661
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The adsorptive removal of lead ions in aquatic media: Performance comparison between advanced functional materials and conventional materials

, , ORCID Icon, &
Pages 2441-2483 | Published online: 02 Dec 2019
 

Abstract

The low permissible concentration of lead ions (Pb2+) in potable water (15 ppb) makes it even more challenging to develop highly efficient water purification technologies. Adsorption has become one of the preferred water treatment techniques for removing various metal species including Pb2+ ions. However, assessment of adsorbent capacities between the tested materials was often made in a biased manner (e.g., derivation of the maximum capacities under unrealistically high initial feeding conditions). In this work, such comparison was made in terms of partition coefficient (PC) as a key metric for the least biased evaluation to explore the best sorbents among materials with a broad range of breakthrough capacities. Nanoscale sorbents derived from carbon-based nanomaterials and MOFs are highly advantageous, as they can offer highly sensitive and selective adsorption of Pb2+ ions. In general, advanced functional materials showcased better adsorption-desorption efficiency for Pb2+ when compared to conventional materials (e.g., over three regeneration cycles). Continuous research and development for the functional materials are further required to scale down the production cost so that cost-effective technologies may be applied for environmental remediation. The future scope for Pb2+ removal techniques is discussed further with respect to the development of novel functional materials.

Graphical Abstract

Additional information

Funding

This research acknowledges the support made by the R&D Center for Green Patrol Technologies through the R&D for Global Top Environmental Technologies funded by the Ministry of Environment (Grant No: 2018001850001) as well as by a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (Grant No: 2016R1E1A1A01940995).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 652.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.