles published up to Jan 2021 through PubMed and Scopus. For this purpose, we used MESH (Medical Subject Heading) and non-MESH keywords. Cohort studies that considered maternal caffeine intake as the exposure variable and LBW as the main outcome variable were included in the systematic review. Finally, seven cohort studies were considered in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

Results

Combining seven effect sizes, we found a significant positive association between maternal caffeine intake and risk of LBW (RR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.19–2.43). We also found that each additional 100-mg per day of maternal caffeine intake was significantly associated with an increased risk of LBW (RR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.03–1.22; Pheterogeneity = 0.020). In addition, nonlinear dose–response analysis showed a significant relationship (Pnonlinearity < 0.001) between maternal caffeine intake and risk of LBW.

Conclusions

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we found a significant positive association between maternal caffeine intake and risk of LBW.

Acknowledgements

The authors’ responsibilities were as follows— SS, LA, BL and AE: designed the research; SS and MA: conducted the research; SS, ASM and PS: analyzed the data; SS and AE: wrote the manuscript; AE: had primary responsibility for the final content; and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Disclosure statement

All authors reported no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Funding

The authors received no funding from an external source.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 440.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.